<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MINI Sourced Triumph Still Years Away</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/02/15/a-mini-sourced-triumph-not-so-fast/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/02/15/a-mini-sourced-triumph-not-so-fast/</link>
	<description>MotoringFile &#124; MINI news, reviews and opinion. MINI Cooper, Cooper S, Clubman, Countryman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:14:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: gokartride</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/02/15/a-mini-sourced-triumph-not-so-fast/comment-page-1/#comment-31923</link>
		<dc:creator>gokartride</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/02/15/a-mini-sourced-triumph-not-so-fast/#comment-31923</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;If it&#039;s only a rumor then so be it.  It is interesting though that a tidbit like this could cause such a stir.  Maybe someone out there is watching and listening, but if there weren&#039;t it would be no surprise.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it&#8217;s only a rumor then so be it.  It is interesting though that a tidbit like this could cause such a stir.  Maybe someone out there is watching and listening, but if there weren&#8217;t it would be no surprise.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: isellem</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/02/15/a-mini-sourced-triumph-not-so-fast/comment-page-1/#comment-31909</link>
		<dc:creator>isellem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 02:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/02/15/a-mini-sourced-triumph-not-so-fast/#comment-31909</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;ya... their isn&#039;t a platform for the triumph to be built on... it coudn&#039;t be built on the MINI platform... and the z4 chasis is likely to expensive... plus the car is built in america... i don&#039;t know how warm of a welcome it would be to LAUNCH a CLASSIC BRITISH ICON... thats made in america... kind of like having the next generation camero built in china... it just wouldn&#039;t be wise... plus we are talking about an entire brand not just an individual car... plus the triumph if built on the z4 chasis would be a direct competitor to the z4 and proabably rob sales... now if they were to come out with a triumph to battle th mx5 and solistice OR take the place of the S2000... then thats something completly differnt but again a less expensive chassis would have to be utilized&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ya&#8230; their isn&#8217;t a platform for the triumph to be built on&#8230; it coudn&#8217;t be built on the MINI platform&#8230; and the z4 chasis is likely to expensive&#8230; plus the car is built in america&#8230; i don&#8217;t know how warm of a welcome it would be to LAUNCH a CLASSIC BRITISH ICON&#8230; thats made in america&#8230; kind of like having the next generation camero built in china&#8230; it just wouldn&#8217;t be wise&#8230; plus we are talking about an entire brand not just an individual car&#8230; plus the triumph if built on the z4 chasis would be a direct competitor to the z4 and proabably rob sales&#8230; now if they were to come out with a triumph to battle th mx5 and solistice OR take the place of the S2000&#8230; then thats something completly differnt but again a less expensive chassis would have to be utilized</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bud Dill</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/02/15/a-mini-sourced-triumph-not-so-fast/comment-page-1/#comment-31908</link>
		<dc:creator>Bud Dill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 02:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/02/15/a-mini-sourced-triumph-not-so-fast/#comment-31908</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I was never a devotee of the Triumph TR series. I have owned classic MGs, i.e., a TD and TC which I thought were extremely classic examples of the marque.
I think the people in Munchen should consider resurecting the Austin Healy 3000 and/or even the cool looking &quot;bug-eyed&quot; Sprite. That would be a step in the right retro direction.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was never a devotee of the Triumph TR series. I have owned classic MGs, i.e., a TD and TC which I thought were extremely classic examples of the marque.
I think the people in Munchen should consider resurecting the Austin Healy 3000 and/or even the cool looking &#8220;bug-eyed&#8221; Sprite. That would be a step in the right retro direction.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathaniel Salzman</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/02/15/a-mini-sourced-triumph-not-so-fast/comment-page-1/#comment-31877</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel Salzman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 18:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/02/15/a-mini-sourced-triumph-not-so-fast/#comment-31877</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Give me a reborn MGb any day! I love the look of the old MG&#039;s so much more than the Triumphs. Like the MINI, there&#039;s so much charm there to be had. Of course, I&#039;m partial - dad&#039;s &#039;69 MGb GT is like a part of the family.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Give me a reborn MGb any day! I love the look of the old MG&#8217;s so much more than the Triumphs. Like the MINI, there&#8217;s so much charm there to be had. Of course, I&#8217;m partial &#8211; dad&#8217;s &#8217;69 MGb GT is like a part of the family.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bartmack</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/02/15/a-mini-sourced-triumph-not-so-fast/comment-page-1/#comment-31868</link>
		<dc:creator>Bartmack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/02/15/a-mini-sourced-triumph-not-so-fast/#comment-31868</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I agree that they should be listening.. I would not likely buy an M1, probably would not buy a Z4, but would have a very hard time keeping my hands off of a BMW-engineered Triumph. The truth is they would not be competing against themselves, they would be picking up sales that they would not otherwise get.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t care much for the looks of the BMW line, but I do appreciate the great engineering, the excellent performance, and when that is combined with the passion and style of well-done retro cues(key wording there, &#039;well-done&#039;) its an unbeatable combination IMO.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;MINI made car enthusiasts out of people who previously thought cars were an appliance, I think because the MINI was so vey well done. If they applied that same commitment to quality design toward a Triumph.. (or MG, but I like the Triumph nameplate better for whatever reason).. I think it would start a whole new era of British sports car fanaticism. =)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that they should be listening.. I would not likely buy an M1, probably would not buy a Z4, but would have a very hard time keeping my hands off of a BMW-engineered Triumph. The truth is they would not be competing against themselves, they would be picking up sales that they would not otherwise get.</p>

<p>I don&#8217;t care much for the looks of the BMW line, but I do appreciate the great engineering, the excellent performance, and when that is combined with the passion and style of well-done retro cues(key wording there, &#8216;well-done&#8217;) its an unbeatable combination IMO.</p>

<p>MINI made car enthusiasts out of people who previously thought cars were an appliance, I think because the MINI was so vey well done. If they applied that same commitment to quality design toward a Triumph.. (or MG, but I like the Triumph nameplate better for whatever reason).. I think it would start a whole new era of British sports car fanaticism. =)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Kane</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/02/15/a-mini-sourced-triumph-not-so-fast/comment-page-1/#comment-31861</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Kane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/02/15/a-mini-sourced-triumph-not-so-fast/#comment-31861</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I just toured the MINI plant, and while they were willing to talk about the new Engine, and the Travler, talk of the Triumph was quickly quashed and deemed not true.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;-- Joshua&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just toured the MINI plant, and while they were willing to talk about the new Engine, and the Travler, talk of the Triumph was quickly quashed and deemed not true.</p>

<p>&#8211; Joshua</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doug</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/02/15/a-mini-sourced-triumph-not-so-fast/comment-page-1/#comment-31850</link>
		<dc:creator>doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/02/15/a-mini-sourced-triumph-not-so-fast/#comment-31850</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;That is certainly possible seeing how miserable the Z4 has been doing for BMW.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is certainly possible seeing how miserable the Z4 has been doing for BMW.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: planeguy</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/02/15/a-mini-sourced-triumph-not-so-fast/comment-page-1/#comment-31848</link>
		<dc:creator>planeguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/02/15/a-mini-sourced-triumph-not-so-fast/#comment-31848</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I would think it would be simple to just build a triumph on the z4 line.  Granted we would all prefer a ground up build, but the feasability of capitalizing on the retro-trend by re-skining the Z4 and selling it as a triumph is certainly there.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would think it would be simple to just build a triumph on the z4 line.  Granted we would all prefer a ground up build, but the feasability of capitalizing on the retro-trend by re-skining the Z4 and selling it as a triumph is certainly there.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: O(=^=)O Capn</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/02/15/a-mini-sourced-triumph-not-so-fast/comment-page-1/#comment-31839</link>
		<dc:creator>O(=^=)O Capn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/02/15/a-mini-sourced-triumph-not-so-fast/#comment-31839</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;If anything, we&#039;re giving them Ideas&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If anything, we&#8217;re giving them Ideas</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doug</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/02/15/a-mini-sourced-triumph-not-so-fast/comment-page-1/#comment-31832</link>
		<dc:creator>doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 13:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/02/15/a-mini-sourced-triumph-not-so-fast/#comment-31832</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I can see BMW bringing their own family first... 
meaning more or less...
Their development and model range on the new 1 series is moving at such furious pace that it&#039;s almost too much for them to consider a Triumph model line that would directly compete against the 1.  Especially when the ///M 1 is on the line.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s a fun rumor though and maybe someday soon it will be confirmed either way.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see BMW bringing their own family first&#8230; 
meaning more or less&#8230;
Their development and model range on the new 1 series is moving at such furious pace that it&#8217;s almost too much for them to consider a Triumph model line that would directly compete against the 1.  Especially when the ///M 1 is on the line.</p>

<p>It&#8217;s a fun rumor though and maybe someday soon it will be confirmed either way.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

