<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Next MINI Caught Cold Weather Testing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/01/25/the_next_mini_caught_cold_weather_testing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/01/25/the_next_mini_caught_cold_weather_testing/</link>
	<description>MotoringFile &#124; MINI news, reviews and opinion. MINI Cooper, Cooper S, Clubman, Countryman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:14:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CA</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/01/25/the_next_mini_caught_cold_weather_testing/comment-page-1/#comment-15893</link>
		<dc:creator>CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2005 02:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/01/25/#comment-15893</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Take this for what it is worth.  I understand that there is not a new body built for the new MINI.  It only exists in drawings right now.  There is still a lot of time for a body and frame to be built.  We still don&#039;t know if MINI will offer other styles yet.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Hang in a let&#039;s see what happens.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take this for what it is worth.  I understand that there is not a new body built for the new MINI.  It only exists in drawings right now.  There is still a lot of time for a body and frame to be built.  We still don&#8217;t know if MINI will offer other styles yet.</p>

<p>Hang in a let&#8217;s see what happens.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnsocal</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/01/25/the_next_mini_caught_cold_weather_testing/comment-page-1/#comment-15892</link>
		<dc:creator>johnsocal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2005 22:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/01/25/#comment-15892</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;While the 7 series doesn&#039;t do it for me, I do like the 5 series.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;While everyone gets so negative when they see testing-mules of the next-gen Mini, I&#039;m willing to bet that it will look pretty good and wont deviate to far from todays design.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While the 7 series doesn&#8217;t do it for me, I do like the 5 series.</p>

<p>While everyone gets so negative when they see testing-mules of the next-gen Mini, I&#8217;m willing to bet that it will look pretty good and wont deviate to far from todays design.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/01/25/the_next_mini_caught_cold_weather_testing/comment-page-1/#comment-15891</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2005 21:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/01/25/#comment-15891</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;FYI - The 7 sieres rear wasn&#039;t revised in it&#039;s second year.  In fact it went the normal 4 years (as all BMWs do) before being revised in 2006.  During that time it has become the most successful selling 7 series ever.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI &#8211; The 7 sieres rear wasn&#8217;t revised in it&#8217;s second year.  In fact it went the normal 4 years (as all BMWs do) before being revised in 2006.  During that time it has become the most successful selling 7 series ever.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NAHMME</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/01/25/the_next_mini_caught_cold_weather_testing/comment-page-1/#comment-15890</link>
		<dc:creator>NAHMME</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2005 21:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/01/25/#comment-15890</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;BMW has done some doozies in the design area!   That ugly looking back end on that high priced Bimmer.  Only lasted one year and they revised it to make it look like part of the car.  Heaven forbid if they bungle the MINI to look like everything else on the road.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There used to be a time when as a young child, I could tell you exactly the make, model, year, etc. of every car on the road in the US.  No more!  They all look the same, whether they&#039;re Japanese, German, US, or any other country.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Could be because Ford, Chrysler, and big old GM own bits and pieces of every car on the road!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;My wife has a Pontiac Aztek, which will be deleted from production because of its ugly look, that the Prius copied the rear of!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BMW has done some doozies in the design area!   That ugly looking back end on that high priced Bimmer.  Only lasted one year and they revised it to make it look like part of the car.  Heaven forbid if they bungle the MINI to look like everything else on the road.</p>

<p>There used to be a time when as a young child, I could tell you exactly the make, model, year, etc. of every car on the road in the US.  No more!  They all look the same, whether they&#8217;re Japanese, German, US, or any other country.</p>

<p>Could be because Ford, Chrysler, and big old GM own bits and pieces of every car on the road!</p>

<p>My wife has a Pontiac Aztek, which will be deleted from production because of its ugly look, that the Prius copied the rear of!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/01/25/the_next_mini_caught_cold_weather_testing/comment-page-1/#comment-15889</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2005 05:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/01/25/#comment-15889</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t think it&#039;s quite &lt;em&gt;Audi&lt;/em&gt; big!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s quite <em>Audi</em> big!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: allan  MICHAEL</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/01/25/the_next_mini_caught_cold_weather_testing/comment-page-1/#comment-15888</link>
		<dc:creator>allan  MICHAEL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2005 05:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/01/25/#comment-15888</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;....the 2007 has a strange resemblence to the new Audi and VW fronts...?!...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;so big.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;.the 2007 has a strange resemblence to the new Audi and VW fronts&#8230;?!&#8230;</p>

<p>so big.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnsocal</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/01/25/the_next_mini_caught_cold_weather_testing/comment-page-1/#comment-15887</link>
		<dc:creator>johnsocal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2005 03:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/01/25/#comment-15887</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It looks like the next-gen MC would get a 140HP turbo with a six speed and the MC CVT would only have 115HP like the current car.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I would think if the standard next-gen MC has a 6-speed 140HP turbo I would suspect that it would be more expensive then the current MC.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Who knows maybe the next-gen MC CVT might become the cheapest car in the lineup priced @ $19,995.00 and positioned as the affordable commuter as the 6-speed 140HP MC moves up market to help offset the cost associated with the declining US Dollar vs. Euro.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like the next-gen MC would get a 140HP turbo with a six speed and the MC CVT would only have 115HP like the current car.</p>

<p>I would think if the standard next-gen MC has a 6-speed 140HP turbo I would suspect that it would be more expensive then the current MC.</p>

<p>Who knows maybe the next-gen MC CVT might become the cheapest car in the lineup priced @ $19,995.00 and positioned as the affordable commuter as the 6-speed 140HP MC moves up market to help offset the cost associated with the declining US Dollar vs. Euro.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/01/25/the_next_mini_caught_cold_weather_testing/comment-page-1/#comment-15886</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2005 02:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/01/25/#comment-15886</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;According to &quot;The MINI Gets a Prince&quot; does that mean that we may see the current generation MC get a hp bump up to 140 and a 6 speed transmission in 2006? I&#039;m assuming that would also mark the arrival of the new engine.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to &#8220;The MINI Gets a Prince&#8221; does that mean that we may see the current generation MC get a hp bump up to 140 and a 6 speed transmission in 2006? I&#8217;m assuming that would also mark the arrival of the new engine.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/01/25/the_next_mini_caught_cold_weather_testing/comment-page-1/#comment-15885</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2005 00:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/01/25/#comment-15885</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I could be wrong but that&#039;s just my educateed guess from all the info I&#039;ve seen. I&#039;ve read several places that the next gen MINI won&#039;t even debut at an autoshow until &#039;07.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Then there&#039;s this bit of info that has been proven very reliable over the past year: &lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;http://motoringfile.com/2004/01/04/TheMINIGetsAPrince&quot;&gt;The MINI Gets a Prince&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could be wrong but that&#8217;s just my educateed guess from all the info I&#8217;ve seen. I&#8217;ve read several places that the next gen MINI won&#8217;t even debut at an autoshow until &#8217;07.</p>

<p>Then there&#8217;s this bit of info that has been proven very reliable over the past year: <a rel="nofollow" href="http://motoringfile.com/2004/01/04/TheMINIGetsAPrince">The MINI Gets a Prince</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnsocal</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/01/25/the_next_mini_caught_cold_weather_testing/comment-page-1/#comment-15884</link>
		<dc:creator>johnsocal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2005 00:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/01/25/#comment-15884</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Gabe- You are most likely right but I got the idea from all the articles and rumors floating around that the next-gen Mini would most likely start production in late 06 and we would see them in the US around March/April 2007.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gabe- You are most likely right but I got the idea from all the articles and rumors floating around that the next-gen Mini would most likely start production in late 06 and we would see them in the US around March/April 2007.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/01/25/the_next_mini_caught_cold_weather_testing/comment-page-1/#comment-15883</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2005 00:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/01/25/#comment-15883</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m thinking the &lt;b&gt;earliest&lt;/b&gt; we&#039;d see this in the US would be late 2007 as a 2008 model.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m thinking the <b>earliest</b> we&#8217;d see this in the US would be late 2007 as a 2008 model.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/01/25/the_next_mini_caught_cold_weather_testing/comment-page-1/#comment-15882</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2005 00:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/01/25/#comment-15882</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;that bigger grille does remind me of the Aston Martin Vanquish lol&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that bigger grille does remind me of the Aston Martin Vanquish lol</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/01/25/the_next_mini_caught_cold_weather_testing/comment-page-1/#comment-15881</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2005 00:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/01/25/#comment-15881</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;and when is this supposed to come out? for the 2007&#039;s? so in like a year?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and when is this supposed to come out? for the 2007&#8242;s? so in like a year?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DCE</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/01/25/the_next_mini_caught_cold_weather_testing/comment-page-1/#comment-15880</link>
		<dc:creator>DCE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2005 22:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/01/25/#comment-15880</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The grill kind of reminds me of an Aston-Martin. Not a bad upgrade. LOL&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The grill kind of reminds me of an Aston-Martin. Not a bad upgrade. LOL</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RB</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/01/25/the_next_mini_caught_cold_weather_testing/comment-page-1/#comment-15879</link>
		<dc:creator>RB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2005 20:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/01/25/#comment-15879</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Straight on The grill looks very original Mini. The rest I&#039;ll wait on.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Nice to see some less vile comments.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Holland...one of my favorite countries...that is in summer, daughter lives in Hilversum.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;+++RB&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Straight on The grill looks very original Mini. The rest I&#8217;ll wait on.</p>

<p>Nice to see some less vile comments.</p>

<p>Holland&#8230;one of my favorite countries&#8230;that is in summer, daughter lives in Hilversum.</p>

<p>+++RB</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/01/25/the_next_mini_caught_cold_weather_testing/comment-page-1/#comment-15878</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2005 18:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/01/25/#comment-15878</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Glad you liked it, Ian! I love an opportunity to flex my Dutch. The culture is so funny that there are always some funny translations to be had. ;)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad you liked it, Ian! I love an opportunity to flex my Dutch. The culture is so funny that there are always some funny translations to be had. ;)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nfo</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/01/25/the_next_mini_caught_cold_weather_testing/comment-page-1/#comment-15877</link>
		<dc:creator>nfo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2005 17:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/01/25/#comment-15877</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;i&#039;m feeling it!!!
i really like the way the front end looks much more like the classic! can&#039;t wait to see shots of it from other angles..&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m feeling it!!!
i really like the way the front end looks much more like the classic! can&#8217;t wait to see shots of it from other angles..</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/01/25/the_next_mini_caught_cold_weather_testing/comment-page-1/#comment-15876</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2005 16:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/01/25/#comment-15876</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Wow, that front end will blind people if they chrome out both grills!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Overall, much better than shown in the previous spy shots.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;-Erik&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, that front end will blind people if they chrome out both grills!</p>

<p>Overall, much better than shown in the previous spy shots.</p>

<p>-Erik</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/01/25/the_next_mini_caught_cold_weather_testing/comment-page-1/#comment-15875</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2005 15:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/01/25/#comment-15875</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Mike,
Thanks for the translation - enjoyed the &quot;hotcakes&quot; aside ;)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,
Thanks for the translation &#8211; enjoyed the &#8220;hotcakes&#8221; aside ;)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DUCTTAPE</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/01/25/the_next_mini_caught_cold_weather_testing/comment-page-1/#comment-15874</link>
		<dc:creator>DUCTTAPE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/01/25/#comment-15874</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It does look a tad massive to me. I don&#039;t follow them, so I am not sure exactly which model, but this reminds me of a Chrysler.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It is sort of sad that one sees a Japanese car on the road and it looks very similar to a German car. At least the Swedes try to retain distinctive styling (although Saab is, for all intents and purposes, American, and it now looks like lowest common denominator material.)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What happened to a car pulling in the driveway and any old idiot could tell what it was?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I enjoy the distinct shape of MINI today. I realize, as said above, that probably only the grill is &#039;real&#039; as it is functional, but it doesn&#039;t really work for me.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;My 02c.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does look a tad massive to me. I don&#8217;t follow them, so I am not sure exactly which model, but this reminds me of a Chrysler.</p>

<p>It is sort of sad that one sees a Japanese car on the road and it looks very similar to a German car. At least the Swedes try to retain distinctive styling (although Saab is, for all intents and purposes, American, and it now looks like lowest common denominator material.)</p>

<p>What happened to a car pulling in the driveway and any old idiot could tell what it was?</p>

<p>I enjoy the distinct shape of MINI today. I realize, as said above, that probably only the grill is &#8216;real&#8217; as it is functional, but it doesn&#8217;t really work for me.</p>

<p>My 02c.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

