<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scoop: &#8216;07 Cooper S to Drop Over 180lbs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/07/25/scoop-2007-cooper-s-to-drop-180lbs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/07/25/scoop-2007-cooper-s-to-drop-180lbs/</link>
	<description>MINI Cooper news, reviews and opinion.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 15:20:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MotoringFile &#187; Archive &#187; Official 2007 MINI Specifications</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/07/25/scoop-2007-cooper-s-to-drop-180lbs/comment-page-2/#comment-48661</link>
		<dc:creator>MotoringFile &#187; Archive &#187; Official 2007 MINI Specifications</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/07/25/scoop-2007-cooper-s-to-drop-180lbs/#comment-48661</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] [ Scoop: 2007 MCS to Drop over 180lbs ] MotoringFile [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [ Scoop: 2007 MCS to Drop over 180lbs ] MotoringFile [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MotoringFile &#187; Archive &#187; Is the 2007 MCS Faster than JCW GP?</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/07/25/scoop-2007-cooper-s-to-drop-180lbs/comment-page-2/#comment-47732</link>
		<dc:creator>MotoringFile &#187; Archive &#187; Is the 2007 MCS Faster than JCW GP?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 19:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/07/25/scoop-2007-cooper-s-to-drop-180lbs/#comment-47732</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] But beyond power delivery what other answer could there be? Even if the new suspension is the equal to the JCW Suspension (which it is said to be based on) it couldn&#8217;t trumph the GP in that category. There&#8217;s really only one other variable left to create such performence; weight reduction. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But beyond power delivery what other answer could there be? Even if the new suspension is the equal to the JCW Suspension (which it is said to be based on) it couldn&#8217;t trumph the GP in that category. There&#8217;s really only one other variable left to create such performence; weight reduction. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/07/25/scoop-2007-cooper-s-to-drop-180lbs/comment-page-2/#comment-46874</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 18:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/07/25/scoop-2007-cooper-s-to-drop-180lbs/#comment-46874</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;That is a bummer. Maybe the tech specs are wrong insteadÃ¢â‚¬Â¦? ;)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;(A) no official specs have been released and (B) I think the final figure may surprise you.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
  <p>That is a bummer. Maybe the tech specs are wrong insteadÃ¢â‚¬Â¦? ;)</p>
</blockquote>

<p>(A) no official specs have been released and (B) I think the final figure may surprise you.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 66CooperS</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/07/25/scoop-2007-cooper-s-to-drop-180lbs/comment-page-2/#comment-46744</link>
		<dc:creator>66CooperS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2006 23:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/07/25/scoop-2007-cooper-s-to-drop-180lbs/#comment-46744</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;So far I&#039;m going the &quot;performance/mileage by subtraction&quot; route on my &quot;03 MCS:
2 Rear Seat Backs 29.188 lbs.
1 Rear Seat Base 9.214
1 Cargo Top Tray 2.821
2 Seat/Shoulder Belt Assemblys 7.936
1 Service Jack 5.291
1 Ash Tray .044
1 Tow Hook Kit .749&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Total, So Far 55.214 lbs subtracted&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So far I&#8217;m going the &#8220;performance/mileage by subtraction&#8221; route on my &#8220;03 MCS:
2 Rear Seat Backs 29.188 lbs.
1 Rear Seat Base 9.214
1 Cargo Top Tray 2.821
2 Seat/Shoulder Belt Assemblys 7.936
1 Service Jack 5.291
1 Ash Tray .044
1 Tow Hook Kit .749</p>

<p>Total, So Far 55.214 lbs subtracted</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miniak</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/07/25/scoop-2007-cooper-s-to-drop-180lbs/comment-page-2/#comment-46660</link>
		<dc:creator>Miniak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2006 19:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/07/25/scoop-2007-cooper-s-to-drop-180lbs/#comment-46660</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;That is a bummer. Maybe the tech specs are wrong instead...? ;)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a bummer. Maybe the tech specs are wrong instead&#8230;? ;)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucas</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/07/25/scoop-2007-cooper-s-to-drop-180lbs/comment-page-2/#comment-46276</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 02:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/07/25/scoop-2007-cooper-s-to-drop-180lbs/#comment-46276</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ouch, I was really hoping that Gabe&#039;s sources were right and the new models will be quite a bit lighter than the current one.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I guess Gabe owes Tony a case of beer!! Haha.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ouch, I was really hoping that Gabe&#8217;s sources were right and the new models will be quite a bit lighter than the current one.</p>

<p>I guess Gabe owes Tony a case of beer!! Haha.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tony T</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/07/25/scoop-2007-cooper-s-to-drop-180lbs/comment-page-2/#comment-46259</link>
		<dc:creator>tony T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 00:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/07/25/scoop-2007-cooper-s-to-drop-180lbs/#comment-46259</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve been fed too many &#039;nudge nudge wink wink&#039; lines from a certain &#039;Mini HQ insider&#039; to believe they do much more than serve the tea and clean the toilets down there... :-(&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been fed too many &#8216;nudge nudge wink wink&#8217; lines from a certain &#8216;Mini HQ insider&#8217; to believe they do much more than serve the tea and clean the toilets down there&#8230; :-(</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/07/25/scoop-2007-cooper-s-to-drop-180lbs/comment-page-2/#comment-46251</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 00:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/07/25/scoop-2007-cooper-s-to-drop-180lbs/#comment-46251</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Bizarre considering some of my sources.  I&#039;m pretty sure the 22lbs figure isn&#039;t correct.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bizarre considering some of my sources.  I&#8217;m pretty sure the 22lbs figure isn&#8217;t correct.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MINIAC</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/07/25/scoop-2007-cooper-s-to-drop-180lbs/comment-page-2/#comment-46249</link>
		<dc:creator>MINIAC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 23:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/07/25/scoop-2007-cooper-s-to-drop-180lbs/#comment-46249</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mini2.com/article385-mini2-world-exclusive-2nd-generation-mini-cooper-s-test-drive-report.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;From MINI2 report&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;Despite the lighter engine block and other efforts to keep the bulge to a minimum, the Cooper S has also put on weight, around 10kg, whereas the Cooper (unavailable to drive) has trimmed down a little.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.mini2.com/article385-mini2-world-exclusive-2nd-generation-mini-cooper-s-test-drive-report.html" rel="nofollow">From MINI2 report</a>:</p>

<blockquote>Despite the lighter engine block and other efforts to keep the bulge to a minimum, the Cooper S has also put on weight, around 10kg, whereas the Cooper (unavailable to drive) has trimmed down a little.
</blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MillieTheMini</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/07/25/scoop-2007-cooper-s-to-drop-180lbs/comment-page-2/#comment-46245</link>
		<dc:creator>MillieTheMini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 22:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/07/25/scoop-2007-cooper-s-to-drop-180lbs/#comment-46245</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;IÃ¢â‚¬â„¢m not understanding the comment/wish for the MINI to attain a 50-50 weight distro.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Has any FWD auto achieved 50-50, or anywhere near that? DonÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t see how it would be possible with the engine, transmission, battery, drive all positioned at the very front of the car, and little if any weight towards the back.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Oh, my comments were with regards to hoping that the 2007 MINI moves closer to the &#039;ideal&#039; of 50-50 weight distribution - not that it will, but with word of a lighter engine, that should shift more weight behind the front wheels, or at least less weight above them.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Putting the battery back to the front, (approx 10-15lbs?) won&#039;t help much, but if it&#039;s put behind the front axle, that should minimize the effect.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We can hope and wish, can&#039;t we? Very soon we will know for sure!! :-)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;IÃ¢â‚¬â„¢m not understanding the comment/wish for the MINI to attain a 50-50 weight distro.</p>

<p>Has any FWD auto achieved 50-50, or anywhere near that? DonÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t see how it would be possible with the engine, transmission, battery, drive all positioned at the very front of the car, and little if any weight towards the back.&#8221;</p>

<p>Oh, my comments were with regards to hoping that the 2007 MINI moves closer to the &#8216;ideal&#8217; of 50-50 weight distribution &#8211; not that it will, but with word of a lighter engine, that should shift more weight behind the front wheels, or at least less weight above them.</p>

<p>Putting the battery back to the front, (approx 10-15lbs?) won&#8217;t help much, but if it&#8217;s put behind the front axle, that should minimize the effect.</p>

<p>We can hope and wish, can&#8217;t we? Very soon we will know for sure!! :-)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tony T</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/07/25/scoop-2007-cooper-s-to-drop-180lbs/comment-page-2/#comment-46217</link>
		<dc:creator>tony T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/07/25/scoop-2007-cooper-s-to-drop-180lbs/#comment-46217</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I was rather hoping details would be published a lot sooner... :-(&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was rather hoping details would be published a lot sooner&#8230; :-(</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/07/25/scoop-2007-cooper-s-to-drop-180lbs/comment-page-2/#comment-46216</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/07/25/scoop-2007-cooper-s-to-drop-180lbs/#comment-46216</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Good reasoning Tony - but I&#039;ll just say one thing.  Your comments will be interesting to read in a few months time - trust me on this one :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good reasoning Tony &#8211; but I&#8217;ll just say one thing.  Your comments will be interesting to read in a few months time &#8211; trust me on this one :)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tony T</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/07/25/scoop-2007-cooper-s-to-drop-180lbs/comment-page-2/#comment-46215</link>
		<dc:creator>tony T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/07/25/scoop-2007-cooper-s-to-drop-180lbs/#comment-46215</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Gabe:
Go to this page:
http://www.tritecmotors.com.br/english/motors/16L.htm#
click on the Cooper S engine, when the page loads (larger picture of the S engine) click on &#039;Technical Data&#039;, bottom of the pop up page, reads 118kgs.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Then click on the Cooper Engine, wait for the page to load (larger picture of a Cooper engine), then Technical Data, bottom of the pop up page it reads 104kgs...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;These weigths seem fine tooo me, but the weight of the new engine quoted at 130kgs..? Could this not be the error..?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m happy to accept any measure of appreciable weight loss, doesnt have to be &#039;180lbs&#039;. So if its 150lbs lighter, you win too. If its less than 100lbs, I&#039;ll think about it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Dont get me wrong, I&#039;ll be very glad to see this car weighing a lot less, but if the engine weigths are correct as stated in these docs, then theres even more weight saved somewhere else... and I cant see how, unless they are doing something very drastic. As the Mini isnt a great profit maker in terms of manufacturing cost, I&#039;d be surprised to see it investing so much in producing a lightweight &#039;standard&#039; car.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It puts me in mind of the M3 CSL. It was only 210lbs lighter than the standard car, yet cost Ã‚Â£15k more and had trick CF roof etc etc...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gabe:
Go to this page:
<a href="http://www.tritecmotors.com.br/english/motors/16L.htm#" rel="nofollow">http://www.tritecmotors.com.br/english/motors/16L.htm#</a>
click on the Cooper S engine, when the page loads (larger picture of the S engine) click on &#8216;Technical Data&#8217;, bottom of the pop up page, reads 118kgs.</p>

<p>Then click on the Cooper Engine, wait for the page to load (larger picture of a Cooper engine), then Technical Data, bottom of the pop up page it reads 104kgs&#8230;</p>

<p>These weigths seem fine tooo me, but the weight of the new engine quoted at 130kgs..? Could this not be the error..?</p>

<p>I&#8217;m happy to accept any measure of appreciable weight loss, doesnt have to be &#8216;180lbs&#8217;. So if its 150lbs lighter, you win too. If its less than 100lbs, I&#8217;ll think about it.</p>

<p>Dont get me wrong, I&#8217;ll be very glad to see this car weighing a lot less, but if the engine weigths are correct as stated in these docs, then theres even more weight saved somewhere else&#8230; and I cant see how, unless they are doing something very drastic. As the Mini isnt a great profit maker in terms of manufacturing cost, I&#8217;d be surprised to see it investing so much in producing a lightweight &#8217;standard&#8217; car.</p>

<p>It puts me in mind of the M3 CSL. It was only 210lbs lighter than the standard car, yet cost Ã‚Â£15k more and had trick CF roof etc etc&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cct1</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/07/25/scoop-2007-cooper-s-to-drop-180lbs/comment-page-1/#comment-46206</link>
		<dc:creator>cct1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 16:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/07/25/scoop-2007-cooper-s-to-drop-180lbs/#comment-46206</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;That&#039;s a great idea.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Let&#039;s all donate to the cct1 JCW engine kit charity, which has been around since 2005 established soley to do wonderful things for my MCS....&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a great idea.</p>

<p>Let&#8217;s all donate to the cct1 JCW engine kit charity, which has been around since 2005 established soley to do wonderful things for my MCS&#8230;.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/07/25/scoop-2007-cooper-s-to-drop-180lbs/comment-page-1/#comment-46204</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 16:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/07/25/scoop-2007-cooper-s-to-drop-180lbs/#comment-46204</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m just looking at the engine statistics for each variation.  Where are you seeing your numbers?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Yes I will take your bet.  That&#039;s about $18.50 btw ;)  Who ever is on the short end can donate the cash via Paypal to your choice of charity.  Sound good?  Are we saying over 180lbs less and I win, under 180lbs and you win?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just looking at the engine statistics for each variation.  Where are you seeing your numbers?</p>

<p>Yes I will take your bet.  That&#8217;s about $18.50 btw ;)  Who ever is on the short end can donate the cash via Paypal to your choice of charity.  Sound good?  Are we saying over 180lbs less and I win, under 180lbs and you win?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tony T</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/07/25/scoop-2007-cooper-s-to-drop-180lbs/comment-page-1/#comment-46203</link>
		<dc:creator>tony T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 15:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/07/25/scoop-2007-cooper-s-to-drop-180lbs/#comment-46203</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;Tony - I wouldnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t exactly trust TritecÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s figures on their site. For instance they claim the MCS and MC engines are exactly the same weight when we know that there is a fairly big different between the two. &quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Sorry Gabe, no they dont, you&#039;re mistaken there. They quote 104kgs for the Cooper, and 118kgs for the S, which is in line with the extra weight of the Supercharger etc.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Now even if their figures are a little out from BMW&#039;s (although I cant see how they can be) BMW/citreon still quote the new engine at 130kgs. So where is this weight being saved on the rest of the car.....?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Bigger cars (which the new Mini will be in comparison to the old) end up weighing more. Even the new Clio Cup, with its raised horsepower output, is still lower in terms of BHP per tonne as its gained some 130kgs in weight, which is mainly due to meeting higher crash test standards...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So, where have BMW found 180lbs of weight saving over the older, smaller car...? I&#039;m guessing that producing all the body panels in aluminium wouldnt even give such a weight saving on such a small car... and i&#039;ve not heard of any change from the normal construction so far... but perhaps thats the big new secret???&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m just smelling a fish here. Perhaps there is a little bit of &#039;marketing speak&#039; going on. Perhaps the car is 10% larger than the current on, but weighs the same, so in real terms, someone has extrapollated that to being a net weight saving..??&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Anyway, i&#039;ve got paypal, so I&#039;ll have a tenner (Ã‚Â£10) wager with you (for charity) that the car doesn&#039;t end up weighing this amount less... :-)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Tony &#8211; I wouldnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t exactly trust TritecÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s figures on their site. For instance they claim the MCS and MC engines are exactly the same weight when we know that there is a fairly big different between the two. &#8220;</p>

<p>Sorry Gabe, no they dont, you&#8217;re mistaken there. They quote 104kgs for the Cooper, and 118kgs for the S, which is in line with the extra weight of the Supercharger etc.</p>

<p>Now even if their figures are a little out from BMW&#8217;s (although I cant see how they can be) BMW/citreon still quote the new engine at 130kgs. So where is this weight being saved on the rest of the car&#8230;..?</p>

<p>Bigger cars (which the new Mini will be in comparison to the old) end up weighing more. Even the new Clio Cup, with its raised horsepower output, is still lower in terms of BHP per tonne as its gained some 130kgs in weight, which is mainly due to meeting higher crash test standards&#8230;</p>

<p>So, where have BMW found 180lbs of weight saving over the older, smaller car&#8230;? I&#8217;m guessing that producing all the body panels in aluminium wouldnt even give such a weight saving on such a small car&#8230; and i&#8217;ve not heard of any change from the normal construction so far&#8230; but perhaps thats the big new secret???</p>

<p>I&#8217;m just smelling a fish here. Perhaps there is a little bit of &#8216;marketing speak&#8217; going on. Perhaps the car is 10% larger than the current on, but weighs the same, so in real terms, someone has extrapollated that to being a net weight saving..??</p>

<p>Anyway, i&#8217;ve got paypal, so I&#8217;ll have a tenner (Ã‚Â£10) wager with you (for charity) that the car doesn&#8217;t end up weighing this amount less&#8230; :-)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/07/25/scoop-2007-cooper-s-to-drop-180lbs/comment-page-1/#comment-46197</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 14:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/07/25/scoop-2007-cooper-s-to-drop-180lbs/#comment-46197</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Gabe, any word if MINI is planning on releasing an &#039;07 JCW Automatic in North America? Or do we get to be the red-headed step children again?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gabe, any word if MINI is planning on releasing an &#8216;07 JCW Automatic in North America? Or do we get to be the red-headed step children again?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Hendrie</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/07/25/scoop-2007-cooper-s-to-drop-180lbs/comment-page-1/#comment-46175</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Hendrie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 13:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/07/25/scoop-2007-cooper-s-to-drop-180lbs/#comment-46175</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I have to admit the new MCS sounds amazing and as a soon to be GP owner it is rather annoying. However in the defence of my motor the GP will hold its value well and has loads of exclusive kit which will ensure that it stands out from the crowd, for example those sweet Recaros!
Then roll on the new MCS Works and the GP can be traded in at little loss (that is the plan anyway)!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to admit the new MCS sounds amazing and as a soon to be GP owner it is rather annoying. However in the defence of my motor the GP will hold its value well and has loads of exclusive kit which will ensure that it stands out from the crowd, for example those sweet Recaros!
Then roll on the new MCS Works and the GP can be traded in at little loss (that is the plan anyway)!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nervous</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/07/25/scoop-2007-cooper-s-to-drop-180lbs/comment-page-1/#comment-46162</link>
		<dc:creator>nervous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 12:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/07/25/scoop-2007-cooper-s-to-drop-180lbs/#comment-46162</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Delicious - I can&#039;t wait for the next morsel!
Thanks, Gabe!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Delicious &#8211; I can&#8217;t wait for the next morsel!
Thanks, Gabe!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/07/25/scoop-2007-cooper-s-to-drop-180lbs/comment-page-1/#comment-46155</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 12:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/07/25/scoop-2007-cooper-s-to-drop-180lbs/#comment-46155</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;Let me just say, i dont doubt for a moment that Gabe has reported this story in all good faith. My doubts come from the Ã¢â‚¬ËœinsidersÃ¢â‚¬â„¢, who have let us down before.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Tony - I wouldn&#039;t exactly trust Tritec&#039;s figures on their site.  For instance they claim the MCS and MC engines are exactly the same weight when we know that there is a fairly big different between the two.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;IÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ve got two in the more than 70lbs columnÃ¢â‚¬Â¦ anymore takers?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;When did this happen?  Where is the money?  Do you and they have a Paypal account?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
  <p>Let me just say, i dont doubt for a moment that Gabe has reported this story in all good faith. My doubts come from the Ã¢â‚¬ËœinsidersÃ¢â‚¬â„¢, who have let us down before.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Tony &#8211; I wouldn&#8217;t exactly trust Tritec&#8217;s figures on their site.  For instance they claim the MCS and MC engines are exactly the same weight when we know that there is a fairly big different between the two.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>IÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ve got two in the more than 70lbs columnÃ¢â‚¬Â¦ anymore takers?</p>
</blockquote>

<p>When did this happen?  Where is the money?  Do you and they have a Paypal account?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
