<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MINI Named Most Efficient in Class</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/10/15/mini_named_most_efficient_in_class/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/10/15/mini_named_most_efficient_in_class/</link>
	<description>MotoringFile &#124; MINI news, reviews and opinion. MINI Cooper, Cooper S, Clubman, Countryman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:14:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Burt</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/10/15/mini_named_most_efficient_in_class/comment-page-1/#comment-212391</link>
		<dc:creator>Burt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 21:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/10/15/#comment-212391</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Just bought an 03 MCS with 20K miles on her....yes 20K. All stock...basically new
I have filled up twice...24.8mpg first time 25mpg second time. A little disappointed but I still love the car. Keep in mind I was driving a 2004 F350 diesel that $100 would not fill. My driving is suburban with a little of both city and hwy. I drive like it should be driven. I bet I could get 29 if I really tried, but then I may as well drive a Prius.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;2 questions..Does my car have the on board computer? (I know I could look it up but I&#039;m lazy) and Ian, How do you like the JCW?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just bought an 03 MCS with 20K miles on her&#8230;.yes 20K. All stock&#8230;basically new
I have filled up twice&#8230;24.8mpg first time 25mpg second time. A little disappointed but I still love the car. Keep in mind I was driving a 2004 F350 diesel that $100 would not fill. My driving is suburban with a little of both city and hwy. I drive like it should be driven. I bet I could get 29 if I really tried, but then I may as well drive a Prius.</p>

<p>2 questions..Does my car have the on board computer? (I know I could look it up but I&#8217;m lazy) and Ian, How do you like the JCW?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2004 MCS JCW</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/10/15/mini_named_most_efficient_in_class/comment-page-1/#comment-29854</link>
		<dc:creator>2004 MCS JCW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2006 07:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/10/15/#comment-29854</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;For me it was more frequent oil changes... Waiting for the service indicator to come on around 12K-15K miles is just too long on the same oil. With changes around the 6K mark kept the highway mpg around 32. Any longer and mpg drops to 20.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me it was more frequent oil changes&#8230; Waiting for the service indicator to come on around 12K-15K miles is just too long on the same oil. With changes around the 6K mark kept the highway mpg around 32. Any longer and mpg drops to 20.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spaced</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/10/15/mini_named_most_efficient_in_class/comment-page-1/#comment-12056</link>
		<dc:creator>Spaced</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 19:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/10/15/#comment-12056</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hey at least you guys dont have a crappy neon like me, an &#039;03 Neon Se with ATX to be exact, has a N/A 2.0L, 12.5gal tank and  I get....drumroll, 14mpg, yes my friends 14mpg!!!! Somebody shoot me. Oh and BTW, thats with everything brand new, as in wires, plugs(properly gaped), PCV, breather filter, air filter, tires nicely inflated, fresh oil job. Ride it hard or ride it like a granny, its the same every time.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey at least you guys dont have a crappy neon like me, an &#8217;03 Neon Se with ATX to be exact, has a N/A 2.0L, 12.5gal tank and  I get&#8230;.drumroll, 14mpg, yes my friends 14mpg!!!! Somebody shoot me. Oh and BTW, thats with everything brand new, as in wires, plugs(properly gaped), PCV, breather filter, air filter, tires nicely inflated, fresh oil job. Ride it hard or ride it like a granny, its the same every time.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/10/15/mini_named_most_efficient_in_class/comment-page-1/#comment-12055</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/10/15/#comment-12055</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I have a Mini cooper 02 with cvt and get a consitant 25mpg out of her. I also work with Land Rover ( another British auto maker) Land Rover early models got terrible gas milage due to the fact that they did not use an EGR system to control knocking in the engine. Their method was to use a system called fuel dumping. Yes that is exactly as it sounds, They dump extra fuel into the engine to cool the combustion and stop knocking. I could not find the more fuel saving EGR system on the Mini engine so I am afraid that they may be using the same type of technology. Thus reducing fuel economy for such a small car and engine. I love my Mini however I would love it more at 40-45mpg. I hope I am wrong but that is what I think is going on. If anyone knows better I would be glad to hear it.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a Mini cooper 02 with cvt and get a consitant 25mpg out of her. I also work with Land Rover ( another British auto maker) Land Rover early models got terrible gas milage due to the fact that they did not use an EGR system to control knocking in the engine. Their method was to use a system called fuel dumping. Yes that is exactly as it sounds, They dump extra fuel into the engine to cool the combustion and stop knocking. I could not find the more fuel saving EGR system on the Mini engine so I am afraid that they may be using the same type of technology. Thus reducing fuel economy for such a small car and engine. I love my Mini however I would love it more at 40-45mpg. I hope I am wrong but that is what I think is going on. If anyone knows better I would be glad to hear it.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/10/15/mini_named_most_efficient_in_class/comment-page-1/#comment-12054</link>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2005 13:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/10/15/#comment-12054</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;can you make a cheaper car&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can you make a cheaper car</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim H.</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/10/15/mini_named_most_efficient_in_class/comment-page-1/#comment-12053</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2005 04:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/10/15/#comment-12053</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;2002 Mini Cooper, 28K miles.  Get 24-25 mpg around town.  Best on highway so far has been 34 -- I owned it for a month.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Is it easly to  replace the 2002 computer with a later one that calculates instantenous mileage?  The &quot;computer&quot; functions are pretty worthless.  Instantenous mileage may be.  I have found I have to drive easy to get 27 mpg in the city.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2002 Mini Cooper, 28K miles.  Get 24-25 mpg around town.  Best on highway so far has been 34 &#8212; I owned it for a month.</p>

<p>Is it easly to  replace the 2002 computer with a later one that calculates instantenous mileage?  The &#8220;computer&#8221; functions are pretty worthless.  Instantenous mileage may be.  I have found I have to drive easy to get 27 mpg in the city.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/10/15/mini_named_most_efficient_in_class/comment-page-1/#comment-12052</link>
		<dc:creator>richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 05:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/10/15/#comment-12052</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;ok scratch that last gas estimate , the gas pump i used to fill up last didnt fill it up all the way, i was short about another gal, so in reality its between 27-29 mpg witch is more like it. i will definately be keeping an eye on this to see if it stays this way.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok scratch that last gas estimate , the gas pump i used to fill up last didnt fill it up all the way, i was short about another gal, so in reality its between 27-29 mpg witch is more like it. i will definately be keeping an eye on this to see if it stays this way.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RICHARD</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/10/15/mini_named_most_efficient_in_class/comment-page-1/#comment-12051</link>
		<dc:creator>RICHARD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 01:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/10/15/#comment-12051</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;didnt mean to shout caps was locked on i guess..  well today my speedometer was changed due to telling me my speed was faster than i was realy going,i had the dealer check why i might have bad gas milage, of course everything came back as working properly, so i left dealer fill up gas to the top, went for a 77.9 mile run driving no less than 65 mph averaging 70 on the highway then filled to the top again, witch was 1.6 gal of gas . do the math 77.9 divided by 1.6 = 48 wow my driving style must have changed. figure this out? cause i dont understand it.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>didnt mean to shout caps was locked on i guess..  well today my speedometer was changed due to telling me my speed was faster than i was realy going,i had the dealer check why i might have bad gas milage, of course everything came back as working properly, so i left dealer fill up gas to the top, went for a 77.9 mile run driving no less than 65 mph averaging 70 on the highway then filled to the top again, witch was 1.6 gal of gas . do the math 77.9 divided by 1.6 = 48 wow my driving style must have changed. figure this out? cause i dont understand it.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/10/15/mini_named_most_efficient_in_class/comment-page-1/#comment-12050</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2005 04:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/10/15/#comment-12050</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Richard,
Don&#039;t SHOUT - we can all read you!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Gas mileage is very much a matter of driving style - your &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard,
Don&#8217;t SHOUT &#8211; we can all read you!</p>

<p>Gas mileage is very much a matter of driving style &#8211; your </p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RICHARD</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/10/15/mini_named_most_efficient_in_class/comment-page-1/#comment-12049</link>
		<dc:creator>RICHARD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2005 03:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/10/15/#comment-12049</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I HAVE A 2005 MCS AND AS FAR AS IM CONCERNED FOR THE LITTLE ENGIN THAT IS HAS THE GAS MIALSGE SUCKS!!! MOST HYWAY DRIVING WITH VERY LITTLE STREET USE I GET NOT EVEN 22 MPG I AM VERY DISAPOINTED WITH THIS. THE ONLY MOD I DID WAS A ALTA COLD AIR INTAKE. AND IM NOT REVING HIGH AT ALL I LIKE TO SHIFT AT 3000 AND CRUISE AT 70-75 MPH ON HYWAY. I HAVE 2,700 MILES AT THIS TIME. ANY FEED BACK ON THIS WOULD BE HELPFULL.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I HAVE A 2005 MCS AND AS FAR AS IM CONCERNED FOR THE LITTLE ENGIN THAT IS HAS THE GAS MIALSGE SUCKS!!! MOST HYWAY DRIVING WITH VERY LITTLE STREET USE I GET NOT EVEN 22 MPG I AM VERY DISAPOINTED WITH THIS. THE ONLY MOD I DID WAS A ALTA COLD AIR INTAKE. AND IM NOT REVING HIGH AT ALL I LIKE TO SHIFT AT 3000 AND CRUISE AT 70-75 MPH ON HYWAY. I HAVE 2,700 MILES AT THIS TIME. ANY FEED BACK ON THIS WOULD BE HELPFULL.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared/pezboy</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/10/15/mini_named_most_efficient_in_class/comment-page-1/#comment-12048</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared/pezboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2004 04:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/10/15/#comment-12048</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I got 430 on a tank once.  I drove from Boston to Albany and back, and one day to and from work on one tank of gas.  I set the cruise to about 75 or so.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Ian, &gt;$30?  I usually do about $26.  Did you pay &gt;$2.30/gal?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got 430 on a tank once.  I drove from Boston to Albany and back, and one day to and from work on one tank of gas.  I set the cruise to about 75 or so.</p>

<p>Ian, >$30?  I usually do about $26.  Did you pay >$2.30/gal?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian C.</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/10/15/mini_named_most_efficient_in_class/comment-page-1/#comment-12047</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2004 02:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/10/15/#comment-12047</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Just paid my first ever &gt;$30 to fill GBMINI today :(
I have got over 30 - last summer (before the JCW) driving smoothly with max speed around 65.
These days, encouraged by JCW, with max speed nearer 75 and quicker acceleration, I see about 27 as a long term average - but that is about 2% below true due to the undersized tires.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I am certain on a highway journey stuck at 55 with smooth driving and no fun, I could get 400+ miles out of the tank - but I am not going to prove it ;)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just paid my first ever >$30 to fill GBMINI today :(
I have got over 30 &#8211; last summer (before the JCW) driving smoothly with max speed around 65.
These days, encouraged by JCW, with max speed nearer 75 and quicker acceleration, I see about 27 as a long term average &#8211; but that is about 2% below true due to the undersized tires.</p>

<p>I am certain on a highway journey stuck at 55 with smooth driving and no fun, I could get 400+ miles out of the tank &#8211; but I am not going to prove it ;)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OctaneGuy</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/10/15/mini_named_most_efficient_in_class/comment-page-1/#comment-12046</link>
		<dc:creator>OctaneGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2004 00:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/10/15/#comment-12046</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You will experience vastly difference mpg whether you are city driving or highway.  With Highway, I can get close to 400 miles on a tank.  In City, I do about 300 miles.  I&#039;ve got a 2003 MC with 26,000 miles on it.  I recently did the MTH CarTune chip mod, and my mileage actually improved while gaining more horsepower.  Previously, I was lucky to get 24mpg in city driving, and now I do 27 to 28mpg with the same variables--hard driving--6,000 rpm shifts, AC on, etc..  Might as well enjoy the driving experience!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You will experience vastly difference mpg whether you are city driving or highway.  With Highway, I can get close to 400 miles on a tank.  In City, I do about 300 miles.  I&#39;ve got a 2003 MC with 26,000 miles on it.  I recently did the MTH CarTune chip mod, and my mileage actually improved while gaining more horsepower.  Previously, I was lucky to get 24mpg in city driving, and now I do 27 to 28mpg with the same variables&#8211;hard driving&#8211;6,000 rpm shifts, AC on, etc..  Might as well enjoy the driving experience!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hans Mansa</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/10/15/mini_named_most_efficient_in_class/comment-page-1/#comment-12045</link>
		<dc:creator>Hans Mansa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2004 17:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/10/15/#comment-12045</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;My wife and I just returned from a 5000 miles trip from southern Florida through the N. Carolina &amp; W. Viginia mountains to Canada and accross the mountains in New England. Lots of high speed highway driving and of course putting the &#039;S&#039; through the gears in the montain.
Average mile based on both the computer and actual gas receipts vas a stunning 31.3 mile per gallon. ( i did calculate the liter use in Canada.)
I car performed flawlessly and with 2 people, golf club, tennis rackets and and luggage I was pleased with the performance.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My wife and I just returned from a 5000 miles trip from southern Florida through the N. Carolina &amp; W. Viginia mountains to Canada and accross the mountains in New England. Lots of high speed highway driving and of course putting the &#39;S&#39; through the gears in the montain.
Average mile based on both the computer and actual gas receipts vas a stunning 31.3 mile per gallon. ( i did calculate the liter use in Canada.)
I car performed flawlessly and with 2 people, golf club, tennis rackets and and luggage I was pleased with the performance.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elmor fudwel</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/10/15/mini_named_most_efficient_in_class/comment-page-1/#comment-12044</link>
		<dc:creator>elmor fudwel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2004 14:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/10/15/#comment-12044</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;GSKChicago:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve experienced the same issue with the onboard computer.  I have an MCS&#039;02.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Can&#039;t understand why the computer calculates the gas differently than the tried and true method of calculations by other means.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GSKChicago:</p>

<p>I&#39;ve experienced the same issue with the onboard computer.  I have an MCS&#39;02.  </p>

<p>Can&#39;t understand why the computer calculates the gas differently than the tried and true method of calculations by other means.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/10/15/mini_named_most_efficient_in_class/comment-page-1/#comment-12043</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2004 13:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/10/15/#comment-12043</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Keep in mind that the MCS is not tuned for high fuel economy but rather performance. I think people in general have some unreasonable expectation when it comes to mileage in the MCS model. Also remember that 6th gear in the S is not even overdrive.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I have managed to pull around 27-34 MPG in the highway with my unmodded and 100% stock &#039;04 MCS. In the city I get between 20-24 MPG depending on traffic conditions, A/C usage and driving style. If you go easy on the E-gas pedal and keep your shifting points at no more than 3K RPM, you should expect fairly decent fuel economy.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;My &#039;02 Cooper CVT, on the other hand, is extremely economical. With over 25K miles in the clock the car consistently returns 30+ per gallon in the city and between 35-40 MPG in the highway.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you are going after high calibre fuel economy figures, then the regular Cooper model (5-speed or CVT) is the one to consider. If your goals are performance and power, then the MCS is the one to get.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep in mind that the MCS is not tuned for high fuel economy but rather performance. I think people in general have some unreasonable expectation when it comes to mileage in the MCS model. Also remember that 6th gear in the S is not even overdrive.</p>

<p>I have managed to pull around 27-34 MPG in the highway with my unmodded and 100% stock &#39;04 MCS. In the city I get between 20-24 MPG depending on traffic conditions, A/C usage and driving style. If you go easy on the E-gas pedal and keep your shifting points at no more than 3K RPM, you should expect fairly decent fuel economy.</p>

<p>My &#39;02 Cooper CVT, on the other hand, is extremely economical. With over 25K miles in the clock the car consistently returns 30+ per gallon in the city and between 35-40 MPG in the highway.</p>

<p>If you are going after high calibre fuel economy figures, then the regular Cooper model (5-speed or CVT) is the one to consider. If your goals are performance and power, then the MCS is the one to get.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/10/15/mini_named_most_efficient_in_class/comment-page-1/#comment-12042</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2004 02:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/10/15/#comment-12042</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;GSKChicago - yeah, shift at 3000 for the sweet spot.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve got an &#039;04 MCS JCW with 10K in 7 months.  I&#039;ve seen everything from mid 25 to 30 mpg in those 7 months.  I spend 20% local roads, 40% highway (at, um, speeds a bit above the limit) and 40% highway traffic (20mph tops).  I&#039;m sure that the OBC is slightly off in it&#039;s calculations, but I&#039;m still higher than the 17-21.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GSKChicago &#8211; yeah, shift at 3000 for the sweet spot.</p>

<p>I&#39;ve got an &#39;04 MCS JCW with 10K in 7 months.  I&#39;ve seen everything from mid 25 to 30 mpg in those 7 months.  I spend 20% local roads, 40% highway (at, um, speeds a bit above the limit) and 40% highway traffic (20mph tops).  I&#39;m sure that the OBC is slightly off in it&#39;s calculations, but I&#39;m still higher than the 17-21.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GW</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/10/15/mini_named_most_efficient_in_class/comment-page-1/#comment-12041</link>
		<dc:creator>GW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2004 01:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/10/15/#comment-12041</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I have had my MCS for a couple of weeks and rarely travel on highway roads.  I drive semi-aggresively and have been getting between 25 and 26 mpg&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have had my MCS for a couple of weeks and rarely travel on highway roads.  I drive semi-aggresively and have been getting between 25 and 26 mpg</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GSKChicago</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/10/15/mini_named_most_efficient_in_class/comment-page-1/#comment-12040</link>
		<dc:creator>GSKChicago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2004 23:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/10/15/#comment-12040</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Neal Clark...  So basically the article says if we don&#039;t get the EPA ratings or anywhere near it, it&#039;s probably the driver&#039;s fault.  I kinda figured that much...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;njapaguy...  I do have the on-board computer but it says my mileage is better than what I calculate when I go to the pump, refill and do the division of gas put into the tank into the mileage on the odometer since last fillup.  So either my math is off, the on-board is off or both.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Finally, I don&#039;t wind her too bad.  Much worse when I first got her and I was learning to drive the 6-speed (never drove manual before I got her).  But, I have gotten comfortable with manual now and don&#039;t rev too high out of fear of killing the engine.  When you say &quot;sweet spot&quot; is 3000 RPM, you mean you change gears at 3 grand?  I&#039;m really not that bright. :o) So help a brother out please.  :o)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neal Clark&#8230;  So basically the article says if we don&#39;t get the EPA ratings or anywhere near it, it&#39;s probably the driver&#39;s fault.  I kinda figured that much&#8230;</p>

<p>njapaguy&#8230;  I do have the on-board computer but it says my mileage is better than what I calculate when I go to the pump, refill and do the division of gas put into the tank into the mileage on the odometer since last fillup.  So either my math is off, the on-board is off or both.  </p>

<p>Finally, I don&#39;t wind her too bad.  Much worse when I first got her and I was learning to drive the 6-speed (never drove manual before I got her).  But, I have gotten comfortable with manual now and don&#39;t rev too high out of fear of killing the engine.  When you say &#8220;sweet spot&#8221; is 3000 RPM, you mean you change gears at 3 grand?  I&#39;m really not that bright. :o) So help a brother out please.  :o)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisLW</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/10/15/mini_named_most_efficient_in_class/comment-page-1/#comment-12039</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisLW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2004 23:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/10/15/#comment-12039</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m getting 26.1 with my JCW &#039;04.  I shift at about 4000 (that&#039;s the torque peak for JCW) and have seen 28 max on a all hwy run.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t beat the snot out of it, usually do 70-72 on my hwy commute.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m getting 26.1 with my JCW &#39;04.  I shift at about 4000 (that&#39;s the torque peak for JCW) and have seen 28 max on a all hwy run.</p>

<p>I don&#39;t beat the snot out of it, usually do 70-72 on my hwy commute.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

