Comments on: Auto Express R56 Cooper Review http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/11/02/auto-express-reviews-r56-cooper/ MotoringFile | MINI news, reviews and opinion. MINI Cooper, Cooper S, Clubman, Countryman Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:14:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: gokartride http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/11/02/auto-express-reviews-r56-cooper/comment-page-1/#comment-59228 gokartride Fri, 03 Nov 2006 00:10:28 +0000 http://motoringfile.com/2006/11/02/auto-express-reviews-r56-cooper/#comment-59228 <p>Car looks great!!!</p> Car looks great!!!

]]> By: brad http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/11/02/auto-express-reviews-r56-cooper/comment-page-1/#comment-59214 brad Thu, 02 Nov 2006 22:25:43 +0000 http://motoringfile.com/2006/11/02/auto-express-reviews-r56-cooper/#comment-59214 <p>no, i meant that i hope the measurement they were taking was in imperial gallons. 48mpg in US gallons would be completely unbelievable. yeah, about 39-40 mpg is what my conversion to US gallons came out to as well.</p> no, i meant that i hope the measurement they were taking was in imperial gallons. 48mpg in US gallons would be completely unbelievable. yeah, about 39-40 mpg is what my conversion to US gallons came out to as well.

]]> By: Collin http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/11/02/auto-express-reviews-r56-cooper/comment-page-1/#comment-59179 Collin Thu, 02 Nov 2006 19:06:20 +0000 http://motoringfile.com/2006/11/02/auto-express-reviews-r56-cooper/#comment-59179 <p>OK...48MPG...that is much more then a 19% increase from the 1.6-litre DaimlerChrysler engine in my 2005. Somebody please explain that comment????</p> OK…48MPG…that is much more then a 19% increase from the 1.6-litre DaimlerChrysler engine in my 2005. Somebody please explain that comment????

]]> By: another brad http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/11/02/auto-express-reviews-r56-cooper/comment-page-1/#comment-59177 another brad Thu, 02 Nov 2006 18:58:54 +0000 http://motoringfile.com/2006/11/02/auto-express-reviews-r56-cooper/#comment-59177 <p>you hope that's imperial gallons? you're actively wishing for worse gas milage?</p> <p>assuming it is imperial that converts to 39 mpg (US) which is more in line with what we'd expect.</p> <p>--brad</p> you hope that’s imperial gallons? you’re actively wishing for worse gas milage?

assuming it is imperial that converts to 39 mpg (US) which is more in line with what we’d expect.

–brad

]]> By: brad http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/11/02/auto-express-reviews-r56-cooper/comment-page-1/#comment-59169 brad Thu, 02 Nov 2006 17:37:12 +0000 http://motoringfile.com/2006/11/02/auto-express-reviews-r56-cooper/#comment-59169 <p>48mpg! i hope that's imperial gallons.</p> 48mpg! i hope that’s imperial gallons.

]]>