<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The MCS Automatic Debuts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/01/10/the_mcs_automatic_debuts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/01/10/the_mcs_automatic_debuts/</link>
	<description>MINI Cooper news, reviews and opinion.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 15:20:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Herman L.</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/01/10/the_mcs_automatic_debuts/comment-page-2/#comment-15305</link>
		<dc:creator>Herman L.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2005 23:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/01/10/#comment-15305</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Anyone care to say that BMW is still a company out to make a profit?  the MINI is selling well in the states and so it only makes more sense to bring a auto version for the place that sells well so it sells EVEN better... &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;its not like the automatic is now the only tranny available... enthusiasts can stick with the 6 speed... adding a auto allows those with disabilities yet the same passion to drive the S... look at it from that angle!  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;i can agree that tho... i will start seeing 18 year old spoiled little girls driving cooper S at straight line at 90, turning at 10, or post SUV drivers cutting and wheezing their way around other cars.... (actually.. i do that... and that&#039;s what the mini&#039;s suppose to do anyways!)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;the above is meant to be a joke, apologies if it offended anyone&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone care to say that BMW is still a company out to make a profit?  the MINI is selling well in the states and so it only makes more sense to bring a auto version for the place that sells well so it sells EVEN better&#8230; </p>

<p>its not like the automatic is now the only tranny available&#8230; enthusiasts can stick with the 6 speed&#8230; adding a auto allows those with disabilities yet the same passion to drive the S&#8230; look at it from that angle!  </p>

<p>i can agree that tho&#8230; i will start seeing 18 year old spoiled little girls driving cooper S at straight line at 90, turning at 10, or post SUV drivers cutting and wheezing their way around other cars&#8230;. (actually.. i do that&#8230; and that&#39;s what the mini&#39;s suppose to do anyways!)</p>

<p>the above is meant to be a joke, apologies if it offended anyone</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. P</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/01/10/the_mcs_automatic_debuts/comment-page-2/#comment-15304</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2005 21:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/01/10/#comment-15304</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I am having a hard time keeping my comments to myself on this topic... Ok! seems like there are many comments being made about the people that want this version of transmission. I for one would be happy to take any othese people to the track and show them just how someone can drive this car. As for buying this version because they don&#039;t know how to drive a Manual Trans...There are many reasons to want this not just because they cant drive a stick. Please be courtious about the diversity of needs and wants with the MINI. The bottom line is we all love thee cars for many reasons. 
Drive safe, Drive fun, Drive for life!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am having a hard time keeping my comments to myself on this topic&#8230; Ok! seems like there are many comments being made about the people that want this version of transmission. I for one would be happy to take any othese people to the track and show them just how someone can drive this car. As for buying this version because they don&#39;t know how to drive a Manual Trans&#8230;There are many reasons to want this not just because they cant drive a stick. Please be courtious about the diversity of needs and wants with the MINI. The bottom line is we all love thee cars for many reasons. 
Drive safe, Drive fun, Drive for life!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tired of the whine...</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/01/10/the_mcs_automatic_debuts/comment-page-2/#comment-15303</link>
		<dc:creator>tired of the whine...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/01/10/#comment-15303</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ken, we are in the same boat.  My wife had a back injury in 2000.  We had to sell her MANUAL VW cabrio for a automatic one...she will never be able to drive a &lt;em&gt;real&lt;/em&gt; manual trans again.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;She preferd the manual...she learned to drive on my turbo miata and loved it. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;we are both pleased that there is a auto MSC now.  we wanted more power than the CVT offered and we will be ordering her chili red rag top soon.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken, we are in the same boat.  My wife had a back injury in 2000.  We had to sell her MANUAL VW cabrio for a automatic one&#8230;she will never be able to drive a <em>real</em> manual trans again.</p>

<p>She preferd the manual&#8230;she learned to drive on my turbo miata and loved it. </p>

<p>we are both pleased that there is a auto MSC now.  we wanted more power than the CVT offered and we will be ordering her chili red rag top soon.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/01/10/the_mcs_automatic_debuts/comment-page-2/#comment-15302</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2005 03:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/01/10/#comment-15302</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I would Love get order my 05 MCS in MANUAL, save the $1290 and put it towards a mod or possiblilty a set of rims/tires. But, My ski accident from two years ago ripped apart my leg muscles and teared up my brokes leave me with no choice but to get the Automatic. I couldn&#039;t walk for 6 months, I had to sell my S2000, my Type-R and my GTI Rabbit as the after math of this accident ...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would Love get order my 05 MCS in MANUAL, save the $1290 and put it towards a mod or possiblilty a set of rims/tires. But, My ski accident from two years ago ripped apart my leg muscles and teared up my brokes leave me with no choice but to get the Automatic. I couldn&#39;t walk for 6 months, I had to sell my S2000, my Type-R and my GTI Rabbit as the after math of this accident &#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/01/10/the_mcs_automatic_debuts/comment-page-2/#comment-15301</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2005 17:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/01/10/#comment-15301</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You da man or women, Tate! Well thought out and intelligent.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You da man or women, Tate! Well thought out and intelligent.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/01/10/the_mcs_automatic_debuts/comment-page-2/#comment-15300</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2005 17:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/01/10/#comment-15300</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Tate - I know it&#039;s early but that&#039;s gotta be the front runner for comment of the year.  Well said.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tate &#8211; I know it&#39;s early but that&#39;s gotta be the front runner for comment of the year.  Well said.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vanwall</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/01/10/the_mcs_automatic_debuts/comment-page-2/#comment-15299</link>
		<dc:creator>Vanwall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2005 17:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/01/10/#comment-15299</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Tate, smartly done! One of the best MINI posts ever, anywhere, period. Well spoken.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;pre&gt;&lt;code&gt;BCNU,
&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Rob in Dago&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tate, smartly done! One of the best MINI posts ever, anywhere, period. Well spoken.</p>

<p><pre><code>BCNU,
</code></pre></p>

<p>Rob in Dago</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edge</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/01/10/the_mcs_automatic_debuts/comment-page-2/#comment-15298</link>
		<dc:creator>Edge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2005 16:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/01/10/#comment-15298</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I agree, very well said Tate.  We are a very diverse group of people, and we always will be.  And despite my distaste at the existence of the MCSa, I agree wholeheartedly that I too would rather see an auto-driving teenager over the just about anyone in an SUV.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Let&#039;s Motor, indeed. :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, very well said Tate.  We are a very diverse group of people, and we always will be.  And despite my distaste at the existence of the MCSa, I agree wholeheartedly that I too would rather see an auto-driving teenager over the just about anyone in an SUV.</p>

<p>Let&#39;s Motor, indeed. :)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/01/10/the_mcs_automatic_debuts/comment-page-2/#comment-15297</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2005 16:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/01/10/#comment-15297</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Awesome comments Tate.  I think it should be wrapped up on that.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What more could be said?!  (except that the auto F1 car is quicker on the shifts than its manual counterpart...nanner nanner!)  Hahaha...  ;-)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome comments Tate.  I think it should be wrapped up on that.</p>

<p>What more could be said?!  (except that the auto F1 car is quicker on the shifts than its manual counterpart&#8230;nanner nanner!)  Hahaha&#8230;  ;-)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tate</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/01/10/the_mcs_automatic_debuts/comment-page-2/#comment-15296</link>
		<dc:creator>Tate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2005 15:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/01/10/#comment-15296</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Perhaps one reason this issue (automatic vs. manual) touches off such violent debate amongst MINI owners is that it is, at its root, a struggle amongst owners to define the &quot;soul&quot; of a vehicle that is still quite new. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The MINI does not have the history of a Ferrari or Corvette or Mustang or even Volkswagen New Beetle, just to name a few.  What this car &quot;is&quot; and who it is &quot;for&quot; seems to still be very much up in the air.  Yes, it is related to the original Mini, but the MINI is also very much its own car (witness another violent debate that sometimes flares up between Mini owners and MINI owners).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What might be at stake in the manual/automatic argument? &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For those who feel the soul of the MINI must stay on the side of performance (which seems to be the loudest argument coming from those advocating the &quot;manual&quot;) perhaps it is a worry that by adding the automatic option to the &quot;top-of-the-line&quot; MINI, the BMW execs are indicating that, ultimately, they don&#039;t intend the MINI to be a &quot;pure&quot; sports car (whatever that means).  Perhaps they view it as diluting the brand, as opening the door just a little too wide to allowing the MINI to become a &quot;chick car&quot; ala the Volkswagen New Beetle and PT Crusier.  (No offense intended to female owners and drivers, but statistically, those cars are bought and driven overwhelmingly by women).  That there appears to be such a thing as &quot;men&#039;s&quot; and &quot;women&#039;s&quot; cars is  another issue altogether, but I have a feeling this divide is contributing to the clamor.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For those who feel the soul of the MINI must stay on the side of choice (seems to be the loudest argument coming from the &quot;automatic&quot; crowd), perhaps the concern is that if MINI DIDN&#039;T offer an automatic, the whole &quot;customize the car and make it yours&quot; philosophy would be proved a lie.  A manual-only at the top of the model line might suggest:  &quot;MINI is all about choice-- up to a point&quot;  A choice that isn&#039;t open to everybody might create a level of elitism within the brand that seems to fly in the face of the &quot;make it yours&quot; philosophy, which many obviously feel is a part of what the MINI is.    &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So what &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; the &quot;soul&quot; of the MINI?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The MINI image that Crispin, Porter and Bogusky created was designed to appeal to a lot of different people.  I believe that what they effectively did was start something that hasn&#039;t happened often in automotive history; they found a way to connect the &quot;soul&quot; of the MINI very strongly to their owners.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What is a MINI?  Ask ANY MINI owner, and you will have the answer.  The soul of the MINI is a diverse, multi-faceted, often CONFLICTING thing.  Is the MINI a &quot;pure&quot; sports car?  YES.  Is the MINI about choice and individuality?  At the same time, YES.  Is the MINI a &quot;chick car&quot;?  If someone wants to classify it like that, then YES.  Is the MINI just another way of getting from point A to point B, like a Honda Civic?  (Sadly, I think) Yes.  MINI is all these things at the SAME TIME, because these are (some of) who MINI owners are!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And so, just like any time a diverse community struggles to be together, there is conflict.  There are arguments.  This is who we are as human beings, and more so than perhaps any other factory-fitted vehicles, our MINIs will reflect this. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But can this conflicting diversity be good?  I think it can.  Might it mean that what MINI &lt;em&gt;is,&lt;/em&gt; is alive and well?  When the arguments stop, when new information about our beloved vehicles is greeted with a shrug, THAT will be a truly sad time, because that might mean that the DIVERSE COMMUNITY of what MINI is has died, or at least that the connection between owners and vehicles has been broken.  That is a day which I hope never comes.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So argue away.  Shake your head at the maturity level of some of the comments.  Defend your views.  Speak your mind, because your mind is the mind of MINI-- not exclusively, but inclusively.  MINI is performance, MINI is individuality and choice, but perhaps most of all MINI is DIVERSE COMMUNITY. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Let&#039;s Motor.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps one reason this issue (automatic vs. manual) touches off such violent debate amongst MINI owners is that it is, at its root, a struggle amongst owners to define the &#8220;soul&#8221; of a vehicle that is still quite new. </p>

<p>The MINI does not have the history of a Ferrari or Corvette or Mustang or even Volkswagen New Beetle, just to name a few.  What this car &#8220;is&#8221; and who it is &#8220;for&#8221; seems to still be very much up in the air.  Yes, it is related to the original Mini, but the MINI is also very much its own car (witness another violent debate that sometimes flares up between Mini owners and MINI owners).</p>

<p>What might be at stake in the manual/automatic argument? </p>

<p>For those who feel the soul of the MINI must stay on the side of performance (which seems to be the loudest argument coming from those advocating the &#8220;manual&#8221;) perhaps it is a worry that by adding the automatic option to the &#8220;top-of-the-line&#8221; MINI, the BMW execs are indicating that, ultimately, they don&#39;t intend the MINI to be a &#8220;pure&#8221; sports car (whatever that means).  Perhaps they view it as diluting the brand, as opening the door just a little too wide to allowing the MINI to become a &#8220;chick car&#8221; ala the Volkswagen New Beetle and PT Crusier.  (No offense intended to female owners and drivers, but statistically, those cars are bought and driven overwhelmingly by women).  That there appears to be such a thing as &#8220;men&#39;s&#8221; and &#8220;women&#39;s&#8221; cars is  another issue altogether, but I have a feeling this divide is contributing to the clamor.  </p>

<p>For those who feel the soul of the MINI must stay on the side of choice (seems to be the loudest argument coming from the &#8220;automatic&#8221; crowd), perhaps the concern is that if MINI DIDN&#39;T offer an automatic, the whole &#8220;customize the car and make it yours&#8221; philosophy would be proved a lie.  A manual-only at the top of the model line might suggest:  &#8220;MINI is all about choice&#8211; up to a point&#8221;  A choice that isn&#39;t open to everybody might create a level of elitism within the brand that seems to fly in the face of the &#8220;make it yours&#8221; philosophy, which many obviously feel is a part of what the MINI is.    </p>

<p>So what <em>is</em> the &#8220;soul&#8221; of the MINI?</p>

<p>The MINI image that Crispin, Porter and Bogusky created was designed to appeal to a lot of different people.  I believe that what they effectively did was start something that hasn&#39;t happened often in automotive history; they found a way to connect the &#8220;soul&#8221; of the MINI very strongly to their owners.</p>

<p>What is a MINI?  Ask ANY MINI owner, and you will have the answer.  The soul of the MINI is a diverse, multi-faceted, often CONFLICTING thing.  Is the MINI a &#8220;pure&#8221; sports car?  YES.  Is the MINI about choice and individuality?  At the same time, YES.  Is the MINI a &#8220;chick car&#8221;?  If someone wants to classify it like that, then YES.  Is the MINI just another way of getting from point A to point B, like a Honda Civic?  (Sadly, I think) Yes.  MINI is all these things at the SAME TIME, because these are (some of) who MINI owners are!</p>

<p>And so, just like any time a diverse community struggles to be together, there is conflict.  There are arguments.  This is who we are as human beings, and more so than perhaps any other factory-fitted vehicles, our MINIs will reflect this. </p>

<p>But can this conflicting diversity be good?  I think it can.  Might it mean that what MINI <em>is,</em> is alive and well?  When the arguments stop, when new information about our beloved vehicles is greeted with a shrug, THAT will be a truly sad time, because that might mean that the DIVERSE COMMUNITY of what MINI is has died, or at least that the connection between owners and vehicles has been broken.  That is a day which I hope never comes.</p>

<p>So argue away.  Shake your head at the maturity level of some of the comments.  Defend your views.  Speak your mind, because your mind is the mind of MINI&#8211; not exclusively, but inclusively.  MINI is performance, MINI is individuality and choice, but perhaps most of all MINI is DIVERSE COMMUNITY. </p>

<p>Let&#39;s Motor.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I forgot</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/01/10/the_mcs_automatic_debuts/comment-page-2/#comment-15295</link>
		<dc:creator>I forgot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2005 08:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/01/10/#comment-15295</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Gabe,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks again for keeping us up to date.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I am impressed by the Britishness of that article.  The words tend toward the euphemistic.  The mellifluous tone recalls adverts for Schweppes tonics.  I sense the Union Jack fluttering in the background.  The lengthy article implies a lot, but delivers very little.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s deceptive; filled with evocative equivocations.  For example, the auto shifter might be quicker than most drivers with manuals, but it does not mean (nor state) that the car is quicker than a manual trans version.  Let&#039;s wait for the road tests.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Despite my complaints I am delighted to read so much about another interesting variant for the Mini roster.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I too hope people will stop knocking the auto MCS--except perhaps in jest.  As someone (sorry, I could not find it again) wrote above it would be similar to drivers of the original Mini complaining that the current model is too bloated and cushy to be worthy of the name.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That just reminded me that my old Austin Mini Cooper S had straight cut gears (graunch and whine) that seemed suitable only on the rare occasions when I could wring out the little monster on undulating two lane backroads.  And (as JT wrote) I had no idea what I smelled like when I arrived (the spare tire was in the backseat) nor could I hear very well either.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In the 30+ years since I had that car I have gained 60 pounds (ordering too many options with my meals).  Could I even fit into an original Mini?  If so, how would I get back out?  So I sure am looking forward to getting an MCSa.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Happy motoring to everybody.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gabe,</p>

<p>Thanks again for keeping us up to date.  </p>

<p>I am impressed by the Britishness of that article.  The words tend toward the euphemistic.  The mellifluous tone recalls adverts for Schweppes tonics.  I sense the Union Jack fluttering in the background.  The lengthy article implies a lot, but delivers very little.  </p>

<p>It&#39;s deceptive; filled with evocative equivocations.  For example, the auto shifter might be quicker than most drivers with manuals, but it does not mean (nor state) that the car is quicker than a manual trans version.  Let&#39;s wait for the road tests.</p>

<p>Despite my complaints I am delighted to read so much about another interesting variant for the Mini roster.</p>

<p>I too hope people will stop knocking the auto MCS&#8211;except perhaps in jest.  As someone (sorry, I could not find it again) wrote above it would be similar to drivers of the original Mini complaining that the current model is too bloated and cushy to be worthy of the name.  </p>

<p>That just reminded me that my old Austin Mini Cooper S had straight cut gears (graunch and whine) that seemed suitable only on the rare occasions when I could wring out the little monster on undulating two lane backroads.  And (as JT wrote) I had no idea what I smelled like when I arrived (the spare tire was in the backseat) nor could I hear very well either.  </p>

<p>In the 30+ years since I had that car I have gained 60 pounds (ordering too many options with my meals).  Could I even fit into an original Mini?  If so, how would I get back out?  So I sure am looking forward to getting an MCSa.</p>

<p>Happy motoring to everybody.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Z.</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/01/10/the_mcs_automatic_debuts/comment-page-2/#comment-15294</link>
		<dc:creator>David Z.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2005 07:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/01/10/#comment-15294</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Gabe,
Back to the original article,  could you please decipher the EU cycle?  What is the hwy/city mpg? Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gabe,
Back to the original article,  could you please decipher the EU cycle?  What is the hwy/city mpg? Thanks.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JT</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/01/10/the_mcs_automatic_debuts/comment-page-2/#comment-15293</link>
		<dc:creator>JT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2005 04:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/01/10/#comment-15293</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;For the &quot;purists&quot; out there, request that BMW make a straight-cut gear tranny available (yes, that means no synchronizers) and a non-hydraulic racing clutch.  Then, drive that for a month or two in stop&amp;go traffic.  Oh yes, no power steering and no air conditioning (just like an original Mini).  Let me know when you give up.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I drove a 1964 Corvette like this for 7 years in South Texas.  Great if you&#039;re a kid who doesn&#039;t care what you look/smell like when you get somewhere...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s not as if an army of black-clad BMW/MINI mechanics (actually, most of them wear dark blue) is going to descend on your garage in the middle of the night and switch the transmission in your car.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;BMW isn&#039;t going to remove the manual shifter option on any car in the MINI lineup.  If they do something like that, maybe you&#039;ll have something to complain about.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;(For the record, I have a 2003 MCS, and most of my past cars have had manual trannys either by choice or non-availability of anything else.  I don&#039;t have a problem with an automatic transmission in a car as long as it drives reasonably close to the manual transmissioned variant.)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the &#8220;purists&#8221; out there, request that BMW make a straight-cut gear tranny available (yes, that means no synchronizers) and a non-hydraulic racing clutch.  Then, drive that for a month or two in stop&amp;go traffic.  Oh yes, no power steering and no air conditioning (just like an original Mini).  Let me know when you give up.</p>

<p>I drove a 1964 Corvette like this for 7 years in South Texas.  Great if you&#39;re a kid who doesn&#39;t care what you look/smell like when you get somewhere&#8230;</p>

<p>It&#39;s not as if an army of black-clad BMW/MINI mechanics (actually, most of them wear dark blue) is going to descend on your garage in the middle of the night and switch the transmission in your car.</p>

<p>BMW isn&#39;t going to remove the manual shifter option on any car in the MINI lineup.  If they do something like that, maybe you&#39;ll have something to complain about.</p>

<p>(For the record, I have a 2003 MCS, and most of my past cars have had manual trannys either by choice or non-availability of anything else.  I don&#39;t have a problem with an automatic transmission in a car as long as it drives reasonably close to the manual transmissioned variant.)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrV</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/01/10/the_mcs_automatic_debuts/comment-page-2/#comment-15292</link>
		<dc:creator>MrV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2005 04:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/01/10/#comment-15292</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry to do a double post, but to re-ask a question that got lost about 60 comments ago.....&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Pros and cons of this particular automatic vs. other automatics tranny&#039;s? To read the PR it does indeed appear to be a good auto (but I don&#039;t know that much about autos having driven a standard my whole life). Of course I bear in mind that it is a PR, not an objective review.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I really can&#039;t wait to hear a review of an actual drive in this thing. I bought a MCSa sight unseen and I am curious / nervous about what I bought.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to do a double post, but to re-ask a question that got lost about 60 comments ago&#8230;..</p>

<p>Pros and cons of this particular automatic vs. other automatics tranny&#39;s? To read the PR it does indeed appear to be a good auto (but I don&#39;t know that much about autos having driven a standard my whole life). Of course I bear in mind that it is a PR, not an objective review.</p>

<p>I really can&#39;t wait to hear a review of an actual drive in this thing. I bought a MCSa sight unseen and I am curious / nervous about what I bought.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/01/10/the_mcs_automatic_debuts/comment-page-2/#comment-15291</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2005 04:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/01/10/#comment-15291</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ah the manual Mustang.  I have very fond memories of rowing the gears in my friends supercharged monster Mustang a few years back... talk about torque.  Good times.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah the manual Mustang.  I have very fond memories of rowing the gears in my friends supercharged monster Mustang a few years back&#8230; talk about torque.  Good times.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edge</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/01/10/the_mcs_automatic_debuts/comment-page-2/#comment-15290</link>
		<dc:creator>Edge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2005 04:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/01/10/#comment-15290</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Oops, I take that back.  I missed the bit at the end about a JCW auto kit coming out later.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Edge&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, I take that back.  I missed the bit at the end about a JCW auto kit coming out later.</p>

<p>Edge</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edge</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/01/10/the_mcs_automatic_debuts/comment-page-2/#comment-15289</link>
		<dc:creator>Edge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2005 04:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/01/10/#comment-15289</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I certainly hope I am not one of the people whose comments have been viewed as &quot;habitually stupid&quot;.  I have strong opinions, sure... but I do try not to take them TOO seriously.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That&#039;s the only problem with censorship - one person&#039;s opinion of wrong does not equal anothers.  Hard to find that fair balance.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Back on topic... in the interest of finding a middle ground, I want to remind all anti-auto people that the JCW package is not available for the Auto.  So in that regard, it remains a manual-only option, at least for now.  (yes, yes, I know - aftermarket is still there)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Something to be happy about for manual exclusivity.  Since I am also a Mustang fan, it reminds me of the Cobra models being rarer and stick only, while the V8 GT models are both auto &amp; manual.  Similar comparison.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;An auto MCS was inevitable.  This is the USA - the market spoke on this issue a very long time ago, whether some of us like it or not.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I certainly hope I am not one of the people whose comments have been viewed as &#8220;habitually stupid&#8221;.  I have strong opinions, sure&#8230; but I do try not to take them TOO seriously.</p>

<p>That&#39;s the only problem with censorship &#8211; one person&#39;s opinion of wrong does not equal anothers.  Hard to find that fair balance.</p>

<p>Back on topic&#8230; in the interest of finding a middle ground, I want to remind all anti-auto people that the JCW package is not available for the Auto.  So in that regard, it remains a manual-only option, at least for now.  (yes, yes, I know &#8211; aftermarket is still there)</p>

<p>Something to be happy about for manual exclusivity.  Since I am also a Mustang fan, it reminds me of the Cobra models being rarer and stick only, while the V8 GT models are both auto &amp; manual.  Similar comparison.</p>

<p>An auto MCS was inevitable.  This is the USA &#8211; the market spoke on this issue a very long time ago, whether some of us like it or not.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/01/10/the_mcs_automatic_debuts/comment-page-2/#comment-15288</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2005 04:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/01/10/#comment-15288</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with Gabe about registration. As long as I have anything to say about it, this site won&#039;t have it. However, I think that we should be a little more liberal about the comments we delete. Let them whine about being censored. We have ways of dealing with habitual stupidity.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Gabe about registration. As long as I have anything to say about it, this site won&#39;t have it. However, I think that we should be a little more liberal about the comments we delete. Let them whine about being censored. We have ways of dealing with habitual stupidity.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vanwall</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/01/10/the_mcs_automatic_debuts/comment-page-2/#comment-15287</link>
		<dc:creator>Vanwall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2005 03:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/01/10/#comment-15287</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;As I generally don&#039;t post from work, (I do believe that doing my job come first, as long as I&#039;m paid for it!), so getting home and posting towards what is hopefully the end of this pustulent argy-bargy is hardly a pleasure after reading the spew eructed by some of the more bloviate motorers. I hesitate to attempt an attitude adjustment because there may be no hope for a middle ground, and figuratively tattoing it on a recalcitrant&#039;s forehead with a blunt instrument is a very tedious process indeed. If you like shifting and it&#039;s your definition of sporting, well more power to you. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Be warned, however, this kind of spurious classification is just like counting the seats to figure out if you&#039;re looking at a sportscar. Tell that to a 911 owner. If you feel threatened that your choice of an &#039;S&#039; will be cheapened by adding an automatic to the line-up, I&#039;m sorry you feel that way, but it&#039;s been known for years that this was going to happen, so you went in with a blindfold on if you bought with wishful thinking. &quot;I&#039;m shocked, Ricky, shocked!&quot; said Captain Renault.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Those that have an exagerated  opinion of their talents are the only ones who will suffer by comparison, so all of those who choose an Automatic &#039;S&#039; be forwarned - sadly, overcompensation is now no longer reserved for those who drive SUV&#039;s, but will soon start affecting the MINI community, or at least those that don&#039;t mind posting about their.... shortcomings, so to speak. I&#039;d much rather see more MINIs, than more of those lesser vehicles that crowd my freeways, and trundle on my twisties. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;pre&gt;&lt;code&gt;   BCNU,
 Rob in Dago
&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I generally don&#39;t post from work, (I do believe that doing my job come first, as long as I&#39;m paid for it!), so getting home and posting towards what is hopefully the end of this pustulent argy-bargy is hardly a pleasure after reading the spew eructed by some of the more bloviate motorers. I hesitate to attempt an attitude adjustment because there may be no hope for a middle ground, and figuratively tattoing it on a recalcitrant&#39;s forehead with a blunt instrument is a very tedious process indeed. If you like shifting and it&#39;s your definition of sporting, well more power to you. </p>

<p>Be warned, however, this kind of spurious classification is just like counting the seats to figure out if you&#39;re looking at a sportscar. Tell that to a 911 owner. If you feel threatened that your choice of an &#39;S&#39; will be cheapened by adding an automatic to the line-up, I&#39;m sorry you feel that way, but it&#39;s been known for years that this was going to happen, so you went in with a blindfold on if you bought with wishful thinking. &#8220;I&#39;m shocked, Ricky, shocked!&#8221; said Captain Renault.</p>

<p>Those that have an exagerated  opinion of their talents are the only ones who will suffer by comparison, so all of those who choose an Automatic &#39;S&#39; be forwarned &#8211; sadly, overcompensation is now no longer reserved for those who drive SUV&#39;s, but will soon start affecting the MINI community, or at least those that don&#39;t mind posting about their&#8230;. shortcomings, so to speak. I&#39;d much rather see more MINIs, than more of those lesser vehicles that crowd my freeways, and trundle on my twisties. </p>

<p><pre><code>   BCNU,
 Rob in Dago
</code></pre></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/01/10/the_mcs_automatic_debuts/comment-page-2/#comment-15286</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2005 03:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/01/10/#comment-15286</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;just one to make one point.
why do you auto-haters drive a bmw mini. u should be driving a original mini cooper s. thats the one u should be driving if you are all about &#039;purity&#039; of driving. no technology, just pure mechanical genius. why you u want a &#039;cute-looking-electronically-assisted-supercharged-manual&#039;? comeon guys, you will be happier in the original mini cooper s. its pure driving skill there. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;btw, they (original mini cooper s drivers) are all laughing at you and treating you guys like you treat us auto drivers....&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just one to make one point.
why do you auto-haters drive a bmw mini. u should be driving a original mini cooper s. thats the one u should be driving if you are all about &#39;purity&#39; of driving. no technology, just pure mechanical genius. why you u want a &#39;cute-looking-electronically-assisted-supercharged-manual&#39;? comeon guys, you will be happier in the original mini cooper s. its pure driving skill there. </p>

<p>btw, they (original mini cooper s drivers) are all laughing at you and treating you guys like you treat us auto drivers&#8230;.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
