<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CNN on Future MINI Product Development</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/10/07/cnn_on_future_mini_product_development/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/10/07/cnn_on_future_mini_product_development/</link>
	<description>MotoringFile &#124; MINI news, reviews and opinion. MINI Cooper, Cooper S, Clubman, Countryman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:14:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GMINI</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/10/07/cnn_on_future_mini_product_development/comment-page-1/#comment-26260</link>
		<dc:creator>GMINI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2005 17:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/10/07/#comment-26260</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, Capn. That&#039;s just the ticket. Subie clearance (and AWD), Cooper profile. And the name, well, MOKE. But not so much of a departure, (please!)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, Capn. That&#8217;s just the ticket. Subie clearance (and AWD), Cooper profile. And the name, well, MOKE. But not so much of a departure, (please!)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: O(=^=)O Capn</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/10/07/cnn_on_future_mini_product_development/comment-page-1/#comment-26259</link>
		<dc:creator>O(=^=)O Capn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2005 08:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/10/07/#comment-26259</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think that Nostrodamus is right, We should ban pedestrians. They are too dangerous. Especially the elderly pedestrians. When they are too slow to get out of the way, they should be &quot;retired&quot;. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Soylent Green, ITS PEOPLE!!!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Oh and GMINI, I&#039;m thinking more like a Subie Outback/MINI. Is that still considered an SUV? It still has clearance but not jacked up so much per se.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Clearance = taller tires, range of motion in suspension. &lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=imho&quot;&gt;IMHO.&lt;/a&gt; 
Suv, Explorer/Escalade/Expedition...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m in one of my moods...
Anyone who takes me seriously should be taken out into the street and shot, seriously.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m not joking, not even a limerick.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that Nostrodamus is right, We should ban pedestrians. They are too dangerous. Especially the elderly pedestrians. When they are too slow to get out of the way, they should be &#8220;retired&#8221;. </p>

<p>Soylent Green, ITS PEOPLE!!!</p>

<p>Oh and GMINI, I&#8217;m thinking more like a Subie Outback/MINI. Is that still considered an SUV? It still has clearance but not jacked up so much per se.</p>

<p>Clearance = taller tires, range of motion in suspension. <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=imho">IMHO.</a> 
Suv, Explorer/Escalade/Expedition&#8230;</p>

<p>I&#8217;m in one of my moods&#8230;
Anyone who takes me seriously should be taken out into the street and shot, seriously.</p>

<p>I&#8217;m not joking, not even a limerick.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/10/07/cnn_on_future_mini_product_development/comment-page-1/#comment-26258</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2005 07:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/10/07/#comment-26258</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s funny that even CNN is covering news on the MINI, maybe because the MINI is getting to be so popular even CNN wants a &quot;piece of the pie&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s funny that even CNN is covering news on the MINI, maybe because the MINI is getting to be so popular even CNN wants a &#8220;piece of the pie&#8221;.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark (Ohio)</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/10/07/cnn_on_future_mini_product_development/comment-page-1/#comment-26257</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark (Ohio)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2005 06:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/10/07/#comment-26257</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I guess while we&#039;re dreaming...where&#039;s the mid-engine Mini two-seater?  A la Renault&#039;s idea with the Clio v6.  :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess while we&#8217;re dreaming&#8230;where&#8217;s the mid-engine Mini two-seater?  A la Renault&#8217;s idea with the Clio v6.  :)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GMINI</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/10/07/cnn_on_future_mini_product_development/comment-page-1/#comment-26256</link>
		<dc:creator>GMINI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2005 06:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/10/07/#comment-26256</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think a multi-terrained MINI is very far off. And it&#039;s marketers will do well to keep it from being called an SUV. That means a  better name and a bettter design.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a multi-terrained MINI is very far off. And it&#8217;s marketers will do well to keep it from being called an SUV. That means a  better name and a bettter design.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nostrodamus</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/10/07/cnn_on_future_mini_product_development/comment-page-1/#comment-26255</link>
		<dc:creator>Nostrodamus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2005 04:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/10/07/#comment-26255</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;SUVs pose greater danger to pedestrians -- scientists
By Patricia Reaney Fri Oct 7, 3:40 PM ET
LONDON (Reuters) - Sports utility vehicles (SUVs) may feel safer for their drivers but they are more deadly than other cars for pedestrians, Irish scientists said on Friday.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;ADVERTISEMENT&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Research has shown that the chance of killing or seriously injuring a pedestrian is two to four times higher for someone driving an SUV, or 4X4 vehicle, than a car.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&quot;There is clearly a higher risk for pedestrians when they are struck by a light truck or SUV compared to a passenger car,&quot; Dr. Ciaran Simms, an expert in mechanical engineering at Trinity College in Dublin, told Reuters.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Elderly pedestrians and children are most at risk.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In an editorial in The British Medical Journal medical journal, Simms and Desmond O&#039;Neill, a professor of medical gerontology at Trinity College, called for warnings on SUVs to inform buyers of the increased risk the vehicles pose to pedestrians.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;They also recommended a higher road tax and called for all SUVs involved in accidents to be documented.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The researchers, who studied accidents involving SUVs to determine why they are so deadly for pedestrians, said size didn&#039;t matter.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The main problem was the height and shape of the front of vehicle. The hood, or bonnet, is higher than on cars and has a more severe impact when it strikes the center of the body and upper legs and pelvis.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Raising the edge of the front hood or bonnet of a vehicle from 600-850 mm (24-33 inches) increases the impact by a factor of two, which results in a doubling of injuries to vulnerable parts of the body such as the head and abdomen.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The vehicles are increasingly popular. Sales of SUVs in Europe have risen by 15 percent in the last year while demand for cars has slumped by 4 percent, according to the scientists.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&quot;In the United States, 40 percent of new vehicles are classified as light trucks or vans (many of which are SUVs),&quot; they said in the editorial.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Elderly pedestrians are more vulnerable to the dangers of SUVs because they are weaker, less agile and may have poorer reactions that may make them less likely to avoid being struck and more at risk of suffering serious injuries and dying.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The increased height may also make it more difficult for drivers to see young children in front of or around the vehicle, according to the researchers.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SUVs pose greater danger to pedestrians &#8212; scientists
By Patricia Reaney Fri Oct 7, 3:40 PM ET
LONDON (Reuters) &#8211; Sports utility vehicles (SUVs) may feel safer for their drivers but they are more deadly than other cars for pedestrians, Irish scientists said on Friday.</p>

<p>ADVERTISEMENT</p>

<p>Research has shown that the chance of killing or seriously injuring a pedestrian is two to four times higher for someone driving an SUV, or 4X4 vehicle, than a car.</p>

<p>&#8220;There is clearly a higher risk for pedestrians when they are struck by a light truck or SUV compared to a passenger car,&#8221; Dr. Ciaran Simms, an expert in mechanical engineering at Trinity College in Dublin, told Reuters.</p>

<p>Elderly pedestrians and children are most at risk.</p>

<p>In an editorial in The British Medical Journal medical journal, Simms and Desmond O&#8217;Neill, a professor of medical gerontology at Trinity College, called for warnings on SUVs to inform buyers of the increased risk the vehicles pose to pedestrians.</p>

<p>They also recommended a higher road tax and called for all SUVs involved in accidents to be documented.</p>

<p>The researchers, who studied accidents involving SUVs to determine why they are so deadly for pedestrians, said size didn&#8217;t matter.</p>

<p>The main problem was the height and shape of the front of vehicle. The hood, or bonnet, is higher than on cars and has a more severe impact when it strikes the center of the body and upper legs and pelvis.</p>

<p>Raising the edge of the front hood or bonnet of a vehicle from 600-850 mm (24-33 inches) increases the impact by a factor of two, which results in a doubling of injuries to vulnerable parts of the body such as the head and abdomen.</p>

<p>The vehicles are increasingly popular. Sales of SUVs in Europe have risen by 15 percent in the last year while demand for cars has slumped by 4 percent, according to the scientists.</p>

<p>&#8220;In the United States, 40 percent of new vehicles are classified as light trucks or vans (many of which are SUVs),&#8221; they said in the editorial.</p>

<p>Elderly pedestrians are more vulnerable to the dangers of SUVs because they are weaker, less agile and may have poorer reactions that may make them less likely to avoid being struck and more at risk of suffering serious injuries and dying.</p>

<p>The increased height may also make it more difficult for drivers to see young children in front of or around the vehicle, according to the researchers.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nostrodamus</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/10/07/cnn_on_future_mini_product_development/comment-page-1/#comment-26254</link>
		<dc:creator>Nostrodamus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2005 02:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/10/07/#comment-26254</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Its definitely a MAXI!!  It is cute but MINI just lost me.  WHATS THE GAS MILEAGE ON THIS SUV ANYWAY?  What happened to &quot;SIP DON&quot;T GUZZLE&quot;?  Sounds to me like MINI is selling out on its own brand advertising.  Guess thats why the  ad company got the old heave hoe!  So long to MINI and Hello MAXI!!!!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Nos&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its definitely a MAXI!!  It is cute but MINI just lost me.  WHATS THE GAS MILEAGE ON THIS SUV ANYWAY?  What happened to &#8220;SIP DON&#8221;T GUZZLE&#8221;?  Sounds to me like MINI is selling out on its own brand advertising.  Guess thats why the  ad company got the old heave hoe!  So long to MINI and Hello MAXI!!!!</p>

<p>Nos</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GMINI</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/10/07/cnn_on_future_mini_product_development/comment-page-1/#comment-26253</link>
		<dc:creator>GMINI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2005 02:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/10/07/#comment-26253</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;On that other note, ground clearance.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On that other note, ground clearance.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: O(=^=)O Capn</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/10/07/cnn_on_future_mini_product_development/comment-page-1/#comment-26252</link>
		<dc:creator>O(=^=)O Capn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2005 01:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/10/07/#comment-26252</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;It&#039;s sort of a station wagon Mini. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Looks like &quot;sort of&quot; a technical term.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;but a taller off-road like vehicle is probably unlikely in the near future.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;on another note, why would an SUV have to be Taller?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
  <p>It&#8217;s sort of a station wagon Mini. </p>
</blockquote>

<p>Looks like &#8220;sort of&#8221; a technical term.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>but a taller off-road like vehicle is probably unlikely in the near future.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>on another note, why would an SUV have to be Taller?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: indimini</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/10/07/cnn_on_future_mini_product_development/comment-page-1/#comment-26251</link>
		<dc:creator>indimini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2005 00:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/10/07/#comment-26251</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I like the line that reads &quot;don&#039;t expect major changes.&quot;, lol.  Yeah, except for an all new powerplant, platform, interior and sheet metal, it&#039;s pretty much going to be the same car they offer now.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the line that reads &#8220;don&#8217;t expect major changes.&#8221;, lol.  Yeah, except for an all new powerplant, platform, interior and sheet metal, it&#8217;s pretty much going to be the same car they offer now.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/10/07/cnn_on_future_mini_product_development/comment-page-1/#comment-26250</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2005 00:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/10/07/#comment-26250</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I guess stories like this on CNN and the earlier Cnet one indicate how hot the MINI still is ...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess stories like this on CNN and the earlier Cnet one indicate how hot the MINI still is &#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

