<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Official 2007 MINI USA Specifications PDF</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/01/29/official-2007-mini-usa-mini-specifications-pdf/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/01/29/official-2007-mini-usa-mini-specifications-pdf/</link>
	<description>MotoringFile &#124; MINI news, reviews and opinion. MINI Cooper, Cooper S, Clubman, Countryman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:14:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MotoringFile &#187; Archive &#187; 2007 Cooper S Power Curve Graph</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/01/29/official-2007-mini-usa-mini-specifications-pdf/comment-page-1/#comment-96911</link>
		<dc:creator>MotoringFile &#187; Archive &#187; 2007 Cooper S Power Curve Graph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 17:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2007/01/29/official-2007-mini-usa-mini-specifications-pdf/#comment-96911</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] We&#8217;ve seen R56 specifications on both sides of the Atlantic but one thing we haven&#8217;t seen yet is the official Cooper S power graph. Until now. Check out the scan of the official MINI document that just showed up in our inbox. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We&#8217;ve seen R56 specifications on both sides of the Atlantic but one thing we haven&#8217;t seen yet is the official Cooper S power graph. Until now. Check out the scan of the official MINI document that just showed up in our inbox. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/01/29/official-2007-mini-usa-mini-specifications-pdf/comment-page-1/#comment-90372</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 05:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2007/01/29/official-2007-mini-usa-mini-specifications-pdf/#comment-90372</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Don&#039;t forget that the R56 Cooper has a 6 Speed manual trans. and the R50 has a 5 Speed. Surely there should be a weight difference.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget that the R56 Cooper has a 6 Speed manual trans. and the R50 has a 5 Speed. Surely there should be a weight difference.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theo</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/01/29/official-2007-mini-usa-mini-specifications-pdf/comment-page-1/#comment-89940</link>
		<dc:creator>Theo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 16:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2007/01/29/official-2007-mini-usa-mini-specifications-pdf/#comment-89940</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Am I correct that &quot;Unladen Weight&quot; reflects the weight of the car with all fluids (including fuel) topped-up, but without occupants (including driver) and luggage?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Theo&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I correct that &#8220;Unladen Weight&#8221; reflects the weight of the car with all fluids (including fuel) topped-up, but without occupants (including driver) and luggage?</p>

<p>Theo</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/01/29/official-2007-mini-usa-mini-specifications-pdf/comment-page-1/#comment-89899</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 13:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2007/01/29/official-2007-mini-usa-mini-specifications-pdf/#comment-89899</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;Funny, the new Cooper w/ manual gearbox is listed as 22 lbs HEAVIER than the outgoing model (2546 vs 2524 on my 06 registration)ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã‚Â¦.thought it was supposed to be that much LIGHTERÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã‚Â¦..&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The new car has more standard so the very base config is heavier.  However if both cars are optioned equally supposedly the R56 is lighter.  You&#039;ll see this in the Euro specifications PDF.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;BTW the base R56 Cooper S is 11lbs lighter than the base R53 Cooper S.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;hey gabe any specs for the 2006 factory jcw cars?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Exact same as the 2005 specs with more power, torque, and 11.6&quot; brakes.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
  <p>Funny, the new Cooper w/ manual gearbox is listed as 22 lbs HEAVIER than the outgoing model (2546 vs 2524 on my 06 registration)ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã‚Â¦.thought it was supposed to be that much LIGHTERÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã‚Â¦..</p>
</blockquote>

<p>The new car has more standard so the very base config is heavier.  However if both cars are optioned equally supposedly the R56 is lighter.  You&#8217;ll see this in the Euro specifications PDF.</p>

<p>BTW the base R56 Cooper S is 11lbs lighter than the base R53 Cooper S.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>hey gabe any specs for the 2006 factory jcw cars?</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Exact same as the 2005 specs with more power, torque, and 11.6&#8243; brakes.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gbuff</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/01/29/official-2007-mini-usa-mini-specifications-pdf/comment-page-1/#comment-89898</link>
		<dc:creator>gbuff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 13:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2007/01/29/official-2007-mini-usa-mini-specifications-pdf/#comment-89898</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Funny, the new Cooper w/ manual gearbox is listed as 22 lbs HEAVIER than the outgoing model (2546 vs 2524 on my 06 registration)....thought it was supposed to be that much LIGHTER.....&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny, the new Cooper w/ manual gearbox is listed as 22 lbs HEAVIER than the outgoing model (2546 vs 2524 on my 06 registration)&#8230;.thought it was supposed to be that much LIGHTER&#8230;..</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sandm4130</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/01/29/official-2007-mini-usa-mini-specifications-pdf/comment-page-1/#comment-89771</link>
		<dc:creator>sandm4130</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 06:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2007/01/29/official-2007-mini-usa-mini-specifications-pdf/#comment-89771</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;hey gabe any specs for the 2006 factory jcw cars?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;thanks,&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey gabe any specs for the 2006 factory jcw cars?</p>

<p>thanks,</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robble</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/01/29/official-2007-mini-usa-mini-specifications-pdf/comment-page-1/#comment-89759</link>
		<dc:creator>robble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 05:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2007/01/29/official-2007-mini-usa-mini-specifications-pdf/#comment-89759</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;all right gabe! ;)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>all right gabe! ;)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

