MotoringFile Analysis: JCW GP Kit

With all the hype and build up of the rumored “lightweight” Cooper S, there was probably little MINI could do to actually impress everyone. With numbers like 230bhp and 15% weight reduction being bandied around, it would have taken a Herculean effort by BMW engineers to meet expectations and keep the car certified for sale around the world easily without spending a boat load of engineering time and money. Not to mention that all this work was going into a model less than a year away from being completely replaced. With that in mind, the JCW GP starts to make a bit more sense.

The JCW GP prototype shown in Misano ant MINI United was just that… a prototype. BMW/MINI engineers are still working on the final engine modifications, styling, and interior design. So with that said we’ll be offering our analysis on the car shown at Misano and the specifications provided by MINI Press.

Performance

Since we don’t have test figures yet, we can only judge the car by it’s raw performance.

Power: 218bhp (likely to be around 215hp for the US)
The JCW GP power gains over the standard MCS JCW are accomplished by modifying the intercooler and tweaking the ECU. Not rocket science but then again what could we hope for with a supercharged engine in it’s last year of production. But 218 bhp? Surely this special edition could be more special? I imagine the economic realities of tweaking an engine that was soon to be discontinued were hard to overcome. While MINI engineers surely could have squeezed more power out of the trusty Tritec, they most likely didn’t have the time, staff, or budget to get it done. Furthermore, they have to retain the engines eco-friendly qualities for it to be certified for sale on many world markets. So 218 bhp it is.

Weight savings: 40kg (or 88.1 pounds)
There were lots of rumors of carbon fiber but in the end MINI decided against it. Reportedly it would have been too costly to homologate for worldwide sales (the proposed thinner glass fell into this category as well). So that leaves us with aluminum control arms (not insignificant), deleted rear seats and sound deadening material. MINI is also planning to offer optional radio and A/C delete to further reduce the weight of the car. While undoubtedly the use of aluminum and carbon fiber would have been welcome by most, final costs would have sky-rocketed. And if costs weren’t the only issue with light-weight materials, you can bet that government regulations were right behind them.

I think MINI has walked a fine line rather well between weight reduction and producing a car that is still marketable to a wide audience. While engineers could have certainly pulled out more weight and in turn more creature comforts, the potential market would have likely been reduced to a level that would have not made the car economically feasible.

Improved Aerodynamics and Increase Downforce
As it turns out the JCW GP actually did spend some time in the wind tunnel. This is a nice surprise as it was assumed the body kit and wing were purely cosmetic. In fact it’s been reported that the JCW GP’s drag coefficient has been reduced from .36 to around .30. Since the MINI is known to get a little unbalanced in some high speeds situations, these are welcome additions. Particularly interesting is the “under body paneling”.

The other performance improvements on the JCW GP are no brainer. The JCW suspension kit helps get the power to the road and the car balanced in the corners and the JCW Brakes of course help it all come to a stop safely and quickly. However one aspect of the car that’s surely going to disappoint enthusiasts; the apparent brake cooling ducts are reportedly just for show. This is odd since JCW Motorsport actually sells a brake cooling ducts for the JCW Challenge cars. It would have seemed a no-brainer to integrate them into this car.

But all that said, the performance of the JCW GP isn’t necessarily where I’m personally disappointed. When one looks at the features and performance, for around the price of a well equipped MCS (roughly £22k or if we’re lucky low$30s), the JCW GP is not at all unreasonable.

Design (Exterior)

Yes folks, this is where things get ugly. Let’s start with the front.

The MINI design team have chosen to go a bit more extreme with the front apron. On the face of it I have no complaints there. And I have to say the front of the car really succeeds in letting everyone know it’s intentions. With the color coded grille, the flat black in the air-scoop (a great detail), slick brake ducts (unfortunately faux), it would seem the designers really sweated the details and the car is better for it.

But wait… what’s this? Why does the beloved black fender arch not visually extend to the apron? There’s certainly no well crafted design theme on the car that would make sense of this. Yet the MINI designers didn’t stop there however. They extended this design language to the side skirts. Here too, the decision still makes little sense. Visually there a disconnect that is obvious to almost all who see the car. Naturally MINI designers didn’t want to paint the arches as it de-empathizes the corners of the car (one of the most integral parts of the design). So why not simply extend the black trim to the bottom of the front apron at the very least? Could this be a classic case of something working in the sketches that simply didn’t translate well to the finished product? Or perhaps this portion of the design isn’t complete? I personally hope it’s the latter.

As we move around towards the rear, some of my faith is restored in a fairly simple and well executed rear apron. The base design is essentially the same as a standard MCS. However MINI have added extended lower black trim and added two silver bits that look to be air defusers of some kind. While they may not be functional, they do a good job of covering the black stock rear grilles (which as we all know are also not functional).

The rear wiper deletion is actually quite a nice touch. Apparently the change also mandated the JCW GP getting the MINI Convertible’s third brake light. All welcome changes for a car that probably won’t see a lot of in-climate weather.

And what about that rear spoiler? I was inclined to dismiss it’s size and form as a product from a designer who’d seen too much WRC. However I’m now told that it was specifically shaped in the wind-tunnel to reduce drag and increase down-force. Again, all good attributes for a high performance car. So the wing gets a nod of approval from this corner.

The color is hard to judge at this point. The photos I’ve seen from MINI PR range from blue-grey to just grey. I imagine it’s makes a but more sense in the flesh. Yet I can’t help but feel MINI is missing an obvious chance to give the car more of a motorsport feel. A medium red (BMW’s Imola) or even a traditional non-metallic British racing green would have seemingly been more welcome. But I’ll withhold final color-related opinions until I see the car in person.

That said there’s one aspect of the color I’m all too happy to judge; the red mirror caps. I’ve tried hard to understand the logic behind them. I’ve tried looking at the car at every angle imaginable. Yet I still can’t fully understand the logic of red mirror caps on a blue-grey car. I’m told that once we see the final interior, they will make more sense. Perhaps… but you can’t see the interior from the outside.

But all this pales in comparison to those absurd four-spoke wheels. Now I have to be honest, I loathe four-spoke wheels in general. At best they look inconsequential and weak. At their worst they look simply terrible. I’m afraid in this instance the answer would be both A and B. MINI has succeeded in creating an 18″ performance wheel that neither looks big or athletic. In fact it’s hard to believe they’re 18″ wheels at all. And there’s really no other way to put it, they simply look weak and contrived. Or to put it another way, like the product of a design theme gone too far.

Despite this, there’s still hope for the JCW GP. As an owner, you could easily replace the mirror caps. And of course there’s three other fine choices for 18″ wheels in the JCW catalog (not to mention countless after-market options). What’s the point of buying a MINI if you don’t make it your own!

The better news is that MINI isn’t quite done with the JCW GP. The final production version (again the one shown here is simply a prototype) will be debuted at the Geneva Motorshow in March. This gives MINI a little more time to touch up a few areas and finish off what sounds like a very impressive interior.

It’s probably safe to say that the JCW GP isn’t the car that most of the hardcore enthusiasts have been waiting for. However (assuming our pricing forecasts are correct) it just may be a viable option for someone interested in a no-frills JCW MCS. And as a bonus they’ll also be getting the rarest and fastest production MINI ever.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Written By: Gabe

  • Bryn

    JCW actually market/sell brake ducts that can be fitted in place of foglights on MCS so couldn’t they have gone with these? They were used – and promoted – on the Targa MINI which carried MINI Accessories’ sponsorship, if I recall correctly. Like most enthusiasts, I suspect, I prefer working features rather than stuck on fancy or faux ones, generally, irrespective of appearances. In fact, my favourite looking cars are mean and functional; what I’ve always thought of as “Beautifully Ugly” — know what I mean?

  • Dave Messina

    I think, given the constraints of cost, time, and manpower they were working under, this kit turned out pretty well. I get the impression that some people were expecting a race-ready MINI for $30k, which in my opinion is a little unrealistic.

    By the way, I’m surprised so many people are down on the color scheme — personally I think the grey/red looks pretty sweet.

  • GSP

    Sometimes it takes a while for me to get used to a new look. That is not happening with this car. Sad that BMW would consider making this the last hurrah of 1-st generation MINIs. Fugly. Contrived.

  • Jim

    Great analysis Gabe, and I appreciated your comments on the Woofcast. One question — during the show you intimated that the Mini’s “lead designer” was involved in the design of the JCW GP kit. Didn’t Frank Stephenson ex-Mini design lead move over to Ferrari about a year ago? If so, then it helps explain why the GP kit has poor design integration (although the .30 drag coefficient is impressive.)

  • http://www.motoringfile.com/ Gabe
    Great analysis Gabe, and I appreciated your comments on the Woofcast. One question — during the show you intimated that the Mini’s “lead designer” was involved in the design of the JCW GP kit. Didn’t Frank Stephenson ex-Mini design lead move over to Ferrari about a year ago? If so, then it helps explain why the GP kit has poor design integration (although the .30 drag coefficient is impressive.)

    Frank Stephenson moved to Ferarri/Maseratti/Fiat a 4-5 years ago. Gerd Hildebrandt is currently the lead designer at MINI (and has been for quite awhile. While Frank designed the current car, I don’t believe he ever held the position of head of design at MINI.

    It’s been implicated by a few people that Gerd Hildebrandt was somehow directly involved in the JCW GP design. While I’m not sure of what exactly he did on the car, he’s at the very least a figure head for it and all MINI design (and the one that subsequently gets the press positive or negative).

  • Z4MINI

    I’m fine with the car except for the color. But it DOES seem as if it were photographed on an overcast day. Maybe it will look better in the sun….or not.

  • Tony Marone

    The JCW GP! The car looks superb for what it is. Lightened, redesigned spoiler along with a new aero kit make me smile. My complaints are minor, or not, you decide. I would’ve liked to see the standard mini grill replaced with the black honeycomb ones (minor gripe). The problem about automotive performance nowadays is that manufacturers design and sell cars that are supposed to be marques and perfect for whatever they are designed to do as soon as they’re driven off the showroom floor. The Brakes and the Suspension Drop! Where are they? Calipers comparable to a Porsche 911 Turbo’s and a suspension drop like a GT Spec DB9′s would’ve made a good thing GREAT!!! There’s nothing more unsightly than a gap between the tire and wheel arch. I ABSOLUTELY LOVE the wheels. The cosmetics of the GP are of an aquired taste, as is anything else. You either like it or you don’t. And frankly, I LOVE IT!!! If the engineers made the car perfect ( slammed to the ground & with big fat brakes), then I would’nt have to screw up a perfect thing like everyone else. I already own a 2005 Cooper S and look forward to seeing the GP on the road soon. My opinions are all that they are. I’m sure the GP is as perfect as the engineers wanted it to be. Well see, I guess.

    ALOHA from Hawaii, MARONE

  • Pete

    what is up with this thing? i mean, they couldn’t have at least made it appealing to the eyes? if i was building a high performance street car, i would add as much carbon fiber to the body as possible:

    -carbon fiber mirrors -carbon grill bars -carbon front splitter -carbon wheel arches -carbon body panels under the side markers -carbon hood scoop -carbon roof -carbon tailgate handle -carbon door handles -carbon interior package i.e. dash, trim, steering wheel, door panels -carbon guages and a whole lotta them i mean boost, tach, speedo, oil guages, volt guage, temp guage

    -better brakes, cross drilled/slotted brembos front and back -sparco jcw seats -aero kit rear bumber cover with real grilles -carbon fiber aero kit style side skirts

    MORE POWER!!!!!!! 250 bhp at the least

  • Rollin

    On F1 cars the team leader has a red camera pod. I recently happened across some photos on the web of a couple race cars with red mirror caps which did not seem to be part of their graphics package — could the JCW GP red caps be derived from this racing visual language?

    It would be great for you guys to get someone from Mini design on the Whiteroof Radio podcast sometime.

  • tanya

    God, I get more pissed every time I look at this… thing. Despite the MC40 debacle, I actually had hopes this would be the real deal.

    Well, the next-gen Mini better be pretty effing incredible to make up for this sacrilege.

  • Charles

    I have a deposit down for one with this thought: I have eight months to decide if I want it. I love my modified 02MCS and was planning to drive it a couple more years. I have 60K miles on it, and I am sure I do not want either a longer wheelbase car or a turbo (no matter what the HP). My mods give me about 190 HP (crank), a very balanced car, and great ride on the five or six tracks I run on every season. But the two mods I do not have – big brakes and a stiffer suspension – are on the upcoming GP. I can’t decide about its looks.

    Finally, if I decide I don’t want it, it’s a sure bet that if I take delivery of the car at MSRP (as promosied by the dealer), I will make a few thousand dollars if I sell it. Enough to make a couple more improvements on my much-loved 02. Seems like a win-win however I play it.

  • Charlie

    There isn’t much blue in Michigan Blue! I stopped by the local BMW dealer the other day, and although they didn’t have any 7 Series cars in “Michigan Blue” (Color Code A38) on the lot, I looked at the color samples, and if NJT is correct and the GP is in fact coming in “Michigan Blue”, then the car photographs with a lot more blue in it than the color sample shows.

    Is NJT sure that the GP will be done in this color, ’cause it more like “Michigan Gray than Blue”!

  • Pingback: MotoringFile » Archive » Autoweek’s Take on the JCW GP

  • LMB

    I didn’t like the GP when I first saw it. I think like others it was not what I was expecting. But the more I’ve looked at it, the more I’ve come to like it. So much so I plan on buying one. The reported price here in the UK is £22K and for that you get a fully kitted out limited edition JCW, with Recaro’s to boot. To spec a similar MCS would cost well over £26K. It’s a steal !!!

  • Pingback: MotoringFile » Archive » MotoringFile 2005 in Review

  • Pingback: MotoringFile » Archive » The JCW GP Gets a Major Upgrade

  • Pingback: MotoringFile » Archive » New JCW GP Photos and Debut Info

  • Pingback: MotoringFile » Archive » John Cooper Works GP Kit - In Depth

  • Pingback: MotoringFile » Archive » MF Analysis: Factory JCW MINI


Sort by MINI model


OutMotoring

MINI Model Cheat Sheet

1st Gen MINI
R50: One & MC Hatch
R52: All 1st Gen MINI Convt.
R53: MCS Hatch
2nd Gen MINI
R55: Clubman
R56: Hatch
R57: Convertible
R58: Coupe
R59: Roadster
R60: MINI Crossover
R61: MINI Crossover Coupe
3rd Gen MINI
F55: Clubman
F56: Hatch
F57: Convertible
F60: MINI Crossover
F62: Traveller

Advertise with MotoringFile

If you or your company are interested in advertising on the most influential MINI website in the world, please visit our Advertising section. If you have further questions about becoming a sponsor or would like to see our rate sheet please feel free to contact us directly.
mini mini
Translate MotoringFile with Google: 
 
Morristown MINI Auctions
BF

MF NewsRoom

MotoringFile Buyers Guides

R50 ('02-'06 MC) Buyers Guide
R53 ('02-'06 MCS) Buyers Guide



MotoringFile Reviews

Auto Reviews:
'12 JCW Coupe
'11 Fiat 500 Sport
'11 Tesla Roaster 2.5 '11 Countryman Comparo
'11 Cooper S Hatch
'11 Countryman MCS (FWD)
'11 Countryman MC (auto)
'10 Mayfair MCS (auto)
'11 Countryman MCS (ALL4)
'10 MINI E
'10 Tesla Roadster Sport
'09 Cooper S Convertible
'09 JCW Coupe
'09 JCW Clubman
JCW Stage I vs JCW Stage II
'08 Clubman S (Auto)
1st Drive: '08 MINI Clubman
'08 Smart Fourtwo
Comparison: '08 BMW 135i
'06 R53 MCS vs '07 R56 MCS
'07 R56 JCW (Stage 1)
'07 MINI Cooper S Long Term
'07 BMW Z4 M Coupe
'07 MINI Cooper & Cooper S
Audio: '07 MC/MCS at the Track
'06 JCW GP Long term
Reader Review: JCW GP
'06 JCW Cooper S Long Term
Comparison: '06 Lotus Elise
Comparison: '06 Mazda MX5
Comparison: '06 UK Focus ST
Comparison: '06 Civic Si
Comparison: '04 TVR T350
Comparison: '06 Nissan 350z
Comparison: '06 VW GTI w/DSG
Podcast: Cooper S Auto
Podcast: BMW 325i
Podcast: JCW MC Soundkit
'04 JCW MINI Cooper Tuning Kit
'05 MCS: One Month Review
'05 MCS Auto
'05 JCW S 1st Drive
'05 MINI Cooper
'05 MCS Conv. Long Term
'05 MINI Cooper S
'05 MCS Cabrio 1st Drive
'04 JCW MCS First Drive
'04 MC w/JCW Tuning Kit
BMW M3 SMG Vs. MCS
'04 MINI Cooper CVT
'02 MCS 3 year Review
Autocrossing the MINI Range

cafepress



Performance Accessories:
M7 Rear Chassis Brace
R56 JCW Engine Kit
R56 JCW Suspension (Long-Term)
R56 JCW Suspension (Track)
R56 JCW Suspension (Street)
R53 Craven Speed Short Shifter
R53 M7 Understrut System
Kumho Ecsta SPT Tires
R53 M7 Strut Tower Plates
R53 JCW Alcantara Wheel
R53 JCW Brake Kit
R53 Webb 15% Pulley
R53 Helix MCSa 15% Pulley
R53 H-Sport 19mm Sway Bar
R53 MCS Supersprint Exhaust
Podcast: R53 MCS SS Exhaust
R53 JCW Cold Air Intake
Reader Rev.: R53 JCW Brakes
R50 Supersprint Exhaust
R50 Remus Exhaust
R50 Promini Intake
R50 Remus Dual Exhaust
Schroth Harness System
R50 CVT Steering Wheel Paddles

Exterior Accessories:
MINI Do More Clubman Hitch
Miniature's Receiver Hitch
OEM White Tail Lights

Lifestyle Accessories:
MINI_Motion Watch
MINI_Motion Driving Shoe

Audio:
MINI Digital SoundModul
ICE-Link Plus iPod Adapter
Official BMW/iPod adapter
ICE-Link iPod Adapter
Kenwood iPod Interface
Alpine iPod Interface
Harman Kardon Stereo

Interior Accessories:
JCW Alcantara Steering Wheel JCW Leather Dash
MCAW Auto Up Circuit
MINI Rear Camera
MINI Rear Saddle (official)
MINI Rear Cargo Storage Case
Official MINI Rear Saddle Bag
2004 MINI Armrest Reviewed
Mymini Knee Pad
MINI Bluetooth Kit
MINI Video Input
Aftermarket Bluetooth Integration
Ian Cull Auto-up Circuit
Universal Mobile Phone Holder