<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cheaper Mini on its Way?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/05/31/cheaper_mini_on_its_way/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/05/31/cheaper_mini_on_its_way/</link>
	<description>MotoringFile &#124; MINI news, reviews and opinion. MINI Cooper, Cooper S, Clubman, Countryman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:14:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/05/31/cheaper_mini_on_its_way/comment-page-1/#comment-6770</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2004 13:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/05/31/#comment-6770</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Okay - I offiially feel better now Stuart! Thanks :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay &#8211; I offiially feel better now Stuart! Thanks :)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/05/31/cheaper_mini_on_its_way/comment-page-1/#comment-6769</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2004 13:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/05/31/#comment-6769</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Just a quick comment, I think the word &#039;cheap&#039; is the wrong word, it implies low quality and tackiness, I think the article got it wrong, and any remarks were taken out of context. What should be read into this is that the current MINI design maybe difficult and expensive to produce, a new version, though having the same dynamics and looks, would be easier to build right thru the process, thus costing less in overheads, time, and materials. The quality of the car will be further improved I would imagine.
So forget the &#039;cheap&#039; and think &quot;more cost effectively produced&quot;, but with at least as good customer perceived quality and styling, thats the idea for all business enterprises surely?.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a quick comment, I think the word &#39;cheap&#39; is the wrong word, it implies low quality and tackiness, I think the article got it wrong, and any remarks were taken out of context. What should be read into this is that the current MINI design maybe difficult and expensive to produce, a new version, though having the same dynamics and looks, would be easier to build right thru the process, thus costing less in overheads, time, and materials. The quality of the car will be further improved I would imagine.
So forget the &#39;cheap&#39; and think &#8220;more cost effectively produced&#8221;, but with at least as good customer perceived quality and styling, thats the idea for all business enterprises surely?.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/05/31/cheaper_mini_on_its_way/comment-page-1/#comment-6768</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2004 17:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/05/31/#comment-6768</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I agree Bill. Thanks for your perspective.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Bill. Thanks for your perspective.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/05/31/cheaper_mini_on_its_way/comment-page-1/#comment-6767</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2004 16:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/05/31/#comment-6767</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;When I was working my way through college, I worked on the assembly line of a major commercial truck manufacturer.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;They introduced a new model that was cheaper to build.  One of the things they did to cut costs was to make a one piece floor pan, rather than one that came in 8 pieces.  This made it so there were 2 people working on the floor assembly, rather than 8.  In the process, the body was stiffer and there was less rooom for error in it&#039;s build.  Not only was the truck cheaper to build, but the customer got a superior product.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;BMW will probably take the same approach with the MINI.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I was working my way through college, I worked on the assembly line of a major commercial truck manufacturer.  </p>

<p>They introduced a new model that was cheaper to build.  One of the things they did to cut costs was to make a one piece floor pan, rather than one that came in 8 pieces.  This made it so there were 2 people working on the floor assembly, rather than 8.  In the process, the body was stiffer and there was less rooom for error in it&#39;s build.  Not only was the truck cheaper to build, but the customer got a superior product.  </p>

<p>BMW will probably take the same approach with the MINI.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dgszweda1</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/05/31/cheaper_mini_on_its_way/comment-page-1/#comment-6766</link>
		<dc:creator>dgszweda1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2004 03:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/05/31/#comment-6766</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think the general trend throughout industry at least in the last decade, has been the thinking that to increase profits you must increase your margins.  Sell for more but produce for cheaper.  Unfortunately the cheaper usually comes at the expense of the quality of the product.  And as time goes and the pressure builds to continue to increase profits, the push to decrease costs at the expense of quality begins to build.  Whatever happen to building a better product.  I have always been willinging to spend more for a superior product.  I think in general quality and customer service are on the decline.  One example to make the case the people are willing to spend for quality.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the general trend throughout industry at least in the last decade, has been the thinking that to increase profits you must increase your margins.  Sell for more but produce for cheaper.  Unfortunately the cheaper usually comes at the expense of the quality of the product.  And as time goes and the pressure builds to continue to increase profits, the push to decrease costs at the expense of quality begins to build.  Whatever happen to building a better product.  I have always been willinging to spend more for a superior product.  I think in general quality and customer service are on the decline.  One example to make the case the people are willing to spend for quality.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/05/31/cheaper_mini_on_its_way/comment-page-1/#comment-6765</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2004 03:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/05/31/#comment-6765</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Peter, did you read all 20 comments before yours????&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter, did you read all 20 comments before yours????</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/05/31/cheaper_mini_on_its_way/comment-page-1/#comment-6764</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2004 02:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/05/31/#comment-6764</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;well, really i think this sucks alot. i am 15 years old and my brother bought a 2003 MINI cooper s. i have to say that i love this car, and by the time it will take for me to be able to afford one, this cheaper model will be out.i think this is really bad, and the only thing that bmw is turning the great MINI into is just a SCION or an AVEO. If BMW changes the model to a cheaper version, i think that ill just have to settle with a RABBIT GTI. I hate saying, this becuase the MINI is my favorite car, and is a very fun driver.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, really i think this sucks alot. i am 15 years old and my brother bought a 2003 MINI cooper s. i have to say that i love this car, and by the time it will take for me to be able to afford one, this cheaper model will be out.i think this is really bad, and the only thing that bmw is turning the great MINI into is just a SCION or an AVEO. If BMW changes the model to a cheaper version, i think that ill just have to settle with a RABBIT GTI. I hate saying, this becuase the MINI is my favorite car, and is a very fun driver.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KE3VP</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/05/31/cheaper_mini_on_its_way/comment-page-1/#comment-6763</link>
		<dc:creator>KE3VP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2004 21:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/05/31/#comment-6763</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hope for the best, but prepare for the worst...
With some of the trends I&#039;ve seen in manufacturing and worldwide corporate mindsets, I can&#039;t help but think the way &quot;R&quot; does.  The bottom line seems to always be more important than quality.
The MINI is my first experience with BMW, and I have been very impressed. I don&#039;t remember EVER being so excited about an automobile. I&#039;m looking forward to purchasing another MINI about 2007.  If I see a major negative deviation from the current quality/performance benchmark, I&#039;ll back off in a heartbeat.
A phrase that comes to my mind is &quot;...if it&#039;s not broken, don&#039;t fix it...&quot;. I hope BMW is listening !!?!??
I guess we&#039;ll have to just wait and see.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hope for the best, but prepare for the worst&#8230;
With some of the trends I&#39;ve seen in manufacturing and worldwide corporate mindsets, I can&#39;t help but think the way &#8220;R&#8221; does.  The bottom line seems to always be more important than quality.
The MINI is my first experience with BMW, and I have been very impressed. I don&#39;t remember EVER being so excited about an automobile. I&#39;m looking forward to purchasing another MINI about 2007.  If I see a major negative deviation from the current quality/performance benchmark, I&#39;ll back off in a heartbeat.
A phrase that comes to my mind is &#8220;&#8230;if it&#39;s not broken, don&#39;t fix it&#8230;&#8221;. I hope BMW is listening !!?!??
I guess we&#39;ll have to just wait and see.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rocketboy</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/05/31/cheaper_mini_on_its_way/comment-page-1/#comment-6762</link>
		<dc:creator>Rocketboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2004 20:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/05/31/#comment-6762</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I too doubt that BMW will start making &#039;disposable&#039; MINIs.  If BMW wanted to use the MINI to increase image, why would they degrade the quailty of it?  The only &#039;major&#039; changes that I could see them doing is making the MINI One cheaper, and less like the Cooper, or maybe a MINI .5 that will be even more budget minded than the One.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I just can&#039;t see them Dawoo-ifying the current lineup..&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too doubt that BMW will start making &#39;disposable&#39; MINIs.  If BMW wanted to use the MINI to increase image, why would they degrade the quailty of it?  The only &#39;major&#39; changes that I could see them doing is making the MINI One cheaper, and less like the Cooper, or maybe a MINI .5 that will be even more budget minded than the One.</p>

<p>I just can&#39;t see them Dawoo-ifying the current lineup..</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/05/31/cheaper_mini_on_its_way/comment-page-1/#comment-6761</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2004 19:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/05/31/#comment-6761</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Folks, I think everyone has raised very good points but in my opinion most seem to be jumping the gun way ahead of time. The article is pretty vague and has a clear sensasionalistic tone to it. BMW has gone thru incredible efforts to nurture and preserve the essence of the MINI brand and product alike. MINI has been a resounding success for the marque and if previous history serves as evidence of future strategies I doubt very much BMW will radically change or delute what the MINI is all about in the name of profits and reduced production costs. BMW is what it is because they understand the markets where they sell thier products extremely well and they have earned their reputation based on keeping that core market satisfied with world class products. other manufacturers have loads of trouble understanding this, but it would be short of suicidal to transform the R50 MINI into a Hyundai and like I said that ain&#039;t gonna happen.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The cut throat automotive market demands decreased production costs and yet while retaining high quality and product appeal for the customer...that&#039;s quite a hefty challenge and most of us understand it one-dimensionally but it is so much more than cheapening a car for the heck of it.
All manufacturers in operation today are always seeking to cut costs to keep thier products and profits competitve. as for BMW it doesn&#039;t seem to me that they will be willing to jeopardize thier must successful franchise ever. My prediction is that when the R56 comes out in a few years the car will be a hit and it will look higher quality too, perhaps in the interior and materials used, yet they would have cut costs in areas that you will never see/touch or hear. probably the R56 will make use of more integrated modules, use less welds, cheaper dashboard modules that will still look and feel MINI all the way.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Us MINI owners are very passionate about our cars and jump to conclusions without even getting all the facts together and seeing the finish product in person. People complained last year when MINi announced the softening of the suspension, yet today no one complaints as the handling was not affected and the ride quality was improved dramatically. So the R56 will be the same thing, so let&#039;s all relax enjoy our cars and let BMW do thier job. 3 years is an eternity in the car business and anything can happen from here til then.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Folks, I think everyone has raised very good points but in my opinion most seem to be jumping the gun way ahead of time. The article is pretty vague and has a clear sensasionalistic tone to it. BMW has gone thru incredible efforts to nurture and preserve the essence of the MINI brand and product alike. MINI has been a resounding success for the marque and if previous history serves as evidence of future strategies I doubt very much BMW will radically change or delute what the MINI is all about in the name of profits and reduced production costs. BMW is what it is because they understand the markets where they sell thier products extremely well and they have earned their reputation based on keeping that core market satisfied with world class products. other manufacturers have loads of trouble understanding this, but it would be short of suicidal to transform the R50 MINI into a Hyundai and like I said that ain&#39;t gonna happen.</p>

<p>The cut throat automotive market demands decreased production costs and yet while retaining high quality and product appeal for the customer&#8230;that&#39;s quite a hefty challenge and most of us understand it one-dimensionally but it is so much more than cheapening a car for the heck of it.
All manufacturers in operation today are always seeking to cut costs to keep thier products and profits competitve. as for BMW it doesn&#39;t seem to me that they will be willing to jeopardize thier must successful franchise ever. My prediction is that when the R56 comes out in a few years the car will be a hit and it will look higher quality too, perhaps in the interior and materials used, yet they would have cut costs in areas that you will never see/touch or hear. probably the R56 will make use of more integrated modules, use less welds, cheaper dashboard modules that will still look and feel MINI all the way.</p>

<p>Us MINI owners are very passionate about our cars and jump to conclusions without even getting all the facts together and seeing the finish product in person. People complained last year when MINi announced the softening of the suspension, yet today no one complaints as the handling was not affected and the ride quality was improved dramatically. So the R56 will be the same thing, so let&#39;s all relax enjoy our cars and let BMW do thier job. 3 years is an eternity in the car business and anything can happen from here til then.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/05/31/cheaper_mini_on_its_way/comment-page-1/#comment-6760</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2004 19:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/05/31/#comment-6760</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Randolph. 
Unless i am mistaken, Chris Bangle is the current head of design for all of BMWs brands... BMW, Rolls-Royce and MINI.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Randolph. 
Unless i am mistaken, Chris Bangle is the current head of design for all of BMWs brands&#8230; BMW, Rolls-Royce and MINI.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/05/31/cheaper_mini_on_its_way/comment-page-1/#comment-6759</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2004 19:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/05/31/#comment-6759</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Oh well...nothing we can do about it anyway.  I guess that just means that the existing model will be more valuable in the long run!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh well&#8230;nothing we can do about it anyway.  I guess that just means that the existing model will be more valuable in the long run!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: napster</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/05/31/cheaper_mini_on_its_way/comment-page-1/#comment-6758</link>
		<dc:creator>napster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2004 18:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/05/31/#comment-6758</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I hope they know better than to mess with the current car&#039;s suspension setup in a negative way.  Everybody remember what Nissan did to the 95/99 Maxima&#039;s rear suspension setup.  They changed over to a cheaper solid beam setup in lieu of the previous generations setup.  The result was a disaster for road handling.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope they know better than to mess with the current car&#39;s suspension setup in a negative way.  Everybody remember what Nissan did to the 95/99 Maxima&#39;s rear suspension setup.  They changed over to a cheaper solid beam setup in lieu of the previous generations setup.  The result was a disaster for road handling.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/05/31/cheaper_mini_on_its_way/comment-page-1/#comment-6757</link>
		<dc:creator>R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2004 18:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/05/31/#comment-6757</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Lock &amp; load, aim at foot, fire! &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Let&#039;s hope that when I buy my next MINI it still is a MINI and not a mainland Chinese version...R&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lock &amp; load, aim at foot, fire! </p>

<p>Let&#39;s hope that when I buy my next MINI it still is a MINI and not a mainland Chinese version&#8230;R</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: njpaguy</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/05/31/cheaper_mini_on_its_way/comment-page-1/#comment-6756</link>
		<dc:creator>njpaguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2004 11:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/05/31/#comment-6756</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;There are many ways to realize savings in design and production, but current BMW thinking does tend to make one pause.  Take for example the new 5.  Subjective comments about design aside, look at the uproar over their choice of interior materials.  A simple miscalculation or Bavarian arrogance?  (You&#039;ll learn to like it...just like iDrive).  As I&#039;ve mentioned before, Dr Panke may be a nuclear physicist, but he&#039;s no rocket scientist.  Not a doomsayer here; just an observation.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are many ways to realize savings in design and production, but current BMW thinking does tend to make one pause.  Take for example the new 5.  Subjective comments about design aside, look at the uproar over their choice of interior materials.  A simple miscalculation or Bavarian arrogance?  (You&#39;ll learn to like it&#8230;just like iDrive).  As I&#39;ve mentioned before, Dr Panke may be a nuclear physicist, but he&#39;s no rocket scientist.  Not a doomsayer here; just an observation.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randolph Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/05/31/cheaper_mini_on_its_way/comment-page-1/#comment-6755</link>
		<dc:creator>Randolph Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2004 07:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/05/31/#comment-6755</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Just Pray that they do not let Chris Bangle or some one like him near the MINI &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The mess he makes of any car he designs is breathtaking... Why BMW is still folowing this pied piper of bad design is beyond me.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I recall reading somewhere that if not for the paint shop bottleneck the plant could build almost 300,000 a year... but like anything you read in a paper or on the net these days I do notknow how true it was/is.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I too expect to see a traveler version in the future but I think that the SUV craze will be a fading one by the time that MINI might be thinking of doing it, hence we may be saved from that travisty except fot the ones that come out of the custom shops...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;BMW has positioned the MINI as a premium brand and I do not see them risking this hard won  identity with an intentional cheapening of the brand... that said of course they will look, like any builder of any product will, for ways to improve their profit margin... but not in ways that would impact the perceived quality of the product. That would be Just stupid.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;~R&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just Pray that they do not let Chris Bangle or some one like him near the MINI </p>

<p>The mess he makes of any car he designs is breathtaking&#8230; Why BMW is still folowing this pied piper of bad design is beyond me.</p>

<p>I recall reading somewhere that if not for the paint shop bottleneck the plant could build almost 300,000 a year&#8230; but like anything you read in a paper or on the net these days I do notknow how true it was/is.</p>

<p>I too expect to see a traveler version in the future but I think that the SUV craze will be a fading one by the time that MINI might be thinking of doing it, hence we may be saved from that travisty except fot the ones that come out of the custom shops&#8230;</p>

<p>BMW has positioned the MINI as a premium brand and I do not see them risking this hard won  identity with an intentional cheapening of the brand&#8230; that said of course they will look, like any builder of any product will, for ways to improve their profit margin&#8230; but not in ways that would impact the perceived quality of the product. That would be Just stupid.</p>

<p>~R</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Diver</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/05/31/cheaper_mini_on_its_way/comment-page-1/#comment-6754</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Diver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2004 05:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/05/31/#comment-6754</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Frank &amp; Evan...
You both bring up good points, and there are definitely ways of designing and producing a MINI that is cheaper for BMW to produce, without sacrificing overall quality.  As Gabe said, a redesigned dash may be cheaper for BMW to produce, while still retaining the same look as the old, and perhaps even providing improvements over the older more complex and expensive design.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is something that is always happening in the manufacturing world.  You have a design, and you want to find a way to make it cheaper to produce, but keep the same level of quality.  I think you can be sure of one thing though, that BMW will not want to tarnish its name by producing an inferior product.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think we will just have to wait and see on this one.  The article probably sounds scarier, than what will actually happen.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank &amp; Evan&#8230;
You both bring up good points, and there are definitely ways of designing and producing a MINI that is cheaper for BMW to produce, without sacrificing overall quality.  As Gabe said, a redesigned dash may be cheaper for BMW to produce, while still retaining the same look as the old, and perhaps even providing improvements over the older more complex and expensive design.</p>

<p>This is something that is always happening in the manufacturing world.  You have a design, and you want to find a way to make it cheaper to produce, but keep the same level of quality.  I think you can be sure of one thing though, that BMW will not want to tarnish its name by producing an inferior product.</p>

<p>I think we will just have to wait and see on this one.  The article probably sounds scarier, than what will actually happen.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/05/31/cheaper_mini_on_its_way/comment-page-1/#comment-6753</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2004 03:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/05/31/#comment-6753</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Evan and Frank - you both bring up good points.  I think one good example of a recent cost cutting measure done right is the new three-piece dash.  They&#039;ve reduced the complexity, cost and hopefully rattles without any cheapening of the interior.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evan and Frank &#8211; you both bring up good points.  I think one good example of a recent cost cutting measure done right is the new three-piece dash.  They&#39;ve reduced the complexity, cost and hopefully rattles without any cheapening of the interior.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/05/31/cheaper_mini_on_its_way/comment-page-1/#comment-6752</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2004 02:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/05/31/#comment-6752</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;There are definite ways to cut costs on building cars without &quot;cheapening&quot; them. I believe BMW is smart enough to not ruin what is has established with the MINI. With an increase in model variety and production numbers, the costs will come down. Also keep in mind that this initial iteration required the establishment of a dealer network- even if it is based off of BMW&#039;s existing plan. That huge investment has already been made.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As it is, the current generation does have its cost-cutting evident in some of the plastics and quality of the interior bits. But, and this is why none of that matters, they spent the money in all of the right places- the chassis and structure are excellent along with safety and overall build.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We just have to trust BMW. Even if they drop some now standard equipment, they will keep the core of the car alive and well. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Or I at least have the best model year so far (2004) and will keep it forever.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are definite ways to cut costs on building cars without &#8220;cheapening&#8221; them. I believe BMW is smart enough to not ruin what is has established with the MINI. With an increase in model variety and production numbers, the costs will come down. Also keep in mind that this initial iteration required the establishment of a dealer network- even if it is based off of BMW&#39;s existing plan. That huge investment has already been made.</p>

<p>As it is, the current generation does have its cost-cutting evident in some of the plastics and quality of the interior bits. But, and this is why none of that matters, they spent the money in all of the right places- the chassis and structure are excellent along with safety and overall build.</p>

<p>We just have to trust BMW. Even if they drop some now standard equipment, they will keep the core of the car alive and well. </p>

<p>Or I at least have the best model year so far (2004) and will keep it forever.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/05/31/cheaper_mini_on_its_way/comment-page-1/#comment-6751</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2004 01:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/05/31/#comment-6751</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I hope you&#039;re right Frank.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope you&#39;re right Frank.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

