<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: John Cooper Works GP Tuning Kit First Photos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/10/29/john_cooper_works_gp_tuning_kit_first_photos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/10/29/john_cooper_works_gp_tuning_kit_first_photos/</link>
	<description>MINI Cooper news, reviews and opinion.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 04:51:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mini Cooper S JWC GP</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/10/29/john_cooper_works_gp_tuning_kit_first_photos/comment-page-3/#comment-100815</link>
		<dc:creator>Mini Cooper S JWC GP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 20:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/10/29/#comment-100815</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] VÃƒÆ&#8217;Ã‚Â­a | MotoringFile [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MotoringFile &#187; Archive &#187; MotoringFile 2005 in Review</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/10/29/john_cooper_works_gp_tuning_kit_first_photos/comment-page-3/#comment-29737</link>
		<dc:creator>MotoringFile &#187; Archive &#187; MotoringFile 2005 in Review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 14:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/10/29/#comment-29737</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] 2. John Cooper Works GP Kit First Pics [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2. John Cooper Works GP Kit First Pics [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: k</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/10/29/john_cooper_works_gp_tuning_kit_first_photos/comment-page-3/#comment-27147</link>
		<dc:creator>k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2005 16:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/10/29/#comment-27147</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;i hate it&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i hate it</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RHT3</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/10/29/john_cooper_works_gp_tuning_kit_first_photos/comment-page-3/#comment-27146</link>
		<dc:creator>RHT3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 20:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/10/29/#comment-27146</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think it&#039;s a great look overall. The fact is, the original styling is so solid a design that departures from it offend everyone a little. But. . . I like this departure!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Personal preference.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s a great look overall. The fact is, the original styling is so solid a design that departures from it offend everyone a little. But. . . I like this departure!</p>

<p>Personal preference.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RW</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/10/29/john_cooper_works_gp_tuning_kit_first_photos/comment-page-3/#comment-27145</link>
		<dc:creator>RW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 20:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/10/29/#comment-27145</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;So... what we&#039;ve got here... is basically an MC-40 of a different color. An option package that maximizes profits for MINI.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That&#039;s crazy. A company in business trying to maximize profits?! Good for them. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Maybe they&#039;ll stay around and continue to make not only cars like this, but inexpensive, obtainable cars like the Cooper.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>So&#8230; what we&#8217;ve got here&#8230; is basically an MC-40 of a different color. An option package that maximizes profits for MINI.</blockquote>

<p>That&#8217;s crazy. A company in business trying to maximize profits?! Good for them. </p>

<p>Maybe they&#8217;ll stay around and continue to make not only cars like this, but inexpensive, obtainable cars like the Cooper.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/10/29/john_cooper_works_gp_tuning_kit_first_photos/comment-page-3/#comment-27144</link>
		<dc:creator>rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 19:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/10/29/#comment-27144</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The officeal word as of 5 minutes ago.
The US will NOT get the Recaro seats.
&lt;em&gt;grr&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The officeal word as of 5 minutes ago.
The US will NOT get the Recaro seats.
<em>grr</em></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony T</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/10/29/john_cooper_works_gp_tuning_kit_first_photos/comment-page-3/#comment-27143</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 15:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/10/29/#comment-27143</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Like it or loath it, there really is only one reason why Mini did this project in my mind - to ensure high volume sales in the run out last months of the Mk1 New Mini. Not only will they sell each and every one of these during that period, but those people dissapointed with not being able to get one will end up buying a standard Works during this period as the sales advisor will happily point out that &#039;the two cars are virtually the same anyway&#039;.... perhaps sales of DS coloured cars will actually increase too...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Its starting to grow on me. i can&#039;t believe its finished or that they won&#039;t take our comments on board for minor styling tweeks. However, you can&#039;t live without a rear wash wipe in the UK imho... so it will be hard to live with as a daily driver.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like it or loath it, there really is only one reason why Mini did this project in my mind &#8211; to ensure high volume sales in the run out last months of the Mk1 New Mini. Not only will they sell each and every one of these during that period, but those people dissapointed with not being able to get one will end up buying a standard Works during this period as the sales advisor will happily point out that &#8216;the two cars are virtually the same anyway&#8217;&#8230;. perhaps sales of DS coloured cars will actually increase too&#8230;</p>

<p>Its starting to grow on me. i can&#8217;t believe its finished or that they won&#8217;t take our comments on board for minor styling tweeks. However, you can&#8217;t live without a rear wash wipe in the UK imho&#8230; so it will be hard to live with as a daily driver.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian F</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/10/29/john_cooper_works_gp_tuning_kit_first_photos/comment-page-3/#comment-27142</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 15:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/10/29/#comment-27142</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t really think the car looks bad but my dissappointment stems for the fact that MINI simply missed the mark of what the LTW hopefulls were looking for: A lighter MCS. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Doesn&#039;t really need to be more powerful or look all that different from a stock car. Just be lighter. A LOT lighter. And many autocrossers and track-fiends would be willing to pay a premium for that.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;However, that being said, there are likely some underlying reasons for the car being what it is. A completely re-worked MCS would likely need to be re-federalized here in the US which would increase costs (and lead-time) substancially. From what I can see, this car does not represent a big enough change to require that. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So... what we&#039;ve got here... is basically an MC-40 of a different color. An option package that maximizes profits for MINI.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t really think the car looks bad but my dissappointment stems for the fact that MINI simply missed the mark of what the LTW hopefulls were looking for: A lighter MCS. </p>

<p>Doesn&#8217;t really need to be more powerful or look all that different from a stock car. Just be lighter. A LOT lighter. And many autocrossers and track-fiends would be willing to pay a premium for that.</p>

<p>However, that being said, there are likely some underlying reasons for the car being what it is. A completely re-worked MCS would likely need to be re-federalized here in the US which would increase costs (and lead-time) substancially. From what I can see, this car does not represent a big enough change to require that. </p>

<p>So&#8230; what we&#8217;ve got here&#8230; is basically an MC-40 of a different color. An option package that maximizes profits for MINI.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GMINI</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/10/29/john_cooper_works_gp_tuning_kit_first_photos/comment-page-3/#comment-27141</link>
		<dc:creator>GMINI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 12:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/10/29/#comment-27141</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Dan, the photos you link to wÃƒÂ¼ss the car out by displaying a car in motion, on a trackl, with a helmetless driver. Makes the car look like it&#039;s going thirty for photographs. Parade laps. :0&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan, the photos you link to wÃƒÂ¼ss the car out by displaying a car in motion, on a trackl, with a helmetless driver. Makes the car look like it&#8217;s going thirty for photographs. Parade laps. :0</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/10/29/john_cooper_works_gp_tuning_kit_first_photos/comment-page-3/#comment-27140</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 09:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/10/29/#comment-27140</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Here are more pics:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://media.mysan.de/index.php?action=showgal&amp;cat=312&amp;page=1&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Imagining the deletion of the wing on the rear view pictures, the ricer stigma melts away and it actually looks cool.  However, 88lbs still isn&#039;t enough savings to give up &quot;removal of the rear seats and the air conditioning system, elimination of sound-deadening material, and replacement of the rear axle control arms with aluminum units&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;When I 1st dreamed of this car, I imagined it being taken apart and major body panels (if not pieces) being recast in aluminum and carbon.  That would be worth any fuss.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are more pics:</p>

<p><a href="http://media.mysan.de/index.php?action=showgal&amp;cat=312&amp;page=1" rel="nofollow">http://media.mysan.de/index.php?action=showgal&amp;cat=312&amp;page=1</a></p>

<p>Imagining the deletion of the wing on the rear view pictures, the ricer stigma melts away and it actually looks cool.  However, 88lbs still isn&#8217;t enough savings to give up &#8220;removal of the rear seats and the air conditioning system, elimination of sound-deadening material, and replacement of the rear axle control arms with aluminum units&#8221;</p>

<p>When I 1st dreamed of this car, I imagined it being taken apart and major body panels (if not pieces) being recast in aluminum and carbon.  That would be worth any fuss.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/10/29/john_cooper_works_gp_tuning_kit_first_photos/comment-page-3/#comment-27139</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 06:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/10/29/#comment-27139</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Wing - great shape, looks good, but let&#039;s get it in body color or, better yet, silver roof color. After all, even if it is CF, nothing else on the car looks like it - let&#039;s integrate.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Front fascia - like the color-coded grille and lower grille blockoff. Not too big a fan of the brake-duct-things, unless they are functional. I do like the front lower lip.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Side Skirts - only way to make these look good is integrate the wheel arches (like others have said) and make the rear bulges functional, perhaps rounting side-exit exhaust through them? Otherwise, why have them?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Rear - kinda like the rear vent additions (look similar to the Oricari front cowl vents) and I do like the rear lip as well. Deletion of rear wiper is slick.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Wheels - Ugh.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Red Mirrors - CF would be better, or silver.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Badging - terrible. I do like the face, but it&#039;s way too big. Numbering the roof is novel, but I&#039;d rather have just a small dash plaque somwhere, especially if those numbers on the roof are just gonna be stickers. The highlight band around the bonnet scoop is ok, but the GP inside is not. I guess I&#039;m biased, as I like to de-badge everything, but all that plastic lettering on the boot is unfortunate.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Overall, exterior is a letdown. Not nearly as integrated from the factory as I&#039;d hoped. I dunno, I think special editions should make you drool, wishing you had changed your order or been lucky enough to get on a list or something. Hearing the original rumors of power and weight savings, that&#039;s how I was feeling. Now, I&#039;m very happy with my existing car!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wing &#8211; great shape, looks good, but let&#8217;s get it in body color or, better yet, silver roof color. After all, even if it is CF, nothing else on the car looks like it &#8211; let&#8217;s integrate.</p>

<p>Front fascia &#8211; like the color-coded grille and lower grille blockoff. Not too big a fan of the brake-duct-things, unless they are functional. I do like the front lower lip.</p>

<p>Side Skirts &#8211; only way to make these look good is integrate the wheel arches (like others have said) and make the rear bulges functional, perhaps rounting side-exit exhaust through them? Otherwise, why have them?</p>

<p>Rear &#8211; kinda like the rear vent additions (look similar to the Oricari front cowl vents) and I do like the rear lip as well. Deletion of rear wiper is slick.</p>

<p>Wheels &#8211; Ugh.</p>

<p>Red Mirrors &#8211; CF would be better, or silver.</p>

<p>Badging &#8211; terrible. I do like the face, but it&#8217;s way too big. Numbering the roof is novel, but I&#8217;d rather have just a small dash plaque somwhere, especially if those numbers on the roof are just gonna be stickers. The highlight band around the bonnet scoop is ok, but the GP inside is not. I guess I&#8217;m biased, as I like to de-badge everything, but all that plastic lettering on the boot is unfortunate.</p>

<p>Overall, exterior is a letdown. Not nearly as integrated from the factory as I&#8217;d hoped. I dunno, I think special editions should make you drool, wishing you had changed your order or been lucky enough to get on a list or something. Hearing the original rumors of power and weight savings, that&#8217;s how I was feeling. Now, I&#8217;m very happy with my existing car!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/10/29/john_cooper_works_gp_tuning_kit_first_photos/comment-page-3/#comment-27138</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 04:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/10/29/#comment-27138</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I am not changing the specs on my order come the first of the year. This build is for the buyer who wants more tickets and less riders.  Why don&#039;t they wait for the 2 seater that is in the wind? Special builds that stand thet test of time are few and far between. Personally I will wait a few more months until I finally order to replace my &#039;03. But on the postive note it is good to see MINI isn&#039;t standing still!!!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not changing the specs on my order come the first of the year. This build is for the buyer who wants more tickets and less riders.  Why don&#8217;t they wait for the 2 seater that is in the wind? Special builds that stand thet test of time are few and far between. Personally I will wait a few more months until I finally order to replace my &#8216;03. But on the postive note it is good to see MINI isn&#8217;t standing still!!!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/10/29/john_cooper_works_gp_tuning_kit_first_photos/comment-page-3/#comment-27137</link>
		<dc:creator>rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2005 21:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/10/29/#comment-27137</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Brake caliper colors - note the JCW big brake kit has only the front calipers painted. Not the back.  Also if you order JCW from factory it automatically comes with LSD.  So I would think GP would have it by default.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brake caliper colors &#8211; note the JCW big brake kit has only the front calipers painted. Not the back.  Also if you order JCW from factory it automatically comes with LSD.  So I would think GP would have it by default.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MA</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/10/29/john_cooper_works_gp_tuning_kit_first_photos/comment-page-3/#comment-27136</link>
		<dc:creator>MA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2005 21:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/10/29/#comment-27136</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The offical word from MINI USA is that each dealership in the US will be allocated 5 each.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The offical word from MINI USA is that each dealership in the US will be allocated 5 each.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RB</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/10/29/john_cooper_works_gp_tuning_kit_first_photos/comment-page-3/#comment-27135</link>
		<dc:creator>RB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2005 19:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/10/29/#comment-27135</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Whatever!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matted</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/10/29/john_cooper_works_gp_tuning_kit_first_photos/comment-page-3/#comment-27134</link>
		<dc:creator>matted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2005 18:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/10/29/#comment-27134</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&amp; 4 this i waited how long? ne1 want my place on the list in pdx or? i&#039;m taking my $ &amp; getting an elise. nice job bmw/mini, can u say mc40 all over again.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&amp; 4 this i waited how long? ne1 want my place on the list in pdx or? i&#8217;m taking my $ &amp; getting an elise. nice job bmw/mini, can u say mc40 all over again.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RB</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/10/29/john_cooper_works_gp_tuning_kit_first_photos/comment-page-3/#comment-27133</link>
		<dc:creator>RB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2005 17:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/10/29/#comment-27133</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the UPDATE  Philip.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;RB&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the UPDATE  Philip.</p>

<p>RB</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/10/29/john_cooper_works_gp_tuning_kit_first_photos/comment-page-3/#comment-27132</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2005 17:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/10/29/#comment-27132</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Given the hype that arose with speculation about a 300 lb weight decrease &amp; a (possible) 240 HP motor, I can understand the disappointment.  Some thoughts centered on the wheels &amp; the aerokit--with a bit of speculation on why only a 10HP gain.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;*The aerokit looks interesting, but it needs to be clarified.  The chopping up of the wheel arches into blue &amp; black gives the kit a tacked on look.  Possible solutions: 1) color key the wheel arches, and 2) color key the rear diffuser moldings as was done on the front air dam?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;*218 hp?  A 10-hp gain does seem on the small side. I&#039;m betting the gain is at least a little higher base on the up to 2004 SAE standards.  Is BMW/MINI looking to the longer term, though?  Meaning: is the 10 hp gain meant to keep the GP2 from intruding on the power levels coming from the next gen S?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;4-spoke rims?  They work--if the surrounding body parts flow around the wheel openings.  This design doesn&#039;t flow.  (See above re: the aerokit looking chopped up).  A 5-spoke iteration of this design, with each spoke slightly smaller would be a better alternative.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;*IMHO 18&#039;s are meant to fill the wheel opening--adding the vertical bump stop to the back end of the side skirt gives the visual impression of a larger wheel opening, which defeats the purpose of larger rims.  Pull the trailing end of the skirt closer to the wheel, in a curve that follows the wheel arch?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given the hype that arose with speculation about a 300 lb weight decrease &amp; a (possible) 240 HP motor, I can understand the disappointment.  Some thoughts centered on the wheels &amp; the aerokit&#8211;with a bit of speculation on why only a 10HP gain.</p>

<p>*The aerokit looks interesting, but it needs to be clarified.  The chopping up of the wheel arches into blue &amp; black gives the kit a tacked on look.  Possible solutions: 1) color key the wheel arches, and 2) color key the rear diffuser moldings as was done on the front air dam?</p>

<p>*218 hp?  A 10-hp gain does seem on the small side. I&#8217;m betting the gain is at least a little higher base on the up to 2004 SAE standards.  Is BMW/MINI looking to the longer term, though?  Meaning: is the 10 hp gain meant to keep the GP2 from intruding on the power levels coming from the next gen S?</p>

<ul>
<li>4-spoke rims?  They work&#8211;if the surrounding body parts flow around the wheel openings.  This design doesn&#8217;t flow.  (See above re: the aerokit looking chopped up).  A 5-spoke iteration of this design, with each spoke slightly smaller would be a better alternative.</li>
</ul>

<p>*IMHO 18&#8217;s are meant to fill the wheel opening&#8211;adding the vertical bump stop to the back end of the side skirt gives the visual impression of a larger wheel opening, which defeats the purpose of larger rims.  Pull the trailing end of the skirt closer to the wheel, in a curve that follows the wheel arch?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HERBIE</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/10/29/john_cooper_works_gp_tuning_kit_first_photos/comment-page-3/#comment-27131</link>
		<dc:creator>HERBIE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2005 17:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/10/29/#comment-27131</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Just like your name says, humourless.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;:p&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just like your name says, humourless.</p>

<p>:p</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Humourless</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/10/29/john_cooper_works_gp_tuning_kit_first_photos/comment-page-3/#comment-27130</link>
		<dc:creator>Humourless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2005 16:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewgifford.com/2005/10/29/#comment-27130</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;I&#039;d say very clever design of the sideskirts and rear wing has eliminated the need for a rear windscreen wiper.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;...and I&#039;d say there&#039;s a lovely bridge for sale in Brooklyn.  ;)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I&#8217;d say very clever design of the sideskirts and rear wing has eliminated the need for a rear windscreen wiper.&#8221;</p>

<p>&#8230;and I&#8217;d say there&#8217;s a lovely bridge for sale in Brooklyn.  ;)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
