<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2005 MINI Cooper Reviewed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/05/02/2005_mini_cooper_reviewed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/05/02/2005_mini_cooper_reviewed/</link>
	<description>MINI Cooper news, reviews and opinion.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 05:28:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joannie</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/05/02/2005_mini_cooper_reviewed/comment-page-1/#comment-57308</link>
		<dc:creator>Joannie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 18:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/05/02/#comment-57308</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi all,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m turning in my Honda Pilot, which I absolutely love; DVD player and all, but I&#039;m looking at the Mini Cooper&#039;s now.  I like to play.  Ha!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Anyway, I&#039;ve been reading all of your advice and am still having trouble with which one to get.  And which year.  Can someone break it down in layman&#039;s terms?  I drive mostly city, but living close to L.A. I also drive freeway.  I like the convertibles but I&#039;m seeing that some of you are choosing the sun roof instead.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m reading about the tires and all, but what &quot;really&quot; about the flip and roll on these cars?  I do take my grandkids around sometimes.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thank you so much.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all,</p>

<p>I&#8217;m turning in my Honda Pilot, which I absolutely love; DVD player and all, but I&#8217;m looking at the Mini Cooper&#8217;s now.  I like to play.  Ha!</p>

<p>Anyway, I&#8217;ve been reading all of your advice and am still having trouble with which one to get.  And which year.  Can someone break it down in layman&#8217;s terms?  I drive mostly city, but living close to L.A. I also drive freeway.  I like the convertibles but I&#8217;m seeing that some of you are choosing the sun roof instead.</p>

<p>I&#8217;m reading about the tires and all, but what &#8220;really&#8221; about the flip and roll on these cars?  I do take my grandkids around sometimes.</p>

<p>Thank you so much.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Walker</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/05/02/2005_mini_cooper_reviewed/comment-page-1/#comment-50325</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 15:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/05/02/#comment-50325</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;There are so many reasons to prefer the MC over the MCS that it is difficult to mention them all in a short post.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But let me begin with the history of the original MINI itself.  The original MINI came of age in the era of Minimalism, and I am convinced even the name of the car had as much to do with it&#039;s minimalist design elements as it did it&#039;s minimal size.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Which immediately brings us to the differences in body style of the current models, especially the hood of the cars.  The MC simply looks a lot better and conveys a much more minimalist look than the MCS. Ditto the simpler exhaust on the MC.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And I think this same concept extends to all of the available exterior accessories as well, -for the most part they clutter up the look of a terrific automobile.  I will be the first to admit that some of roof designs availble do look pretty cool, my favorite being the St. Andrew&#039;s Cross on a silver roof with hyper blue body, --and of course the rally lights do looks kind of cool so long as you can block the vision in your mind of vandals one day ripping them off the car.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But as for the rest, especially all the chrome available, it just leaves the car looking, --well--,, looking kind of pimpish.  This is especially true of the chrome line bumber treatment that is available, it looks vastly inferior to the plane body color trim and leaves the car looking like a PT Cruiser knock-off.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The interior of the MC and MCS are essentially identicle, so no gripe there.  Both are vastly superior to the new 2007, especially the instrumentation the 2007 will sport.  The handling is similar, and unless the driver plans on racing the cars there is little incentive to deviate from the base MC for this reason alone.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Which leaves 2 items, performance and cost.  The MC is already so much fun to drive that the added HP in the MCS is a negligble reason for spending $3,500 more for the super charger.  Personally, I found spending that additional $3,500 on upgrades to be a vastly better investment.  Better seats, premium package including sunroof.  And in my own case, additional guages in the auxilliary instrument panel installed above the cup holder, fog lights front and back, and a fully populated toggle switch panel. And of course the John Cooper sound package that includes stainless exhaust etc.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;No extra chrome, no bonnet stripes, no checked boards on the fenders, no ridiculously low profile tires, none of that non-sense(!)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Probably sounds a wee bit to humble for many Mini enthusiasts, but it works for me.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are so many reasons to prefer the MC over the MCS that it is difficult to mention them all in a short post.</p>

<p>But let me begin with the history of the original MINI itself.  The original MINI came of age in the era of Minimalism, and I am convinced even the name of the car had as much to do with it&#8217;s minimalist design elements as it did it&#8217;s minimal size.</p>

<p>Which immediately brings us to the differences in body style of the current models, especially the hood of the cars.  The MC simply looks a lot better and conveys a much more minimalist look than the MCS. Ditto the simpler exhaust on the MC.</p>

<p>And I think this same concept extends to all of the available exterior accessories as well, -for the most part they clutter up the look of a terrific automobile.  I will be the first to admit that some of roof designs availble do look pretty cool, my favorite being the St. Andrew&#8217;s Cross on a silver roof with hyper blue body, &#8211;and of course the rally lights do looks kind of cool so long as you can block the vision in your mind of vandals one day ripping them off the car.</p>

<p>But as for the rest, especially all the chrome available, it just leaves the car looking, &#8211;well&#8211;,, looking kind of pimpish.  This is especially true of the chrome line bumber treatment that is available, it looks vastly inferior to the plane body color trim and leaves the car looking like a PT Cruiser knock-off.</p>

<p>The interior of the MC and MCS are essentially identicle, so no gripe there.  Both are vastly superior to the new 2007, especially the instrumentation the 2007 will sport.  The handling is similar, and unless the driver plans on racing the cars there is little incentive to deviate from the base MC for this reason alone.</p>

<p>Which leaves 2 items, performance and cost.  The MC is already so much fun to drive that the added HP in the MCS is a negligble reason for spending $3,500 more for the super charger.  Personally, I found spending that additional $3,500 on upgrades to be a vastly better investment.  Better seats, premium package including sunroof.  And in my own case, additional guages in the auxilliary instrument panel installed above the cup holder, fog lights front and back, and a fully populated toggle switch panel. And of course the John Cooper sound package that includes stainless exhaust etc.</p>

<p>No extra chrome, no bonnet stripes, no checked boards on the fenders, no ridiculously low profile tires, none of that non-sense(!)</p>

<p>Probably sounds a wee bit to humble for many Mini enthusiasts, but it works for me.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amdy</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/05/02/2005_mini_cooper_reviewed/comment-page-1/#comment-39635</link>
		<dc:creator>Amdy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 22:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/05/02/#comment-39635</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The Cooper desperately needs a new engine. It is a fantastic car but the engine is a few decades behind a 1988 Honda Civic and its throttle response is woeful.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Cooper desperately needs a new engine. It is a fantastic car but the engine is a few decades behind a 1988 Honda Civic and its throttle response is woeful.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sixsixsix</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/05/02/2005_mini_cooper_reviewed/comment-page-1/#comment-19686</link>
		<dc:creator>sixsixsix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2005 21:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/05/02/#comment-19686</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Anyone who is looking for a real drivers car like the mini, but not wishing to choose the &#039;image&#039; (good or bad), or simply can&#039;t afford one, should drive a Peugeot 306 GTi6. Â£18,500 new, good ones can be picked up for between Â£4k and immaculate ones for Â£6k.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is my favourite car to date, I&#039;ve owned it for over 3 years and have done over 80,000 miles in it and it still brings a smile to my face every time I drive it. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The only car that came close was a Mini Cooper S that I drove 3 years ago for 1 whole day. Came close was an understatement, I was amazed that there was a new car still manufactured like the GTi6. The performance of both cars is virtually identical and the handling is sublime on both cars. The only fault I had with the Mini was the lack of grip from stationary, even in the dry. With the Traction Control ON the car just bogged down and with the Traction Control OFF it was virtually impossible to pull away without wheelspin. I couldn&#039;t live with that.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The GTi6 pulls away without wheelspinning even in very wet conditions without having to resort to Traction Control. On grass, when pulling away fast it leaves two equal length wheelspin marks despite not having a LSD (Limited Slip Differential).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I drive the GTi6 very hard and it is a a match performance wise for some very fast cars such as the Porsche Boxster and BMW 330i. It&#039;s handling is more than a match for almost everything I have come across on the road including Subaru Impreza Turbo&#039;s.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I hope this gets printed as I just want to say that the Mini Cooper S is the best current Saloon Car out there.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone who is looking for a real drivers car like the mini, but not wishing to choose the &#8216;image&#8217; (good or bad), or simply can&#8217;t afford one, should drive a Peugeot 306 GTi6. Â£18,500 new, good ones can be picked up for between Â£4k and immaculate ones for Â£6k.</p>

<p>This is my favourite car to date, I&#8217;ve owned it for over 3 years and have done over 80,000 miles in it and it still brings a smile to my face every time I drive it. </p>

<p>The only car that came close was a Mini Cooper S that I drove 3 years ago for 1 whole day. Came close was an understatement, I was amazed that there was a new car still manufactured like the GTi6. The performance of both cars is virtually identical and the handling is sublime on both cars. The only fault I had with the Mini was the lack of grip from stationary, even in the dry. With the Traction Control ON the car just bogged down and with the Traction Control OFF it was virtually impossible to pull away without wheelspin. I couldn&#8217;t live with that.</p>

<p>The GTi6 pulls away without wheelspinning even in very wet conditions without having to resort to Traction Control. On grass, when pulling away fast it leaves two equal length wheelspin marks despite not having a LSD (Limited Slip Differential).</p>

<p>I drive the GTi6 very hard and it is a a match performance wise for some very fast cars such as the Porsche Boxster and BMW 330i. It&#8217;s handling is more than a match for almost everything I have come across on the road including Subaru Impreza Turbo&#8217;s.</p>

<p>I hope this gets printed as I just want to say that the Mini Cooper S is the best current Saloon Car out there.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob in Mass</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/05/02/2005_mini_cooper_reviewed/comment-page-1/#comment-19685</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob in Mass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2005 22:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/05/02/#comment-19685</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I just bought a Cooper with the CVT. On the test drive, I was hugely impressed. I will be commuting, sometimes in bad traffic, so a manual would have been misery.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I was a little worried it would buzz the engine to up the available power when accellerating, but the electronics are amazingly good at picking the right ratio all the time. The main sensation is one of smoothness and power available on-demand.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It feels like nothing else. There is no &quot;kick down&quot; as with a conventional automatic, and there are no &quot;shift points.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What I had to get used to was expecting to either have to shift, or to to feel a shift point. Speed and gear ratio adjust continuously, so there is this odd sensation of being in the &quot;right&quot; gear waaaaay longer than is possible. You keep moving faster, but the engine note stays the same - adding to the sensation of smoothness.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just bought a Cooper with the CVT. On the test drive, I was hugely impressed. I will be commuting, sometimes in bad traffic, so a manual would have been misery.</p>

<p>I was a little worried it would buzz the engine to up the available power when accellerating, but the electronics are amazingly good at picking the right ratio all the time. The main sensation is one of smoothness and power available on-demand.</p>

<p>It feels like nothing else. There is no &#8220;kick down&#8221; as with a conventional automatic, and there are no &#8220;shift points.&#8221;</p>

<p>What I had to get used to was expecting to either have to shift, or to to feel a shift point. Speed and gear ratio adjust continuously, so there is this odd sensation of being in the &#8220;right&#8221; gear waaaaay longer than is possible. You keep moving faster, but the engine note stays the same &#8211; adding to the sensation of smoothness.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Cabaniss</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/05/02/2005_mini_cooper_reviewed/comment-page-1/#comment-19684</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Cabaniss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2005 22:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/05/02/#comment-19684</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I can&#039;t seem to get an engineering type answer for this question.....I wish to tow 4 wheels down my new 05 mini convertable (ordered June 05)behind my motor home.  Can it be done without damage to the transmission?  Please don&#039;t give me the mini warrenty junk, just the facts please as they say.  Thanks for your help!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t seem to get an engineering type answer for this question&#8230;..I wish to tow 4 wheels down my new 05 mini convertable (ordered June 05)behind my motor home.  Can it be done without damage to the transmission?  Please don&#8217;t give me the mini warrenty junk, just the facts please as they say.  Thanks for your help!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/05/02/2005_mini_cooper_reviewed/comment-page-1/#comment-19683</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2005 09:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/05/02/#comment-19683</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I have owned two mustang converts and still own my 2000. When I first saw the new MINI I wanted one. unfortunantly when my wife saw what I wanted she said it is too small and ugly. It won&#039;t carry all the groceries we get in the stang and she likes the sound and power of the V8. Alas I&#039;m destined to die a sad old man.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have owned two mustang converts and still own my 2000. When I first saw the new MINI I wanted one. unfortunantly when my wife saw what I wanted she said it is too small and ugly. It won&#8217;t carry all the groceries we get in the stang and she likes the sound and power of the V8. Alas I&#8217;m destined to die a sad old man.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/05/02/2005_mini_cooper_reviewed/comment-page-1/#comment-19682</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2005 13:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/05/02/#comment-19682</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think the Cooper is a fantastic car in its own right. We have owned ours for nearly 3 years and the car works as the finest piece of Swiss clock machinery.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Having said that however, I find the constant supercharger whining and the nicely tuned popping exhaust sound to be highly intoxicating in the MCS :)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Power wise and acceleration the MCS has it all over the Cooper.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Our &#039;02 MC CVT has a pretty loud stock exhaust. You can hear the car from a mile away! Very nice.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the Cooper is a fantastic car in its own right. We have owned ours for nearly 3 years and the car works as the finest piece of Swiss clock machinery.</p>

<p>Having said that however, I find the constant supercharger whining and the nicely tuned popping exhaust sound to be highly intoxicating in the MCS :)</p>

<p>Power wise and acceleration the MCS has it all over the Cooper.</p>

<p>Our &#8216;02 MC CVT has a pretty loud stock exhaust. You can hear the car from a mile away! Very nice.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt Nelson</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/05/02/2005_mini_cooper_reviewed/comment-page-1/#comment-19681</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2005 02:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/05/02/#comment-19681</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m one of those who agonized and finally decided on the MC (just ordered), even though the MCS was easily within my budget.  For the kind of driving I do (a lot of crowded fwy commuting as well as fun weekend trips) the MC just suited my needs better, and seemed in keeping with the original spirit and intent of the mini - light weight and great handling.  I&#039;m going to stay away from the sunroof, have already purchase 16&quot; vspokes &amp; will get some lightweight hiperf. tires.  At first I wondered about the lack of a 6th gear, but took several test drives on fwy @ 70mph and while the revs are a bit higher than in the MCS, there is simply no undue noise or vibration.  I see the point of the MCS for many, but I love the balance (and the fuel economy) of the MC.  IMHO it is prettier too.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m one of those who agonized and finally decided on the MC (just ordered), even though the MCS was easily within my budget.  For the kind of driving I do (a lot of crowded fwy commuting as well as fun weekend trips) the MC just suited my needs better, and seemed in keeping with the original spirit and intent of the mini &#8211; light weight and great handling.  I&#8217;m going to stay away from the sunroof, have already purchase 16&#8243; vspokes &amp; will get some lightweight hiperf. tires.  At first I wondered about the lack of a 6th gear, but took several test drives on fwy @ 70mph and while the revs are a bit higher than in the MCS, there is simply no undue noise or vibration.  I see the point of the MCS for many, but I love the balance (and the fuel economy) of the MC.  IMHO it is prettier too.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jojo</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/05/02/2005_mini_cooper_reviewed/comment-page-1/#comment-19680</link>
		<dc:creator>Jojo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2005 01:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/05/02/#comment-19680</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I will be getting my &#039;06 MCS in July!  I was lucky enough to get it for $22k since I bought it directly from Germany.  It&#039;s dark silver with the roof the same color, 6-speed, sports package w/sunroof.  I will also lightly tint all the windows.  When I test drove this car, I was just doing for kicks.  You know what happened after that!  I had to buy one.  I own a &#039;98 and a &#039;00 BMW 328i but the MCS is so much more fun to drive.  Getting anxious to get this car alreaady!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will be getting my &#8216;06 MCS in July!  I was lucky enough to get it for $22k since I bought it directly from Germany.  It&#8217;s dark silver with the roof the same color, 6-speed, sports package w/sunroof.  I will also lightly tint all the windows.  When I test drove this car, I was just doing for kicks.  You know what happened after that!  I had to buy one.  I own a &#8216;98 and a &#8216;00 BMW 328i but the MCS is so much more fun to drive.  Getting anxious to get this car alreaady!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gokartride</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/05/02/2005_mini_cooper_reviewed/comment-page-1/#comment-19679</link>
		<dc:creator>gokartride</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 17:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/05/02/#comment-19679</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;When I was deciding what MINI to purchase back in late &#039;02, I happened upon a glowing Cooper review by the Car Talk guys.  They (Tommy) noted, in no uncertain terms, that the Cooper engine was perfect for the car because it engaged you and made you drive it.  I see the same comments echoed here.  I did get a Cooper and, since I drive it around town mostly, I am certain I would never fully make use of the added power offered by the MCS (I have test driven three...an &#039;03, an &#039;03 JCW, and an &#039;05).  Funny thing, I have perhaps the most fun in my Cooper on the highway, either opening her up getting highway speeds or passing by dropping into 4th.....I&#039;m outa there!!!!!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I was deciding what MINI to purchase back in late &#8216;02, I happened upon a glowing Cooper review by the Car Talk guys.  They (Tommy) noted, in no uncertain terms, that the Cooper engine was perfect for the car because it engaged you and made you drive it.  I see the same comments echoed here.  I did get a Cooper and, since I drive it around town mostly, I am certain I would never fully make use of the added power offered by the MCS (I have test driven three&#8230;an &#8216;03, an &#8216;03 JCW, and an &#8216;05).  Funny thing, I have perhaps the most fun in my Cooper on the highway, either opening her up getting highway speeds or passing by dropping into 4th&#8230;..I&#8217;m outa there!!!!!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Livesey</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/05/02/2005_mini_cooper_reviewed/comment-page-1/#comment-19678</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Livesey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 16:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/05/02/#comment-19678</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;That&#039;s OK Gabe. Here in the UK you can spec a Mini One in the guise of a Cooper (including the Sports Suspension) and have enough left from the savings to get it chipped past the Cooper&#039;s 115 BHP. When I take my One to the Dealers they mistake it for a Cooper everytime!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s OK Gabe. Here in the UK you can spec a Mini One in the guise of a Cooper (including the Sports Suspension) and have enough left from the savings to get it chipped past the Cooper&#8217;s 115 BHP. When I take my One to the Dealers they mistake it for a Cooper everytime!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Clark</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/05/02/2005_mini_cooper_reviewed/comment-page-1/#comment-19677</link>
		<dc:creator>David Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 16:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/05/02/#comment-19677</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;To Bruce Hord - My comments on going to 195/55R15 performance tires on the Cooper - I think you will like them!
In some respects I wish I had gone this way, as the std. 7-hole wheels have a very light and agile feel to them. I chose to use the 7-hole wheels to mount winter tires on, and bought a set of the 16&quot; X-lites w/ runflats for summer use.  The raw grip improved but the light turn-in feel is somewhat blunted, I presume by the weight increase.  If I had to do it all again I think I would go with a light tire like a Toyo T-1S on the 7-hole wheels, or an even lighter wheel such as OZ Superleggarras or Kosei K1-TS.  The differences can be felt on a car with as good a chassis as the MINI.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Bruce Hord &#8211; My comments on going to 195/55R15 performance tires on the Cooper &#8211; I think you will like them!
In some respects I wish I had gone this way, as the std. 7-hole wheels have a very light and agile feel to them. I chose to use the 7-hole wheels to mount winter tires on, and bought a set of the 16&#8243; X-lites w/ runflats for summer use.  The raw grip improved but the light turn-in feel is somewhat blunted, I presume by the weight increase.  If I had to do it all again I think I would go with a light tire like a Toyo T-1S on the 7-hole wheels, or an even lighter wheel such as OZ Superleggarras or Kosei K1-TS.  The differences can be felt on a car with as good a chassis as the MINI.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/05/02/2005_mini_cooper_reviewed/comment-page-1/#comment-19676</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 14:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/05/02/#comment-19676</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Rob - you missed the point of that sentence if you thought I was putting down the Cooper.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob &#8211; you missed the point of that sentence if you thought I was putting down the Cooper.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2nd MINI</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/05/02/2005_mini_cooper_reviewed/comment-page-1/#comment-19675</link>
		<dc:creator>2nd MINI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 13:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/05/02/#comment-19675</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve tried both the MC and MCS and own an &quot;S&quot;.  Whenever I get work done on my &quot;S&quot;, I borrow the dealer&#039;s borrower MINI Coopers.  I see virtues in both, actually.  The manual MC is a much more fun car in stop and go traffic.  It is much more forgiving and gentle on the clutch, which is what you want in those situations.  However, without the Sport Suspension+, the MC wallows a bit in curves.   The MC with CVS is more sedate, but is the easiest commuter of the bunch.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The manual MCS is definitely more high-spirited, even high-strung.  I wouldn&#039;t want to face a long, daily bumper-to-bumper, stop-and-go commute in an MCS.  Still-and-all, when you come down to, &quot;I&#039;ve had enough of this crap!&quot;, and need to pass an annoying driver and &quot;put him safely behind&quot;, ;) the grunt and quickness of the MCS is most welcome and its sound is lovely.  The standard SS+ makes the &quot;S&quot; stick to the road and gives you a very sure feeling but it does bounce you a bit.  Still, it has the &quot;toy&quot; car thing in spades.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So it&#039;s all good.  You just have to decide what you are looking for.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;2nd MINI&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve tried both the MC and MCS and own an &#8220;S&#8221;.  Whenever I get work done on my &#8220;S&#8221;, I borrow the dealer&#8217;s borrower MINI Coopers.  I see virtues in both, actually.  The manual MC is a much more fun car in stop and go traffic.  It is much more forgiving and gentle on the clutch, which is what you want in those situations.  However, without the Sport Suspension+, the MC wallows a bit in curves.   The MC with CVS is more sedate, but is the easiest commuter of the bunch.</p>

<p>The manual MCS is definitely more high-spirited, even high-strung.  I wouldn&#8217;t want to face a long, daily bumper-to-bumper, stop-and-go commute in an MCS.  Still-and-all, when you come down to, &#8220;I&#8217;ve had enough of this crap!&#8221;, and need to pass an annoying driver and &#8220;put him safely behind&#8221;, ;) the grunt and quickness of the MCS is most welcome and its sound is lovely.  The standard SS+ makes the &#8220;S&#8221; stick to the road and gives you a very sure feeling but it does bounce you a bit.  Still, it has the &#8220;toy&#8221; car thing in spades.</p>

<p>So it&#8217;s all good.  You just have to decide what you are looking for.</p>

<p>2nd MINI</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Livesey</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/05/02/2005_mini_cooper_reviewed/comment-page-1/#comment-19674</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Livesey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 10:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/05/02/#comment-19674</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Watch you tongue! I own a Mini One so if a Cooper is &quot;lowly&quot; what does that make mine ?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watch you tongue! I own a Mini One so if a Cooper is &#8220;lowly&#8221; what does that make mine ?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/05/02/2005_mini_cooper_reviewed/comment-page-1/#comment-19673</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 04:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/05/02/#comment-19673</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;James - the JCW kit is actually still available for the Cooper.  In fact I know of at least one dealership that has one of two in stock as we speak.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James &#8211; the JCW kit is actually still available for the Cooper.  In fact I know of at least one dealership that has one of two in stock as we speak.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/05/02/2005_mini_cooper_reviewed/comment-page-1/#comment-19672</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 04:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/05/02/#comment-19672</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I chose a CVT MC with my ex-girlfriend.  When it was time to buy myself a MINI, I had no thoughts of an MCS.  I got another MC, though this time with a 5-speed manual.  It has been said that the MC to 40 mph can nearly run with an MCS.  I believe it, especially the CVT in SD mode.  I prefer the smooth, lower bonnet; chrome grill as standard; the look of the roof without the spoiler; better gas mileage; more options for wheels; and having a spare.  If I were buying a third MINI, it would be an Astro Black (not available on the MCS) 2006 MINI Cooper.  I only wish they&#039;d bring back the short-lived JCW kit (not sound kit) for the MC.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I chose a CVT MC with my ex-girlfriend.  When it was time to buy myself a MINI, I had no thoughts of an MCS.  I got another MC, though this time with a 5-speed manual.  It has been said that the MC to 40 mph can nearly run with an MCS.  I believe it, especially the CVT in SD mode.  I prefer the smooth, lower bonnet; chrome grill as standard; the look of the roof without the spoiler; better gas mileage; more options for wheels; and having a spare.  If I were buying a third MINI, it would be an Astro Black (not available on the MCS) 2006 MINI Cooper.  I only wish they&#8217;d bring back the short-lived JCW kit (not sound kit) for the MC.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/05/02/2005_mini_cooper_reviewed/comment-page-1/#comment-19671</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 01:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/05/02/#comment-19671</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Anyone going from a MCS to a MC/CVT (which is what I assume you drove) is certainly in for a shock if they&#039;re not used to it.  Even someone going from a manual Cooper to the CVT Cooper will find some big differences in drivability and performance.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And before all you CVT owners write in to tell me to stop bashing the CVT Cooper... please read my previous review of the car ;)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;[ &lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;http://www.motoringfile.com/2003/09/10/TheCVTRevisited-AFullReview&quot;&gt;motoringfile.com/2003/09/10/TheCVTRevisited-AFullReview&lt;/a&gt; ]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone going from a MCS to a MC/CVT (which is what I assume you drove) is certainly in for a shock if they&#8217;re not used to it.  Even someone going from a manual Cooper to the CVT Cooper will find some big differences in drivability and performance.  </p>

<p>And before all you CVT owners write in to tell me to stop bashing the CVT Cooper&#8230; please read my previous review of the car ;)</p>

<p>[ <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.motoringfile.com/2003/09/10/TheCVTRevisited-AFullReview">motoringfile.com/2003/09/10/TheCVTRevisited-AFullReview</a> ]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MadisonMini</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/05/02/2005_mini_cooper_reviewed/comment-page-1/#comment-19670</link>
		<dc:creator>MadisonMini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 00:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/05/02/#comment-19670</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This is an interesting discussion and one that I brought up recently on Mini2.com.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think it&#039;s all what you get used to and what your looking for when comparing the MC to the MCS.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I have an MCSC which I brought to Patrick Mini 3 weeks ago for the JCW upgrade.  Brought it down on a Wednesday and picked it up on Saturday.  Patrick gave me a loaner MCCa to drive for those days.  In all, drove about 400 miles (Madison to Chicago).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t know how to say this nicely...I hated the MCC.  It was the same around corners, but after that, it felt to me like driving an electric car.  Keep in mind, I was so used to my MCSC, the only Mini I&#039;ve ever driven before.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Now with JCW, a &quot;standard&quot; MCSC would probably feel like an electric car.  If my first Mini was a MCC, I would love it.  But like I said, it&#039;s what you get used to.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m hope I&#039;m not making anyone mad, just my impressions.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an interesting discussion and one that I brought up recently on Mini2.com.</p>

<p>I think it&#8217;s all what you get used to and what your looking for when comparing the MC to the MCS.  </p>

<p>I have an MCSC which I brought to Patrick Mini 3 weeks ago for the JCW upgrade.  Brought it down on a Wednesday and picked it up on Saturday.  Patrick gave me a loaner MCCa to drive for those days.  In all, drove about 400 miles (Madison to Chicago).</p>

<p>I don&#8217;t know how to say this nicely&#8230;I hated the MCC.  It was the same around corners, but after that, it felt to me like driving an electric car.  Keep in mind, I was so used to my MCSC, the only Mini I&#8217;ve ever driven before.</p>

<p>Now with JCW, a &#8220;standard&#8221; MCSC would probably feel like an electric car.  If my first Mini was a MCC, I would love it.  But like I said, it&#8217;s what you get used to.</p>

<p>I&#8217;m hope I&#8217;m not making anyone mad, just my impressions.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
