<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Welcome to MotoringFile 3.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/11/22/welcome-to-motoringfile-30/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/11/22/welcome-to-motoringfile-30/</link>
	<description>MotoringFile &#124; MINI news, reviews and opinion. MINI Cooper, Cooper S, Clubman, Countryman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:48:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timmee</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/11/22/welcome-to-motoringfile-30/comment-page-2/#comment-65873</link>
		<dc:creator>Timmee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 06:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/11/22/welcome-to-motoringfile-30/#comment-65873</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Heh, 56 comments so far. When I used to do web ui design I used to hate getting feedback from colleagues and users. You simply cannot satisfy everyone. If I had one happy user I was thrilled. In fact, if the person paying the bill was cool with it, I was happy that my job was done. Oh, who pays for this again? :P&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Bring back the Orange! Viva la 2002!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh, 56 comments so far. When I used to do web ui design I used to hate getting feedback from colleagues and users. You simply cannot satisfy everyone. If I had one happy user I was thrilled. In fact, if the person paying the bill was cool with it, I was happy that my job was done. Oh, who pays for this again? :P</p>

<p>Bring back the Orange! Viva la 2002!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DWF</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/11/22/welcome-to-motoringfile-30/comment-page-2/#comment-65686</link>
		<dc:creator>DWF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 06:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/11/22/welcome-to-motoringfile-30/#comment-65686</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hey guys, now that you&#039;re on WP, any chance you&#039;ll install Alex King&#039;s WP-Mobile plugin?  I&#039;ve poked Gabe about this before not realizing you weren&#039;t on WordPress.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This would allow folks to read MF from our phones (he says, lightly plugging his own site that would love to have MF added to available news feeds...)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thoughts?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey guys, now that you&#8217;re on WP, any chance you&#8217;ll install Alex King&#8217;s WP-Mobile plugin?  I&#8217;ve poked Gabe about this before not realizing you weren&#8217;t on WordPress.</p>

<p>This would allow folks to read MF from our phones (he says, lightly plugging his own site that would love to have MF added to available news feeds&#8230;)</p>

<p>Thoughts?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt G.</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/11/22/welcome-to-motoringfile-30/comment-page-2/#comment-65475</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 05:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/11/22/welcome-to-motoringfile-30/#comment-65475</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The problem where the Browse by Category link crashes IE should be fixed.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For web developers: There is a known bug in the slide effect in Scriptaculous 1.6.5. As you might have guessed, it causes IE to crash. I fixed the problem on this site by switching to version 1.6.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem where the Browse by Category link crashes IE should be fixed.</p>

<p>For web developers: There is a known bug in the slide effect in Scriptaculous 1.6.5. As you might have guessed, it causes IE to crash. I fixed the problem on this site by switching to version 1.6.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BobS</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/11/22/welcome-to-motoringfile-30/comment-page-2/#comment-65413</link>
		<dc:creator>BobS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 15:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/11/22/welcome-to-motoringfile-30/#comment-65413</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I use Safari at home and the site works great. However, at work Safari is a four letter word that also begins with s. Anyway, at work I use IE6 SP2 on XP Pro and the very cool Browse by Category crashes IE. When any MF page loads there is a syntax error at line 2 char 1 but the page works okay until the slider is activated. Then IE crashes. 
Just today I rolled over an item in the Browse by Category table in the window footer and it turned the bottom visible part of the window bkgnd black. Scrolling up out of the black area restores the bkgnd to white.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Safari at home and the site works great. However, at work Safari is a four letter word that also begins with s. Anyway, at work I use IE6 SP2 on XP Pro and the very cool Browse by Category crashes IE. When any MF page loads there is a syntax error at line 2 char 1 but the page works okay until the slider is activated. Then IE crashes. 
Just today I rolled over an item in the Browse by Category table in the window footer and it turned the bottom visible part of the window bkgnd black. Scrolling up out of the black area restores the bkgnd to white.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/11/22/welcome-to-motoringfile-30/comment-page-2/#comment-65293</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 05:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/11/22/welcome-to-motoringfile-30/#comment-65293</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;And if people didnÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢t look hard enough for content before, I honestly doubt that they are going to muddle through all the links.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m at a loss there.  Nothing has changed, the content is still the same size, located in the same place and the titles are still big, bold and black. Countless hours of user research shows that the vast majority of users don&#039;t have trouble with understanding where the daily content is in a three column weblog style layout like the one here.  If you look at the leading weblog news sites out there, they almost all have a variation of this layout.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And it may be worth mentioning, since launching the updated site, not only are our daily visits up on the home page (compared to this time last year) but I&#039;ve seen more hits to a broader range of pages within the site.  Exactly what we had wanted.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;Congrats on all the years of Motoring FunÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã‚Â¦ IÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢m just afraid that IÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢ll get a neck cramp by looking slightly to the left so oftenÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã‚Â¦.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks but just to clarify, the main content area has always been on the left.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
  <p>And if people didnÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢t look hard enough for content before, I honestly doubt that they are going to muddle through all the links.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>I&#8217;m at a loss there.  Nothing has changed, the content is still the same size, located in the same place and the titles are still big, bold and black. Countless hours of user research shows that the vast majority of users don&#8217;t have trouble with understanding where the daily content is in a three column weblog style layout like the one here.  If you look at the leading weblog news sites out there, they almost all have a variation of this layout.</p>

<p>And it may be worth mentioning, since launching the updated site, not only are our daily visits up on the home page (compared to this time last year) but I&#8217;ve seen more hits to a broader range of pages within the site.  Exactly what we had wanted.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Congrats on all the years of Motoring FunÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã‚Â¦ IÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢m just afraid that IÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢ll get a neck cramp by looking slightly to the left so oftenÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã‚Â¦.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Thanks but just to clarify, the main content area has always been on the left.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominique</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/11/22/welcome-to-motoringfile-30/comment-page-2/#comment-65282</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominique</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 00:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/11/22/welcome-to-motoringfile-30/#comment-65282</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve always liked the simple layout, the colors, etc etc of motoringfile, but it just feels like the right of the page has become awfully cluttered.  And if people didn&#039;t look hard enough for content before, I honestly doubt that they are going to muddle through all the links.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I still love the site, still love the content, and just about everything else... but that&#039;s my two cents. :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always liked the simple layout, the colors, etc etc of motoringfile, but it just feels like the right of the page has become awfully cluttered.  And if people didn&#8217;t look hard enough for content before, I honestly doubt that they are going to muddle through all the links.</p>

<p>I still love the site, still love the content, and just about everything else&#8230; but that&#8217;s my two cents. :)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rocketboy</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/11/22/welcome-to-motoringfile-30/comment-page-2/#comment-65247</link>
		<dc:creator>Rocketboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2006 14:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/11/22/welcome-to-motoringfile-30/#comment-65247</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Congrats on all the years of Motoring Fun...  I&#039;m just afraid that I&#039;ll get a neck cramp by looking slightly to the left so often....&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats on all the years of Motoring Fun&#8230;  I&#8217;m just afraid that I&#8217;ll get a neck cramp by looking slightly to the left so often&#8230;.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snid</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/11/22/welcome-to-motoringfile-30/comment-page-1/#comment-65201</link>
		<dc:creator>snid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 19:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/11/22/welcome-to-motoringfile-30/#comment-65201</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m another one of the few that doesn&#039;t browse with their browser window anywhere near the full width of the screen.  My browser window is &quot;tall and narrow&quot;  with an aspect ration similar to a book.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If everything on the web were multi-column, then a wider window would be okay.  But, when you run into a site that doesn&#039;t have columns, a wide window makes text content too hard to read as the lines are too long.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I guess I&#039;m a net luddite, though.  :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m another one of the few that doesn&#8217;t browse with their browser window anywhere near the full width of the screen.  My browser window is &#8220;tall and narrow&#8221;  with an aspect ration similar to a book.</p>

<p>If everything on the web were multi-column, then a wider window would be okay.  But, when you run into a site that doesn&#8217;t have columns, a wide window makes text content too hard to read as the lines are too long.</p>

<p>I guess I&#8217;m a net luddite, though.  :)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coruscation</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/11/22/welcome-to-motoringfile-30/comment-page-1/#comment-65194</link>
		<dc:creator>Coruscation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 18:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/11/22/welcome-to-motoringfile-30/#comment-65194</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The archives navigation of wordpress sites
is a little lacking.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Lots of --&gt; next&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;etc&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;where next refers to slightly older.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The list of posts on eg page 3 of the archives 
will shift by one every time a new post is 
published, or when maybe when the day or week passes.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If the numbering could start from the beginning, then
eg page 17 of the archives always has the same contaent.
A date-based URL scheme would be better&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;WhiteRoof Radio bypassed the problem
by bulk linking to archives by generic number,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;but a more descriptive link text for the more
topic specific posts on Motoringfile would be appropriate.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The archives navigation of wordpress sites
is a little lacking.</p>

<p>Lots of &#8211;&gt; next</p>

<p>etc</p>

<p>where next refers to slightly older.</p>

<p>The list of posts on eg page 3 of the archives 
will shift by one every time a new post is 
published, or when maybe when the day or week passes.</p>

<p>If the numbering could start from the beginning, then
eg page 17 of the archives always has the same contaent.
A date-based URL scheme would be better</p>

<p>WhiteRoof Radio bypassed the problem
by bulk linking to archives by generic number,</p>

<p>but a more descriptive link text for the more
topic specific posts on Motoringfile would be appropriate.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coruscation</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/11/22/welcome-to-motoringfile-30/comment-page-1/#comment-65193</link>
		<dc:creator>Coruscation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 18:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/11/22/welcome-to-motoringfile-30/#comment-65193</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Can you add a preview for the comments so I can test out
the &lt;strong&gt;formatting&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;em&gt;and stuff&lt;/em&gt; ?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you add a preview for the comments so I can test out
the <strong>formatting</strong> <em>and stuff</em> ?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coruscation</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/11/22/welcome-to-motoringfile-30/comment-page-1/#comment-65192</link>
		<dc:creator>Coruscation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 18:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/11/22/welcome-to-motoringfile-30/#comment-65192</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Have you thought of a most recent comment by
on the front page, or on a post-specific basis ?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you thought of a most recent comment by
on the front page, or on a post-specific basis ?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coruscation</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/11/22/welcome-to-motoringfile-30/comment-page-1/#comment-65191</link>
		<dc:creator>Coruscation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 18:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/11/22/welcome-to-motoringfile-30/#comment-65191</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;_  ... you should add the model names to the categories at the top and footer as well (like you did with ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã…â€œR55 (Clubman)ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã‚Â. _&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&#039;Unfortunately thereÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢s no room. Otherwise we would have. However weÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢ll continue to evolve this little feature. 
&#039;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;** try mouseover title text if you&#039;re really out of room.**&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>_  &#8230; you should add the model names to the categories at the top and footer as well (like you did with ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã…â€œR55 (Clubman)ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã‚Â. _</p>

<p>&#8216;Unfortunately thereÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢s no room. Otherwise we would have. However weÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢ll continue to evolve this little feature. 
&#8216;</p>

<p>** try mouseover title text if you&#8217;re really out of room.**</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coruscation</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/11/22/welcome-to-motoringfile-30/comment-page-1/#comment-65085</link>
		<dc:creator>Coruscation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/11/22/welcome-to-motoringfile-30/#comment-65085</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Nice work.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I would like more text above the fold, and less&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;-----&gt;&gt; continued ....&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice work.</p>

<p>I would like more text above the fold, and less</p>

<p>&#8212;&#8211;&gt;&gt; continued &#8230;.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/11/22/welcome-to-motoringfile-30/comment-page-1/#comment-65084</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/11/22/welcome-to-motoringfile-30/#comment-65084</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ah we missed those.  Thanks for the heads up!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah we missed those.  Thanks for the heads up!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dickdavid</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/11/22/welcome-to-motoringfile-30/comment-page-1/#comment-65083</link>
		<dc:creator>dickdavid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/11/22/welcome-to-motoringfile-30/#comment-65083</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Just a couple of navigation bugs under MotoringFile Reviews:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&#039;05 JCW MINI Cooper Tuning Kit - is actually an &#039;04&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;You have two links to: JCW Brake Kit&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a couple of navigation bugs under MotoringFile Reviews:</p>

<ul>
<li>&#8217;05 JCW MINI Cooper Tuning Kit &#8211; is actually an &#8217;04</li>
<li>You have two links to: JCW Brake Kit</li>
</ul>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/11/22/welcome-to-motoringfile-30/comment-page-1/#comment-65016</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 04:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/11/22/welcome-to-motoringfile-30/#comment-65016</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;For individual articles, I think your format works very well. However for the home page, a lot of very prime real estate is occupied by infrequently used reference/archive link listings. The home page would work much better if the top of the page could be formatted for two columns of article summaries, with the archive stuff moved down underneath.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;On the face of it I agree with you and have even looked in this kind of layout a few years back.  However with the amount of emails and comments we get continuously asking about subjects we&#039;ve already posted about, it&#039;s obvious we need to keep links to larger, more important stories, at the top.  Thus the MF Features section.  Then you have the top 5 posts... again a very popular click-point for users. Finally we need to have certain space for our sponors that lies above the fold.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In an ideal world we&#039;d be able to move in that direction.  However there may be &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.subtraction.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;better solutions&lt;/a&gt; that work within our current frame-work.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But all that said this new wider layout does give us some freedom to try new things in the future.  This is another reason for the recent change.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
  <p>For individual articles, I think your format works very well. However for the home page, a lot of very prime real estate is occupied by infrequently used reference/archive link listings. The home page would work much better if the top of the page could be formatted for two columns of article summaries, with the archive stuff moved down underneath.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>On the face of it I agree with you and have even looked in this kind of layout a few years back.  However with the amount of emails and comments we get continuously asking about subjects we&#8217;ve already posted about, it&#8217;s obvious we need to keep links to larger, more important stories, at the top.  Thus the MF Features section.  Then you have the top 5 posts&#8230; again a very popular click-point for users. Finally we need to have certain space for our sponors that lies above the fold.</p>

<p>In an ideal world we&#8217;d be able to move in that direction.  However there may be <a href="http://www.subtraction.com/" rel="nofollow">better solutions</a> that work within our current frame-work.</p>

<p>But all that said this new wider layout does give us some freedom to try new things in the future.  This is another reason for the recent change.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rkw</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/11/22/welcome-to-motoringfile-30/comment-page-1/#comment-65014</link>
		<dc:creator>rkw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 04:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/11/22/welcome-to-motoringfile-30/#comment-65014</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;For individual articles, I think your format works very well. However for the home page, a lot of very prime real estate is occupied by infrequently used reference/archive link listings. The home page would work much better if the top of the page could be formatted for two columns of article summaries, with the archive stuff moved down underneath.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For individual articles, I think your format works very well. However for the home page, a lot of very prime real estate is occupied by infrequently used reference/archive link listings. The home page would work much better if the top of the page could be formatted for two columns of article summaries, with the archive stuff moved down underneath.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/11/22/welcome-to-motoringfile-30/comment-page-1/#comment-65011</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 03:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/11/22/welcome-to-motoringfile-30/#comment-65011</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Are you suggesting color is now passÃƒÆ&#039;Ã‚Â©?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you suggesting color is now passÃƒÆ&#8217;Ã‚Â©?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/11/22/welcome-to-motoringfile-30/comment-page-1/#comment-64984</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 00:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/11/22/welcome-to-motoringfile-30/#comment-64984</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for all the suggestions.  Let mw answer a few of the questions.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;Finally, consider making external links open into new windows.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We would never degrade our users by taking away that control.  Instead we allow our users to decide for themselves how to open external links using built tools in every web browser.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;ItÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢s cool that you have the ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã…â€œMINI Numbering System Cheat SheetÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã‚Â, but you should add the model names to the categories at the top and footer as well (like you did with ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã…â€œR55 (Clubman)ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã‚Â.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately there&#039;s no room.  Otherwise we would have.  However we&#039;ll continue to evolve this little feature.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;The site used to have more color, namely orange, but now itÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢s almost completely black, white, and grey.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Web design circa 2002 vs circa 2006.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;A lot of what is in the second and third columns could be put on a separate page, such as the ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã…â€œArchiveÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã‚Â page. I rarely look at that stuff, myself. And I agree those columns should go away once you open an article.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Again we&#039;re trying to introduce our newer users to some of this classic content.  We get so many emails and comments every day asking questions about content we&#039;ve already posted. This is a way to subtly remind users about MotoringFile&#039;s huge content archives&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for all the suggestions.  Let mw answer a few of the questions.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Finally, consider making external links open into new windows.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>We would never degrade our users by taking away that control.  Instead we allow our users to decide for themselves how to open external links using built tools in every web browser.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>ItÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢s cool that you have the ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã…â€œMINI Numbering System Cheat SheetÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã‚Â, but you should add the model names to the categories at the top and footer as well (like you did with ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã…â€œR55 (Clubman)ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã‚Â.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Unfortunately there&#8217;s no room.  Otherwise we would have.  However we&#8217;ll continue to evolve this little feature.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>The site used to have more color, namely orange, but now itÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢s almost completely black, white, and grey.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Web design circa 2002 vs circa 2006.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>A lot of what is in the second and third columns could be put on a separate page, such as the ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã…â€œArchiveÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã‚Â page. I rarely look at that stuff, myself. And I agree those columns should go away once you open an article.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Again we&#8217;re trying to introduce our newer users to some of this classic content.  We get so many emails and comments every day asking questions about content we&#8217;ve already posted. This is a way to subtly remind users about MotoringFile&#8217;s huge content archives</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2006/11/22/welcome-to-motoringfile-30/comment-page-1/#comment-64980</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 00:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2006/11/22/welcome-to-motoringfile-30/#comment-64980</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;A lot of what is in the second and third columns could be put on a separate page, such as the &quot;Archive&quot; page.  I rarely look at that stuff, myself.  And I agree those columns should go away once you open an article.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The site used to have more color, namely orange, but now it&#039;s almost completely black, white, and grey.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s cool that you have the &quot;MINI Numbering
System Cheat Sheet&quot;, but you should add the model names to the categories at the top and footer as well (like you did with &quot;R55 (Clubman)&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Finally, consider making external links open into new windows.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;When is Wordpress going to allow one to preview comments before submitting them?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of what is in the second and third columns could be put on a separate page, such as the &#8220;Archive&#8221; page.  I rarely look at that stuff, myself.  And I agree those columns should go away once you open an article.</p>

<p>The site used to have more color, namely orange, but now it&#8217;s almost completely black, white, and grey.</p>

<p>It&#8217;s cool that you have the &#8220;MINI Numbering
System Cheat Sheet&#8221;, but you should add the model names to the categories at the top and footer as well (like you did with &#8220;R55 (Clubman)&#8221;.</p>

<p>Finally, consider making external links open into new windows.</p>

<p>When is WordPress going to allow one to preview comments before submitting them?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

