<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More MINI Variants Confirmed w/Production Likely Outside the UK</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/02/05/more-mini-variants-confirmed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/02/05/more-mini-variants-confirmed/</link>
	<description>MotoringFile &#124; MINI news, reviews and opinion. MINI Cooper, Cooper S, Clubman, Countryman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:14:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tgaz</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/02/05/more-mini-variants-confirmed/comment-page-1/#comment-172765</link>
		<dc:creator>tgaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 09:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2007/02/05/more-mini-variants-confirmed/#comment-172765</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The new mini AWD will be a beefed up version of the clubman, not very imaginative. As for other reader comments on not going above a 1.2 engine, well the original mini&#039;s had a 1.3 and if you put anything that small in the car it would be quite slugish. As for sticking to original mini prinipals,  in my day it was morris, austin, BL or rover mini now it&#039;s just mini --- one, cooper or cooper S no model so when they put these trims on the clubman it becomes realy confusing. It&#039;s sad to see BMW pandering to an american market and turning a British icon which stood for getting the most out of a small car, into a fat gas guzzling suv, instead they should bring out a small car to rival the smart for two which is closer to mini&#039;s true herritage. And as for being built outside the UK, well the original was made outside the UK as well at times but then they aren&#039;t true mini&#039;s and never will be as will be the same for the current model.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new mini AWD will be a beefed up version of the clubman, not very imaginative. As for other reader comments on not going above a 1.2 engine, well the original mini&#8217;s had a 1.3 and if you put anything that small in the car it would be quite slugish. As for sticking to original mini prinipals,  in my day it was morris, austin, BL or rover mini now it&#8217;s just mini &#8212; one, cooper or cooper S no model so when they put these trims on the clubman it becomes realy confusing. It&#8217;s sad to see BMW pandering to an american market and turning a British icon which stood for getting the most out of a small car, into a fat gas guzzling suv, instead they should bring out a small car to rival the smart for two which is closer to mini&#8217;s true herritage. And as for being built outside the UK, well the original was made outside the UK as well at times but then they aren&#8217;t true mini&#8217;s and never will be as will be the same for the current model.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MotoringFile &#187; Archive &#187; MotorTrend Reports on MINI&#8217;s Cross-Over</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/02/05/more-mini-variants-confirmed/comment-page-1/#comment-112233</link>
		<dc:creator>MotoringFile &#187; Archive &#187; MotorTrend Reports on MINI&#8217;s Cross-Over</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 13:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2007/02/05/more-mini-variants-confirmed/#comment-112233</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] for years now that MINI has eyes on a cross-over (soft-roader if you will) type of vehicle. We also broke the news about production locations outside the UK (most like South Carolina or Austria). However it&#8217;s [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for years now that MINI has eyes on a cross-over (soft-roader if you will) type of vehicle. We also broke the news about production locations outside the UK (most like South Carolina or Austria). However it&#8217;s [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MotoringFile &#187; 2007 &#187; February &#187; 28</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/02/05/more-mini-variants-confirmed/comment-page-1/#comment-100532</link>
		<dc:creator>MotoringFile &#187; 2007 &#187; February &#187; 28</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 13:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2007/02/05/more-mini-variants-confirmed/#comment-100532</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] MF Select Featured Articles   2007 MINI Cooper &amp; Cooper S Reviewed 2007 MINI Reader Reviews More MINI Variants Officially Confirmed MINI&#039;s Future Models Revealed 2007 MINI Q&amp;A MINI&#039;s Top Secret Colorado Project (aka R58) BMW To Re-Brand JCW MINI USA&#039;s Motorby Pilot Program R56 Pedestrian Crash Analysis 2007 MINI In Detail (Part 2 / Part 3) 2007 MINI Official Photos (Part 2 / Part 3) 2007 JCW Accessories Revealed MINI Names the R55: The Clubman  MF Design Analysis: 2007 MINI [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] MF Select Featured Articles   2007 MINI Cooper &#38; Cooper S Reviewed 2007 MINI Reader Reviews More MINI Variants Officially Confirmed MINI&#8217;s Future Models Revealed 2007 MINI Q&#38;A MINI&#8217;s Top Secret Colorado Project (aka R58) BMW To Re-Brand JCW MINI USA&#8217;s Motorby Pilot Program R56 Pedestrian Crash Analysis 2007 MINI In Detail (Part 2 / Part 3) 2007 MINI Official Photos (Part 2 / Part 3) 2007 JCW Accessories Revealed MINI Names the R55: The Clubman  MF Design Analysis: 2007 MINI [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg W</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/02/05/more-mini-variants-confirmed/comment-page-1/#comment-94653</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 07:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2007/02/05/more-mini-variants-confirmed/#comment-94653</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hmmm....does this mean MINI could be assembled at Spartanburg??? just for USA market?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230;.does this mean MINI could be assembled at Spartanburg??? just for USA market?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/02/05/more-mini-variants-confirmed/comment-page-1/#comment-94392</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 20:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2007/02/05/more-mini-variants-confirmed/#comment-94392</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with you Bud.  A Mini with a diesel &amp; AWD; make it a clubman too!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you Bud.  A Mini with a diesel &amp; AWD; make it a clubman too!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MINI to have 4 or 5 models in the next 5 years - Auto Insider News</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/02/05/more-mini-variants-confirmed/comment-page-1/#comment-94073</link>
		<dc:creator>MINI to have 4 or 5 models in the next 5 years - Auto Insider News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 04:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2007/02/05/more-mini-variants-confirmed/#comment-94073</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] ## Source: Motoring File ## [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ## Source: Motoring File ## [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 5 more new MINIs in 5 years &#124; eGMCarTech the CarTech Mag - brought to you by eGadgetMag</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/02/05/more-mini-variants-confirmed/comment-page-1/#comment-94059</link>
		<dc:creator>5 more new MINIs in 5 years &#124; eGMCarTech the CarTech Mag - brought to you by eGadgetMag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 03:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2007/02/05/more-mini-variants-confirmed/#comment-94059</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Source: MotoringFile (via autoblog)       &#160;&#160;Digg this&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;  Stumble&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;  Submit to Netscape&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160; &#160;&#160;Add to del.icio.us [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source: MotoringFile (via autoblog)       &nbsp;&nbsp;Digg this&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;  Stumble&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;  Submit to Netscape&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;Add to del.icio.us [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Car Crowd &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 5 more MINIs in 5 years</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/02/05/more-mini-variants-confirmed/comment-page-1/#comment-94028</link>
		<dc:creator>Car Crowd &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 5 more MINIs in 5 years</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 01:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2007/02/05/more-mini-variants-confirmed/#comment-94028</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Read &#124; Permalink &#124; Email this &#124; Comments [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: O(=^=)O Capn</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/02/05/more-mini-variants-confirmed/comment-page-1/#comment-93937</link>
		<dc:creator>O(=^=)O Capn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 23:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2007/02/05/more-mini-variants-confirmed/#comment-93937</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Facetious? We can&#039;t have any of that in a MINI either!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Facetious? We can&#8217;t have any of that in a MINI either!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimskater</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/02/05/more-mini-variants-confirmed/comment-page-1/#comment-93891</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimskater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 21:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2007/02/05/more-mini-variants-confirmed/#comment-93891</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Capn,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Methinks you are being facetious.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;:)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Capn,</p>

<p>Methinks you are being facetious.</p>

<p>:)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: O(=^=)O Capn</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/02/05/more-mini-variants-confirmed/comment-page-1/#comment-93787</link>
		<dc:creator>O(=^=)O Capn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 17:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2007/02/05/more-mini-variants-confirmed/#comment-93787</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I am shocked! This flys in the face of everything that the Mini or MINI stands for! A Truck! AWD?!? A Convertible!! A Wagon! There never were, nor ever should be any such nonsense! Sunroofs are horrible, An MCS with an automatic trans?!? Wrong! The Engine is too big! It should just be MAX 1200cc. Anything bigger just goes against tradition.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I could live with training wheels on it though, so when you corner at high speeds you don&#039;t roll it. The ultimate in classic DSC. Yeah, do away with DSC too!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am shocked! This flys in the face of everything that the Mini or MINI stands for! A Truck! AWD?!? A Convertible!! A Wagon! There never were, nor ever should be any such nonsense! Sunroofs are horrible, An MCS with an automatic trans?!? Wrong! The Engine is too big! It should just be MAX 1200cc. Anything bigger just goes against tradition.</p>

<p>I could live with training wheels on it though, so when you corner at high speeds you don&#8217;t roll it. The ultimate in classic DSC. Yeah, do away with DSC too!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crusoe</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/02/05/more-mini-variants-confirmed/comment-page-1/#comment-93778</link>
		<dc:creator>Crusoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 16:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2007/02/05/more-mini-variants-confirmed/#comment-93778</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The MINI truck!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The MINI truck!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bilbo Baggins</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/02/05/more-mini-variants-confirmed/comment-page-1/#comment-93775</link>
		<dc:creator>Bilbo Baggins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 16:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2007/02/05/more-mini-variants-confirmed/#comment-93775</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I would truely see something as close as possible to an R53 with AWD/Twinster drivetrain.  Taught suspension, raspy exhaust, plenty of horsepower potential, throaty intake growl/howl.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Mmmmmmmm, makes my knees weak just thinking about it.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would truely see something as close as possible to an R53 with AWD/Twinster drivetrain.  Taught suspension, raspy exhaust, plenty of horsepower potential, throaty intake growl/howl.</p>

<p>Mmmmmmmm, makes my knees weak just thinking about it.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bud</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/02/05/more-mini-variants-confirmed/comment-page-1/#comment-93613</link>
		<dc:creator>Bud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 07:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2007/02/05/more-mini-variants-confirmed/#comment-93613</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Anticipating new models will keep our imaginations working O.T. I am sure.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Perhaps MINI should consider more engine variants as well as body configurations. GM has a turbine powered vehicle that may never see the light of a showroom but nonetheless excited all onlookers at the NAAS a few weeks ago.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Let&#039;s start by bringing the MINI Diesel to America this year and next year Let&#039;s motor with AWD! That&#039;s what I&#039;d like to see materialize ASAP.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anticipating new models will keep our imaginations working O.T. I am sure.</p>

<p>Perhaps MINI should consider more engine variants as well as body configurations. GM has a turbine powered vehicle that may never see the light of a showroom but nonetheless excited all onlookers at the NAAS a few weeks ago.</p>

<p>Let&#8217;s start by bringing the MINI Diesel to America this year and next year Let&#8217;s motor with AWD! That&#8217;s what I&#8217;d like to see materialize ASAP.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SB</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/02/05/more-mini-variants-confirmed/comment-page-1/#comment-93590</link>
		<dc:creator>SB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 04:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2007/02/05/more-mini-variants-confirmed/#comment-93590</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;d love to see a MINI roadster.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d love to see a MINI roadster.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lavardera</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/02/05/more-mini-variants-confirmed/comment-page-1/#comment-93585</link>
		<dc:creator>lavardera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 04:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2007/02/05/more-mini-variants-confirmed/#comment-93585</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The GP must have made it clear that there is a market for a two seat Mini. I see a two door with a folding hard top coming. Look out miatas!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The GP must have made it clear that there is a market for a two seat Mini. I see a two door with a folding hard top coming. Look out miatas!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gokartride</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/02/05/more-mini-variants-confirmed/comment-page-1/#comment-93546</link>
		<dc:creator>gokartride</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 01:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2007/02/05/more-mini-variants-confirmed/#comment-93546</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Okay, my jaw just dropped, too!  Here we&#039;re approaching the 50th anniversary of the Mini and this juggernaut shows no sign of slowing down.  What a fascinating marque to watch!!!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, my jaw just dropped, too!  Here we&#8217;re approaching the 50th anniversary of the Mini and this juggernaut shows no sign of slowing down.  What a fascinating marque to watch!!!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drill</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/02/05/more-mini-variants-confirmed/comment-page-1/#comment-93509</link>
		<dc:creator>Drill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 00:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2007/02/05/more-mini-variants-confirmed/#comment-93509</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Any chance he was counting the JCW Coupe as a separate model? If MINI does what&#039;s been rumored and ONLY make the JCW&#039;s from the factory AND it&#039;s built with a factory exclusive body kit, then that may be it :-(&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any chance he was counting the JCW Coupe as a separate model? If MINI does what&#8217;s been rumored and ONLY make the JCW&#8217;s from the factory AND it&#8217;s built with a factory exclusive body kit, then that may be it :-(</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BG</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/02/05/more-mini-variants-confirmed/comment-page-1/#comment-93498</link>
		<dc:creator>BG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 23:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2007/02/05/more-mini-variants-confirmed/#comment-93498</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Probably the same thing J saw.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably the same thing J saw.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BG</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/02/05/more-mini-variants-confirmed/comment-page-1/#comment-93497</link>
		<dc:creator>BG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 23:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motoringfile.com/2007/02/05/more-mini-variants-confirmed/#comment-93497</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;One of the US mags had a 4X4 Mini SUV looking thing in it this month. Either Motor Trend or Car and Driver. I just got it in the mail so I&#039;m not sure if it&#039;s Feb issue or March but it&#039;s the latest edition.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the US mags had a 4X4 Mini SUV looking thing in it this month. Either Motor Trend or Car and Driver. I just got it in the mail so I&#8217;m not sure if it&#8217;s Feb issue or March but it&#8217;s the latest edition.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

