<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brand History: MINI and VW</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/11/29/brand-history-mini-and-vw/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/11/29/brand-history-mini-and-vw/</link>
	<description>MINI Cooper news, reviews and opinion.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 02:01:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paladin7</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/11/29/brand-history-mini-and-vw/comment-page-2/#comment-28779</link>
		<dc:creator>Paladin7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2005 23:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/?p=4498#comment-28779</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;By all means, much of the new MINI&#039;s success can be attributed to the history of the brand. I suspect however, that many bought for what it is now regardless of the noble history. Like art, if the perfomance and looks of a car are too unpreditable, it will not appeal to the buying public. On the otherhand, if things are too predictable, the fickle public can lose interest. By genius or luck (probably some of both), BMW created a design with lasting appeal.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I enjoy my 03 Cooper EVERYTIME I get in it. I love the perfomance, handling and the design. The lines of the body evoke a classic but not nostalgic appeal. They combined the best of the past with the right mix of novelty and found that sweet spot between boredom and chaos in a form that I will enjoy for many years to come.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So many cars on the road today look and feel the same. I used to be able to tell a Chrysler from a Ford, from a Chevy right down to make a model just from the headlights at a distance. Now I can&#039;t tell them apart in broad daylight. This is not because I am not capable, but because they are all so boring and samo samo that I am not drawn to them anymore. But a 1965 mustang reamins a thing of beauty. Car makers don&#039;t always know what makes their cars appealing. How many Mona Lisa&#039;s could Leonardo paint?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As for the future of MINI it is the engineering and art that will tell. The Traveller may serve a different function, but if it can be innovative without being too unpredictable and can keep from looking like everything else out there, it will succeed. That is a fine line to walk for any business.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I like the small, efficient, peppy fun of my 03 Cooper. I just ordered an 06 Cooper S. In the future, regardless of the looks or size, if the MINI&#039;s don&#039;t have the fun of the models of today, I will look for something else or keep mine going for as long as I can.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By all means, much of the new MINI&#8217;s success can be attributed to the history of the brand. I suspect however, that many bought for what it is now regardless of the noble history. Like art, if the perfomance and looks of a car are too unpreditable, it will not appeal to the buying public. On the otherhand, if things are too predictable, the fickle public can lose interest. By genius or luck (probably some of both), BMW created a design with lasting appeal.</p>

<p>I enjoy my 03 Cooper EVERYTIME I get in it. I love the perfomance, handling and the design. The lines of the body evoke a classic but not nostalgic appeal. They combined the best of the past with the right mix of novelty and found that sweet spot between boredom and chaos in a form that I will enjoy for many years to come.</p>

<p>So many cars on the road today look and feel the same. I used to be able to tell a Chrysler from a Ford, from a Chevy right down to make a model just from the headlights at a distance. Now I can&#8217;t tell them apart in broad daylight. This is not because I am not capable, but because they are all so boring and samo samo that I am not drawn to them anymore. But a 1965 mustang reamins a thing of beauty. Car makers don&#8217;t always know what makes their cars appealing. How many Mona Lisa&#8217;s could Leonardo paint?</p>

<p>As for the future of MINI it is the engineering and art that will tell. The Traveller may serve a different function, but if it can be innovative without being too unpredictable and can keep from looking like everything else out there, it will succeed. That is a fine line to walk for any business.</p>

<p>I like the small, efficient, peppy fun of my 03 Cooper. I just ordered an 06 Cooper S. In the future, regardless of the looks or size, if the MINI&#8217;s don&#8217;t have the fun of the models of today, I will look for something else or keep mine going for as long as I can.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/11/29/brand-history-mini-and-vw/comment-page-2/#comment-28716</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2005 05:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/?p=4498#comment-28716</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think it&#039;s really just the opposite.  The engine will have valvtronic (although they can&#039;t use the term due to copyright issues) among other BMW technologies.  It&#039;ll be by far more BMW like in it&#039;s use of technology than the current iron block Tritec.  This may help:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;[ &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/12/14/new_mini_38_psa_engine_range_in_detail&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;New MINI/PSA Engine Range in Detail&lt;/a&gt; ] MotoringFile&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s really just the opposite.  The engine will have valvtronic (although they can&#8217;t use the term due to copyright issues) among other BMW technologies.  It&#8217;ll be by far more BMW like in it&#8217;s use of technology than the current iron block Tritec.  This may help:</p>

<p>[ <a href="http://www.motoringfile.com/2004/12/14/new_mini_38_psa_engine_range_in_detail" rel="nofollow">New MINI/PSA Engine Range in Detail</a> ] MotoringFile</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/11/29/brand-history-mini-and-vw/comment-page-2/#comment-28713</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2005 05:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/?p=4498#comment-28713</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Does anyone else think the turbocharged new joint venture engine is unMINI?  Because at the least it is opposite of 50 years of BMW philosophy.  What happened to higher compression ratios and higher-revving engines?  If Honda can get 240 horses normally aspirated out of an I-4 in the S2000 why can&#039;t MINIget anywhere near that with forced induction?  And seriously 9,000 RPM is exciting.  Higher compression ratios make sense because MINI insists on high-octane gas anyway even though it isn&#039;t needed.  Thoughts?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone else think the turbocharged new joint venture engine is unMINI?  Because at the least it is opposite of 50 years of BMW philosophy.  What happened to higher compression ratios and higher-revving engines?  If Honda can get 240 horses normally aspirated out of an I-4 in the S2000 why can&#8217;t MINIget anywhere near that with forced induction?  And seriously 9,000 RPM is exciting.  Higher compression ratios make sense because MINI insists on high-octane gas anyway even though it isn&#8217;t needed.  Thoughts?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/11/29/brand-history-mini-and-vw/comment-page-2/#comment-28606</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 03:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/?p=4498#comment-28606</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;For all those who are worried about MINI tampering with it&#039;s iconic design, don&#039;t be. MINI and BMW execs have said time and time again that they hope to emulate Porsche in it&#039;s slow evolution of the 911.  It&#039;s almost been a mantra over the years.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For all those who are worried about MINI tampering with it&#8217;s iconic design, don&#8217;t be. MINI and BMW execs have said time and time again that they hope to emulate Porsche in it&#8217;s slow evolution of the 911.  It&#8217;s almost been a mantra over the years.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shep</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/11/29/brand-history-mini-and-vw/comment-page-2/#comment-28605</link>
		<dc:creator>shep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 03:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/?p=4498#comment-28605</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I too am concerned about frequent changes of visual design, made apparently just to &quot;freshen up&quot; the appearance. If you take the myriad cosmetic differences between the &#039;02 and the &#039;06, and extrapolate this for a dozen or two years into the future, the 2020 Mini will look very different indeed from the 2002 model. This is a bad idea, given that most of the &#039;02 design is so darned good. (One exception: a square SatNav looks silly in a circular surround).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s a different matter for me with engine, brakes, transmission, etc. By all means continue to update the mechanicals.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For me, the Classic Mini never looked the same once they replaced the original downcurved radiator grille with the hexagonal-shaped one. And that&#039;s a lot less change than I see in the new Minis already!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too am concerned about frequent changes of visual design, made apparently just to &#8220;freshen up&#8221; the appearance. If you take the myriad cosmetic differences between the &#8216;02 and the &#8216;06, and extrapolate this for a dozen or two years into the future, the 2020 Mini will look very different indeed from the 2002 model. This is a bad idea, given that most of the &#8216;02 design is so darned good. (One exception: a square SatNav looks silly in a circular surround).</p>

<p>It&#8217;s a different matter for me with engine, brakes, transmission, etc. By all means continue to update the mechanicals.</p>

<p>For me, the Classic Mini never looked the same once they replaced the original downcurved radiator grille with the hexagonal-shaped one. And that&#8217;s a lot less change than I see in the new Minis already!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/11/29/brand-history-mini-and-vw/comment-page-2/#comment-28602</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 02:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/?p=4498#comment-28602</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s true the original Mini was a clever economy car, but in its final decade of production (the 1990s) the Mini could no longer compete as an econobox and enjoyed a renaissance.   It was sold then solely on nostalgia and its considerable sporting and luxury credentials.  This helped lead the way to the launch of the new MINI.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s true the original Mini was a clever economy car, but in its final decade of production (the 1990s) the Mini could no longer compete as an econobox and enjoyed a renaissance.   It was sold then solely on nostalgia and its considerable sporting and luxury credentials.  This helped lead the way to the launch of the new MINI.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hugh</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/11/29/brand-history-mini-and-vw/comment-page-2/#comment-28601</link>
		<dc:creator>hugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 02:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/?p=4498#comment-28601</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I bought a new 70 Beetle and new 74 Rabbit. Loved them. In the 80s I went to Volvo 240 and 740 to accomodate my growing family. With empty-nest syndrome, not knowing how much VW had changed, I returned, buying a new 99.5 Jetta VR6.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Woe was me. I experienced everything bad you ever heard about that pos. Sold it at at a tremendous loss (had to wholesale it)this year when I got my 05MCS.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I shudder to think that I was so brainwashed by the VW mystique, that in January of this year, when they were selling GTI VR6s at $5000 below msrp, in spite of all of the forums like VW Sucks, My Lemon VW, a dealer network of complete idiots, and abandonment by VWOA, I still considered buying one.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Fortuitously, I test drove an MCS first, fell in love, and the rest is history.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I love my MCS like I loved my Beetle and Rabbit.I too fear for what the future holds. I&#039;m seriously thinking of trading it in for an 06, just in case. MINI may well go the route of VW. BMW is very unpredictable. They&#039;ve made serious marketing blunders and there&#039;s no assurance that the MINI will be immune to various upsizing, upscaling marketing ploys if they abandon their present market and try to capture a larger share of the upper income market.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought a new 70 Beetle and new 74 Rabbit. Loved them. In the 80s I went to Volvo 240 and 740 to accomodate my growing family. With empty-nest syndrome, not knowing how much VW had changed, I returned, buying a new 99.5 Jetta VR6.</p>

<p>Woe was me. I experienced everything bad you ever heard about that pos. Sold it at at a tremendous loss (had to wholesale it)this year when I got my 05MCS.</p>

<p>I shudder to think that I was so brainwashed by the VW mystique, that in January of this year, when they were selling GTI VR6s at $5000 below msrp, in spite of all of the forums like VW Sucks, My Lemon VW, a dealer network of complete idiots, and abandonment by VWOA, I still considered buying one.</p>

<p>Fortuitously, I test drove an MCS first, fell in love, and the rest is history.</p>

<p>I love my MCS like I loved my Beetle and Rabbit.I too fear for what the future holds. I&#8217;m seriously thinking of trading it in for an 06, just in case. MINI may well go the route of VW. BMW is very unpredictable. They&#8217;ve made serious marketing blunders and there&#8217;s no assurance that the MINI will be immune to various upsizing, upscaling marketing ploys if they abandon their present market and try to capture a larger share of the upper income market.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trick</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/11/29/brand-history-mini-and-vw/comment-page-2/#comment-28598</link>
		<dc:creator>Trick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 23:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/?p=4498#comment-28598</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Curious: Is there a precedent for a MINI Speedster?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curious: Is there a precedent for a MINI Speedster?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snid</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/11/29/brand-history-mini-and-vw/comment-page-2/#comment-28593</link>
		<dc:creator>snid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 19:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/?p=4498#comment-28593</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Here&#039;s my &quot;where I&#039;d like to see MINI go&quot; list, which doesn&#039;t make much sense.  :)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Keep a low-spec car available.  Lighter is better than more powerful.  I love my Cooper - all 115hp of it.  I love that people think &quot;1.6 litres and 115 hp?  How can you stand to drive that?&quot; and then I go flying around the track at HPDE events.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t like the thought that all the MINIs will end up being heavier, and more powerful.  Sure, a majority of the on-line presence loves their 200hp hopped-up MCSs.  Not for me, though.  Keep building &quot;the underdog&quot; please.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And, as a dream, a light weight, 2 seat, removable hardtop speedster.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Keep it light, keep it simple.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s my &#8220;where I&#8217;d like to see MINI go&#8221; list, which doesn&#8217;t make much sense.  :)</p>

<p>Keep a low-spec car available.  Lighter is better than more powerful.  I love my Cooper &#8211; all 115hp of it.  I love that people think &#8220;1.6 litres and 115 hp?  How can you stand to drive that?&#8221; and then I go flying around the track at HPDE events.</p>

<p>I don&#8217;t like the thought that all the MINIs will end up being heavier, and more powerful.  Sure, a majority of the on-line presence loves their 200hp hopped-up MCSs.  Not for me, though.  Keep building &#8220;the underdog&#8221; please.</p>

<p>And, as a dream, a light weight, 2 seat, removable hardtop speedster.</p>

<p>Keep it light, keep it simple.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BwanaYak</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/11/29/brand-history-mini-and-vw/comment-page-1/#comment-28592</link>
		<dc:creator>BwanaYak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 19:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/?p=4498#comment-28592</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Bring on the Traveller!  I love my &#039;06 MCS, and I hope MINI continues to develop that platform while maintaining its simplicity and performance, but I need more room!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m probably not your typical MINI owner, if there is such a thing.  I put two kayaks and a bike on top of my MCS and it was beautiful sight.  Two days worth of camping, kayaking and partying gear stuffed inside for me and my wife, and we still had more than enough power to leave everyone behind on the interstate as we accelerated up the mountainsides of West Virginia.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The only thing I miss with my MCS is that I can only share the fun with one other person at a time (back seat passengers just don&#039;t enjoy the experience for some reason).  That&#039;s why I am eagerly anticipating the Traveller, because it is everything I love about my MCS, with room to share the fun with my friends and/or family.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t understand the folks who cringe whenever the Traveller is mentioned.  The Traveller is a separate product that appeals to a different group of people.  It won&#039;t replace the current MINI any more than the MCS or Cabrio did.  But there are plenty of folks like me who are looking for the unique qualities of the MINI while needing a more (dare I utter the word?) utilitarian vehicle.  If MINI needs to grow market share, they should do it by offering new models to appeal to new markets rather than trying to redesign the current models to please wider audiences.  Keep the MINI Cooper true to its original concept and bring on the MINI Traveller!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;BTW, you&#039;d be surprised how much driving an MCS and paddling a whitewater kayak have in common.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;BwanaYak&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bring on the Traveller!  I love my &#8216;06 MCS, and I hope MINI continues to develop that platform while maintaining its simplicity and performance, but I need more room!</p>

<p>I&#8217;m probably not your typical MINI owner, if there is such a thing.  I put two kayaks and a bike on top of my MCS and it was beautiful sight.  Two days worth of camping, kayaking and partying gear stuffed inside for me and my wife, and we still had more than enough power to leave everyone behind on the interstate as we accelerated up the mountainsides of West Virginia.</p>

<p>The only thing I miss with my MCS is that I can only share the fun with one other person at a time (back seat passengers just don&#8217;t enjoy the experience for some reason).  That&#8217;s why I am eagerly anticipating the Traveller, because it is everything I love about my MCS, with room to share the fun with my friends and/or family.</p>

<p>I don&#8217;t understand the folks who cringe whenever the Traveller is mentioned.  The Traveller is a separate product that appeals to a different group of people.  It won&#8217;t replace the current MINI any more than the MCS or Cabrio did.  But there are plenty of folks like me who are looking for the unique qualities of the MINI while needing a more (dare I utter the word?) utilitarian vehicle.  If MINI needs to grow market share, they should do it by offering new models to appeal to new markets rather than trying to redesign the current models to please wider audiences.  Keep the MINI Cooper true to its original concept and bring on the MINI Traveller!</p>

<p>BTW, you&#8217;d be surprised how much driving an MCS and paddling a whitewater kayak have in common.</p>

<p>BwanaYak</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snid</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/11/29/brand-history-mini-and-vw/comment-page-1/#comment-28578</link>
		<dc:creator>snid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 12:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/?p=4498#comment-28578</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I have yet to meet anyone who owned a Golf prior to owning a MINI.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Raises hand.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>I have yet to meet anyone who owned a Golf prior to owning a MINI.</blockquote>

<p>Raises hand.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/11/29/brand-history-mini-and-vw/comment-page-1/#comment-28577</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 12:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/?p=4498#comment-28577</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Shamus, I was not arguing. Rather debating some of the points. That&#039;s all.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shamus, I was not arguing. Rather debating some of the points. That&#8217;s all.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shamus</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/11/29/brand-history-mini-and-vw/comment-page-1/#comment-28576</link>
		<dc:creator>Shamus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 09:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/?p=4498#comment-28576</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Frank,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;My concerns remain that...my concerns, not yours or anyone elses for that matter.  Re-read the question at the begining of the post and state your concerns...don&#039;t argue with other people&#039;s.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank,</p>

<p>My concerns remain that&#8230;my concerns, not yours or anyone elses for that matter.  Re-read the question at the begining of the post and state your concerns&#8230;don&#8217;t argue with other people&#8217;s.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vanwall</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/11/29/brand-history-mini-and-vw/comment-page-1/#comment-28575</link>
		<dc:creator>Vanwall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 07:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/?p=4498#comment-28575</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;One thing people should keep in mind about the prodigious lifespan of the Mini, the Beetle, and the 2CV - they were over-engineered to begin with, but for the last 20 years or so, at the least, of their production - they were woefully behind the times as up-to-date engineered automobiles. The makers got complacent. Yes, they sold, but they were on the showroom floor because the makers had made the decision to spend money elsewhere rather than extensive progressive modernizing of the existing designs, especially early in the production cycle, and were essentialy boutique cars in the end.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The original Mini probably made little or no money over the course of its life for the various marques that made it, something that is not BMW&#039;s plan for the new MINI. Yes, part of that was management price-point errors, but even so, they all ended up close to banco and eventually were bought-out.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;VW found itself in one helluva hole in the seventies after changing direction away from the Beetle, until the FWD Golf and its derivitives, basically big Mini designs, saved their asses, and continued to do so for a long time as they were updated. Citroen&#039;s 2CV rather agricultural factory was running on last gasps for many years, and was not an asset at all at the end. FWD cars that owed a lot to the Mini were their salvation as well, and are kept very modern.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t see how the new MINI can survive as a fly in amber like the old days - the market has changed, and the MINI must adapt as it goes along. I have faith in BMW&#039;s management, they&#039;ve done a fantastic engineering job with the MINI, and if they can get over the service issues and the demographic marketing tweaks without too much trouble, I see a long life for the brand. As long as they don&#039;t get complacent. ;-)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;pre&gt;&lt;code&gt;           BCNU,
         Rob in Dago
&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing people should keep in mind about the prodigious lifespan of the Mini, the Beetle, and the 2CV &#8211; they were over-engineered to begin with, but for the last 20 years or so, at the least, of their production &#8211; they were woefully behind the times as up-to-date engineered automobiles. The makers got complacent. Yes, they sold, but they were on the showroom floor because the makers had made the decision to spend money elsewhere rather than extensive progressive modernizing of the existing designs, especially early in the production cycle, and were essentialy boutique cars in the end.</p>

<p>The original Mini probably made little or no money over the course of its life for the various marques that made it, something that is not BMW&#8217;s plan for the new MINI. Yes, part of that was management price-point errors, but even so, they all ended up close to banco and eventually were bought-out.</p>

<p>VW found itself in one helluva hole in the seventies after changing direction away from the Beetle, until the FWD Golf and its derivitives, basically big Mini designs, saved their asses, and continued to do so for a long time as they were updated. Citroen&#8217;s 2CV rather agricultural factory was running on last gasps for many years, and was not an asset at all at the end. FWD cars that owed a lot to the Mini were their salvation as well, and are kept very modern.</p>

<p>I don&#8217;t see how the new MINI can survive as a fly in amber like the old days &#8211; the market has changed, and the MINI must adapt as it goes along. I have faith in BMW&#8217;s management, they&#8217;ve done a fantastic engineering job with the MINI, and if they can get over the service issues and the demographic marketing tweaks without too much trouble, I see a long life for the brand. As long as they don&#8217;t get complacent. ;-)</p>

<pre><code>           BCNU,
         Rob in Dago
</code></pre>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/11/29/brand-history-mini-and-vw/comment-page-1/#comment-28573</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 06:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/?p=4498#comment-28573</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Volkswagen is a troubled car company. The $75,000+ Phaeton luxury sedan will be axed soon, making it one of the biggest flops in VWAG history. The Touareg SUV is suffering from teething quality problems, slows sales and dismal fuel economy. The &quot;New Beetle&quot; (aka Mark IV Golf) is the most obsolete car in VW showrooms right now. This car has not received any major facelifts or redesigns in ages. VW has been tight lipped about the future of the Beetle, but it has been rumored that VW doesn&#039;t intend to update it and will rather let it die peacefully under the shadow of future product offerings that will take its place.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The current Jetta is another dismal sales failure. A pig of a car that resembles more a Toyota Corolla. The MKIV Jetta was more akin of a BMW 3 series for the masses. Can you see what is wrong with the picture?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The current Passat is a run of the mill car. Not a sales success either. The current MKIV Golf, while a decent car in most respects is long on the tooth and also obsolete. VW has delayed the introduction of the MKV Golf in America. The MKV Golf has received very mixed reviews since its dayview introduction in Europe last year.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;VW killed the resurrection of one of their signature products: The VW BUS (Van).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;VW needs to address the following problems:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;1) Quality and reliability. VWs rate lower than most Korean makes!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;2) Lousy dealer/service network&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;3) Abandon their stupid and blind persuit of markets where they have no business being in (Phaeton). VW will always be &quot;The car of the people&quot;. VW will never be perceived as an alternative to a Mercedes, BMW, Lexus or even Audi.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;4) Address the quality problems and dismal resale values of their upscale Audi division. Audis have the worst resale values of any luxury car in the United States.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;5) bring back the &quot;spark&quot; that made the aircooled beetle, rabbit and golf cars desirable among consumer at their respective time periods.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;No amount of &quot;smart&quot; and &quot;Cool&quot; ads will pull VW away from the brink of the cliff.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Volkswagen is a troubled car company. The $75,000+ Phaeton luxury sedan will be axed soon, making it one of the biggest flops in VWAG history. The Touareg SUV is suffering from teething quality problems, slows sales and dismal fuel economy. The &#8220;New Beetle&#8221; (aka Mark IV Golf) is the most obsolete car in VW showrooms right now. This car has not received any major facelifts or redesigns in ages. VW has been tight lipped about the future of the Beetle, but it has been rumored that VW doesn&#8217;t intend to update it and will rather let it die peacefully under the shadow of future product offerings that will take its place.</p>

<p>The current Jetta is another dismal sales failure. A pig of a car that resembles more a Toyota Corolla. The MKIV Jetta was more akin of a BMW 3 series for the masses. Can you see what is wrong with the picture?</p>

<p>The current Passat is a run of the mill car. Not a sales success either. The current MKIV Golf, while a decent car in most respects is long on the tooth and also obsolete. VW has delayed the introduction of the MKV Golf in America. The MKV Golf has received very mixed reviews since its dayview introduction in Europe last year.</p>

<p>VW killed the resurrection of one of their signature products: The VW BUS (Van).</p>

<p>VW needs to address the following problems:</p>

<p>1) Quality and reliability. VWs rate lower than most Korean makes!</p>

<p>2) Lousy dealer/service network</p>

<p>3) Abandon their stupid and blind persuit of markets where they have no business being in (Phaeton). VW will always be &#8220;The car of the people&#8221;. VW will never be perceived as an alternative to a Mercedes, BMW, Lexus or even Audi.</p>

<p>4) Address the quality problems and dismal resale values of their upscale Audi division. Audis have the worst resale values of any luxury car in the United States.</p>

<p>5) bring back the &#8220;spark&#8221; that made the aircooled beetle, rabbit and golf cars desirable among consumer at their respective time periods.</p>

<p>No amount of &#8220;smart&#8221; and &#8220;Cool&#8221; ads will pull VW away from the brink of the cliff.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/11/29/brand-history-mini-and-vw/comment-page-1/#comment-28572</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 06:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/?p=4498#comment-28572</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Shamus, while I agree with the basic premise of your post, I feel compelled to say that MINI has done an outstanding job in bringing the MINI to the 21st century.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Keep in mind, the original Mini has manufactured, virtually unchanged, from 1959 until October 2000. Think about it... a very successful design that had not seen a major revamp in 41 years. How many new cars designed in the 1950&#039;s can you buy brand new today?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For BMW it was a daunting challenge to update this iconic classic automobile. The classic Mini while a beautiful, charming, great handling little car, lacks key safety features (In despite of offering front airbags in the mid-late 1990&#039;s Rover Minis), ammenities, etc.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Without me accusing you of being another &quot;Jim in Ohio&quot; for the MINI to be successful in the USA and elsewhere in the world, the car had to offer all the latest safety features. In a country like ours, where small cars (specially hatchbacks) carried a stigma of being death traps until the arrival of the MINI, the car would not have sold if the safety features would not have been there in the first place. Sure, 2,600 pounds is a lot for a Classic Mini (Whose weight probably was in the 1,600-1,800 ballpark) but I think it is about perfect for a modern day MINI. A VW Golf weighs close to 3,000 pounds and more.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Sorry, this maybe contradictory to your &quot;purist&quot; views but after spending quality time in and around classic Minis, I can say with confidence that MINI did their homework with the current car and it shows.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shamus, while I agree with the basic premise of your post, I feel compelled to say that MINI has done an outstanding job in bringing the MINI to the 21st century.</p>

<p>Keep in mind, the original Mini has manufactured, virtually unchanged, from 1959 until October 2000. Think about it&#8230; a very successful design that had not seen a major revamp in 41 years. How many new cars designed in the 1950&#8217;s can you buy brand new today?</p>

<p>For BMW it was a daunting challenge to update this iconic classic automobile. The classic Mini while a beautiful, charming, great handling little car, lacks key safety features (In despite of offering front airbags in the mid-late 1990&#8217;s Rover Minis), ammenities, etc.</p>

<p>Without me accusing you of being another &#8220;Jim in Ohio&#8221; for the MINI to be successful in the USA and elsewhere in the world, the car had to offer all the latest safety features. In a country like ours, where small cars (specially hatchbacks) carried a stigma of being death traps until the arrival of the MINI, the car would not have sold if the safety features would not have been there in the first place. Sure, 2,600 pounds is a lot for a Classic Mini (Whose weight probably was in the 1,600-1,800 ballpark) but I think it is about perfect for a modern day MINI. A VW Golf weighs close to 3,000 pounds and more.</p>

<p>Sorry, this maybe contradictory to your &#8220;purist&#8221; views but after spending quality time in and around classic Minis, I can say with confidence that MINI did their homework with the current car and it shows.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shamus</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/11/29/brand-history-mini-and-vw/comment-page-1/#comment-28570</link>
		<dc:creator>Shamus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 04:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/?p=4498#comment-28570</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think all manufacturers now are guilty of over-guessing the consumer base...trying too hard to come up with the &quot;latest and greatest&quot;.  Mini itself over-retro&#039;d the new MINI just to do something different.  Sure, there&#039;s probably a method to the madness, but if we can do a one-piece grille now, why come up with a two-piece to begin with?  Why put big, outlined circular panels in the doors?  Why make a twelve-foot car 2600 pounds?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Basically, what I&#039;m tring to say is this...think of your favorite car, the sleek beauty you dream about.  Is there anything gimicky about it?  Doubtfull.  Most &quot;classic&quot; cars are classic because they have a timeless beauty to them that defied the generational crap that has long since burried their competitors.  MINI needs to stay simple and consistent with their designs and overall message.  Stay away from over-kitchy, overweight, over-pretentious cars.  MINI&#039;s are small, simple and humble...keep them that way, period.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think all manufacturers now are guilty of over-guessing the consumer base&#8230;trying too hard to come up with the &#8220;latest and greatest&#8221;.  Mini itself over-retro&#8217;d the new MINI just to do something different.  Sure, there&#8217;s probably a method to the madness, but if we can do a one-piece grille now, why come up with a two-piece to begin with?  Why put big, outlined circular panels in the doors?  Why make a twelve-foot car 2600 pounds?</p>

<p>Basically, what I&#8217;m tring to say is this&#8230;think of your favorite car, the sleek beauty you dream about.  Is there anything gimicky about it?  Doubtfull.  Most &#8220;classic&#8221; cars are classic because they have a timeless beauty to them that defied the generational crap that has long since burried their competitors.  MINI needs to stay simple and consistent with their designs and overall message.  Stay away from over-kitchy, overweight, over-pretentious cars.  MINI&#8217;s are small, simple and humble&#8230;keep them that way, period.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrV</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/11/29/brand-history-mini-and-vw/comment-page-1/#comment-28569</link>
		<dc:creator>MrV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 04:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/?p=4498#comment-28569</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Very interesting to see this comparison made.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;VW lost me as a customer the minute the abandoned their heritage.  I am convinced that they did this &lt;em&gt;INTENTIONALLY&lt;/em&gt; because they wanted to distance themselves from their &quot;cheap&quot; heritage.  If you don&#039;t believe me, go ask on any aircooled VW forum if they feel supported by VWAG or VW of America.  VWOA has sued enthusiasts and actively tried to sabatoge the classic community.  I know, becuase I was (well, I guess I still am since I continue to own a classic VW) part of that community.  When VW started going after vendors that were making parts for the old aircooled cars that VW didn&#039;t make anymore, it was obvious they didn&#039;t want those cars on the road anymore.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;MINI is in a little bit different situation, since they are really a new company now.  I don&#039;t think they owe brand loyalty to the &quot;old&quot; Mini made under Austin or Rover.  It&#039;s nice that they do nod their head that way and actively acknowledge their roots though.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So I think in a very real way, MINI must stay true to the ideals behind the current &quot;New&quot; MINIs.  That means performance, fun, individuality.  Not so much cost though.  I think the base $17000 Cooper is the most fun you can have at that price, but lets not pay so much attention to the cost of the MINI.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I agree that the worst thing MINI could do is try to woo a much larger audience.  Don&#039;t make it quieter, softer, more comfortable, more convenient, more appealing to the masses.  Let the masses buy Corrollas.  Let MINI stand for what it is.... always.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;== Jay&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting to see this comparison made.</p>

<p>VW lost me as a customer the minute the abandoned their heritage.  I am convinced that they did this <em>INTENTIONALLY</em> because they wanted to distance themselves from their &#8220;cheap&#8221; heritage.  If you don&#8217;t believe me, go ask on any aircooled VW forum if they feel supported by VWAG or VW of America.  VWOA has sued enthusiasts and actively tried to sabatoge the classic community.  I know, becuase I was (well, I guess I still am since I continue to own a classic VW) part of that community.  When VW started going after vendors that were making parts for the old aircooled cars that VW didn&#8217;t make anymore, it was obvious they didn&#8217;t want those cars on the road anymore.</p>

<p>MINI is in a little bit different situation, since they are really a new company now.  I don&#8217;t think they owe brand loyalty to the &#8220;old&#8221; Mini made under Austin or Rover.  It&#8217;s nice that they do nod their head that way and actively acknowledge their roots though.</p>

<p>So I think in a very real way, MINI must stay true to the ideals behind the current &#8220;New&#8221; MINIs.  That means performance, fun, individuality.  Not so much cost though.  I think the base $17000 Cooper is the most fun you can have at that price, but lets not pay so much attention to the cost of the MINI.</p>

<p>I agree that the worst thing MINI could do is try to woo a much larger audience.  Don&#8217;t make it quieter, softer, more comfortable, more convenient, more appealing to the masses.  Let the masses buy Corrollas.  Let MINI stand for what it is&#8230;. always.</p>

<p>== Jay</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham Chandler (aka track-toy)</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/11/29/brand-history-mini-and-vw/comment-page-1/#comment-28567</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Chandler (aka track-toy)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 03:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/?p=4498#comment-28567</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;My observations of modern automotive engineering and design is that modern cars tend to grow fat over the years. Look at the Nissan Altima. MINI-sized to begin with and now an overstuffed pork barrel.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I understand the mentality. Start small and gradually start feeding followers of the car with more and more stuff so that a bigger sticker can be justified.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;With our MINIs we don&#039;t need or want that (IMHO). BMW unfortunately just did that with the 3-series to the extent that they had to put a version of the 330 engine in the 325 instead of the 2.5 liter engine. So now the 3-series looks as big as the old 5-series.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The MINI is now the perfect size. Let&#039;s not grow it or it won&#039;t be a MINI!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My observations of modern automotive engineering and design is that modern cars tend to grow fat over the years. Look at the Nissan Altima. MINI-sized to begin with and now an overstuffed pork barrel.</p>

<p>I understand the mentality. Start small and gradually start feeding followers of the car with more and more stuff so that a bigger sticker can be justified.</p>

<p>With our MINIs we don&#8217;t need or want that (IMHO). BMW unfortunately just did that with the 3-series to the extent that they had to put a version of the 330 engine in the 325 instead of the 2.5 liter engine. So now the 3-series looks as big as the old 5-series.</p>

<p>The MINI is now the perfect size. Let&#8217;s not grow it or it won&#8217;t be a MINI!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pete burke</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2005/11/29/brand-history-mini-and-vw/comment-page-1/#comment-28562</link>
		<dc:creator>pete burke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 01:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/?p=4498#comment-28562</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Please keep it simple! Rememeber Freude am Fahren!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please keep it simple! Rememeber Freude am Fahren!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
