<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EVO Comparison: JCW MCS vs Clio 197</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/10/26/evo-comparison-jcw-mcs-vs-clio-197/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/10/26/evo-comparison-jcw-mcs-vs-clio-197/</link>
	<description>MotoringFile &#124; MINI news, reviews and opinion. MINI Cooper, Cooper S, Clubman, Countryman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:14:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MotoringFile &#187; Archive &#187; EVO Magazine Drives the R56 JCW (Updated)</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/10/26/evo-comparison-jcw-mcs-vs-clio-197/comment-page-1/#comment-176905</link>
		<dc:creator>MotoringFile &#187; Archive &#187; EVO Magazine Drives the R56 JCW (Updated)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 13:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/10/26/evo-comparison-jcw-mcs-vs-clio-197/#comment-176905</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] EVO Magazine Compares the R56 JCW and the Clio 197 ] [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] EVO Magazine Compares the R56 JCW and the Clio 197 ] [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thou</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/10/26/evo-comparison-jcw-mcs-vs-clio-197/comment-page-1/#comment-173681</link>
		<dc:creator>thou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 02:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/10/26/evo-comparison-jcw-mcs-vs-clio-197/#comment-173681</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Clarification is required - the four second slower lap time for Cooper S from the EVO list is an R53.  EVO has not timed a non-JCW R56 MCS.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clarification is required &#8211; the four second slower lap time for Cooper S from the EVO list is an R53.  EVO has not timed a non-JCW R56 MCS.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timmee</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/10/26/evo-comparison-jcw-mcs-vs-clio-197/comment-page-1/#comment-173209</link>
		<dc:creator>timmee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 07:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/10/26/evo-comparison-jcw-mcs-vs-clio-197/#comment-173209</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;is the MCS JCW on test equipped with standard suspension?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is the MCS JCW on test equipped with standard suspension?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greg</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/10/26/evo-comparison-jcw-mcs-vs-clio-197/comment-page-1/#comment-172842</link>
		<dc:creator>greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 21:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/10/26/evo-comparison-jcw-mcs-vs-clio-197/#comment-172842</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;No SS much less a JCW suspension. Bet the tires were all season. My JCW was $40K and I love it 2x as much as my $70K CMN S. A bargain id you ask me.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No SS much less a JCW suspension. Bet the tires were all season. My JCW was $40K and I love it 2x as much as my $70K CMN S. A bargain id you ask me.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon E</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/10/26/evo-comparison-jcw-mcs-vs-clio-197/comment-page-1/#comment-172826</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 18:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/10/26/evo-comparison-jcw-mcs-vs-clio-197/#comment-172826</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Perhaps the time listed for the stock MCS was the previous generation car?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps the time listed for the stock MCS was the previous generation car?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/10/26/evo-comparison-jcw-mcs-vs-clio-197/comment-page-1/#comment-172824</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 18:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/10/26/evo-comparison-jcw-mcs-vs-clio-197/#comment-172824</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I would love to the track to understand how 20 more horses and 10 ft.lbs shaved off 4 seconds off a road track.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love to the track to understand how 20 more horses and 10 ft.lbs shaved off 4 seconds off a road track.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark (Texas)</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/10/26/evo-comparison-jcw-mcs-vs-clio-197/comment-page-1/#comment-172822</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark (Texas)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 18:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/10/26/evo-comparison-jcw-mcs-vs-clio-197/#comment-172822</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;why is it so hard to get factory-equipped Recaro seats in the USA&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Not hard, MINI just has to want to do it. Because the seatbelt/airbag system Fed requirements in the U.S. are different than in the EU, it means they would need to have Recaro seats with side airbags specifically designed and manufactured for the U.S. MINIs. Currently MINI does not think it would be cost-effective to do so.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>why is it so hard to get factory-equipped Recaro seats in the USA</blockquote>

<p>Not hard, MINI just has to want to do it. Because the seatbelt/airbag system Fed requirements in the U.S. are different than in the EU, it means they would need to have Recaro seats with side airbags specifically designed and manufactured for the U.S. MINIs. Currently MINI does not think it would be cost-effective to do so.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon E</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/10/26/evo-comparison-jcw-mcs-vs-clio-197/comment-page-1/#comment-172821</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 18:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/10/26/evo-comparison-jcw-mcs-vs-clio-197/#comment-172821</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It is interesting to note that the MINI&#039;s lap time is only 0.6 seconds behind the Lotus Elise S.  I would have guessed that the Elise would be substantially quicker than the MINI.  However, not knowing what the track looks like its hard to know which cars it favors.  It would be real interesting to see a lap time for a MCS JCW with the JCW suspension package.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I sure wish MINI would offer Recaro seats like the ones pictured in the Clio 197.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is interesting to note that the MINI&#8217;s lap time is only 0.6 seconds behind the Lotus Elise S.  I would have guessed that the Elise would be substantially quicker than the MINI.  However, not knowing what the track looks like its hard to know which cars it favors.  It would be real interesting to see a lap time for a MCS JCW with the JCW suspension package.</p>

<p>I sure wish MINI would offer Recaro seats like the ones pictured in the Clio 197.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RB</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/10/26/evo-comparison-jcw-mcs-vs-clio-197/comment-page-1/#comment-172820</link>
		<dc:creator>RB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/10/26/evo-comparison-jcw-mcs-vs-clio-197/#comment-172820</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;d feel smug, hell those others, Cayman etc, should be way better.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d feel smug, hell those others, Cayman etc, should be way better.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/10/26/evo-comparison-jcw-mcs-vs-clio-197/comment-page-1/#comment-172818</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/10/26/evo-comparison-jcw-mcs-vs-clio-197/#comment-172818</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, why is it so hard to get factory-equipped Recaro seats in the USA?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, why is it so hard to get factory-equipped Recaro seats in the USA?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jas cooper</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/10/26/evo-comparison-jcw-mcs-vs-clio-197/comment-page-1/#comment-172816</link>
		<dc:creator>jas cooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/10/26/evo-comparison-jcw-mcs-vs-clio-197/#comment-172816</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Gotta like those seats in the Clio...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gotta like those seats in the Clio&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Motoring Advisor</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/10/26/evo-comparison-jcw-mcs-vs-clio-197/comment-page-1/#comment-172814</link>
		<dc:creator>Motoring Advisor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/10/26/evo-comparison-jcw-mcs-vs-clio-197/#comment-172814</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Nah... I still feel smug... since the Cayman S base price is 60K, while my Works equipped R56 prices out at about 32K.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nah&#8230; I still feel smug&#8230; since the Cayman S base price is 60K, while my Works equipped R56 prices out at about 32K.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timmee</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/10/26/evo-comparison-jcw-mcs-vs-clio-197/comment-page-1/#comment-172808</link>
		<dc:creator>timmee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/10/26/evo-comparison-jcw-mcs-vs-clio-197/#comment-172808</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;thank you for the pdf!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you for the pdf!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

