<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MINI SUV to be Partially 1 Series Based</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/12/19/minis-sav-to-be-part-minipart-bmw/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/12/19/minis-sav-to-be-part-minipart-bmw/</link>
	<description>MINI Cooper news, reviews and opinion.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 22:13:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The R60, aka MINI SUV &#124; dbmini.us</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/12/19/minis-sav-to-be-part-minipart-bmw/comment-page-1/#comment-291769</link>
		<dc:creator>The R60, aka MINI SUV &#124; dbmini.us</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/12/19/minis-sav-to-be-part-minipart-bmw/#comment-291769</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Instead, I&#8217;ve gleaned the information right from Motoringfile. Check out this post and this one for the most comprehensive information we have to [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Instead, I&#8217;ve gleaned the information right from Motoringfile. Check out this post and this one for the most comprehensive information we have to [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john mcilroy</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/12/19/minis-sav-to-be-part-minipart-bmw/comment-page-1/#comment-197086</link>
		<dc:creator>john mcilroy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 08:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/12/19/minis-sav-to-be-part-minipart-bmw/#comment-197086</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Who would go off road in a Mini, with the groud clearance&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who would go off road in a Mini, with the groud clearance</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Obnxs</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/12/19/minis-sav-to-be-part-minipart-bmw/comment-page-1/#comment-194157</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Obnxs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 17:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/12/19/minis-sav-to-be-part-minipart-bmw/#comment-194157</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry, bad keystrokes... The above isn&#039;t a right or wrong assesment, just an objective look at the market and where the customers are.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Matt&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, bad keystrokes&#8230; The above isn&#8217;t a right or wrong assesment, just an objective look at the market and where the customers are.</p>

<p>Matt</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Obnxs</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/12/19/minis-sav-to-be-part-minipart-bmw/comment-page-1/#comment-194156</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Obnxs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 17:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/12/19/minis-sav-to-be-part-minipart-bmw/#comment-194156</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Think of it this way... How can you double brand sales of the marque in a few years. The Coupe ain&#039;t gonna do it. A two seater ain&#039;t gonna do it. Sure it will sell, but it will also take some of the 2-door coupe sales. Sad to say, when you&#039;re as small as the Mini Coupe is, the fastest way to grow the brand is by going for the buyers who need more space inside.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think of it this way&#8230; How can you double brand sales of the marque in a few years. The Coupe ain&#8217;t gonna do it. A two seater ain&#8217;t gonna do it. Sure it will sell, but it will also take some of the 2-door coupe sales. Sad to say, when you&#8217;re as small as the Mini Coupe is, the fastest way to grow the brand is by going for the buyers who need more space inside.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/12/19/minis-sav-to-be-part-minipart-bmw/comment-page-1/#comment-193832</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 10:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/12/19/minis-sav-to-be-part-minipart-bmw/#comment-193832</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;If it was just me, I&#039;d go with the 2-seater, race ready production Cooper S I heard about on WRR. Unfortunately, I&#039;ve had to trade in the sports car for the family minivan.  This may be my one &amp; only chance to own a mini before retirement age.
The BMW Mini has been leading the inovation in its class from the start.  Bending the American car makers over they&#039;re big fat hoods &amp; giving them a good @#%!howdy do from the 1st R50 that roller off the production line to every subsequent model.  And now that they&#039;re trying to follow after like a lumberjack late for breakfast, why shouldn&#039;t we give them another good old @#%!howdy do &amp; teach them that sitting on your laurels is only going to give you hemmoriods.&lt;br /&gt;
Let&#039;s show them that it&#039;s not the &quot;size that matters.&quot; But the fun in using it!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it was just me, I&#8217;d go with the 2-seater, race ready production Cooper S I heard about on WRR. Unfortunately, I&#8217;ve had to trade in the sports car for the family minivan.  This may be my one &amp; only chance to own a mini before retirement age.
The BMW Mini has been leading the inovation in its class from the start.  Bending the American car makers over they&#8217;re big fat hoods &amp; giving them a good @#%!howdy do from the 1st R50 that roller off the production line to every subsequent model.  And now that they&#8217;re trying to follow after like a lumberjack late for breakfast, why shouldn&#8217;t we give them another good old @#%!howdy do &amp; teach them that sitting on your laurels is only going to give you hemmoriods.<br />
Let&#8217;s show them that it&#8217;s not the &#8220;size that matters.&#8221; But the fun in using it!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MYTMINI</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/12/19/minis-sav-to-be-part-minipart-bmw/comment-page-1/#comment-192499</link>
		<dc:creator>MYTMINI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 20:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/12/19/minis-sav-to-be-part-minipart-bmw/#comment-192499</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Some prior successes that have spawned future successes:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Model T
Corvette
F150
R53
Boeing 737&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some prior successes that have spawned future successes:</p>

<p>Model T
Corvette
F150
R53
Boeing 737</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/12/19/minis-sav-to-be-part-minipart-bmw/comment-page-1/#comment-192279</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 18:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/12/19/minis-sav-to-be-part-minipart-bmw/#comment-192279</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;If it were only that simple though for a manufacturer to claim future success on prior success. I love seeing the Clubman selling well, not at all surprised by this. I have massive respect for the Mini management and design team. Still every manufacture lives and dies by their next product, heck even BMW has turned out a turkey every now and then.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Actually with the SUV crazed US market I believe in many ways that the R60 could be a good seller for Mini. I could even see it selling better than the coupe in the states for its greater usability. If this comes to past have to say I would have the largest laugh in my life the common standard of the brand is a bloated 3000lbs plastic coated offroad wannabe.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it were only that simple though for a manufacturer to claim future success on prior success. I love seeing the Clubman selling well, not at all surprised by this. I have massive respect for the Mini management and design team. Still every manufacture lives and dies by their next product, heck even BMW has turned out a turkey every now and then.</p>

<p>Actually with the SUV crazed US market I believe in many ways that the R60 could be a good seller for Mini. I could even see it selling better than the coupe in the states for its greater usability. If this comes to past have to say I would have the largest laugh in my life the common standard of the brand is a bloated 3000lbs plastic coated offroad wannabe.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MYTMINI</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/12/19/minis-sav-to-be-part-minipart-bmw/comment-page-1/#comment-192253</link>
		<dc:creator>MYTMINI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 15:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/12/19/minis-sav-to-be-part-minipart-bmw/#comment-192253</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well the Clubman is sold out in the UK.  Looks like the ball is still in play.  BMW must be doing something right--this success might just spill over onto their SAV/SUV concept.  There seems to be a trend here.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well the Clubman is sold out in the UK.  Looks like the ball is still in play.  BMW must be doing something right&#8211;this success might just spill over onto their SAV/SUV concept.  There seems to be a trend here.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MINIme</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/12/19/minis-sav-to-be-part-minipart-bmw/comment-page-1/#comment-192138</link>
		<dc:creator>MINIme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 01:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/12/19/minis-sav-to-be-part-minipart-bmw/#comment-192138</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with Bwana about the Cooper S being the &quot;center of the MINI universe&quot;.  Before I bought my &#039;05 &quot;S&quot;, I drove a Cooper without all the bits and parts.  I drove it much harder than the dealer wanted me to. 8)  I had more fun driving that car through the twisty test area near the dealer than I have had with my &quot;S&quot; in two years of ownership.  It was  much more a &quot;seat-of-the-pants&quot; style ride.  Now some may say, &quot;well then, you&#039;re not doing it right...&quot;  And, to be sure, I have not yet visited the Dragon or even replaced the all-season runflats on my &quot;S&quot;(the limiting factor for this car).  All I am saying, is that sometimes a stripped down car, properly driven, can be more fun than an optioned out car (mine certainly is) that requires less driver input.  At least, that is my experience.
 I do love my &quot;S&quot;!  And, I can&#039;t wait to see what is born of this latest SAV/SUV concept.  Providing BMW/MINI doesn&#039;t completely drop the ball, there is a good bet that I will be making an addition to the family.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Bwana about the Cooper S being the &#8220;center of the MINI universe&#8221;.  Before I bought my &#8216;05 &#8220;S&#8221;, I drove a Cooper without all the bits and parts.  I drove it much harder than the dealer wanted me to. 8)  I had more fun driving that car through the twisty test area near the dealer than I have had with my &#8220;S&#8221; in two years of ownership.  It was  much more a &#8220;seat-of-the-pants&#8221; style ride.  Now some may say, &#8220;well then, you&#8217;re not doing it right&#8230;&#8221;  And, to be sure, I have not yet visited the Dragon or even replaced the all-season runflats on my &#8220;S&#8221;(the limiting factor for this car).  All I am saying, is that sometimes a stripped down car, properly driven, can be more fun than an optioned out car (mine certainly is) that requires less driver input.  At least, that is my experience.
 I do love my &#8220;S&#8221;!  And, I can&#8217;t wait to see what is born of this latest SAV/SUV concept.  Providing BMW/MINI doesn&#8217;t completely drop the ball, there is a good bet that I will be making an addition to the family.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C4 - The one and only</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/12/19/minis-sav-to-be-part-minipart-bmw/comment-page-1/#comment-192120</link>
		<dc:creator>C4 - The one and only</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 22:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/12/19/minis-sav-to-be-part-minipart-bmw/#comment-192120</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I personally find this car very appealing. Will I buy it? I am not sure of that as of yet. It all depends how the Clubman we have on order will perform out in the real world.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Jon- I clearly remember you bemoaning when MINI announced automatic transmission availability for the MCS back in &#039;05. You used to say that people that could not drive a manual transmission MINI were undeserving of the car.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It seems to me that 3 years after the auto MCS was released, your so called &quot;Community&quot; is still there, in one piece.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;While I respect your views, your sense of &quot;MINI Community&quot; appears to be a) shotsighted and b) ellitist to the max.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you want to belong to a private country club, join one or become an exotic car owner so you don&#039;t have to endure the anti-climatic BMW business decisions that seem to touch a nerve with your ellitist persona.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally find this car very appealing. Will I buy it? I am not sure of that as of yet. It all depends how the Clubman we have on order will perform out in the real world.</p>

<p>Jon- I clearly remember you bemoaning when MINI announced automatic transmission availability for the MCS back in &#8216;05. You used to say that people that could not drive a manual transmission MINI were undeserving of the car.</p>

<p>It seems to me that 3 years after the auto MCS was released, your so called &#8220;Community&#8221; is still there, in one piece.</p>

<p>While I respect your views, your sense of &#8220;MINI Community&#8221; appears to be a) shotsighted and b) ellitist to the max.</p>

<p>If you want to belong to a private country club, join one or become an exotic car owner so you don&#8217;t have to endure the anti-climatic BMW business decisions that seem to touch a nerve with your ellitist persona.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bwana Yak</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/12/19/minis-sav-to-be-part-minipart-bmw/comment-page-1/#comment-192087</link>
		<dc:creator>Bwana Yak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 20:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/12/19/minis-sav-to-be-part-minipart-bmw/#comment-192087</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I also agree with Jon that BMW, or more specifically the MINI group within BMW, should stick to what made the MINI the runaway success that it is.  Keep in mind that part of that success is the normally aspirated Cooper, which is not what I would consider a performance car but still has all the other qualities that make it a true-blue MINI.  I think we all tend to think of the Cooper S as the &#039;real&#039; MINI - the center of the MINI universe.  The normally aspirated Cooper is a toned-down version, while the JCW takes the concept in the opposite direction, the Clubman takes it in another and the SAV will take it in yet another.  Still I see them all fitting into the MINI product line as long as BMW keeps true to the idea of a small, nimble, unique vehicle with that MINI styling we all love.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That being said, I sure hope they don&#039;t botch it and come out with some gawd-awful embarrassment of an SUV...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also agree with Jon that BMW, or more specifically the MINI group within BMW, should stick to what made the MINI the runaway success that it is.  Keep in mind that part of that success is the normally aspirated Cooper, which is not what I would consider a performance car but still has all the other qualities that make it a true-blue MINI.  I think we all tend to think of the Cooper S as the &#8216;real&#8217; MINI &#8211; the center of the MINI universe.  The normally aspirated Cooper is a toned-down version, while the JCW takes the concept in the opposite direction, the Clubman takes it in another and the SAV will take it in yet another.  Still I see them all fitting into the MINI product line as long as BMW keeps true to the idea of a small, nimble, unique vehicle with that MINI styling we all love.</p>

<p>That being said, I sure hope they don&#8217;t botch it and come out with some gawd-awful embarrassment of an SUV&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MINIme</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/12/19/minis-sav-to-be-part-minipart-bmw/comment-page-1/#comment-192064</link>
		<dc:creator>MINIme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 18:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/12/19/minis-sav-to-be-part-minipart-bmw/#comment-192064</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The fact is, there are segments of the MINI community interested in high mileage, SUV, high performance, roadster, Moke, etc., respectively.  We are one big melting pot.  I could care less about fuel economy with my MINI Cooper S.  I didn&#039;t purchase it for that reason.  I purchased it because it is a reflection of an icon and I could spec the build with features that I love and it is fun to drive.  And, I always wanted to own a Mini, but, so far, have not found the right car to purchase.  I am sure others purchased their MINIs just because it was small and they assumed great MPG.  Who cares why any of us took the plunge?  What&#039;s important is we are all part of the &quot;community&quot; as a result of our decisions, no matter what influenced them.  Some folks will be driven to purchase a MINI because it has 4 real doors and seating for 3 kids in back ( I would), and it is way cooler than the Hondas and Toyotas of similar size and purpose.  After purchasing my MINI Cooper S, I was, and continue to be, faced with the daily dilemma that I cannot trasport my wife and all 3 children at the same time.  I end up feeling selfish about the fact that I own this car, and chose it as my daily driver.  As much as I love the car, that detracts from it&#039;s usefulness, and ultimately it&#039;s appeal.  So, you see, this is one of the reasons I think an SAV/SUV could be a nifty offering.  That, and I just happen to love SUVs!!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I sort of agree with Jon, in that any manufacturer should stick to what they do best.  I also believe in evolution (of a product, brand, community).  For example, if a hybrid MINI is built, I am sure their are many interested parties inside, and outside, the community.  I&#039;m not one of them, but to each his own.  I would not fail to return a wave from a Hybrid MINI owner.  Do I think that is the right direction for the company?  NO.  Do I care if they pursue it anyway?  NO.  Would I ostracize someone else for wanting higher mileage.  NO.  There is room for variations on an original.  The SAV is no exception.  Right or wrong, BMW/MINI is moving in that direction right now and I am hopeful that the end product will live up to my expectations.  And, if it arrives with a diesel (I&#039;m talking Bluetec-style, clean burning diesel), that&#039;s even better.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact is, there are segments of the MINI community interested in high mileage, SUV, high performance, roadster, Moke, etc., respectively.  We are one big melting pot.  I could care less about fuel economy with my MINI Cooper S.  I didn&#8217;t purchase it for that reason.  I purchased it because it is a reflection of an icon and I could spec the build with features that I love and it is fun to drive.  And, I always wanted to own a Mini, but, so far, have not found the right car to purchase.  I am sure others purchased their MINIs just because it was small and they assumed great MPG.  Who cares why any of us took the plunge?  What&#8217;s important is we are all part of the &#8220;community&#8221; as a result of our decisions, no matter what influenced them.  Some folks will be driven to purchase a MINI because it has 4 real doors and seating for 3 kids in back ( I would), and it is way cooler than the Hondas and Toyotas of similar size and purpose.  After purchasing my MINI Cooper S, I was, and continue to be, faced with the daily dilemma that I cannot trasport my wife and all 3 children at the same time.  I end up feeling selfish about the fact that I own this car, and chose it as my daily driver.  As much as I love the car, that detracts from it&#8217;s usefulness, and ultimately it&#8217;s appeal.  So, you see, this is one of the reasons I think an SAV/SUV could be a nifty offering.  That, and I just happen to love SUVs!!</p>

<p>I sort of agree with Jon, in that any manufacturer should stick to what they do best.  I also believe in evolution (of a product, brand, community).  For example, if a hybrid MINI is built, I am sure their are many interested parties inside, and outside, the community.  I&#8217;m not one of them, but to each his own.  I would not fail to return a wave from a Hybrid MINI owner.  Do I think that is the right direction for the company?  NO.  Do I care if they pursue it anyway?  NO.  Would I ostracize someone else for wanting higher mileage.  NO.  There is room for variations on an original.  The SAV is no exception.  Right or wrong, BMW/MINI is moving in that direction right now and I am hopeful that the end product will live up to my expectations.  And, if it arrives with a diesel (I&#8217;m talking Bluetec-style, clean burning diesel), that&#8217;s even better.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/12/19/minis-sav-to-be-part-minipart-bmw/comment-page-1/#comment-192045</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 17:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/12/19/minis-sav-to-be-part-minipart-bmw/#comment-192045</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I concur on many of your points Bwana. My issues with this vehicle are not with the Mini community, there are many people in the current community and future people that may enter it that do have valid needs of a larger vehicle.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I just wonder if Mini really needs to fill this void. Read MF, NAM, Mini2 and you can see a large volume of the messages are based on performance. With the same logic Mini has followed for the SUV it would seem that there are a sizable number of people that are looking for a higher end sports car, something far beyond even the JCW solutions. Does this mean Mini should develop something like this? Once again I say no for the exact same reason, Mini would be entering into direct completion with established manufacturers and to me just doesn&#039;t fit the brand image to me. I personally think the outstanding thing for our brand is that they created their current market with pure creativity of the Mini design. I would much rather see Mini develop a new market.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;One of those for me would be something I have been asked a thousand times since I have been driving the BMW/Mini by other drivers. &quot;Bet that gets good gas mileage&quot;, I personally think spending the money to develop a high mileage vehicle would make much more sense as the factual properties would match the perception of our brand making a instant sales point, while this would no doubt fall in completion with current offerings I believe that none of the current offerings are much other than iffy quality vehicles in this market.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I concur on many of your points Bwana. My issues with this vehicle are not with the Mini community, there are many people in the current community and future people that may enter it that do have valid needs of a larger vehicle.</p>

<p>I just wonder if Mini really needs to fill this void. Read MF, NAM, Mini2 and you can see a large volume of the messages are based on performance. With the same logic Mini has followed for the SUV it would seem that there are a sizable number of people that are looking for a higher end sports car, something far beyond even the JCW solutions. Does this mean Mini should develop something like this? Once again I say no for the exact same reason, Mini would be entering into direct completion with established manufacturers and to me just doesn&#8217;t fit the brand image to me. I personally think the outstanding thing for our brand is that they created their current market with pure creativity of the Mini design. I would much rather see Mini develop a new market.</p>

<p>One of those for me would be something I have been asked a thousand times since I have been driving the BMW/Mini by other drivers. &#8220;Bet that gets good gas mileage&#8221;, I personally think spending the money to develop a high mileage vehicle would make much more sense as the factual properties would match the perception of our brand making a instant sales point, while this would no doubt fall in completion with current offerings I believe that none of the current offerings are much other than iffy quality vehicles in this market.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bwana Yak</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/12/19/minis-sav-to-be-part-minipart-bmw/comment-page-1/#comment-192023</link>
		<dc:creator>Bwana Yak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 16:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/12/19/minis-sav-to-be-part-minipart-bmw/#comment-192023</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Jon, your views are as valid as any, and I was not calling for censorship, only for a restraint from the complete rejection of the SAV concept.  The SAV is a done deal, but your opinions on how it will take shape are not only valid but perhaps uniquely valuable as you interject some perspective on the &quot;oh boy I can&#039;t wait&quot; opinions of myself and others.  We have much more that we agree on than that which we disagree on, for instance, neither of us want BMW to take anything away from the MINI driving experience in a MINI SAV.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;One point where we disagree is in who we want to be a part of the MINI community.  I&#039;m not convinced that the MINI SAV will appeal to the soccer mom crowd all that much, as it will be too small to fit five kids and the family dog in and it won&#039;t provide that feeling of invulnerability like the monster SUV&#039;s.  However, it probably will draw some buyers (maybe many buyers) away from CR-V&#039;s and RAV-4&#039;s, and I&#039;m willing to accept those converts into the fold, because that&#039;s what I think will happen - new buyers will be converted into MINI fanatics, just like the rest of us and for the same reasons.  Given the MINI size and driving characteristics, I just don&#039;t see most people having a hard time choosing between a MINI SAV and a Honda CR-V - either they want a MINI because it&#039;s a MINI (with all that entails), or they don&#039;t care about that and they buy the cheaper more conventional vehicle.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon, your views are as valid as any, and I was not calling for censorship, only for a restraint from the complete rejection of the SAV concept.  The SAV is a done deal, but your opinions on how it will take shape are not only valid but perhaps uniquely valuable as you interject some perspective on the &#8220;oh boy I can&#8217;t wait&#8221; opinions of myself and others.  We have much more that we agree on than that which we disagree on, for instance, neither of us want BMW to take anything away from the MINI driving experience in a MINI SAV.</p>

<p>One point where we disagree is in who we want to be a part of the MINI community.  I&#8217;m not convinced that the MINI SAV will appeal to the soccer mom crowd all that much, as it will be too small to fit five kids and the family dog in and it won&#8217;t provide that feeling of invulnerability like the monster SUV&#8217;s.  However, it probably will draw some buyers (maybe many buyers) away from CR-V&#8217;s and RAV-4&#8217;s, and I&#8217;m willing to accept those converts into the fold, because that&#8217;s what I think will happen &#8211; new buyers will be converted into MINI fanatics, just like the rest of us and for the same reasons.  Given the MINI size and driving characteristics, I just don&#8217;t see most people having a hard time choosing between a MINI SAV and a Honda CR-V &#8211; either they want a MINI because it&#8217;s a MINI (with all that entails), or they don&#8217;t care about that and they buy the cheaper more conventional vehicle.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ML</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/12/19/minis-sav-to-be-part-minipart-bmw/comment-page-1/#comment-191866</link>
		<dc:creator>ML</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 23:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/12/19/minis-sav-to-be-part-minipart-bmw/#comment-191866</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m really looking forward to this. I don&#039;t think it&#039;s in the wrong direction as long as they don&#039;t go overboard and it gets good mpg. I find situations when I wish my MINI was bigger, but I don&#039;t really like the clubman too much. I&#039;m also hoping the upcoming 50th anniversary might involve a re-do of the current interior - or I&#039;m hoping the SAV will have a different interior. That really is the main thing that puts me off owning another MINI right now. At least it coming out in 2010 is right when my current MINI is paid off and I can wait to see how the first year model is doing before considering getting one :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m really looking forward to this. I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s in the wrong direction as long as they don&#8217;t go overboard and it gets good mpg. I find situations when I wish my MINI was bigger, but I don&#8217;t really like the clubman too much. I&#8217;m also hoping the upcoming 50th anniversary might involve a re-do of the current interior &#8211; or I&#8217;m hoping the SAV will have a different interior. That really is the main thing that puts me off owning another MINI right now. At least it coming out in 2010 is right when my current MINI is paid off and I can wait to see how the first year model is doing before considering getting one :)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MINIme</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/12/19/minis-sav-to-be-part-minipart-bmw/comment-page-1/#comment-191862</link>
		<dc:creator>MINIme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 23:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/12/19/minis-sav-to-be-part-minipart-bmw/#comment-191862</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;We are all passionate.  That is clear.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I respect Jon&#039;s opinion on the SAV, although I disagree with him.  I refute the notion that he has been badgered by me or anyone else on this board.  Responding to his prophecy regarding the MINI community, over the production of an SAV/SUV, does not constitute badgering.  I, personally, have not initiated any posts with regard to this subject, nor have I sought to persecute Jon.  I have only responded to posts that I feel are off base.  My position is this: Don&#039;t lead the charge to divide the &quot;community&quot;. In other words, &quot;Don&#039;t start no stuff, won&#039;t be no stuff&quot;!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are all passionate.  That is clear.</p>

<p>I respect Jon&#8217;s opinion on the SAV, although I disagree with him.  I refute the notion that he has been badgered by me or anyone else on this board.  Responding to his prophecy regarding the MINI community, over the production of an SAV/SUV, does not constitute badgering.  I, personally, have not initiated any posts with regard to this subject, nor have I sought to persecute Jon.  I have only responded to posts that I feel are off base.  My position is this: Don&#8217;t lead the charge to divide the &#8220;community&#8221;. In other words, &#8220;Don&#8217;t start no stuff, won&#8217;t be no stuff&#8221;!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/12/19/minis-sav-to-be-part-minipart-bmw/comment-page-1/#comment-191820</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 19:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/12/19/minis-sav-to-be-part-minipart-bmw/#comment-191820</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Minime in some small part I believe that expressing views like mine are a primary driver to push Mini to develop something good enough to silence its detractors. Don&#039;t get me wrong I still feel strongly that a SUV is a misguided path though.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Guys please don&#039;t stress over my comments or other views counter to mine. I take nothing you guys are saying personally, though I do at times feel like a target I believe this debate is good for our brand. On another aspect over a great many years I have found that opinions tend to not be influenced by others rather is a personal choice made by the individual based on the preponderance of their point of view, logic, factual information, and passion.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Minime in some small part I believe that expressing views like mine are a primary driver to push Mini to develop something good enough to silence its detractors. Don&#8217;t get me wrong I still feel strongly that a SUV is a misguided path though.</p>

<p>Guys please don&#8217;t stress over my comments or other views counter to mine. I take nothing you guys are saying personally, though I do at times feel like a target I believe this debate is good for our brand. On another aspect over a great many years I have found that opinions tend to not be influenced by others rather is a personal choice made by the individual based on the preponderance of their point of view, logic, factual information, and passion.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathaniel Salzman</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/12/19/minis-sav-to-be-part-minipart-bmw/comment-page-1/#comment-191817</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel Salzman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 19:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/12/19/minis-sav-to-be-part-minipart-bmw/#comment-191817</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Nathaniel, I donâ€™t see any rebuttal to Jonâ€™s commentary as censorship. We are simply using transformational dialogue in order to influence Jonâ€™s opinion. Collectively, thatâ€™s politics.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m all for rebuttal - I&#039;ve written more than a few. I&#039;m opposed to his being singled out, not your difference of opinion. It&#039;s not your &quot;collective&quot; role to badger him until he thinks like you do. That&#039;s politics alright, but not the good kind.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>Nathaniel, I donâ€™t see any rebuttal to Jonâ€™s commentary as censorship. We are simply using transformational dialogue in order to influence Jonâ€™s opinion. Collectively, thatâ€™s politics.</blockquote>

<p>I&#8217;m all for rebuttal &#8211; I&#8217;ve written more than a few. I&#8217;m opposed to his being singled out, not your difference of opinion. It&#8217;s not your &#8220;collective&#8221; role to badger him until he thinks like you do. That&#8217;s politics alright, but not the good kind.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MINIme</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/12/19/minis-sav-to-be-part-minipart-bmw/comment-page-1/#comment-191798</link>
		<dc:creator>MINIme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 17:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/12/19/minis-sav-to-be-part-minipart-bmw/#comment-191798</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;As many owners/drivers/enthusiasts (the community), let&#039;s make sure that MINI doesn&#039;t allow this project to reek of mediocrity.  Let&#039;s demand an offering that eclipses everything currently in the market or on the drawing board in this category (micro crossover/suv?).  If MINI was able to create a niche in 2002, why not now?  Jon said it well when he said &quot; One of the greatest things Mini did in 2002 is to create a new market for the luxury micro car. (MINI did not create the micro car, but the market for the luxury version).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I ask you, have we, as a community, lost faith?  Fear not.  Believe fellow MINIons!  Ask for the ultimate micro SUV and ye shall receive it!  Demand the features and options that we would include in the build and accept nothing less.  MotoringFile is a great medium for expressing our ideas, wants, grievances.  Let&#039;s take advantage of our collective voice to influence BMW/MINI to build the R60 to specs that are worthy of the MINI marque.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As many owners/drivers/enthusiasts (the community), let&#8217;s make sure that MINI doesn&#8217;t allow this project to reek of mediocrity.  Let&#8217;s demand an offering that eclipses everything currently in the market or on the drawing board in this category (micro crossover/suv?).  If MINI was able to create a niche in 2002, why not now?  Jon said it well when he said &#8221; One of the greatest things Mini did in 2002 is to create a new market for the luxury micro car. (MINI did not create the micro car, but the market for the luxury version).</p>

<p>I ask you, have we, as a community, lost faith?  Fear not.  Believe fellow MINIons!  Ask for the ultimate micro SUV and ye shall receive it!  Demand the features and options that we would include in the build and accept nothing less.  MotoringFile is a great medium for expressing our ideas, wants, grievances.  Let&#8217;s take advantage of our collective voice to influence BMW/MINI to build the R60 to specs that are worthy of the MINI marque.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/12/19/minis-sav-to-be-part-minipart-bmw/comment-page-1/#comment-191789</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 17:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/12/19/minis-sav-to-be-part-minipart-bmw/#comment-191789</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Great debate guys, there are more than a few valid concepts on all sides here in my opinion. I will say again that I have no doubt&#039;s to the creativity of the Mini design team to come up with a solid development for the R60. I still personally believe that they have a chosen a market sector that is filled with competition. Micro crossover SUV&#039;s if anything are common on the roads I drive already. One of the greatest things Mini did in 2002 is to create a new market for the luxury micro car. A SUV reeks of being an easy and otherwise predictable path for them, believe the design team has shot firmly towards mediocrity on this. I expected something much more from Mini than following every other manufacturer.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;While I can see where many people are coming from with saying I am creating the very gulf that I am worried about. However the base fact is there are a lot of people that have expressed a wide variety views, everything from total acceptance to outright outrage. I am only expressing my own personal view on this matter.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great debate guys, there are more than a few valid concepts on all sides here in my opinion. I will say again that I have no doubt&#8217;s to the creativity of the Mini design team to come up with a solid development for the R60. I still personally believe that they have a chosen a market sector that is filled with competition. Micro crossover SUV&#8217;s if anything are common on the roads I drive already. One of the greatest things Mini did in 2002 is to create a new market for the luxury micro car. A SUV reeks of being an easy and otherwise predictable path for them, believe the design team has shot firmly towards mediocrity on this. I expected something much more from Mini than following every other manufacturer.</p>

<p>While I can see where many people are coming from with saying I am creating the very gulf that I am worried about. However the base fact is there are a lot of people that have expressed a wide variety views, everything from total acceptance to outright outrage. I am only expressing my own personal view on this matter.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
