<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Angle on the Next MINI</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/12/01/another_angle_on_the_next_mini/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/12/01/another_angle_on_the_next_mini/</link>
	<description>MotoringFile &#124; MINI news, reviews and opinion. MINI Cooper, Cooper S, Clubman, Countryman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:14:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rocketboy</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/12/01/another_angle_on_the_next_mini/comment-page-1/#comment-13989</link>
		<dc:creator>Rocketboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2004 17:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/12/01/#comment-13989</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I still like the large grill, but is it me, or making a car extra safe if you run someone over sort of bunk?  It&#039;s a freakin car, don&#039;t walk in front of one.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still like the large grill, but is it me, or making a car extra safe if you run someone over sort of bunk?  It&#39;s a freakin car, don&#39;t walk in front of one.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/12/01/another_angle_on_the_next_mini/comment-page-1/#comment-13988</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2004 23:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/12/01/#comment-13988</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It&#039;d look better with bonnet stripes.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And some of those cool new headlights.  NOT.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;d look better with bonnet stripes.</p>

<p>And some of those cool new headlights.  NOT.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/12/01/another_angle_on_the_next_mini/comment-page-1/#comment-13987</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2004 23:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/12/01/#comment-13987</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;One thing I saw that gives me hope for the next MINI is the Rolls Royce Phantom.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There is no sign of BMW styling in the Phantom.  This big, massive hulk of fat cat car says Rolls Royce all over it.  When you see it in person, it&#039;s size, lines and workmanship really take you back in time when the worlds premier luxury cars were something bigger and more  ostentatious than the cars us peasants could acquire.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If BMW can keep the identity of the Rolls Royce on a 7-series platform distinctive from it&#039;s German cousin, then there is hope for us fans of the MINI.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Don&#039;t fret guys, BMW is arguably one of the best car companys in the world.  They are certainly smart enough to make the right decisions on their biggest success story of the last decade.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing I saw that gives me hope for the next MINI is the Rolls Royce Phantom.  </p>

<p>There is no sign of BMW styling in the Phantom.  This big, massive hulk of fat cat car says Rolls Royce all over it.  When you see it in person, it&#39;s size, lines and workmanship really take you back in time when the worlds premier luxury cars were something bigger and more  ostentatious than the cars us peasants could acquire.</p>

<p>If BMW can keep the identity of the Rolls Royce on a 7-series platform distinctive from it&#39;s German cousin, then there is hope for us fans of the MINI.</p>

<p>Don&#39;t fret guys, BMW is arguably one of the best car companys in the world.  They are certainly smart enough to make the right decisions on their biggest success story of the last decade.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vin</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/12/01/another_angle_on_the_next_mini/comment-page-1/#comment-13986</link>
		<dc:creator>vin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2004 16:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/12/01/#comment-13986</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;People calm down.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It may not look like it, but the mini in the pic has a lot of body cladding/camoflage on it.  Check around on the internet for spy shots of BMW&#039;s.  If you look closely, you&#039;ll notice that this is how bmw covers its cars when testing.  The body panels look real, but they aren&#039;t.  I&#039;d wager the next MINI won&#039;t look as bad as everyone says.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People calm down.</p>

<p>It may not look like it, but the mini in the pic has a lot of body cladding/camoflage on it.  Check around on the internet for spy shots of BMW&#39;s.  If you look closely, you&#39;ll notice that this is how bmw covers its cars when testing.  The body panels look real, but they aren&#39;t.  I&#39;d wager the next MINI won&#39;t look as bad as everyone says.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/12/01/another_angle_on_the_next_mini/comment-page-1/#comment-13985</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2004 05:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/12/01/#comment-13985</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Anything feels like a great engine after living with the 8-valve VW 2.0L for a couple years, damn that engine sucked.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anything feels like a great engine after living with the 8-valve VW 2.0L for a couple years, damn that engine sucked.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/12/01/another_angle_on_the_next_mini/comment-page-1/#comment-13984</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2004 04:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/12/01/#comment-13984</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;lots of comments about headlights ... those headlights are the current mini headlights so they are too small for the prototype ... they will not look like that in the final version&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;this is stated in the article: http://www.autocarmagazine.com/news&lt;em&gt;article.asp?na&lt;/em&gt;id=212251&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lots of comments about headlights &#8230; those headlights are the current mini headlights so they are too small for the prototype &#8230; they will not look like that in the final version</p>

<p>this is stated in the article: <a href="http://www.autocarmagazine.com/news" rel="nofollow">http://www.autocarmagazine.com/news</a><em>article.asp?na</em>id=212251</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DancesWithCones</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/12/01/another_angle_on_the_next_mini/comment-page-1/#comment-13983</link>
		<dc:creator>DancesWithCones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2004 03:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/12/01/#comment-13983</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This must have been taken in France because everything has been frenched: the engine, the headlights, the grill. =:^) I like the headlights.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you look carefully, you&#039;ll notice that the bonnet is just a skin over the original. There&#039;s a lip around the grill, headlights and fender break. I don&#039;t think any of the body has anything to do with the R56. It&#039;s just to us talking and keep us talking. This car will have been through 6 production years (or more) before a major change. BMW is nervous that they might lose the momentum they have between now and mid-06...and it&#039;s working. Just count the posts. Frankly, I&#039;m probably going with the 140 horse 06 R50 as my next MC. With any luck the LSD will also be available.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;John&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This must have been taken in France because everything has been frenched: the engine, the headlights, the grill. =:^) I like the headlights.</p>

<p>If you look carefully, you&#39;ll notice that the bonnet is just a skin over the original. There&#39;s a lip around the grill, headlights and fender break. I don&#39;t think any of the body has anything to do with the R56. It&#39;s just to us talking and keep us talking. This car will have been through 6 production years (or more) before a major change. BMW is nervous that they might lose the momentum they have between now and mid-06&#8230;and it&#39;s working. Just count the posts. Frankly, I&#39;m probably going with the 140 horse 06 R50 as my next MC. With any luck the LSD will also be available.</p>

<p>John</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/12/01/another_angle_on_the_next_mini/comment-page-1/#comment-13982</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2004 03:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/12/01/#comment-13982</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Evan - totally agree. It&#039;s hard to know for sure but from my understanding BMW didn&#039;t have much input on the general design of th tritec.  It would appear that the new Prince engines will be very different in that regard.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evan &#8211; totally agree. It&#39;s hard to know for sure but from my understanding BMW didn&#39;t have much input on the general design of th tritec.  It would appear that the new Prince engines will be very different in that regard.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/12/01/another_angle_on_the_next_mini/comment-page-1/#comment-13981</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2004 03:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/12/01/#comment-13981</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;First off, Nissan&#039;s V6 was designed well before Renault got in to the deal and saved the entire company. It is an amazing engine, but it is a strictly Nissan design.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For the French, they do good cars and decent engines, and as mentioned before, BMW has had much input on the Prince engine series (probably more than it did on the Tritec unit) and the engine will be built to BMW specs in its own factory. I can&#039;t think of any engine that the flying propeller ever let out that wasn&#039;t a great unit.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That said, I like my MINI&#039;s current engine, it is very reliable and warms up quickly. However, I do have to concede that it isn&#039;t as free a revver as other I4&#039;s I&#039;ve driven. It&#039;s powerful, and screams over 3500 rpm, but its overall smoothness is a step off of the VTEC I4 in my girlfriend&#039;s Civic. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Before anyone says anything, I wouldn&#039;t trade my MINI for anything and enjoy every fire of its cylinders.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Motor On. And let&#039;s wait for some real spy shots and not just engine/suspension mules....&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off, Nissan&#39;s V6 was designed well before Renault got in to the deal and saved the entire company. It is an amazing engine, but it is a strictly Nissan design.</p>

<p>For the French, they do good cars and decent engines, and as mentioned before, BMW has had much input on the Prince engine series (probably more than it did on the Tritec unit) and the engine will be built to BMW specs in its own factory. I can&#39;t think of any engine that the flying propeller ever let out that wasn&#39;t a great unit.</p>

<p>That said, I like my MINI&#39;s current engine, it is very reliable and warms up quickly. However, I do have to concede that it isn&#39;t as free a revver as other I4&#39;s I&#39;ve driven. It&#39;s powerful, and screams over 3500 rpm, but its overall smoothness is a step off of the VTEC I4 in my girlfriend&#39;s Civic. </p>

<p>Before anyone says anything, I wouldn&#39;t trade my MINI for anything and enjoy every fire of its cylinders.</p>

<p>Motor On. And let&#39;s wait for some real spy shots and not just engine/suspension mules&#8230;.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randolph Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/12/01/another_angle_on_the_next_mini/comment-page-1/#comment-13980</link>
		<dc:creator>Randolph Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2004 03:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/12/01/#comment-13980</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I too am a fan of the current Supercharged 1.6; engine and while I accept that there is probably not enough long term growth available in the block to keep on with it what I will miss most is the supercharger... Turbos are just so common! and I love the sound of the blower... I bet one of the most popular mods for the new engine will be a supercharger... I just hope that John Cooper Works will offer it so I will be able to get one and keep the warranty when I trade in for a new MINI in 2008&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too am a fan of the current Supercharged 1.6; engine and while I accept that there is probably not enough long term growth available in the block to keep on with it what I will miss most is the supercharger&#8230; Turbos are just so common! and I love the sound of the blower&#8230; I bet one of the most popular mods for the new engine will be a supercharger&#8230; I just hope that John Cooper Works will offer it so I will be able to get one and keep the warranty when I trade in for a new MINI in 2008</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flav</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/12/01/another_angle_on_the_next_mini/comment-page-1/#comment-13979</link>
		<dc:creator>flav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2004 03:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/12/01/#comment-13979</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;didn&#039;t nissan and peugeot team up to create the amazing VQ engine in all nissans including the new 350Z. the VQ is probably one of the best engines even made (take it from me i owned a 350Z). and the VQ made it in wards top 10 for the past 10 years. so imagine when BMW and peugeot team up, it will be great. and i&#039;m with frank, i do love the tritec. i would rather drive a small engine hard than a large engine soft. and these tritec engines in the mini and mini s are ment to be reved high. and from what they have shown are vitually indestructable. what more can a driver want in a small engine.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>didn&#39;t nissan and peugeot team up to create the amazing VQ engine in all nissans including the new 350Z. the VQ is probably one of the best engines even made (take it from me i owned a 350Z). and the VQ made it in wards top 10 for the past 10 years. so imagine when BMW and peugeot team up, it will be great. and i&#39;m with frank, i do love the tritec. i would rather drive a small engine hard than a large engine soft. and these tritec engines in the mini and mini s are ment to be reved high. and from what they have shown are vitually indestructable. what more can a driver want in a small engine.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/12/01/another_angle_on_the_next_mini/comment-page-1/#comment-13978</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2004 01:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/12/01/#comment-13978</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;LOL, Gabe I am not against progress and evolution..But... I think the TRITEC engine deserves better recognition for a job well done in powering the R50/53 generation with a very solid powerplant.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Wards automotive awarded the 1.6L Supercharged version of this engine the title of the &quot;10 best engines in the world&quot; back in 2003.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I hope that the new &quot;prince&quot; engines deliver not only in terms of performance but quality and reliability but like I said, nothing from France&#039;s autodom has ever lasted in this country long enough.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I love simple engines. The MINI&#039;s engine is the first ever 1.6L motor that I have truly enjoyed (Even better than the DOHC powerplants in my previous Hondas/Acuras).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Take this from a guy that before catching the &quot;MINI Fever&quot; always believed that there was no &quot;Replacement for Displacement&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL, Gabe I am not against progress and evolution..But&#8230; I think the TRITEC engine deserves better recognition for a job well done in powering the R50/53 generation with a very solid powerplant.</p>

<p>Wards automotive awarded the 1.6L Supercharged version of this engine the title of the &#8220;10 best engines in the world&#8221; back in 2003.</p>

<p>I hope that the new &#8220;prince&#8221; engines deliver not only in terms of performance but quality and reliability but like I said, nothing from France&#39;s autodom has ever lasted in this country long enough.</p>

<p>I love simple engines. The MINI&#39;s engine is the first ever 1.6L motor that I have truly enjoyed (Even better than the DOHC powerplants in my previous Hondas/Acuras).</p>

<p>Take this from a guy that before catching the &#8220;MINI Fever&#8221; always believed that there was no &#8220;Replacement for Displacement&#8221;.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/12/01/another_angle_on_the_next_mini/comment-page-1/#comment-13977</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2004 01:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/12/01/#comment-13977</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Frank - you&#039;re always good for a pro-Tritec comment.  I love it!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For the record I don&#039;t hate the tritec at all.  I totally respect what both MINI and Chrysler were able to do with it.  That being said I&#039;m very much looking forward to see something a little more modern in it&#039;s design.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And with the new Prince series of engines it would seem BMW will be much more involved in design process.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank &#8211; you&#39;re always good for a pro-Tritec comment.  I love it!</p>

<p>For the record I don&#39;t hate the tritec at all.  I totally respect what both MINI and Chrysler were able to do with it.  That being said I&#39;m very much looking forward to see something a little more modern in it&#39;s design.</p>

<p>And with the new Prince series of engines it would seem BMW will be much more involved in design process.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/12/01/another_angle_on_the_next_mini/comment-page-1/#comment-13976</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2004 01:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/12/01/#comment-13976</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The MINI in the photo above is essentially a R50 Cooper with a revised bonnet and a Peugeot engine. I don&#039;t see any other radical visual differences aside from the headlights, bonnet, larger wheel wheels and (Gasp!) hidden wipers and cowl (One of the most beautiful details of the current MINI). Towards the back, the car is the SAME folks!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We are looking at a test mule, not a final production R56 MINI. The next MINI is still 2 years away, a very very very very long time in the car business!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The MINI in the photo above is essentially a R50 Cooper with a revised bonnet and a Peugeot engine. I don&#39;t see any other radical visual differences aside from the headlights, bonnet, larger wheel wheels and (Gasp!) hidden wipers and cowl (One of the most beautiful details of the current MINI). Towards the back, the car is the SAME folks!</p>

<p>We are looking at a test mule, not a final production R56 MINI. The next MINI is still 2 years away, a very very very very long time in the car business!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/12/01/another_angle_on_the_next_mini/comment-page-1/#comment-13975</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2004 01:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/12/01/#comment-13975</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;John - the MINI currently uses flexible plastic chromed pieces on it&#039;s exterior.  There&#039;s really no old-school chromed steel on the car that i can think of.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John &#8211; the MINI currently uses flexible plastic chromed pieces on it&#39;s exterior.  There&#39;s really no old-school chromed steel on the car that i can think of.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/12/01/another_angle_on_the_next_mini/comment-page-1/#comment-13974</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2004 01:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/12/01/#comment-13974</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;Furthermore the engine should be lighter, more efficient and will be built in the England and engineered in Europe rather than Brazil and Detroit.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Am I the only one getting sick and tired of all this bashing against the current TRITEC engine?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The BMW-Daimler TRITEC engine has proven to be a virtually bulletproof powerplant capable of taking a lot of abuse as demonstrated by the number of mods (Including the twincharged S project) done by many owners in the past couple of years.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I love my &quot;Detroit-Brazil&quot; connection TRITEC engine! Smooth, low maintenance, excellent power delivery, rock solid reliable and fun to drive 1.6L engine!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The TRITEC engine is mad ein one of the most advanced engine plants in the world and uses strict Toyota Manufacturing System quality control processes. The TRITEC motor is perhaps the best and bank vault solid component in the MINI.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There is unreasonable hatred and bashing directed towards this excellent powerplant and the only reason why BMW wants so eagerly to get rid of it its because the plant is owned by archrival Daimler-Chrysler.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I am eager to see the new PSA-Peugeot family of engines, but the truth is that nothing FRENCH has lasted in this country. How many French cars do you see being driven every single day?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Don&#039;t get me wrong. I have been to France many times and seen first hand some of their best cars but quality and reliability continues to be a big question mark for a French engine even counting BMW&#039;s involvement in its development.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Samba away!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Furthermore the engine should be lighter, more efficient and will be built in the England and engineered in Europe rather than Brazil and Detroit.&#8221;</p>

<p>Am I the only one getting sick and tired of all this bashing against the current TRITEC engine?</p>

<p>The BMW-Daimler TRITEC engine has proven to be a virtually bulletproof powerplant capable of taking a lot of abuse as demonstrated by the number of mods (Including the twincharged S project) done by many owners in the past couple of years.</p>

<p>I love my &#8220;Detroit-Brazil&#8221; connection TRITEC engine! Smooth, low maintenance, excellent power delivery, rock solid reliable and fun to drive 1.6L engine!</p>

<p>The TRITEC engine is mad ein one of the most advanced engine plants in the world and uses strict Toyota Manufacturing System quality control processes. The TRITEC motor is perhaps the best and bank vault solid component in the MINI.</p>

<p>There is unreasonable hatred and bashing directed towards this excellent powerplant and the only reason why BMW wants so eagerly to get rid of it its because the plant is owned by archrival Daimler-Chrysler.</p>

<p>I am eager to see the new PSA-Peugeot family of engines, but the truth is that nothing FRENCH has lasted in this country. How many French cars do you see being driven every single day?</p>

<p>Don&#39;t get me wrong. I have been to France many times and seen first hand some of their best cars but quality and reliability continues to be a big question mark for a French engine even counting BMW&#39;s involvement in its development.</p>

<p>Samba away!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/12/01/another_angle_on_the_next_mini/comment-page-1/#comment-13973</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2004 01:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/12/01/#comment-13973</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Is it just me or does that look like a front mounted intercoooler at the bottom there?  Could this be the turbocharged S?  Also, any word on if the hood scoop will remain, and if it does, will it remain functional?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it just me or does that look like a front mounted intercoooler at the bottom there?  Could this be the turbocharged S?  Also, any word on if the hood scoop will remain, and if it does, will it remain functional?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/12/01/another_angle_on_the_next_mini/comment-page-1/#comment-13972</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2004 00:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/12/01/#comment-13972</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I looks like eventually all cars will have giant front grills (upper,lower, and/or both)like Audis since those grills will also act like one giant flexable pedestrian absorber.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Say goodbye to hard steel chomes pieces up front and say hello to flexable chome-looking painted plastic ones.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I looks like eventually all cars will have giant front grills (upper,lower, and/or both)like Audis since those grills will also act like one giant flexable pedestrian absorber.</p>

<p>Say goodbye to hard steel chomes pieces up front and say hello to flexable chome-looking painted plastic ones.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimbo</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/12/01/another_angle_on_the_next_mini/comment-page-1/#comment-13971</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2004 23:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/12/01/#comment-13971</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Actually, even if the new S is turbo charged, there might still be a bonnet scoop. It is there for feeding air to the intercooler. Turbocharged cars have intercoolers too! Also, the europeaa pedestrian saftey thing is a new regulation for car makers to manufacture the front fender area differnetly so when the cars  hit pedestirians, there is less harm done, or something like that....&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, even if the new S is turbo charged, there might still be a bonnet scoop. It is there for feeding air to the intercooler. Turbocharged cars have intercoolers too! Also, the europeaa pedestrian saftey thing is a new regulation for car makers to manufacture the front fender area differnetly so when the cars  hit pedestirians, there is less harm done, or something like that&#8230;.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maxmini</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/12/01/another_angle_on_the_next_mini/comment-page-1/#comment-13970</link>
		<dc:creator>maxmini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2004 23:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2004/12/01/#comment-13970</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I actually like the new look. The larger grille is a nice improvement. I think the headlights will look fine with a healthy dose of chrome around them. The nose does seem a bit longer but this is an early test mule and it may well be a bit different in person. I really like the larger lower air intake. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Also, if an extra inch or two in the nose will allow a slightly bigger, better more powerful engine I&#039;m all for it. I do think they need to be careful not to lose the mini of the MINI but this change doesn&#039;t seem too drastic.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually like the new look. The larger grille is a nice improvement. I think the headlights will look fine with a healthy dose of chrome around them. The nose does seem a bit longer but this is an early test mule and it may well be a bit different in person. I really like the larger lower air intake. </p>

<p>Also, if an extra inch or two in the nose will allow a slightly bigger, better more powerful engine I&#39;m all for it. I do think they need to be careful not to lose the mini of the MINI but this change doesn&#39;t seem too drastic.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

