<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Next Generation MINI Slims Down</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/03/14/the-next-generation-mini-slims-down/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/03/14/the-next-generation-mini-slims-down/</link>
	<description>MINI Cooper news, reviews and opinion.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 05:28:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MotoringFile &#187; Archive &#187; Scoop: 2007 MINI to Get More Power &#38; Less Weight</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/03/14/the-next-generation-mini-slims-down/comment-page-1/#comment-44692</link>
		<dc:creator>MotoringFile &#187; Archive &#187; Scoop: 2007 MINI to Get More Power &#38; Less Weight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 12:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/03/14/the-next-generation-mini-slims-down/#comment-44692</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] A few months back we alluded that the R56 Cooper S would be at least slightly lighter than the current car. What we didn&#8217;t know is that this weight reduction has been described as significant by those in the know. Our source went onto say, &#8220;knowing that we only got a 88lbs savings from the GP, what you will see with the 2007 MCS will probably shock a few people.&#8221; That weight reduction combined with increased power and torque (delivered more evenly through the rev range we&#8217;re told) should create increased performence on both the road and the track. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A few months back we alluded that the R56 Cooper S would be at least slightly lighter than the current car. What we didn&#8217;t know is that this weight reduction has been described as significant by those in the know. Our source went onto say, &#8220;knowing that we only got a 88lbs savings from the GP, what you will see with the 2007 MCS will probably shock a few people.&#8221; That weight reduction combined with increased power and torque (delivered more evenly through the rev range we&#8217;re told) should create increased performence on both the road and the track. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whiteroofradio.com &#187; Woofcast #44</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/03/14/the-next-generation-mini-slims-down/comment-page-1/#comment-34999</link>
		<dc:creator>whiteroofradio.com &#187; Woofcast #44</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2006 13:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/03/14/the-next-generation-mini-slims-down/#comment-34999</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Next Gen MINI slims down [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Next Gen MINI slims down [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crusoe</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/03/14/the-next-generation-mini-slims-down/comment-page-1/#comment-33587</link>
		<dc:creator>Crusoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 21:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/03/14/the-next-generation-mini-slims-down/#comment-33587</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Engine definitely, maybe seat frames in aluminum or the new seat design, lighter wheels hopefully.. though as noted they use the lightest base car for wt. and the holies are very light. Interior looks scarce, even a little less platic is less weight. Then again it may just be the difference in engine wt of maybe 30 to 80 lbs which is great!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Rear windows look to be operable.  Now that they are dropping the wrap around glass, maybe made it easier to do.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Engine definitely, maybe seat frames in aluminum or the new seat design, lighter wheels hopefully.. though as noted they use the lightest base car for wt. and the holies are very light. Interior looks scarce, even a little less platic is less weight. Then again it may just be the difference in engine wt of maybe 30 to 80 lbs which is great!</p>

<p>Rear windows look to be operable.  Now that they are dropping the wrap around glass, maybe made it easier to do.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BelowRadar</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/03/14/the-next-generation-mini-slims-down/comment-page-1/#comment-33403</link>
		<dc:creator>BelowRadar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 18:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/03/14/the-next-generation-mini-slims-down/#comment-33403</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;YES, YES, YES!!!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YES, YES, YES!!!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: La nuova Mini - piÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¹ leggera della vecchia ?</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/03/14/the-next-generation-mini-slims-down/comment-page-1/#comment-33391</link>
		<dc:creator>La nuova Mini - piÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¹ leggera della vecchia ?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 15:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/03/14/the-next-generation-mini-slims-down/#comment-33391</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Il sito da seguire per i Mini-dipendenti ÃƒÆ&#8217;Ã‚Â¨ sicuramente Motoring File, di solito molto affidabile. Ieri riportava voci secondo cui la prossima generazione Mini sarÃƒÆ&#8217;Ã‚Â  piu leggera della attuale. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Plumbob</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/03/14/the-next-generation-mini-slims-down/comment-page-1/#comment-33368</link>
		<dc:creator>Plumbob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 04:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/03/14/the-next-generation-mini-slims-down/#comment-33368</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;Is it just me or is the rear end really lifted?&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I hope this picture was taken while the car was breaking - hard.  I doubt its true profile resembles the General Lee.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Is it just me or is the rear end really lifted?&#8221;</p>

<p>I hope this picture was taken while the car was breaking &#8211; hard.  I doubt its true profile resembles the General Lee.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GMINI</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/03/14/the-next-generation-mini-slims-down/comment-page-1/#comment-33367</link>
		<dc:creator>GMINI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 03:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/03/14/the-next-generation-mini-slims-down/#comment-33367</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;rear wheels seem larger on that there mule.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rear wheels seem larger on that there mule.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vanwall</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/03/14/the-next-generation-mini-slims-down/comment-page-1/#comment-33353</link>
		<dc:creator>Vanwall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 22:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/03/14/the-next-generation-mini-slims-down/#comment-33353</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Weight loss? It always seems like it&#039;s all just water loss, but who knows? Gotta stay away from the Fatty Snax Deli, I guess. ;-) Al-u-mini-um is the way forward! Take that Fix-Or-Repair-Daily! HeHe!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;pre&gt;&lt;code&gt;              BCNU,
           Rob in Dago
&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weight loss? It always seems like it&#8217;s all just water loss, but who knows? Gotta stay away from the Fatty Snax Deli, I guess. ;-) Al-u-mini-um is the way forward! Take that Fix-Or-Repair-Daily! HeHe!</p>

<pre><code>              BCNU,
           Rob in Dago
</code></pre>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alpinamike</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/03/14/the-next-generation-mini-slims-down/comment-page-1/#comment-33351</link>
		<dc:creator>alpinamike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 22:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/03/14/the-next-generation-mini-slims-down/#comment-33351</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ha, I was just talking about this at the dealer.
When will MINI recess the window wipers like the 3,5,6,7 BMW and when to get the new Valeo wipers.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;They are reading my MIND. Stop reading it..
Then a black 7 pulls up to my house and i am escorted to the trunk.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;-alpinamike&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha, I was just talking about this at the dealer.
When will MINI recess the window wipers like the 3,5,6,7 BMW and when to get the new Valeo wipers.</p>

<p>They are reading my MIND. Stop reading it..
Then a black 7 pulls up to my house and i am escorted to the trunk.</p>

<p>-alpinamike</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/03/14/the-next-generation-mini-slims-down/comment-page-1/#comment-33350</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 20:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/03/14/the-next-generation-mini-slims-down/#comment-33350</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;And what happened to the hidden windsheild wipers?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;They were never said to be hidden.  Just not resting at the same level as the hood (as with the current car).  They will be similar to the 3 series design.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
  <p>And what happened to the hidden windsheild wipers?</p>
</blockquote>

<p>They were never said to be hidden.  Just not resting at the same level as the hood (as with the current car).  They will be similar to the 3 series design.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: O(=^=)O Capn</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/03/14/the-next-generation-mini-slims-down/comment-page-1/#comment-33349</link>
		<dc:creator>O(=^=)O Capn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 20:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/03/14/the-next-generation-mini-slims-down/#comment-33349</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well, one of the major changes that were argued here on MF, is quite obvious in this picture.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The headlights. It is very apparent that they tip out to show the integrated blinker lights. The rear hips on this thing can still bear children. But oh well, it still does look good. Not TOO drastic.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Is it just me or is the rear end really lifted?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And what happened to the hidden windsheild wipers?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, one of the major changes that were argued here on MF, is quite obvious in this picture.</p>

<p>The headlights. It is very apparent that they tip out to show the integrated blinker lights. The rear hips on this thing can still bear children. But oh well, it still does look good. Not TOO drastic.</p>

<p>Is it just me or is the rear end really lifted?</p>

<p>And what happened to the hidden windsheild wipers?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathaniel Salzman</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/03/14/the-next-generation-mini-slims-down/comment-page-1/#comment-33347</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel Salzman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 19:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/03/14/the-next-generation-mini-slims-down/#comment-33347</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, this photo shows so much of the un-camo look of the new car and I agree with Eelke, even we enthusiasts will have to take second glances. For me that&#039;s a huge relief. If only the interior changes were as subtle. That and I&#039;ll never get off my on/off water and oil pump soap box. But it&#039;s great to hear that an already light car will be even more trim in its newest iteration. I can&#039;t wait for the debut.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, this photo shows so much of the un-camo look of the new car and I agree with Eelke, even we enthusiasts will have to take second glances. For me that&#8217;s a huge relief. If only the interior changes were as subtle. That and I&#8217;ll never get off my on/off water and oil pump soap box. But it&#8217;s great to hear that an already light car will be even more trim in its newest iteration. I can&#8217;t wait for the debut.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee L</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/03/14/the-next-generation-mini-slims-down/comment-page-1/#comment-33346</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 19:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/03/14/the-next-generation-mini-slims-down/#comment-33346</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Are the rear windows operable? It looks like a plastic button on the back window (though it might just be a reflection) where the operating arm might attach.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If so, that would be cool. Even better if they were power operated (though that is probably wishfull thinking).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are the rear windows operable? It looks like a plastic button on the back window (though it might just be a reflection) where the operating arm might attach.</p>

<p>If so, that would be cool. Even better if they were power operated (though that is probably wishfull thinking).</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/03/14/the-next-generation-mini-slims-down/comment-page-1/#comment-33342</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 17:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/03/14/the-next-generation-mini-slims-down/#comment-33342</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hmm...Can&#039;t see much else that can be made in plastic.  For example the only chromed part that is metal is the belt-line strip.  AFIK everything else is chromed plastic.  If you look carefully at the current MINIs the only parts that are metal are those parts that can not be made in plastic due to strength and operating environment requirements.  Take a close look, you may be surprised about how many parts are plastic that may appear to be metal or you would assume are metal at first glance.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230;Can&#8217;t see much else that can be made in plastic.  For example the only chromed part that is metal is the belt-line strip.  AFIK everything else is chromed plastic.  If you look carefully at the current MINIs the only parts that are metal are those parts that can not be made in plastic due to strength and operating environment requirements.  Take a close look, you may be surprised about how many parts are plastic that may appear to be metal or you would assume are metal at first glance.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/03/14/the-next-generation-mini-slims-down/comment-page-1/#comment-33340</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 17:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/03/14/the-next-generation-mini-slims-down/#comment-33340</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;My guess - look for a lot more plastic.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My guess &#8211; look for a lot more plastic.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/03/14/the-next-generation-mini-slims-down/comment-page-1/#comment-33339</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 17:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/03/14/the-next-generation-mini-slims-down/#comment-33339</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I for one am not surprised that the new model is lighter.  I was EXPECTING that the new model would be lighter than the current models.  Mainly due to the all aluminum motor.  The difference in weight between an all aluminum motor and a cast iron lump is huge even on such a small 4 cyl motor.  I&#039;m guessing a loss on the order of 50-100 lbs over all.  Remember, one of the main goals of the &quot;Prince&quot; motor line is increased fuel efficiency.  Reducing the weight of the vehicle also contributes to that goal.  Also any increase in size appears to be mostly superficial due to reshaped bumper covers and body panels.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I for one am not surprised that the new model is lighter.  I was EXPECTING that the new model would be lighter than the current models.  Mainly due to the all aluminum motor.  The difference in weight between an all aluminum motor and a cast iron lump is huge even on such a small 4 cyl motor.  I&#8217;m guessing a loss on the order of 50-100 lbs over all.  Remember, one of the main goals of the &#8220;Prince&#8221; motor line is increased fuel efficiency.  Reducing the weight of the vehicle also contributes to that goal.  Also any increase in size appears to be mostly superficial due to reshaped bumper covers and body panels.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/03/14/the-next-generation-mini-slims-down/comment-page-1/#comment-33336</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/03/14/the-next-generation-mini-slims-down/#comment-33336</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This is so not fair.. I really want one, but that will never happen.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is so not fair.. I really want one, but that will never happen.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/03/14/the-next-generation-mini-slims-down/comment-page-1/#comment-33331</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 15:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/03/14/the-next-generation-mini-slims-down/#comment-33331</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;I was also wondering about the photo that goes with this articleÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã‚Â¦I thought the new turn signals were to be integrated into the headlight unitÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã‚Â¦is this really an R56 camo pic?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The lower lights are a combination of driving lights and foglights.  Based on what has been seen in other, less camouflaged photos, the main turn signals are integrated into the main lights.  However as with the current car, the US spec R56 will probably get separate lights and reflectors in the wheel arch (as seen here).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
  <p>I was also wondering about the photo that goes with this articleÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã‚Â¦I thought the new turn signals were to be integrated into the headlight unitÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã‚Â¦is this really an R56 camo pic?</p>
</blockquote>

<p>The lower lights are a combination of driving lights and foglights.  Based on what has been seen in other, less camouflaged photos, the main turn signals are integrated into the main lights.  However as with the current car, the US spec R56 will probably get separate lights and reflectors in the wheel arch (as seen here).</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eelke</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/03/14/the-next-generation-mini-slims-down/comment-page-1/#comment-33330</link>
		<dc:creator>Eelke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 15:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/03/14/the-next-generation-mini-slims-down/#comment-33330</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Mark, you can see the indicators toward the bottom of the headlights just as has been reported before. I think the indicators will indeed be replaced by fog lights in that place, together with whatever the type of light is called that is currently combined with the indicators (sorry, no native English speaker, can&#039;t come up with the correct word right now).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, you can see the indicators toward the bottom of the headlights just as has been reported before. I think the indicators will indeed be replaced by fog lights in that place, together with whatever the type of light is called that is currently combined with the indicators (sorry, no native English speaker, can&#8217;t come up with the correct word right now).</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark (Ohio)</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/03/14/the-next-generation-mini-slims-down/comment-page-1/#comment-33329</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark (Ohio)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 15:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/03/14/the-next-generation-mini-slims-down/#comment-33329</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;...or are the lower lights fog lights...?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;or are the lower lights fog lights&#8230;?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
