<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New MINI Clubman Spy Photos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/01/12/new-clubman-spotting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/01/12/new-clubman-spotting/</link>
	<description>MotoringFile &#124; MINI news, reviews and opinion. MINI Cooper, Cooper S, Clubman, Countryman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:32:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MINI.NEWS : New MINI Clubman Spy Photos</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/01/12/new-clubman-spotting/comment-page-1/#comment-168607</link>
		<dc:creator>MINI.NEWS : New MINI Clubman Spy Photos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 10:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2007/01/12/new-clubman-spotting/#comment-168607</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] MotoringFile: Leftlane News have posted some spy picsMotoringFile writes: Key elements include:  1) Rear [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] MotoringFile: Leftlane News have posted some spy picsMotoringFile writes: Key elements include:  1) Rear [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MotoringFile &#187; Archive &#187; MINI Clubman Debut Date Set</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/01/12/new-clubman-spotting/comment-page-1/#comment-86824</link>
		<dc:creator>MotoringFile &#187; Archive &#187; MINI Clubman Debut Date Set</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 13:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2007/01/12/new-clubman-spotting/#comment-86824</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] For those who may have missed them a few weeks back, you can check out new Clubman spyshots from our friends at Leftlanenews. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For those who may have missed them a few weeks back, you can check out new Clubman spyshots from our friends at Leftlanenews. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rhawth99</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/01/12/new-clubman-spotting/comment-page-1/#comment-83561</link>
		<dc:creator>rhawth99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 01:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2007/01/12/new-clubman-spotting/#comment-83561</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Not bad, I&#039;ll wait until the final product appears before making a final judgement. I&#039;m sure they&#039;ll sell like hotcakes.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not bad, I&#8217;ll wait until the final product appears before making a final judgement. I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;ll sell like hotcakes.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lex low</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/01/12/new-clubman-spotting/comment-page-1/#comment-83512</link>
		<dc:creator>Lex low</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 21:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2007/01/12/new-clubman-spotting/#comment-83512</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;YUK!!!!!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YUK!!!!!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/01/12/new-clubman-spotting/comment-page-1/#comment-83415</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 14:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2007/01/12/new-clubman-spotting/#comment-83415</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Aussom,
Suicide door cannot be opened unless the front door is opened as well. So it is actually there to make the existing entry larger.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Gabe,
All this talk reminds me of the Garth&#039;s line in Wayne&#039;s World - &quot;We FEAR change...&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aussom,
Suicide door cannot be opened unless the front door is opened as well. So it is actually there to make the existing entry larger.</p>

<p>Gabe,
All this talk reminds me of the Garth&#8217;s line in Wayne&#8217;s World &#8211; &#8220;We FEAR change&#8230;&#8221;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aussom</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/01/12/new-clubman-spotting/comment-page-1/#comment-83404</link>
		<dc:creator>Aussom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 14:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2007/01/12/new-clubman-spotting/#comment-83404</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Can an adult actually fit through the suicide door opening?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Assuming that the back seats can be folded down like in the current MINIs? Would like to see the boot depression removed (or an in-fill product available) to make the rear luggage space completely flat.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I also wonder what the final weight is expected to be for the R55. For a full load of people (presumably 5 adults?) and/or luggage in the boot / roof, I&#039;d go for the MCS model as minimum spec for a reasonable power-to-weight ratio fo those hilly getaways. Maybe MINI can turn up the boost for more power for this model?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can an adult actually fit through the suicide door opening?</p>

<p>Assuming that the back seats can be folded down like in the current MINIs? Would like to see the boot depression removed (or an in-fill product available) to make the rear luggage space completely flat.</p>

<p>I also wonder what the final weight is expected to be for the R55. For a full load of people (presumably 5 adults?) and/or luggage in the boot / roof, I&#8217;d go for the MCS model as minimum spec for a reasonable power-to-weight ratio fo those hilly getaways. Maybe MINI can turn up the boost for more power for this model?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lavardera</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/01/12/new-clubman-spotting/comment-page-1/#comment-83196</link>
		<dc:creator>lavardera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 21:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2007/01/12/new-clubman-spotting/#comment-83196</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I see a market for a fiberglass R53 &quot;replicar&quot; coming up. Any investors?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see a market for a fiberglass R53 &#8220;replicar&#8221; coming up. Any investors?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/01/12/new-clubman-spotting/comment-page-1/#comment-83159</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 18:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2007/01/12/new-clubman-spotting/#comment-83159</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
  &lt;blockquote&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;&quot;Fugly. And too big. MINIÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢s should stay mini.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;/blockquote&gt;
  
  &lt;p&gt;&quot;IsnÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢t that what people where saying about the new MINI when came out 5 1/2 years ago!&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Yeah I heard the same thing said for the R50, R56 and now the R55.  In fact every single thing MINI has ever released (including the 2002 Cooper S) has had tons of critism initially from random voices on the web.  Yet every vehicle that has been released has eventually been met with incredible success both in terms of sales and enthusiast&#039;s reverence. I expect nothing less with the R55.  In fact I expect the R55 to be a surprisingly strong seller - especially in the US.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
  <blockquote>
    <p>&#8220;Fugly. And too big. MINIÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢s should stay mini.&#8221;</p>
  </blockquote>
  
  <p>&#8220;IsnÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢t that what people where saying about the new MINI when came out 5 1/2 years ago!&#8221;</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Yeah I heard the same thing said for the R50, R56 and now the R55.  In fact every single thing MINI has ever released (including the 2002 Cooper S) has had tons of critism initially from random voices on the web.  Yet every vehicle that has been released has eventually been met with incredible success both in terms of sales and enthusiast&#8217;s reverence. I expect nothing less with the R55.  In fact I expect the R55 to be a surprisingly strong seller &#8211; especially in the US.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lavardera</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/01/12/new-clubman-spotting/comment-page-1/#comment-83128</link>
		<dc:creator>lavardera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 15:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2007/01/12/new-clubman-spotting/#comment-83128</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;whooo boy. I see it coming. All us 07 buyers thought we caught smack from people with R56 denial. Its going to look like a cakewalk..&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>whooo boy. I see it coming. All us 07 buyers thought we caught smack from people with R56 denial. Its going to look like a cakewalk..</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GrFa</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/01/12/new-clubman-spotting/comment-page-1/#comment-82997</link>
		<dc:creator>GrFa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 07:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2007/01/12/new-clubman-spotting/#comment-82997</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;After two r53 Cooper S&#039;s I would be first in life for an 08 Cooper Clubman. It is still very MINI and I believ the originals had barndoors too.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;My parents Yukon has barndoors which makes loading easier at the expense of rearward visibility. I think it looks cool and functional.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After two r53 Cooper S&#8217;s I would be first in life for an 08 Cooper Clubman. It is still very MINI and I believ the originals had barndoors too.</p>

<p>My parents Yukon has barndoors which makes loading easier at the expense of rearward visibility. I think it looks cool and functional.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TWISTYBITZ</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/01/12/new-clubman-spotting/comment-page-1/#comment-82992</link>
		<dc:creator>TWISTYBITZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 07:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2007/01/12/new-clubman-spotting/#comment-82992</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;My 1997 4Runner had a rear door that swung up and I used to put my surfboard ( 7&#039;2&quot;), ladders and so, on the rack. I guess a QE2 might be trouble. The barn door was a cute thing back when the technology and materials were limited but now itsa joke. Just look at it itsa joke!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Mark Pierce... maybe some of these folks here could use a little Googling for back checking on the Mini&#039;s history...............................................&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;1960 ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬&quot; 1969 
Production of Morris Minivan&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;1960 ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬&quot; 1967 
Production of Morris Mini-Traveller Mk1&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;1961 ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬&quot; 1969 
Production of Austin Mini Pick-up, Morris Mini Pick-up&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;1969 ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬&quot; 1983 
Production of Mini Van and Mini Pick-up&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My 1997 4Runner had a rear door that swung up and I used to put my surfboard ( 7&#8217;2&#8243;), ladders and so, on the rack. I guess a QE2 might be trouble. The barn door was a cute thing back when the technology and materials were limited but now itsa joke. Just look at it itsa joke!</p>

<p>Mark Pierce&#8230; maybe some of these folks here could use a little Googling for back checking on the Mini&#8217;s history&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>

<p>1960 ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬&#8221; 1969 
Production of Morris Minivan</p>

<p>1960 ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬&#8221; 1967 
Production of Morris Mini-Traveller Mk1</p>

<p>1961 ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬&#8221; 1969 
Production of Austin Mini Pick-up, Morris Mini Pick-up</p>

<p>1969 ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬&#8221; 1983 
Production of Mini Van and Mini Pick-up</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marcel</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/01/12/new-clubman-spotting/comment-page-1/#comment-82902</link>
		<dc:creator>marcel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 05:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2007/01/12/new-clubman-spotting/#comment-82902</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I like the idea of the Clubman but I&#039;m not sure about the execution; the higher roof looks odd to me and I don&#039;t think those barn doors are worth the trouble (and added expense) in such a small car. Then again, this may look better in real life (like the GP).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the idea of the Clubman but I&#8217;m not sure about the execution; the higher roof looks odd to me and I don&#8217;t think those barn doors are worth the trouble (and added expense) in such a small car. Then again, this may look better in real life (like the GP).</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/01/12/new-clubman-spotting/comment-page-1/#comment-82771</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 00:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2007/01/12/new-clubman-spotting/#comment-82771</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It just doesn&#039;t seem right to me...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It just doesn&#8217;t seem right to me&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark pierce</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/01/12/new-clubman-spotting/comment-page-1/#comment-82736</link>
		<dc:creator>mark pierce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2007/01/12/new-clubman-spotting/#comment-82736</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Fugly. And too big. MINIÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢s should stay mini.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Isn&#039;t that what people where saying about the new MINI when came out 5 1/2 years ago!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>Fugly. And too big. MINIÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢s should stay mini.</blockquote>

<p>Isn&#8217;t that what people where saying about the new MINI when came out 5 1/2 years ago!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark pierce</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/01/12/new-clubman-spotting/comment-page-1/#comment-82734</link>
		<dc:creator>mark pierce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2007/01/12/new-clubman-spotting/#comment-82734</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;WhatÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢s next ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã‚Â¦ an extended cab MINI pickup truck, or delivery van, or how about a double decker bus? Gag.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Well they have in the past had Mini pickups and vans, so they are not going away from what a Mini used to be.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>WhatÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢s next ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã‚Â¦ an extended cab MINI pickup truck, or delivery van, or how about a double decker bus? Gag.</blockquote>

<p>Well they have in the past had Mini pickups and vans, so they are not going away from what a Mini used to be.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scarlett O'MINI</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/01/12/new-clubman-spotting/comment-page-1/#comment-82733</link>
		<dc:creator>Scarlett O'MINI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2007/01/12/new-clubman-spotting/#comment-82733</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Fugly.  And too big.  MINI&#039;s should stay mini.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fugly.  And too big.  MINI&#8217;s should stay mini.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GZ</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/01/12/new-clubman-spotting/comment-page-1/#comment-82682</link>
		<dc:creator>GZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2007/01/12/new-clubman-spotting/#comment-82682</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;What&#039;s next, a Mini van?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s next, a Mini van?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crusoe</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/01/12/new-clubman-spotting/comment-page-1/#comment-82597</link>
		<dc:creator>Crusoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2007/01/12/new-clubman-spotting/#comment-82597</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Agree the rear doors are an odd implementation. My only guess they didn&#039;t go hatchback because of roof rack options or they are targeting surfers? One curbside opening rear door would have been great, then we could mount a widescreen tv ad do some serious tailgating :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree the rear doors are an odd implementation. My only guess they didn&#8217;t go hatchback because of roof rack options or they are targeting surfers? One curbside opening rear door would have been great, then we could mount a widescreen tv ad do some serious tailgating :)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott a</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/01/12/new-clubman-spotting/comment-page-1/#comment-82571</link>
		<dc:creator>scott a</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2007/01/12/new-clubman-spotting/#comment-82571</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think the Clubman concept is pointless, and if they go too far away from what a MINI was meant to be, they&#039;re in danger of losing the niche that made them successful.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What&#039;s next ... an extended cab MINI pickup truck, or delivery van, or how about a double decker bus?  Gag.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;ps - nice colors, though.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the Clubman concept is pointless, and if they go too far away from what a MINI was meant to be, they&#8217;re in danger of losing the niche that made them successful.</p>

<p>What&#8217;s next &#8230; an extended cab MINI pickup truck, or delivery van, or how about a double decker bus?  Gag.</p>

<p>ps &#8211; nice colors, though.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lavardera</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/01/12/new-clubman-spotting/comment-page-1/#comment-82568</link>
		<dc:creator>lavardera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2007/01/12/new-clubman-spotting/#comment-82568</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;4 vs 5 - if the wheels are far enough back that the don&#039;t intrude on the rear seats then the rear bench will be wider. My old Integra was only a few inches wider than the mini, and took 3 in the back.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>4 vs 5 &#8211; if the wheels are far enough back that the don&#8217;t intrude on the rear seats then the rear bench will be wider. My old Integra was only a few inches wider than the mini, and took 3 in the back.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

