BMW & Peugeot Announce New Engine Range

mini

Here's some news that gives us a glimpse into the future of the MINI range. BMW and PSA have released preliminary information regarding the new range of engines (code named Prince) that will power, among other things, the next generation of MINIs. Here's the press release:

“BMW Group and PSA Peugeot Citroen have unveiled the state-of-the-art technologies deployed in their new gasoline engines, the first to be jointly developed and produced by their cooperative venture.

Announced in July 2002, the two Companies' cooperation in gasoline engines is now setting new standards for performance, driving comfort and reductions in fuel consumption and CO2 emissions.

Beginning in 2006, the engines will equip small and mid-size cars produced by the Peugeot and Citroen marques as well as future models of the MINI. Production is expected to eventually total roughly one million units a year.

mini

At a special technology day at BMW Group's Research and Development Center in Munich, executives from both companies presented the technical features of two types of engines:

  • A 1.6-liter atmospheric engine with a variable valve timing distribution and a power output of 85 kW (115 hp).
  • A 1.6-liter direct injection, compressed turbo engine with a power output of 105 kW (143 hp). The new models are the first in a family that will eventually comprise engines delivering a range of power outputs from 55 kW (75 hp) to 125 kW (170 hp).
mini

As a result of both group's expertise, these engines offer a large number of new features including:

  • Variable valve timing.
  • Fully controlled oil pump.
  • Single belt drive for all ancillary components.
  • Cylinder heads produced by lost foam casting.

In addition, several innovations have been developed, including:

  • Direct injection to optimize power.
  • Twin-Scroll turbocharger to improve response time and driving comfort.
  • Self-disengaging water pump to reduce fuel consumption and emissions.
mini

The co-operation between BMW Group and PSA Peugeot Citroen clearly demonstrates that gasoline engines still offer a great potential of technological progress, thus contributing to the reduction of consumption and CO2 emissions while enhancing the car performances and its related driving pleasure.”

mini

What's that? You swear you've seen these specs before? Well if you're a dedicated MotoringFile or MINI2 reader you did almost exactly a year ago.

While the specs very closely follow what was posted on previously, they differ somewhat from what we've read recently in AutoExpress. Specifically there's no mention of a 200hp engine as a 170hp version is the highest listed.

mini

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Written By: MF Staff

  • Patrick

    Actually, I like Brazil so I don't really mind. You don't hear as many people taking shots at the Brazilians as they do the French for a reason. Plus, it's a Chrysler engine correct? Then agian post 05 JCW a small portion of that engine bay was replaced in the good ol' US of A.

    Fact is -2 customers even if they try to hide it. The fact that the engine is built in the UK not France was probably a way to mitigate the negative sentiment. It might work, but it has already lost 2 sales.

    I hope the fuel economy does turn out quite a bit better though. I actually don't think the current MCS gets amazing numbers. Figure that a 3 3/4 times larger engine in the C6 Vette moves a 20% heavier car MUCH faster with only a 7mpg city 4mpg highway hit. And compared to other engines out there the small block is considered low tech. It kinda makes you think just how great this new tech is ;-)

  • Lucas

    I guess I'm the odd ball here — I prefer the turbos. I guess it's just my experience with my old trusty SAAB?

    Turbos' boost is somewhat controlled by the engine tuning and ECU (I guess, at least on the SAAB — that's probably why the torque curve is flat after the engine reaches certain RPMs). The boost itself is, of course, non-linear, but once engaged gives a very smooth, constant delivery of power.

    Supercharger, on the other hand, is more linear in nature — because the supercharger is connected directly to the engine drive shaft. So faster you drive, the more boost you get.

    As far as Turbo and shutdown delay thingy — like others have explained before — modern turbo designs overcomes that problem — most of the time. On my Saab's manual, it only states a need for delay shutdown when engine has been driven hard immediately before shutdown, or when engine driven hard in high temperatures.

  • Louis

    Is Patrick seriously saying he won't buy the new MINI under any circumstances because he disagrees with the current policies of the government in which the co-developer of the new engine is based?

    You should make decisions like those on more important criteria, like initial body color choices.

  • R50

    Are there 2 different engines pictured here? The engine in the last photo doesn't have a turbo charger. Thanks for this “article.” I love reading about the technical side of the equation.

  • R50

    The pdf file at the above Peugeot url lists oil change interval at 20,000 miles! What will our grandfathers say?

  • http://motoringfile.com Gabe

    Michael – you beat me to it… I was going to be posting the full release Tuesday :)

  • http://motoringfile.com Gabe

    I don't understand why the negativity towards an engine that was co-developed by a worldwide company that happens to be based in France. 100s of components in the current MINI are made in France (and all over Europe for that matter).

    The key you hold in your hand when starting your MINI is made by the French company Valeo for example.

  • http://www.swflamini.com Michael

    Sorry Gabe ;)

  • Nicholas P

    uh oh!

    Patrick will have to trade in his MINI then, if it's made by the gasp FRENCH

    i don't base my purchases on whether or not my government agrees with the policies of another nation…after all, half of America doesn't agree with our current policies…and most of america didn't even vote for our current president the first time…

  • Scott

    I'm also a fan of turbos (and a former Saab owner). If you plan to modify your car to make as much power as possible, a turbo is the only way to go. Becuase of the diminising returns associated with a supercharger, a turbo engine will always be capable of making more power than the same engine with a supercharger. I was talking to a guy last weekend who has an Audi TT with a chip and other mods and he's somewhere in the 275 hp range with a 1.8 liter engine.

  • Rodney

    It's funny the number of Saab owners on this board. I think the die hard supercharger fans out there will just have to wait and see. The low end torque of the low pressure turbo is truly a delight. V8 torque from a small four. I envision a day when the V8 will be put away in favor of small displacement turbo charged engines. Europe is a good example of this. Right now it's still cheaper to build a low tech V8. High tech 4 cylinders are expensive. But that cost will deminish over time. An example is the Crown Vic, it comes with a big V8 that puts out 239HP@4,750 RPM and 287lb/ft@4,100 RPM. The 2.3l Saab Aero puts out 250HP@5300 RPM and 258lb/ft@1900 RPM. That's roughly the same numbers in an engine that is exactly half the size. But note the Saab gets full torque at only 1900RPM. One quick CPU swap and those numbers jump to over 300+ easy. Can you imagine a 4 banger in a Crown Vic… It would never sell no matter how much more HP it produced! Americans are too accustomed to the big thirsty V8.

  • michael Boice

    idiaz,

    Ooooh, sounds great! But, I would expect output to be somewhere north of 200hp, perhaps 220hp. time will tell as Gabe pointed out.

  • Oliver Bonaccorso

    What is so good about a 1.6L engine that only produces 85kW or 105kW? is this so spectacular? japanese 4cyl cars have been producing 130kW from a naturally aspirated, variable valve timing 1.6L engine for the past 10 years! and emissions arent too bad either! now a real advance would be to slash emissions and still retain high power outputs. that would be an advance.

  • Pritch

    “A 1.6-liter atmospheric engine with a variable geometry turbocharger and a power output of 85 kW (115 hp).”

    This comment in the text above is not true and not in the original press release – which refers to variable valve timing instead (an atmospheric engine has of course no turbo)!!

  • http://motoringfile.com Gabe

    Pritch – not sure what to tell you …. that info was copied straight from the release I got from BMW. That being said from what I had heard previously the 115hp engine should be normally aspirated.

    Other sites that are covering this news have that sentence in there as well. Perhaps it's a typo in the original release.

    I'd refer to the story above this one on the main page for more technical detail.

  • Pritch

    Gabe, it's surely a typo somewhere, because following your link (from your “engine details report”) to the PSA web site (and then to the main page), I find exactly the same basic sentence, but just slightly different:

    “A 1.6-liter atmospheric engine with a variable valve timing distribution and a power output of 85 kW (115 hp).”

    Maybe to save any confusion, you could modify your report accordingly (assuming that they have now also corrected their information) ;-)

  • http://motoringfile.com Gabe

    Ah they did change it. I've updated it with the new text.

    Thanks!

  • Gilbert

    turbo????? BMW gonna' kidding and only 143 bhp????

    I don't know..

  • Stuart

    BMW/Peugeot joint design, built in UK, lighter, faster to spin up, tough as old boots, lots of headroom for 'tuning' ;) , Can't stop the Grin factor :D I've just ordered an MCS for next year just to tide me over till the 'new' ones arrive. 1st year production will be fine by me.

  • http://motoringfile.com Gabe

    Stuart – all good to hear. I'll probably be one of the first in line for the new car in '07. But until then I might be ordering something to tide me over as well :)

  • http://www.mini2mini.org Dan Smith

    Appears BMW has decided to use a peugeot 106 gti lump and the same lump with a turbo. I can see Mini being critised for dropping the excellent supercharged engine.

  • non believer

    Austin Mini = British BMW Mini = GERMAN, not really a mini is it.


Sort by MINI model


OutMotoring

MINI Model Cheat Sheet

1st Gen MINI
R50: One & MC Hatch
R52: All 1st Gen MINI Convt.
R53: MCS Hatch
2nd Gen MINI
R55: Clubman
R56: Hatch
R57: Convertible
R58: Coupe
R59: Roadster
R60: MINI Crossover
R61: MINI Crossover Coupe
3rd Gen MINI
F55: Clubman
F56: Hatch
F57: Convertible
F60: MINI Crossover
F62: Traveller

Advertise with MotoringFile

If you or your company are interested in advertising on the most influential MINI website in the world, please visit our Advertising section. If you have further questions about becoming a sponsor or would like to see our rate sheet please feel free to contact us directly.
mini mini
Translate MotoringFile with Google: 
 
Morristown MINI Auctions
BF

MF NewsRoom

MotoringFile Buyers Guides

R50 ('02-'06 MC) Buyers Guide
R53 ('02-'06 MCS) Buyers Guide



MotoringFile Reviews

Auto Reviews:
'12 JCW Coupe
'11 Fiat 500 Sport
'11 Tesla Roaster 2.5 '11 Countryman Comparo
'11 Cooper S Hatch
'11 Countryman MCS (FWD)
'11 Countryman MC (auto)
'10 Mayfair MCS (auto)
'11 Countryman MCS (ALL4)
'10 MINI E
'10 Tesla Roadster Sport
'09 Cooper S Convertible
'09 JCW Coupe
'09 JCW Clubman
JCW Stage I vs JCW Stage II
'08 Clubman S (Auto)
1st Drive: '08 MINI Clubman
'08 Smart Fourtwo
Comparison: '08 BMW 135i
'06 R53 MCS vs '07 R56 MCS
'07 R56 JCW (Stage 1)
'07 MINI Cooper S Long Term
'07 BMW Z4 M Coupe
'07 MINI Cooper & Cooper S
Audio: '07 MC/MCS at the Track
'06 JCW GP Long term
Reader Review: JCW GP
'06 JCW Cooper S Long Term
Comparison: '06 Lotus Elise
Comparison: '06 Mazda MX5
Comparison: '06 UK Focus ST
Comparison: '06 Civic Si
Comparison: '04 TVR T350
Comparison: '06 Nissan 350z
Comparison: '06 VW GTI w/DSG
Podcast: Cooper S Auto
Podcast: BMW 325i
Podcast: JCW MC Soundkit
'04 JCW MINI Cooper Tuning Kit
'05 MCS: One Month Review
'05 MCS Auto
'05 JCW S 1st Drive
'05 MINI Cooper
'05 MCS Conv. Long Term
'05 MINI Cooper S
'05 MCS Cabrio 1st Drive
'04 JCW MCS First Drive
'04 MC w/JCW Tuning Kit
BMW M3 SMG Vs. MCS
'04 MINI Cooper CVT
'02 MCS 3 year Review
Autocrossing the MINI Range

cafepress



Performance Accessories:
M7 Rear Chassis Brace
R56 JCW Engine Kit
R56 JCW Suspension (Long-Term)
R56 JCW Suspension (Track)
R56 JCW Suspension (Street)
R53 Craven Speed Short Shifter
R53 M7 Understrut System
Kumho Ecsta SPT Tires
R53 M7 Strut Tower Plates
R53 JCW Alcantara Wheel
R53 JCW Brake Kit
R53 Webb 15% Pulley
R53 Helix MCSa 15% Pulley
R53 H-Sport 19mm Sway Bar
R53 MCS Supersprint Exhaust
Podcast: R53 MCS SS Exhaust
R53 JCW Cold Air Intake
Reader Rev.: R53 JCW Brakes
R50 Supersprint Exhaust
R50 Remus Exhaust
R50 Promini Intake
R50 Remus Dual Exhaust
Schroth Harness System
R50 CVT Steering Wheel Paddles

Exterior Accessories:
MINI Do More Clubman Hitch
Miniature's Receiver Hitch
OEM White Tail Lights

Lifestyle Accessories:
MINI_Motion Watch
MINI_Motion Driving Shoe

Audio:
MINI Digital SoundModul
ICE-Link Plus iPod Adapter
Official BMW/iPod adapter
ICE-Link iPod Adapter
Kenwood iPod Interface
Alpine iPod Interface
Harman Kardon Stereo

Interior Accessories:
JCW Alcantara Steering Wheel JCW Leather Dash
MCAW Auto Up Circuit
MINI Rear Camera
MINI Rear Saddle (official)
MINI Rear Cargo Storage Case
Official MINI Rear Saddle Bag
2004 MINI Armrest Reviewed
Mymini Knee Pad
MINI Bluetooth Kit
MINI Video Input
Aftermarket Bluetooth Integration
Ian Cull Auto-up Circuit
Universal Mobile Phone Holder