<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MF Review: R56 JCW Engine Kit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/09/13/mf-review-r56-jcw-engine-kit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/09/13/mf-review-r56-jcw-engine-kit/</link>
	<description>MINI Cooper news, reviews and opinion.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:02:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Rapaport</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/09/13/mf-review-r56-jcw-engine-kit/comment-page-2/#comment-270232</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Rapaport</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/09/13/mf-review-r56-jcw-engine-kit/#comment-270232</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;An update... It isn&#039;t a rattle, it&#039;s a pop... The car is back-firing. Not all the time. Mostly at lower speeds in lower gears, and especially when down-shifting. From the inside it sounds like a screw loose somewhere, but from the outside it is distinctly a pop. I&#039;m taking it in today. I hope it&#039;s an easy tweak!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An update&#8230; It isn&#8217;t a rattle, it&#8217;s a pop&#8230; The car is back-firing. Not all the time. Mostly at lower speeds in lower gears, and especially when down-shifting. From the inside it sounds like a screw loose somewhere, but from the outside it is distinctly a pop. I&#8217;m taking it in today. I hope it&#8217;s an easy tweak!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Rapaport</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/09/13/mf-review-r56-jcw-engine-kit/comment-page-2/#comment-270116</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Rapaport</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/09/13/mf-review-r56-jcw-engine-kit/#comment-270116</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Mike, that was quick. But hell, I could cruise at 75 in my old Subaru! :-)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Now having a few days of play with the new JCW upgrade I am hearing a rattle under the floor of the car when I go over bumps at low to medium speed (can&#039;t hear it on the highway) that wasn&#039;t there before. Maybe just a loose screw on the exhaust system or something. I&#039;ll take it into the dealer and let them have a look. I&#039;ve done a few instrumentation upgrades with them (MINI in Mountain View CA), and they never seem to get it exactly right the first time. I always end up going back to tweak something. They are polite and do the correction fast and well, but would be nice if I didn&#039;t have to do that (sigh).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Otherwise, I love the kit. Now must consider the suspension upgrade :-)!! Hey if I don&#039;t throw money at this car, my divorce would have been all in vain!! :-)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;quine@sonic.net&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Mike, that was quick. But hell, I could cruise at 75 in my old Subaru! :-)</p>

<p>Now having a few days of play with the new JCW upgrade I am hearing a rattle under the floor of the car when I go over bumps at low to medium speed (can&#8217;t hear it on the highway) that wasn&#8217;t there before. Maybe just a loose screw on the exhaust system or something. I&#8217;ll take it into the dealer and let them have a look. I&#8217;ve done a few instrumentation upgrades with them (MINI in Mountain View CA), and they never seem to get it exactly right the first time. I always end up going back to tweak something. They are polite and do the correction fast and well, but would be nice if I didn&#8217;t have to do that (sigh).</p>

<p>Otherwise, I love the kit. Now must consider the suspension upgrade :-)!! Hey if I don&#8217;t throw money at this car, my divorce would have been all in vain!! :-)</p>

<p><a href="mailto:quine@sonic.net">quine@sonic.net</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Roberts</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/09/13/mf-review-r56-jcw-engine-kit/comment-page-2/#comment-270109</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/09/13/mf-review-r56-jcw-engine-kit/#comment-270109</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I see a significant drop in MPG when I drive 80+. Keep it to mid 70s and you&#039;ll get your MPG back.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see a significant drop in MPG when I drive 80+. Keep it to mid 70s and you&#8217;ll get your MPG back.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Rapaport</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/09/13/mf-review-r56-jcw-engine-kit/comment-page-2/#comment-270105</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Rapaport</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/09/13/mf-review-r56-jcw-engine-kit/#comment-270105</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Read article on JCW tuning kit with great interest. I knew I wanted it and went ahead with it -- I have a 2009 clubman. It does feel good that little bit of extra power, but with respect to its impact on gas mileage I have to say I was taken by surprise. I was getting about 30mpg on average (I drive at 80+ when I can on the highway) and that&#039;s now dropped to something under 27, more than 10%! Anyone else have any experience with this?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read article on JCW tuning kit with great interest. I knew I wanted it and went ahead with it &#8212; I have a 2009 clubman. It does feel good that little bit of extra power, but with respect to its impact on gas mileage I have to say I was taken by surprise. I was getting about 30mpg on average (I drive at 80+ when I can on the highway) and that&#8217;s now dropped to something under 27, more than 10%! Anyone else have any experience with this?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MotoringFile &#187; Archive &#187; MINI USA Releases JCW Tuning Kit for the Clubman</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/09/13/mf-review-r56-jcw-engine-kit/comment-page-2/#comment-266130</link>
		<dc:creator>MotoringFile &#187; Archive &#187; MINI USA Releases JCW Tuning Kit for the Clubman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/09/13/mf-review-r56-jcw-engine-kit/#comment-266130</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] You can read our review of the JCW Tuning Kit (JCW Stage I as we&#8217;ve called it) as it pertains to the MINI R56 MCS here. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You can read our review of the JCW Tuning Kit (JCW Stage I as we&#8217;ve called it) as it pertains to the MINI R56 MCS here. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimbo</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/09/13/mf-review-r56-jcw-engine-kit/comment-page-2/#comment-261910</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/09/13/mf-review-r56-jcw-engine-kit/#comment-261910</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Love this write up. And your car Gabe.
What kind of difference in performance could be expected with the exhaust manifold. I noticed too the the Tuning kit here in the states omits that part. Why?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love this write up. And your car Gabe.
What kind of difference in performance could be expected with the exhaust manifold. I noticed too the the Tuning kit here in the states omits that part. Why?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rixter</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/09/13/mf-review-r56-jcw-engine-kit/comment-page-2/#comment-257193</link>
		<dc:creator>Rixter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 18:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/09/13/mf-review-r56-jcw-engine-kit/#comment-257193</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Gabe,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;First of all, beautiful black JCW you have there and a great review to boot!!!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m interested in increasing the horsepower for my &#039;08 MCS. Its strictly for street driving. I can relate to your comments about needing the extra umph when in 4th gear.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m not able to install the JCW kit all at once, due to finances. I would like to start with the CAI. Is the CAI an easy DIY mod (for a completely non-mechanical type like me)? It looks like just a bolt on.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If I don&#039;t get around to doing a new exhaust for a couple of years, is simply starting with the CAI going to cause me any problems?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks for your help.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gabe,</p>

<p>First of all, beautiful black JCW you have there and a great review to boot!!!</p>

<p>I&#8217;m interested in increasing the horsepower for my &#8216;08 MCS. Its strictly for street driving. I can relate to your comments about needing the extra umph when in 4th gear.</p>

<p>I&#8217;m not able to install the JCW kit all at once, due to finances. I would like to start with the CAI. Is the CAI an easy DIY mod (for a completely non-mechanical type like me)? It looks like just a bolt on.</p>

<p>If I don&#8217;t get around to doing a new exhaust for a couple of years, is simply starting with the CAI going to cause me any problems?</p>

<p>Thanks for your help.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MotoringFile &#187; Archive &#187; Convertible &#38; Clubman to Get JCW Tuning Kit &#38; Aero Kit</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/09/13/mf-review-r56-jcw-engine-kit/comment-page-2/#comment-251598</link>
		<dc:creator>MotoringFile &#187; Archive &#187; Convertible &#38; Clubman to Get JCW Tuning Kit &#38; Aero Kit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 14:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/09/13/mf-review-r56-jcw-engine-kit/#comment-251598</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Then later in the year the Clubman will be getting some additional JCW love in the form of the dealer/port installed tuning kit. The kit will feature the same 192bhp as the Coupe&#8217;s kit and the same price tag. You can read our review of the kit for the R56 coupe here. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Then later in the year the Clubman will be getting some additional JCW love in the form of the dealer/port installed tuning kit. The kit will feature the same 192bhp as the Coupe&#8217;s kit and the same price tag. You can read our review of the kit for the R56 coupe here. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jake</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/09/13/mf-review-r56-jcw-engine-kit/comment-page-2/#comment-249489</link>
		<dc:creator>jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 00:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/09/13/mf-review-r56-jcw-engine-kit/#comment-249489</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I absolutely love my regular &quot;S&quot;. Worth every penny. Maybe I&#039;m getting old, but looking at the JCW&#039;s stickers on the lot, turns me off. To pay on an average 10+ more thousand? For what?
Quote:
&quot;The kit for the R56 is extraordinarily straight forward. In the US it simply consists of a more aggressive air intake, a free flowing exhaust, a turbocharger air filter air guide and the all important ECU upgrade.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;At that price point, darn near pocket change away from $40 grand, I would just as soon get a Series 1 BMW, which I consider, and many reviewers, the best iconic car to come from BMW in a while.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The JCW should have something totally unique to itself. Not simple parts that can be bought for 1\2 the price at an auto parts supply store, a software upgrade, and skirts that are readily available to anyone in the accessory column. You can almost do it all yourself for a lot less.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I absolutely love my regular &#8220;S&#8221;. Worth every penny. Maybe I&#8217;m getting old, but looking at the JCW&#8217;s stickers on the lot, turns me off. To pay on an average 10+ more thousand? For what?
Quote:
&#8220;The kit for the R56 is extraordinarily straight forward. In the US it simply consists of a more aggressive air intake, a free flowing exhaust, a turbocharger air filter air guide and the all important ECU upgrade.&#8221;</p>

<p>At that price point, darn near pocket change away from $40 grand, I would just as soon get a Series 1 BMW, which I consider, and many reviewers, the best iconic car to come from BMW in a while.</p>

<p>The JCW should have something totally unique to itself. Not simple parts that can be bought for 1\2 the price at an auto parts supply store, a software upgrade, and skirts that are readily available to anyone in the accessory column. You can almost do it all yourself for a lot less.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/09/13/mf-review-r56-jcw-engine-kit/comment-page-2/#comment-238417</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 05:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/09/13/mf-review-r56-jcw-engine-kit/#comment-238417</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Is there a comparison of the R56 MCS with the JCW Stage 1 kit and the Factory R56 JCW coming?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a comparison of the R56 MCS with the JCW Stage 1 kit and the Factory R56 JCW coming?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MotoringFile &#187; Archive &#187; MotoringFile 2007 MCS (JCW) For Sale</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/09/13/mf-review-r56-jcw-engine-kit/comment-page-2/#comment-236243</link>
		<dc:creator>MotoringFile &#187; Archive &#187; MotoringFile 2007 MCS (JCW) For Sale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 18:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/09/13/mf-review-r56-jcw-engine-kit/#comment-236243</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] JCW Engine Kit Review [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] JCW Engine Kit Review [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Farfel</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/09/13/mf-review-r56-jcw-engine-kit/comment-page-2/#comment-226639</link>
		<dc:creator>Farfel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 02:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/09/13/mf-review-r56-jcw-engine-kit/#comment-226639</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Damn, I love this car! It&#039;s like a 200HP go-kart. JCW 4Ever!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn, I love this car! It&#8217;s like a 200HP go-kart. JCW 4Ever!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Plaz</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/09/13/mf-review-r56-jcw-engine-kit/comment-page-2/#comment-203219</link>
		<dc:creator>Plaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 21:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/09/13/mf-review-r56-jcw-engine-kit/#comment-203219</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I removed the &quot;Cooper S&quot; logo on the back and put this on myself. I got the idea from the press pics of the JCW Challenge Race car. Personally Iâ€™ve always loathed the &quot;S&quot; logo on the back of my car and this was a great way to (A) get rid of it and (B) make the look a little cleaner. I love how thereâ€™s no reference to &quot;Cooper S&quot; anywhere on the car now. Itâ€™s simply John Cooper Works. Nothing more, nothing less.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I like that look a lot... what did you use to reaffix the badge on the other side?  Something special, or just some regular old double-sided tape?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>I removed the &#8220;Cooper S&#8221; logo on the back and put this on myself. I got the idea from the press pics of the JCW Challenge Race car. Personally Iâ€™ve always loathed the &#8220;S&#8221; logo on the back of my car and this was a great way to (A) get rid of it and (B) make the look a little cleaner. I love how thereâ€™s no reference to &#8220;Cooper S&#8221; anywhere on the car now. Itâ€™s simply John Cooper Works. Nothing more, nothing less.</blockquote>

<p>I like that look a lot&#8230; what did you use to reaffix the badge on the other side?  Something special, or just some regular old double-sided tape?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MotoringFile &#187; Archive &#187; Ask MF: How Livable is the R56 JCW?</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/09/13/mf-review-r56-jcw-engine-kit/comment-page-2/#comment-198295</link>
		<dc:creator>MotoringFile &#187; Archive &#187; Ask MF: How Livable is the R56 JCW?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/09/13/mf-review-r56-jcw-engine-kit/#comment-198295</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Tuning Kit. We won&#8217;t go into all the details here (you can read a review and see details here) but suffice to say the kit adds power and torque along with improved power delivery. It&#8217;s [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tuning Kit. We won&#8217;t go into all the details here (you can read a review and see details here) but suffice to say the kit adds power and torque along with improved power delivery. It&#8217;s [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MotoringFile &#187; Archive &#187; MotoringFile Top 10 Stories of 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/09/13/mf-review-r56-jcw-engine-kit/comment-page-2/#comment-193794</link>
		<dc:creator>MotoringFile &#187; Archive &#187; MotoringFile Top 10 Stories of 2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 06:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/09/13/mf-review-r56-jcw-engine-kit/#comment-193794</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] 7: MF Review: R56 JCW Engine Kit [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 7: MF Review: R56 JCW Engine Kit [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Interesting American Roadtest - MINI2</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/09/13/mf-review-r56-jcw-engine-kit/comment-page-2/#comment-171075</link>
		<dc:creator>Interesting American Roadtest - MINI2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 17:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/09/13/mf-review-r56-jcw-engine-kit/#comment-171075</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Interesting American Roadtest   Interesting North American link on acceleration times between the R56JCW and the R53JCW...............  MotoringFile » Archive » MF Review: R56 JCW Engine Kit [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Interesting American Roadtest   Interesting North American link on acceleration times between the R56JCW and the R53JCW&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;  MotoringFile » Archive » MF Review: R56 JCW Engine Kit [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Motoring Advisor</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/09/13/mf-review-r56-jcw-engine-kit/comment-page-2/#comment-167553</link>
		<dc:creator>Motoring Advisor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 06:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/09/13/mf-review-r56-jcw-engine-kit/#comment-167553</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Got my JCW installed this week.  It&#039;s incredible!!!  The torque is insane and it is always present.  This MINI is WAY quicker than my 2005 R53 with the DINAN equivilant.  WAY quicker!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I LOVE IT!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got my JCW installed this week.  It&#8217;s incredible!!!  The torque is insane and it is always present.  This MINI is WAY quicker than my 2005 R53 with the DINAN equivilant.  WAY quicker!</p>

<p>I LOVE IT!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MotoringFile &#187; Archive &#187; 2007 MCS JCW Engine Kit Reader Review</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/09/13/mf-review-r56-jcw-engine-kit/comment-page-2/#comment-166008</link>
		<dc:creator>MotoringFile &#187; Archive &#187; 2007 MCS JCW Engine Kit Reader Review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 13:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/09/13/mf-review-r56-jcw-engine-kit/#comment-166008</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] MF Review: R56 JCW Engine Kit ] [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] MF Review: R56 JCW Engine Kit ] [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rattmobbins</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/09/13/mf-review-r56-jcw-engine-kit/comment-page-2/#comment-165804</link>
		<dc:creator>rattmobbins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 22:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/09/13/mf-review-r56-jcw-engine-kit/#comment-165804</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Had a chance to check out a JCW at my dealer today, and I wasn&#039;t all that impressed.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I expected to be able to tell a noticeable difference in power and sound, and I just couldn&#039;t.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Seems like a lot of money for something that doesn&#039;t feel or sound much different than stock.  :(&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Had a chance to check out a JCW at my dealer today, and I wasn&#8217;t all that impressed.</p>

<p>I expected to be able to tell a noticeable difference in power and sound, and I just couldn&#8217;t.</p>

<p>Seems like a lot of money for something that doesn&#8217;t feel or sound much different than stock.  :(</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emtrey</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/09/13/mf-review-r56-jcw-engine-kit/comment-page-2/#comment-161439</link>
		<dc:creator>emtrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 15:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/09/13/mf-review-r56-jcw-engine-kit/#comment-161439</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Gabe---saw your car at KNAUZ today...
Looks great.  Sounded much better than stock(inside, anyway)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Anymore commentary on everyday driving/passing now that you have more seat time w/ JCW.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I am more concerned with mid range grunt than 0-60.
Have another car for that stuff. This is my daily driver and it does seem to flatten out above 5000 rpm.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gabe&#8212;saw your car at KNAUZ today&#8230;
Looks great.  Sounded much better than stock(inside, anyway)</p>

<p>Anymore commentary on everyday driving/passing now that you have more seat time w/ JCW.</p>

<p>I am more concerned with mid range grunt than 0-60.
Have another car for that stuff. This is my daily driver and it does seem to flatten out above 5000 rpm.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
