Is the 2007 MCS Faster than JCW GP? (No)

GP owners breath easy. A vague mention combined with mis-read press release means that the comparison made between the GP and the new MCS isn’t correct. The GP is 14 seconds faster than the stock JCW while the R56 is 15 seconds faster than the stock MCS. Of course this could still mean the R56 MCS is almost as fast as the current JCW MCS, however we don’t have those numbers so we can’t compare.

Recently I read a little fact in the London Motorshow MINI press packet about the JCW GP that seemed rather impressive. According to BMW the GP is a full 14 seconds faster than the stock R53 MCS 200bhp JCW MCS around the famed Nürburgring Nordschleife. Without question something for MINI/BMW engineers to be proud of. However there was another recent mention of Nurburgring lap times, this one coming from a Fifth Gear review of the R56 MCS Prototype. They mentioned that the new 2007 MCS is said to be at least a full 15 seconds faster than the previous R53 Cooper S. If all these numbers are correct (and coming from BMW, they should be) that would make the stock 2007 MCS a second faster than the limited edition JCW GP around the Nürburgring Nordschleife.

MF Analysis

No the 2007 MCS isn’t faster than the GP. But it will on doubt be fast. With a broad torque range (177ft lbs coming on at 1400 rpm, the R56 will be a screamer. And with less weight in key places (and overall) it will be phenomenal in the corners as well.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Written By: Gabe

  • http://xp.solidhelium.com Lucas

    I don’t suppose the new MCS will have better tires than the GP? From the press release it doesn’t seem like the new MCS will be any lighter than the out going model. Perhaps better traction/brakes/tires enables it to be faster, but still, it doesn’t make a whole lot of sense that 2 cars with similar weight/suspension setup and a 40 hp difference will have such similar lap times.

  • http://www.motoringfile.com/ Gabe

    From the press release it doesn’t seem like the new MCS will be any lighter than the out going model.

    There was no mention of vehicle weight in the official press release other than listing several major components that are lighter.

  • danielg
    177 lb-ft available at just 1,600 rpms

    Did I read that right?

  • http://www.alldigitalnyc.com drew

    oh man gabe, way to stir the pot!

    i would guess it has to be weight reduction and engine management – nothing else that could produce such results…

  • http://www.gbmini.net Ian C.

    Of course, it could also be that there are errors in the information – we’ve seen that before – indeed there is definitely a weight error for the ’07, either from Gabes secret source, or from the official Europe pre-press-release presentation …

  • http://www.motoringfile.com/ Gabe

    Ian – keep in mind there was never an official reference to weight of the car. Just some comments made by MINI “handlers” at the event. A very important thing to remember :)

  • http://www.meanmrbean.com ETF

    Could it be that Hans Stuck was driving the 2007 MCS that day?

  • http://www.trackfaq.com MINIAK

    Tires as mentioned above could be a factor. The R56 is engineered to use the run-flats better. Does the GP have runflats?

    Things that could be a factor even in two identical cars: (not all-inclusive)

    1) Tires can make a HUGE difference – even just tire pressures. 2) Weather – cooler air can increase perfomance of the engine and potentially tire grip. 3) Driver – can make a BIG difference 4) Traffic – Lap traffic can slow you down – were these clean laps? 5) Track weight – assuming neither had a passenger and half a tank of gas.

    There are others I am sure, but this is what I could think of immediately.

    Signed a.k.a SpoilSport :-)

  • http://www.kimmelshue.com Chris Kimmelshue

    There are too many variables to do anything other than speculate. The lap time difference could come from a number of factors, not including the bhp difference:

    *tire compound *track conditions (traffic, weather, surface) *different test driver *better brakes (larger swept area, pad compound, etc) *better power delivery (ecu calibration, throttle response) *lighter weight *higher top speed (for those long N-Ring straights) *gearing *suspension (different pickup points, spring rates, etc) *better aerodynamics

    The difference is quite dramatic between the R53 and R56 though.

  • cct1

    Only way to know for sure is have the same driver take each around. I’d wager the GP would win…

    I read recently where a famous professional driver took a Cayman around the Nurburgring and did it eleven seconds faster than another professional driver did it in a Carrera…

    As mentioned above, there is a high amount of variability here, and I’m not so sure a track as long as the Nurburgring is inherently accurate. It would be in BMW’s best interest for the new MCS to be that much better than the old one, so although I’m not doubting that the new MCS is faster, I don’t know if you take much stock in it being 15 seconds faster.

  • Tim

    We know one thing for sure. The GP will be the fastest production Thunder Blue MINI ever produced!!!!!

  • Craig

    Top Gear should have “The Stig” drive both the GP and the R56 then would truly know the difference.

  • Jon

    It wouldn’t be to suprising if the R56 is quicker, afterall I know that I would assume a redesign would make strong grains on the previous model. As cool as the GP’s are they are based on the current platform.

    The GP is at the top of the food chain for our current model but I fully expect it to remain potent but not at the top of the next generation. I would like to think that the owners of the GP bought their cars with more than just lap times in mind, but rather they bought cars that are the best of the best at the current time.

  • Jon

    And because superchargers are just much coolers sounding…

    :-)

  • Frank

    Gee, I would expect the R56 MCS to be better performance wise than the current car, not equal or lesser.

    Having said that, these differences measured in seconds, may or may not be all that noticeable out there in the real world, where 99% of MINIs will spend their useful lives. I see these statistics being important to folks that plan to track/race the cars aside from the daily commuter routine.

    Judgement is still out on the R56. There is no doubt in my mind this car is intriguing and will bring some surprises up its sleeves, because the ’07s better be better than the ’02-’06 MK1 generation if MINI is to continue its success with these cars.

    I hope the PSA engine will prove to be a reliable workhorse from the get go, as much as the TRITEC has been for the R50 MINI since its introduction in 2001.

  • tony T

    Gabe, On a track, the ‘thickness’ of the powerband is irrelevant – Your not trying unless the car is constantly over at least 5500 revs.

    I would suspect the original times of the ‘standard’ R53 being only 14 seconds slower than a GP are probably completly wrong. The GP with 218bhp and seriously uprated suspension and brakes, weight loss, aerodynamics, etc should easily outperform a completly standard car by significantly more than 14 seconds….

    I would expect that the GP (if all the hype is to be in anyway believed) would be at least 8-10 seconds faster than a ‘Standard’ 210bhp JCW….

    Either that, or the hype about the GP is just that. Hype. Which I dont think it is, judging by the reports.

  • tony T

    Just to clarify, my above comment was based on the Nurburgring, not other tracks. I cant think of any corner where, trying to set a decent lap time, you’d be using such low down torque out of any corner, even carousel…. if you were below 4000 rpm, you’d be in the wrong gear.

  • Matt M

    Bleh, all you people that bought a GP are just mad cuz the R56 will be faster. Don’t worry, we are all still jealous of you, and I’m sure if you can afford a GP, you will be able to buy an R56 in a year or two.

  • Kennedy

    Maybe they meant 15 seconds faster than the R53 (in reverse)… any small print or astericks next to that? :)

  • eto

    I’m just impressed that MINI may have developed a car that will outperform the previous generation dramatically. We’ll have to wait a few months to see if the information Gabe has provided is true (although I have faith). I have seen many small cars over the past few years get more and more bloated to meet safety standards, and the engines have had to grow to meet the heavier weight. MINI appears to have bucked the trend and designed a second generation car that increased power, increased efficiency, (possibly) increased performance, and (possibly) decreased weight.

    I have doubts about the R56 S outperforming the GP, but if all the pre-release rumors prove to be correct, MINI (and BMW) should be applauded for proving that a small car doesn’t have to get bigger to be better; minor length increases aside. ;)

  • Jake

    Gabe, you’re working everyone up into a tizzy with this one!

    Nurburgring is a very long track and as mentioned above, many factors can affect a lap time. I just love the clip that Top Gear did on the Jag Type S on that track: http://www.topgear.com/content/timetoburn/sections/videos/

    Never a dull moment at MotoringFile! Well done.

    Jake

  • Diego Lopez

    Gabe,

    Correct me if I’m wrong but I thought I had read that the GP was 14 sec’s quicker than the JCW around the ‘Ring.

    From: http://www.worldcarfans.com/news.cfm/newsid/2060623.003/country/ecf/MINI/mini-cooper-s-jcw-gp-kit-in-depth

    “Comparison tests on the race track prove that the new model offers even better performance than the already outstanding MINI Cooper S with the John Cooper Works Tuning Kit: The MINI Cooper S with the John Cooper Works GP Kit laps the Nordschleife of Nürburgring — without the Grand Prix circuit — in 8 : 41.55 minutes, almost 14 seconds faster than the production model.”

  • http://www.motoringfile.com/ Gabe

    Whew – that makes a helluva a lot more sense than the press release I saw. I hope it’s right. The GP should retain some sort of track-day superiority for at least a year!

  • Diego Lopez

    yeah, i’d hope the GP would stay on top for now…considering i put down for one ;)

  • Mark (Ohio)

    …ugh come on, who really drives a stock MCS or even fully stock JCW MCS anyway! :)

  • eto

    Well, now it looks like the mystery is the difference in lap times for the current generation Cooper S and the JCW. If that can be located, all the puzzle pieces will fall into place… :D

  • GPMINI

    The GP is 14 secs faster around the ring than a “stock” JCW? Only if “stock” means that said JCW did not have the JCW suspension. With the same suspension and brakes, these two cars would be very, very close. A 3% weight reduction and 4% more peak hp would not give the GP much of an edge at all. Don’t believe the hype. It’s a skin job.

  • http://Motoringfile.com Mark Hendrie

    I wonder if anyone short of a professional driver could actually tell the difference and appreciate it?

  • http://www.gbmini.net Ian C.

    GPMINI – you’ve got my name! ;) Remember there is also some aero differences on the GP. I’m not claiming they contribute these differences but they also could be factored into your weight drop & peak power “calculation”

  • chows4us

    This 14 second thing is misleading and perhaps deceiving.

    The JCW reference is from this car

    8:55 Mini Cooper S Works, 200 hp (sport auto ??/04)

    So they are comparing the GP against a MY2004 JCW with both the OLD JCW kit AND the older gearing. The newer gearing should be a lot quicker accelerating out of those 200+ turns and lets add in the additional 10 bhp.

    I would imagine a MY05 210 JCW to be very close to the GP times at the ring.

    This is very misleading.

  • http://www.motoringfile.com/ Gabe

    This is very misleading.

    Maybe I’m missing something here but how do you know what car and spec BMW is referencing in their PR release?

  • chows4us

    The only comprehensive list of Ring times on the Internet (at least that I could find) is here http://www.supercars.net/PitLane?viewThread=y&gID=3&fID=0&tID=10073 Other lists tend to refer to this list.

    The 2004 JCW 200 car on this list is 14 seconds slower than the GP quoted in here http://www.worldcarfans.com/news.cfm/newsID/2060623.003/page/1/country/ecf/lang/eng/mini/mini-cooper-s-jcw-gp-kit-in-depth and noted by Diego above.

    The logical conclusion is that we are talking about the same car as that is the only published time for a JCW. If it were a 2005 JCW 210, I would presume it would have to be quicker. However, I cannot definitively say that is true but I think this is a very good and logical conclusion.

  • http://www.gbmini.net Ian C.

    Full quote from the British Motor Show press release: Comparison tests on the race track proved that the MINI GP offers even better performance than the popular MINI Cooper S with the JCW Tuning Kit. The MINI GP laps the Nordschleife of Nürburgring in under 8 minutes, 42 seconds. Almost 14 seconds faster than the production model. The ‘GP’ benefits not only from its greater engine power, but also from aerodynamic improvements that reduce lift on both the front and rear axle

  • GPMINI
    GPMINI – you’ve got my name! ;)

    Sorry? Looks like your name is Ian.

  • GPMINI
    Remember there is also some aero differences on the GP. I’m not claiming they contribute these differences but they also could be factored into your weight drop & peak power “calculation”

    Like I said… skin job. Ok, I’ll give you 1 second for a bit more downforce in the rear. ;) However, I strongly doubt that they dialed in enough oversteer on the production car to really take advantage of this.

  • karlInSanDiego

    My favorite Nurburgring lapping is a woman kicking major butt in a Ford Transit Van

    http://www.dumpalink.com/media/1135852351/Top_Gear_NÃÆ'¼rburgring

  • Frank

    Please let’s compare apples to apples, shall we?

    I would like to see a comparo between a ’05+ JCW 210HP equipped MCS vs a ’06 MCS JCW GP. I have a gut feeling the time differences between the two will be substantially lesser than 14 seconds.

    I agree with Chows4us. Something doesn’t jive here.

  • http://www.hubertus.net/mymini/ Philip

    It’s all down to the driver anyway! There is guys kicking my butt in a MINI One on the Nordschleife, so relax anyone. (And I have done over 60 fast laps on the Nordschleife in my MCS – so I’m not a beginner.)

  • chows4us

    The fact that one driver may be quicker than another is not relavent to the published Ring times. Take a look at some of the drivers listed … you got factory drivers in there like Walther Röhrl … others like Hans Stuck and the Covette Chief Engineer Dave Hill. These numbers are for bragging rights. Don’t you think Corvette wants the best possible numbers for the Z06 so they claim they are faster than say a 997S for much less money?

    For example, the fact that the Cayman S is actually four seconds quicker than the base 997 driven by the same factory driver has, from what I read, shaken some of the 997 faithful.

    Something isn’t right here. MINI should specifically state which cars they are comparing or the numbers are meaningless.

  • http://www.gbmini.net Ian C.

    GPMINI – note the smiley in my original comment, and then see http://www.gpmini.net/mtblog/ ;)

  • http://www.hubertus.net/mymini/ Philip

    chows4us, trust me. You can get the same driver to drive the same car on two different days and he might do lap times with quite different times. The Nordschleife is beast. There is many factors that will effect lap times.

    But what I really wanted to remind everyone is, that if you’re a really good, concentrated driver, you will easily beat the other guy in his GP.

    And then again, aren’t we here for the fun? :-D

  • http://www.carcounsel.com/hid carcounsel.com

    not to get too far off track here but with BMWs RWD cars, each generation’s standard model stands close to the outgoing generation’s ‘tuned’ variant. e.g. the E36 M3 sedan rough equivalent to E46 330i is roughly equivalent to E90 328i in power and torque production – tracks get wider and body strength:mass ratios, high speed lift and suspension kinematics are better managed with successive generations as well.

    i’m not saying i believe 14 seconds, but if the new Cooper car has the flat bottom that the current 5 and 3 series cars sport for example I could see that as bringing the standard car to roughly where the GP stands in aero managment, surely a much bigger deal on a high speed track like the ring.


Sort by MINI model


OutMotoring

MINI Model Cheat Sheet

1st Gen MINI
R50: One & MC Hatch
R52: All 1st Gen MINI Convt.
R53: MCS Hatch
2nd Gen MINI
R55: Clubman
R56: Hatch
R57: Convertible
R58: Coupe
R59: Roadster
R60: MINI Crossover
R61: MINI Crossover Coupe
3rd Gen MINI
F55: Clubman
F56: Hatch
F57: Convertible
F60: MINI Crossover
F62: Traveller

Advertise with MotoringFile

If you or your company are interested in advertising on the most influential MINI website in the world, please visit our Advertising section. If you have further questions about becoming a sponsor or would like to see our rate sheet please feel free to contact us directly.
mini mini
Translate MotoringFile with Google: 
 
Morristown MINI Auctions
BF

MF NewsRoom

MotoringFile Buyers Guides

R50 ('02-'06 MC) Buyers Guide
R53 ('02-'06 MCS) Buyers Guide



MotoringFile Reviews

Auto Reviews:
'12 JCW Coupe
'11 Fiat 500 Sport
'11 Tesla Roaster 2.5 '11 Countryman Comparo
'11 Cooper S Hatch
'11 Countryman MCS (FWD)
'11 Countryman MC (auto)
'10 Mayfair MCS (auto)
'11 Countryman MCS (ALL4)
'10 MINI E
'10 Tesla Roadster Sport
'09 Cooper S Convertible
'09 JCW Coupe
'09 JCW Clubman
JCW Stage I vs JCW Stage II
'08 Clubman S (Auto)
1st Drive: '08 MINI Clubman
'08 Smart Fourtwo
Comparison: '08 BMW 135i
'06 R53 MCS vs '07 R56 MCS
'07 R56 JCW (Stage 1)
'07 MINI Cooper S Long Term
'07 BMW Z4 M Coupe
'07 MINI Cooper & Cooper S
Audio: '07 MC/MCS at the Track
'06 JCW GP Long term
Reader Review: JCW GP
'06 JCW Cooper S Long Term
Comparison: '06 Lotus Elise
Comparison: '06 Mazda MX5
Comparison: '06 UK Focus ST
Comparison: '06 Civic Si
Comparison: '04 TVR T350
Comparison: '06 Nissan 350z
Comparison: '06 VW GTI w/DSG
Podcast: Cooper S Auto
Podcast: BMW 325i
Podcast: JCW MC Soundkit
'04 JCW MINI Cooper Tuning Kit
'05 MCS: One Month Review
'05 MCS Auto
'05 JCW S 1st Drive
'05 MINI Cooper
'05 MCS Conv. Long Term
'05 MINI Cooper S
'05 MCS Cabrio 1st Drive
'04 JCW MCS First Drive
'04 MC w/JCW Tuning Kit
BMW M3 SMG Vs. MCS
'04 MINI Cooper CVT
'02 MCS 3 year Review
Autocrossing the MINI Range

cafepress



Performance Accessories:
M7 Rear Chassis Brace
R56 JCW Engine Kit
R56 JCW Suspension (Long-Term)
R56 JCW Suspension (Track)
R56 JCW Suspension (Street)
R53 Craven Speed Short Shifter
R53 M7 Understrut System
Kumho Ecsta SPT Tires
R53 M7 Strut Tower Plates
R53 JCW Alcantara Wheel
R53 JCW Brake Kit
R53 Webb 15% Pulley
R53 Helix MCSa 15% Pulley
R53 H-Sport 19mm Sway Bar
R53 MCS Supersprint Exhaust
Podcast: R53 MCS SS Exhaust
R53 JCW Cold Air Intake
Reader Rev.: R53 JCW Brakes
R50 Supersprint Exhaust
R50 Remus Exhaust
R50 Promini Intake
R50 Remus Dual Exhaust
Schroth Harness System
R50 CVT Steering Wheel Paddles

Exterior Accessories:
MINI Do More Clubman Hitch
Miniature's Receiver Hitch
OEM White Tail Lights

Lifestyle Accessories:
MINI_Motion Watch
MINI_Motion Driving Shoe

Audio:
MINI Digital SoundModul
ICE-Link Plus iPod Adapter
Official BMW/iPod adapter
ICE-Link iPod Adapter
Kenwood iPod Interface
Alpine iPod Interface
Harman Kardon Stereo

Interior Accessories:
JCW Alcantara Steering Wheel JCW Leather Dash
MCAW Auto Up Circuit
MINI Rear Camera
MINI Rear Saddle (official)
MINI Rear Cargo Storage Case
Official MINI Rear Saddle Bag
2004 MINI Armrest Reviewed
Mymini Knee Pad
MINI Bluetooth Kit
MINI Video Input
Aftermarket Bluetooth Integration
Ian Cull Auto-up Circuit
Universal Mobile Phone Holder