<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MINI Traveler Caught Hot Weather Testing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/03/16/mini-traveler-caught-hot-weather-testing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/03/16/mini-traveler-caught-hot-weather-testing/</link>
	<description>MINI Cooper news, reviews and opinion.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 04:45:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MotoringFile &#187; Archive &#187; New Spyshots of the MINI Traveler</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/03/16/mini-traveler-caught-hot-weather-testing/comment-page-2/#comment-35427</link>
		<dc:creator>MotoringFile &#187; Archive &#187; New Spyshots of the MINI Traveler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 15:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/03/16/mini-traveler-caught-hot-weather-testing/#comment-35427</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] You&#8217;d think the MINI Traveler had already been released for sale with a &#8220;test mule package&#8221; considering all the photos we&#8217;ve seen over the last few months. But alas, these are simply more photos of a hacked together testing prototype similar to those seen previously on MF. So just like the last photos, there shouldn&#8217;t be a whole heck of a lot to be surprised about. There are the obvious suicide door(s), the split rear doors, the new roof and the name Chris written below the left vent (which may or may not be some kind of future option). You can take a look below: [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You&#8217;d think the MINI Traveler had already been released for sale with a &#8220;test mule package&#8221; considering all the photos we&#8217;ve seen over the last few months. But alas, these are simply more photos of a hacked together testing prototype similar to those seen previously on MF. So just like the last photos, there shouldn&#8217;t be a whole heck of a lot to be surprised about. There are the obvious suicide door(s), the split rear doors, the new roof and the name Chris written below the left vent (which may or may not be some kind of future option). You can take a look below: [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: n!co</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/03/16/mini-traveler-caught-hot-weather-testing/comment-page-2/#comment-33583</link>
		<dc:creator>n!co</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 20:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/03/16/mini-traveler-caught-hot-weather-testing/#comment-33583</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;thx stefan :-) great bunch of pics!
see you at strahlung pur IV&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;eS aka n!co&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thx stefan :-) great bunch of pics!
see you at strahlung pur IV</p>

<p>eS aka n!co</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/03/16/mini-traveler-caught-hot-weather-testing/comment-page-2/#comment-33570</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 17:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/03/16/mini-traveler-caught-hot-weather-testing/#comment-33570</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;If you want to see a serious performance wagon check out a Lancer Evolution IX wagon in Japan. Simply amazing! Lots of people have different needs and not everyone can have a 2nd vehicle. This provides a lot of the style of a MC and some practicality.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I may be able to afford a secondary car in the future and IÃ¢â‚¬â„¢m looking at a MCS Convertible with auto. Driving 50+ miles a day in DC traffic I want something maneuverable, fairly small and fun to drive. The traveler would also fit the bill and could be used on weekends with the kids too. I say spread the joy.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want to see a serious performance wagon check out a Lancer Evolution IX wagon in Japan. Simply amazing! Lots of people have different needs and not everyone can have a 2nd vehicle. This provides a lot of the style of a MC and some practicality.</p>

<p>I may be able to afford a secondary car in the future and IÃ¢â‚¬â„¢m looking at a MCS Convertible with auto. Driving 50+ miles a day in DC traffic I want something maneuverable, fairly small and fun to drive. The traveler would also fit the bill and could be used on weekends with the kids too. I say spread the joy.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whiteroofradio.com &#187; Woofcast #44</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/03/16/mini-traveler-caught-hot-weather-testing/comment-page-2/#comment-33548</link>
		<dc:creator>whiteroofradio.com &#187; Woofcast #44</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 02:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/03/16/mini-traveler-caught-hot-weather-testing/#comment-33548</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Some Spy shots of the new Traveler [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Some Spy shots of the new Traveler [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rocketboy</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/03/16/mini-traveler-caught-hot-weather-testing/comment-page-2/#comment-33547</link>
		<dc:creator>Rocketboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Mar 2006 07:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/03/16/mini-traveler-caught-hot-weather-testing/#comment-33547</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;man that roof looks odd... is that going to be a Traveler only thing?  And I still do not like the turn signals in the headlights.  Too Mercedes Benz for me.  Not to mention the thought process behind putting an indicator light inches away from a broadcast illumination light.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>man that roof looks odd&#8230; is that going to be a Traveler only thing?  And I still do not like the turn signals in the headlights.  Too Mercedes Benz for me.  Not to mention the thought process behind putting an indicator light inches away from a broadcast illumination light.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/03/16/mini-traveler-caught-hot-weather-testing/comment-page-2/#comment-33543</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2006 18:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/03/16/mini-traveler-caught-hot-weather-testing/#comment-33543</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;67, now 68 comments...looks like a car capable of making a lot of conversation, and heads turn...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>67, now 68 comments&#8230;looks like a car capable of making a lot of conversation, and heads turn&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/03/16/mini-traveler-caught-hot-weather-testing/comment-page-2/#comment-33539</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2006 17:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/03/16/mini-traveler-caught-hot-weather-testing/#comment-33539</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;R55 = the Traveler&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>R55 = the Traveler</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: O(=^=)O Capn</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/03/16/mini-traveler-caught-hot-weather-testing/comment-page-2/#comment-33538</link>
		<dc:creator>O(=^=)O Capn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2006 17:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/03/16/mini-traveler-caught-hot-weather-testing/#comment-33538</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;okay, R55 is the 07 MCS? You (Gabe)say it is the 08. rds was talking about the 07.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think that what you are trying to tell me that it is the 08 wagon? I&#039;m Sorry. Right?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>okay, R55 is the 07 MCS? You (Gabe)say it is the 08. rds was talking about the 07.</p>

<p>I think that what you are trying to tell me that it is the 08 wagon? I&#8217;m Sorry. Right?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/03/16/mini-traveler-caught-hot-weather-testing/comment-page-2/#comment-33529</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2006 13:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/03/16/mini-traveler-caught-hot-weather-testing/#comment-33529</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;One word sums it up for me!  HIDEOUS!!!  Its not a MINI anymore!!  Its a MAXI.  Does this behemouth sip not guzzle too?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One word sums it up for me!  HIDEOUS!!!  Its not a MINI anymore!!  Its a MAXI.  Does this behemouth sip not guzzle too?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/03/16/mini-traveler-caught-hot-weather-testing/comment-page-2/#comment-33527</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2006 12:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/03/16/mini-traveler-caught-hot-weather-testing/#comment-33527</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Since he probably can&#039;t answer - I&#039;ll answer for him.  Just like MINI showed the 2007 MC 18 months before being released (03/05) they have now shown the 2008 R55 to select people in focus groups.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since he probably can&#8217;t answer &#8211; I&#8217;ll answer for him.  Just like MINI showed the 2007 MC 18 months before being released (03/05) they have now shown the 2008 R55 to select people in focus groups.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: O(=^=)O Capn</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/03/16/mini-traveler-caught-hot-weather-testing/comment-page-2/#comment-33526</link>
		<dc:creator>O(=^=)O Capn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2006 12:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/03/16/mini-traveler-caught-hot-weather-testing/#comment-33526</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;argh! if youÃ¢â‚¬â„¢re ever asked to participate in a pre-production evaluation for market research purposes, do so at your own peril. i have seen both 2007 models in the flesh, sat in them, played with the doorsÃ¢â‚¬Â¦ i have the answers to all your questions, and i canÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t say a thing! gah! iÃ¢â‚¬â„¢m ready to burstÃ¢â‚¬Â¦&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Hey rds, when you say &quot;both&quot; 2007 models in the flesh, does that mean MC and MCS or sedan and Wagon?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It is interesting that you would say something like this on a Traveller thread. and that would mean that a wagon variant would come out in 2007. HMMN,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&quot;Argh! Gah!&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;IF so let it be AWD AWD AWD!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>argh! if youÃ¢â‚¬â„¢re ever asked to participate in a pre-production evaluation for market research purposes, do so at your own peril. i have seen both 2007 models in the flesh, sat in them, played with the doorsÃ¢â‚¬Â¦ i have the answers to all your questions, and i canÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t say a thing! gah! iÃ¢â‚¬â„¢m ready to burstÃ¢â‚¬Â¦</blockquote>

<p>Hey rds, when you say &#8220;both&#8221; 2007 models in the flesh, does that mean MC and MCS or sedan and Wagon?</p>

<p>It is interesting that you would say something like this on a Traveller thread. and that would mean that a wagon variant would come out in 2007. HMMN,</p>

<p>&#8220;Argh! Gah!&#8221;</p>

<p>IF so let it be AWD AWD AWD!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/03/16/mini-traveler-caught-hot-weather-testing/comment-page-2/#comment-33517</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2006 03:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/03/16/mini-traveler-caught-hot-weather-testing/#comment-33517</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I love the Wagon.  Surf&#039;s up dude!  My first car was a &#039;73 Pinto wagon-which were 2dr wagons.  I think it was way nicer than the Pinto coupe.  I put a sticker on the back that said TURBO.  People used to ask if it was really Turbo charged and all I had to do was take em through some twisties and that would shut them up.  Ford has been downhill ever since then.   Maybe they should bring back the Pinto.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the Wagon.  Surf&#8217;s up dude!  My first car was a &#8216;73 Pinto wagon-which were 2dr wagons.  I think it was way nicer than the Pinto coupe.  I put a sticker on the back that said TURBO.  People used to ask if it was really Turbo charged and all I had to do was take em through some twisties and that would shut them up.  Ford has been downhill ever since then.   Maybe they should bring back the Pinto.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vanwall</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/03/16/mini-traveler-caught-hot-weather-testing/comment-page-2/#comment-33512</link>
		<dc:creator>Vanwall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 21:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/03/16/mini-traveler-caught-hot-weather-testing/#comment-33512</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I also still have my Countryman, and it sure looks like a station wagon, albeit small. It does not look like an extended hatchback, and functioned as a station wagon, not a hatchback. The new Traveller will look like a MINI-wagon, as intended. I&#039;m all for it!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;pre&gt;&lt;code&gt;                  BCNU,
                Rob in Dago
&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also still have my Countryman, and it sure looks like a station wagon, albeit small. It does not look like an extended hatchback, and functioned as a station wagon, not a hatchback. The new Traveller will look like a MINI-wagon, as intended. I&#8217;m all for it!</p>

<pre><code>                  BCNU,
                Rob in Dago
</code></pre>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulsminis</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/03/16/mini-traveler-caught-hot-weather-testing/comment-page-2/#comment-33511</link>
		<dc:creator>paulsminis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 20:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/03/16/mini-traveler-caught-hot-weather-testing/#comment-33511</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;Are you saying you get better autocross times with the wagon than the base classic mini?&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Absolutely!  And remember, they both have the same drivetrain (1275cc Cooper S engine, and 7.5 inch front disk brakes, same wheel and tire size).  The wagon weighs probably at least 100lbs more just because there is more glass, and a longer roof. The gas tank in the Woody is low and under the floor, where the twin tanks in the Cooper S sedan are higher, in the boot on both sides.  Both of them are fully streetable vehicles.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Dave -- thanks for porting the picture over.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;cheers,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Paul&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Are you saying you get better autocross times with the wagon than the base classic mini?&#8221;</p>

<p>Absolutely!  And remember, they both have the same drivetrain (1275cc Cooper S engine, and 7.5 inch front disk brakes, same wheel and tire size).  The wagon weighs probably at least 100lbs more just because there is more glass, and a longer roof. The gas tank in the Woody is low and under the floor, where the twin tanks in the Cooper S sedan are higher, in the boot on both sides.  Both of them are fully streetable vehicles.</p>

<p>Dave &#8212; thanks for porting the picture over.</p>

<p>cheers,</p>

<p>Paul</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/03/16/mini-traveler-caught-hot-weather-testing/comment-page-2/#comment-33508</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 19:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/03/16/mini-traveler-caught-hot-weather-testing/#comment-33508</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;rds - I think there are others here who know the feeling as well!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rds &#8211; I think there are others here who know the feeling as well!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rds</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/03/16/mini-traveler-caught-hot-weather-testing/comment-page-2/#comment-33507</link>
		<dc:creator>rds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 19:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/03/16/mini-traveler-caught-hot-weather-testing/#comment-33507</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;argh! if you&#039;re ever asked to participate in a pre-production evaluation for market research purposes, do so at your own peril. i have seen both 2007 models in the flesh, sat in them, played with the doors... i have the answers to all your questions, and i can&#039;t say a thing! gah! i&#039;m ready to burst...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>argh! if you&#8217;re ever asked to participate in a pre-production evaluation for market research purposes, do so at your own peril. i have seen both 2007 models in the flesh, sat in them, played with the doors&#8230; i have the answers to all your questions, and i can&#8217;t say a thing! gah! i&#8217;m ready to burst&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cct1</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/03/16/mini-traveler-caught-hot-weather-testing/comment-page-2/#comment-33505</link>
		<dc:creator>cct1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 18:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/03/16/mini-traveler-caught-hot-weather-testing/#comment-33505</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Are you saying you get better autocross times with the wagon than the base classic mini?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;BTW, love the picture, but it highlights my major beef with the new mini.  You look at that picture, and it still looks like a mini; the personality is still there.  You look at the new mini traveller, and it looks like a half dozen other station wagons on the road.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I agree we don&#039;t know for sure what the end result is going to be, but from the concept vehicles, I think at least from a style standpoint, the idea is fairly clear.  And besides, what&#039;s the point of looking at articles such as this then, if we&#039;re not going to speculate?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you saying you get better autocross times with the wagon than the base classic mini?</p>

<p>BTW, love the picture, but it highlights my major beef with the new mini.  You look at that picture, and it still looks like a mini; the personality is still there.  You look at the new mini traveller, and it looks like a half dozen other station wagons on the road.</p>

<p>I agree we don&#8217;t know for sure what the end result is going to be, but from the concept vehicles, I think at least from a style standpoint, the idea is fairly clear.  And besides, what&#8217;s the point of looking at articles such as this then, if we&#8217;re not going to speculate?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/03/16/mini-traveler-caught-hot-weather-testing/comment-page-2/#comment-33504</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 18:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/03/16/mini-traveler-caught-hot-weather-testing/#comment-33504</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;If you want to see a picture of the wagon in three wheel mode at an autocross, go to NAM (same user name as here) and look in my gallery.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Here it is: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.northamericanmotoring.com/gallery/data/500/7612heeledover1.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Photo&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>If you want to see a picture of the wagon in three wheel mode at an autocross, go to NAM (same user name as here) and look in my gallery.</blockquote>

<p>Here it is: <a href="http://www.northamericanmotoring.com/gallery/data/500/7612heeledover1.jpg" rel="nofollow">Photo</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulsminis</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/03/16/mini-traveler-caught-hot-weather-testing/comment-page-2/#comment-33502</link>
		<dc:creator>paulsminis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 18:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/03/16/mini-traveler-caught-hot-weather-testing/#comment-33502</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;OK, I will no longer resist commenting.  Since I own BOTH a 67 Austin Cooper S AND a 68 Morris Mini Traveller (woody wagon), I think I can speak to handling differences between them.  I  autocross them both -- both have fairly equivalent suspension and drive trains (since I upgraded the Woody many years ago with a Cooper S engine and brakes).  The Woody does just about everything in autocross better than the Cooper S sedan -- mind you, they are both tons of fun to compete in.  The extended wheelbase of the Woody (a whole 4 inches!) makes the handling (to me)seem much more predictable.  I get lots of warning before the wagon will spin.  In the sedan, when you get the spin warning, it is usually way too late to catch it -- it is going to spin, period -- enjoy the ride.  The wagon slaloms just as quickly, perhaps quicker.  It stops just as well as the sedan, it goes just as quickly.  On very slow corners, I can easily get the rear end of the wagon to hang out and get through the corner quicker.  If I attempt to hang the rear end of the sedan out, about 50% of the time, I will end up spinning it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Now we won&#039;t really know how the New MINI wagon&#039;s handling will compare to the sedans until we get our hands on them, so speculation at this point is just that -- SPECULATION.  However, my best &quot;guess&quot; is that BMW will give us a very fine handling wagon (call it what you want).  I look forward to seeing how it does.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I do know that I can transport 4 extra tires and wheels, floor jack, an air tank, tool box, two helmets, a cooler, and two folding chairs in my wagon when I got to autocross -- can&#039;t do that with the sedan!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you want to see a picture of the wagon in three wheel mode at an autocross, go to NAM (same user name as here) and look in my gallery.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Am I going to run down to my MINI dealer and order a wagon?  Most likely not.  But when I need to replace  my 2006 MCS(if I ever do such a thing) , I will most certainly look.  And when I need to replace my daily driver vehicle (99 Ford Contour SVT)I will have a MINI wagon on the short list.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Let&#039;s preserve judgement until we have the facts -- I know that isn&#039;t as much fun as what is going on here, but the truth is we won&#039;t KNOW until we have our hands on the new wagons.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;cheers,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Paul&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I will no longer resist commenting.  Since I own BOTH a 67 Austin Cooper S AND a 68 Morris Mini Traveller (woody wagon), I think I can speak to handling differences between them.  I  autocross them both &#8212; both have fairly equivalent suspension and drive trains (since I upgraded the Woody many years ago with a Cooper S engine and brakes).  The Woody does just about everything in autocross better than the Cooper S sedan &#8212; mind you, they are both tons of fun to compete in.  The extended wheelbase of the Woody (a whole 4 inches!) makes the handling (to me)seem much more predictable.  I get lots of warning before the wagon will spin.  In the sedan, when you get the spin warning, it is usually way too late to catch it &#8212; it is going to spin, period &#8212; enjoy the ride.  The wagon slaloms just as quickly, perhaps quicker.  It stops just as well as the sedan, it goes just as quickly.  On very slow corners, I can easily get the rear end of the wagon to hang out and get through the corner quicker.  If I attempt to hang the rear end of the sedan out, about 50% of the time, I will end up spinning it.</p>

<p>Now we won&#8217;t really know how the New MINI wagon&#8217;s handling will compare to the sedans until we get our hands on them, so speculation at this point is just that &#8212; SPECULATION.  However, my best &#8220;guess&#8221; is that BMW will give us a very fine handling wagon (call it what you want).  I look forward to seeing how it does.</p>

<p>I do know that I can transport 4 extra tires and wheels, floor jack, an air tank, tool box, two helmets, a cooler, and two folding chairs in my wagon when I got to autocross &#8212; can&#8217;t do that with the sedan!</p>

<p>If you want to see a picture of the wagon in three wheel mode at an autocross, go to NAM (same user name as here) and look in my gallery.</p>

<p>Am I going to run down to my MINI dealer and order a wagon?  Most likely not.  But when I need to replace  my 2006 MCS(if I ever do such a thing) , I will most certainly look.  And when I need to replace my daily driver vehicle (99 Ford Contour SVT)I will have a MINI wagon on the short list.</p>

<p>Let&#8217;s preserve judgement until we have the facts &#8212; I know that isn&#8217;t as much fun as what is going on here, but the truth is we won&#8217;t KNOW until we have our hands on the new wagons.</p>

<p>cheers,</p>

<p>Paul</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/03/16/mini-traveler-caught-hot-weather-testing/comment-page-2/#comment-33500</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 17:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/03/16/mini-traveler-caught-hot-weather-testing/#comment-33500</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;While we&#039;re on the subject of wagons, I like to mention my Dodge Magnum SR/T which will smoke a lot of those other &quot;wagons&quot; out there.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While we&#8217;re on the subject of wagons, I like to mention my Dodge Magnum SR/T which will smoke a lot of those other &#8220;wagons&#8221; out there.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
