<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Limited Slip Unavailable on Factory JCW MINI</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.motoringfile.com/2008/04/30/limited-slip-unavailable-on-factory-jcw-mini/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2008/04/30/limited-slip-unavailable-on-factory-jcw-mini/</link>
	<description>MotoringFile &#124; MINI news, reviews and opinion. MINI Cooper, Cooper S, Clubman, Countryman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:14:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MotoringFile &#187; Archive &#187; Why the JCW Factory MINI will not get LSD.</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2008/04/30/limited-slip-unavailable-on-factory-jcw-mini/comment-page-2/#comment-225910</link>
		<dc:creator>MotoringFile &#187; Archive &#187; Why the JCW Factory MINI will not get LSD.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 15:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2008/04/30/limited-slip-unavailable-on-factory-jcw-mini/#comment-225910</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Further reading on EDLC at MF [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Further reading on EDLC at MF [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cct1</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2008/04/30/limited-slip-unavailable-on-factory-jcw-mini/comment-page-1/#comment-219335</link>
		<dc:creator>cct1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 02:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2008/04/30/limited-slip-unavailable-on-factory-jcw-mini/#comment-219335</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You may be right, but the reviews of the 135i&#039;s ediff have been less than stellar, and after seeing the 135i on the track this past weekend, I&#039;m very skeptical it will be any better on the MINI.  We&#039;ll see...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m not sure why they didn&#039;t leave the LSD as an option though--it should still be theoretically possible to put it on, and for $500, the LSD was one of the few options on the MINI that could really be considered a bargain.  A cynic would say maybe that&#039;s why they got rid of it....:)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may be right, but the reviews of the 135i&#8217;s ediff have been less than stellar, and after seeing the 135i on the track this past weekend, I&#8217;m very skeptical it will be any better on the MINI.  We&#8217;ll see&#8230;</p>

<p>I&#8217;m not sure why they didn&#8217;t leave the LSD as an option though&#8211;it should still be theoretically possible to put it on, and for $500, the LSD was one of the few options on the MINI that could really be considered a bargain.  A cynic would say maybe that&#8217;s why they got rid of it&#8230;.:)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Obnxs</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2008/04/30/limited-slip-unavailable-on-factory-jcw-mini/comment-page-1/#comment-219298</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Obnxs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 21:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2008/04/30/limited-slip-unavailable-on-factory-jcw-mini/#comment-219298</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;We&#039;ll see how this one works out, but I&#039;m betting that electronics will win over the basic mechanical systems. Despite the reputation for electronic gremlins, automotive electronics are very reliable (at least engine managment function, no claims to entertainment iDrive type stuff). Electronic systems are easlily variable (multiple settings like high end DSC systems) that are really hard to do with pure mechanical systems. Mechanical systems for differntials can&#039;t take steering input into account, like the electronic systems can.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Do some reading on what&#039;s in the EVO MR or the GT-R. Electronics up the wazoo! Anyone complaining about how fast the GT-R is around the Nurburgring? Don&#039;t think so.....&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As far as automotive electronics in general, everyone biatched about the end of the carborator and the onset of electronic fuel injection, but now without it, we wouldn&#039;t have the power and efficiency numbers that we have.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Want mechanical timing? Centripital weights and a vacuum diaphram in a distributor? Not me.... Give me a crank triggered CPU controlled timing curve with a knock sensor to keep things in check any day of the week.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Just some other examples to think about, for all those that bitch about the changes coming to todays cars....&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What&#039;s usually the problem for the Mini (And other lower cost cars) is that while the systems ARE much more capable than the mechanical systems they replace, we don&#039;t get access to the full system operating range like the higher end cars. DSC is a perfect example. We&#039;re stuck with a rather bad compramize (out of the box) while high end cars get multiple setting levels that can even allow for some nice, uh, oversteer situations in aggressive turns. We get what we get, one setting, love it or hate it. Like all compramises, there are places where it&#039;s good, others where it&#039;s not so good.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So I guess what&#039;s bad is we&#039;re getting high end systems in low end cars, and suffer for it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Matt&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ll see how this one works out, but I&#8217;m betting that electronics will win over the basic mechanical systems. Despite the reputation for electronic gremlins, automotive electronics are very reliable (at least engine managment function, no claims to entertainment iDrive type stuff). Electronic systems are easlily variable (multiple settings like high end DSC systems) that are really hard to do with pure mechanical systems. Mechanical systems for differntials can&#8217;t take steering input into account, like the electronic systems can.</p>

<p>Do some reading on what&#8217;s in the EVO MR or the GT-R. Electronics up the wazoo! Anyone complaining about how fast the GT-R is around the Nurburgring? Don&#8217;t think so&#8230;..</p>

<p>As far as automotive electronics in general, everyone biatched about the end of the carborator and the onset of electronic fuel injection, but now without it, we wouldn&#8217;t have the power and efficiency numbers that we have.</p>

<p>Want mechanical timing? Centripital weights and a vacuum diaphram in a distributor? Not me&#8230;. Give me a crank triggered CPU controlled timing curve with a knock sensor to keep things in check any day of the week.</p>

<p>Just some other examples to think about, for all those that bitch about the changes coming to todays cars&#8230;.</p>

<p>What&#8217;s usually the problem for the Mini (And other lower cost cars) is that while the systems ARE much more capable than the mechanical systems they replace, we don&#8217;t get access to the full system operating range like the higher end cars. DSC is a perfect example. We&#8217;re stuck with a rather bad compramize (out of the box) while high end cars get multiple setting levels that can even allow for some nice, uh, oversteer situations in aggressive turns. We get what we get, one setting, love it or hate it. Like all compramises, there are places where it&#8217;s good, others where it&#8217;s not so good.</p>

<p>So I guess what&#8217;s bad is we&#8217;re getting high end systems in low end cars, and suffer for it.</p>

<p>Matt</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mozza</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2008/04/30/limited-slip-unavailable-on-factory-jcw-mini/comment-page-1/#comment-219010</link>
		<dc:creator>Mozza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 23:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2008/04/30/limited-slip-unavailable-on-factory-jcw-mini/#comment-219010</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The JCW modifications were engineered and design solely at BMW in Munich. Someday maybe Iâ€™ll be able to let slip some of the more impressive details but lets just say it has some pedigree (despite not having LSD).&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I know you can&#039;t come right out and say it Gabe but I think I see what you&#039;re getting at here. If I&#039;m inferring correctly then that&#039;s iMpressive ;-).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>The JCW modifications were engineered and design solely at BMW in Munich. Someday maybe Iâ€™ll be able to let slip some of the more impressive details but lets just say it has some pedigree (despite not having LSD).</blockquote>

<p>I know you can&#8217;t come right out and say it Gabe but I think I see what you&#8217;re getting at here. If I&#8217;m inferring correctly then that&#8217;s iMpressive ;-).</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dc11</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2008/04/30/limited-slip-unavailable-on-factory-jcw-mini/comment-page-1/#comment-218985</link>
		<dc:creator>dc11</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 19:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2008/04/30/limited-slip-unavailable-on-factory-jcw-mini/#comment-218985</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;I believe that BMW has gone this route for several reasons. BMW likes to solve things electronically because itâ€™s cheaper, there are less parts to fail (a good thing for all parties involved) and itâ€™s a lightweight solution (again a plus). That said if I had a choice thereâ€™s no question Iâ€™d personally opt for a real LSD.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;its a shame that the first thing to fail on all BMWs are the electronics... typically within the first 6 months of ownership =)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;in any case, im still waiting for my 1.8-2.0L turbo motor (by means of either bore or stroking, or both), LSD, aero kit, and suspension, for under $32K... that way, it actually has a chance against the R32 which seems vastly superior to the mini interior, exterior, and performance.  Even the GTI looks like a better deal.  The only thing that mini has going for it is the look of the mini itself.  and again, i really hate VW, but i might be forced to go that route at that price point.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;if mini doesn&#039;t announce a GP version within 12 months, i will completely give up on mini.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I believe that BMW has gone this route for several reasons. BMW likes to solve things electronically because itâ€™s cheaper, there are less parts to fail (a good thing for all parties involved) and itâ€™s a lightweight solution (again a plus). That said if I had a choice thereâ€™s no question Iâ€™d personally opt for a real LSD.&#8221;</p>

<p>its a shame that the first thing to fail on all BMWs are the electronics&#8230; typically within the first 6 months of ownership =)</p>

<p>in any case, im still waiting for my 1.8-2.0L turbo motor (by means of either bore or stroking, or both), LSD, aero kit, and suspension, for under $32K&#8230; that way, it actually has a chance against the R32 which seems vastly superior to the mini interior, exterior, and performance.  Even the GTI looks like a better deal.  The only thing that mini has going for it is the look of the mini itself.  and again, i really hate VW, but i might be forced to go that route at that price point.</p>

<p>if mini doesn&#8217;t announce a GP version within 12 months, i will completely give up on mini.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erich</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2008/04/30/limited-slip-unavailable-on-factory-jcw-mini/comment-page-1/#comment-218974</link>
		<dc:creator>Erich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 18:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2008/04/30/limited-slip-unavailable-on-factory-jcw-mini/#comment-218974</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;How much does the LSD weigh?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How much does the LSD weigh?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2008/04/30/limited-slip-unavailable-on-factory-jcw-mini/comment-page-1/#comment-218972</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 18:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2008/04/30/limited-slip-unavailable-on-factory-jcw-mini/#comment-218972</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Correction, the Cooper D (not sold in the USA) is a turbocharged DIESEL motor.  The petrol motor in the Cooper is nealy identical worldwide.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction, the Cooper D (not sold in the USA) is a turbocharged DIESEL motor.  The petrol motor in the Cooper is nealy identical worldwide.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2008/04/30/limited-slip-unavailable-on-factory-jcw-mini/comment-page-1/#comment-218970</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 18:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2008/04/30/limited-slip-unavailable-on-factory-jcw-mini/#comment-218970</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The Cooper motor is naturaly aspirated NOT turbo.  The Cooper motor also has BMW&#039;s valvetronic tech which provides continuously variable timing and lift for intake and exhaust valves.  This eliminates the need for a throttle plate except as a failsafe measure.  The Cooper S motor is nearly completely different.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Cooper motor is naturaly aspirated NOT turbo.  The Cooper motor also has BMW&#8217;s valvetronic tech which provides continuously variable timing and lift for intake and exhaust valves.  This eliminates the need for a throttle plate except as a failsafe measure.  The Cooper S motor is nearly completely different.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robble</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2008/04/30/limited-slip-unavailable-on-factory-jcw-mini/comment-page-1/#comment-218952</link>
		<dc:creator>robble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 16:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2008/04/30/limited-slip-unavailable-on-factory-jcw-mini/#comment-218952</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;nuvolari.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;ONLY the S model is turbo charged in the US.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nuvolari.</p>

<p>ONLY the S model is turbo charged in the US.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2008/04/30/limited-slip-unavailable-on-factory-jcw-mini/comment-page-1/#comment-218949</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 16:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2008/04/30/limited-slip-unavailable-on-factory-jcw-mini/#comment-218949</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;My interest in the JCW Mini has gone from tepid to completely limp.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My interest in the JCW Mini has gone from tepid to completely limp.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brice</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2008/04/30/limited-slip-unavailable-on-factory-jcw-mini/comment-page-1/#comment-218941</link>
		<dc:creator>Brice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 15:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2008/04/30/limited-slip-unavailable-on-factory-jcw-mini/#comment-218941</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Gabe, you said this does a good job of preventing one tire roasting, but does it do what a true LSD does (allow TWO wheel roasting)? That to me is the measure of whether the systems are equivalent, and I can&#039;t see it doing this. If it applies the brake to the inside wheel, seems like it would eventually just make the outside wheel be the &quot;peg leg&quot; (this is admittedly better than without intervention, but still fundamentally different than a proper LSD).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gabe, you said this does a good job of preventing one tire roasting, but does it do what a true LSD does (allow TWO wheel roasting)? That to me is the measure of whether the systems are equivalent, and I can&#8217;t see it doing this. If it applies the brake to the inside wheel, seems like it would eventually just make the outside wheel be the &#8220;peg leg&#8221; (this is admittedly better than without intervention, but still fundamentally different than a proper LSD).</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nuvolari</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2008/04/30/limited-slip-unavailable-on-factory-jcw-mini/comment-page-1/#comment-218914</link>
		<dc:creator>nuvolari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 14:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2008/04/30/limited-slip-unavailable-on-factory-jcw-mini/#comment-218914</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;scabpicker - but aren&#039;t both US-spec R56 engines (S and Cooper) turbos and therefore identical?  I thought only the One was NA.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>scabpicker &#8211; but aren&#8217;t both US-spec R56 engines (S and Cooper) turbos and therefore identical?  I thought only the One was NA.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C4</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2008/04/30/limited-slip-unavailable-on-factory-jcw-mini/comment-page-1/#comment-218898</link>
		<dc:creator>C4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 13:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2008/04/30/limited-slip-unavailable-on-factory-jcw-mini/#comment-218898</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The Tritec engine might not be a &quot;Tour de Force&quot; in the technological front, but it is still a damn impressive little engine in Supercharged guise and virtually bulletproof to boot.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Not bad for a powerplant that was pretty much put together in 12 months by then former Chrysler Corporation in the &#039;96-&#039;97 time period.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Tritec engine might not be a &#8220;Tour de Force&#8221; in the technological front, but it is still a damn impressive little engine in Supercharged guise and virtually bulletproof to boot.</p>

<p>Not bad for a powerplant that was pretty much put together in 12 months by then former Chrysler Corporation in the &#8217;96-&#8217;97 time period.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2008/04/30/limited-slip-unavailable-on-factory-jcw-mini/comment-page-1/#comment-218891</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 11:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2008/04/30/limited-slip-unavailable-on-factory-jcw-mini/#comment-218891</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;Iâ€™m still a little wigged by its Peugeot heritage, and that it might be too clever for its own good in the end. But it is quite a tech monster.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Just to reiterate what has been on MF in the past. The engine was designed by BMW (I&#039;ve talked to the german engineer who headed the project and lead the design). The block is cast in a PSA plant. It&#039;s then shipped over to the UK where the entire thing is manufactured.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The JCW modifications were engineered and design solely at BMW in Munich. Someday maybe I&#039;ll be able to let slip some of the more impressive details but lets just say it has some pedigree (despite not having LSD).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
  <p>Iâ€™m still a little wigged by its Peugeot heritage, and that it might be too clever for its own good in the end. But it is quite a tech monster.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Just to reiterate what has been on MF in the past. The engine was designed by BMW (I&#8217;ve talked to the german engineer who headed the project and lead the design). The block is cast in a PSA plant. It&#8217;s then shipped over to the UK where the entire thing is manufactured.</p>

<p>The JCW modifications were engineered and design solely at BMW in Munich. Someday maybe I&#8217;ll be able to let slip some of the more impressive details but lets just say it has some pedigree (despite not having LSD).</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scabpicker</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2008/04/30/limited-slip-unavailable-on-factory-jcw-mini/comment-page-1/#comment-218888</link>
		<dc:creator>scabpicker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 11:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2008/04/30/limited-slip-unavailable-on-factory-jcw-mini/#comment-218888</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The R56 S and plain Cooper engines aren&#039;t that similar. Just the general block dimensions are the same.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The turbo engine block gets steel sintered onto the aluminum around the crank journals, and it gets an oil/water heat exchanger. The blocks are cast in different processes, (n/a=lost foam, turbo=low pressure), and the heads are totally different. Plus, the turbo engine gets different pistons with a different combustion chamber.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The R53 has a lot to speak for it, but the tritec engine is not necessarily the best in comparison to the prince series, at least not on the technology front. I&#039;m still a little wigged by its Peugeot heritage, and that it might be too clever for its own good in the end. But it is quite a tech monster.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The R56 S and plain Cooper engines aren&#8217;t that similar. Just the general block dimensions are the same.</p>

<p>The turbo engine block gets steel sintered onto the aluminum around the crank journals, and it gets an oil/water heat exchanger. The blocks are cast in different processes, (n/a=lost foam, turbo=low pressure), and the heads are totally different. Plus, the turbo engine gets different pistons with a different combustion chamber.</p>

<p>The R53 has a lot to speak for it, but the tritec engine is not necessarily the best in comparison to the prince series, at least not on the technology front. I&#8217;m still a little wigged by its Peugeot heritage, and that it might be too clever for its own good in the end. But it is quite a tech monster.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nuvolari</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2008/04/30/limited-slip-unavailable-on-factory-jcw-mini/comment-page-1/#comment-218856</link>
		<dc:creator>nuvolari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 05:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2008/04/30/limited-slip-unavailable-on-factory-jcw-mini/#comment-218856</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Gabe, what&#039;s NMA?  Nameless Mechanical Authority? :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gabe, what&#8217;s NMA?  Nameless Mechanical Authority? :)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nuvolari</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2008/04/30/limited-slip-unavailable-on-factory-jcw-mini/comment-page-1/#comment-218855</link>
		<dc:creator>nuvolari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 05:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2008/04/30/limited-slip-unavailable-on-factory-jcw-mini/#comment-218855</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;c4, my bad, I was talking US-spec cars.  Both the US Cooper and S models are turbocharged, correct?  So I&#039;m assuming no differences between the bottom half of those engines.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>c4, my bad, I was talking US-spec cars.  Both the US Cooper and S models are turbocharged, correct?  So I&#8217;m assuming no differences between the bottom half of those engines.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: c4</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2008/04/30/limited-slip-unavailable-on-factory-jcw-mini/comment-page-1/#comment-218846</link>
		<dc:creator>c4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 04:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2008/04/30/limited-slip-unavailable-on-factory-jcw-mini/#comment-218846</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I believe there are differences in terms of reinforced components between the R56 N/A and turbocharged engines.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately, both R53 and R56 suffers from the same hit or miss LuK OEM clutch disk/flywheel assemblies that either seem to die prematurely or last forever if they are well abused.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe there are differences in terms of reinforced components between the R56 N/A and turbocharged engines.</p>

<p>Unfortunately, both R53 and R56 suffers from the same hit or miss LuK OEM clutch disk/flywheel assemblies that either seem to die prematurely or last forever if they are well abused.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2008/04/30/limited-slip-unavailable-on-factory-jcw-mini/comment-page-1/#comment-218842</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 03:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2008/04/30/limited-slip-unavailable-on-factory-jcw-mini/#comment-218842</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;And I have personally put 80k hard miles, including many track days, on the Getrag 6 speed and stock clutch at 180 ftlbs peak torque at the crank with zero issues, and many people are driving competitively with stock R53 drivetrains, so I think that sh!tâ€™s pretty solid.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Last thing I&#039;m going to do is make any blanket statements about R53 or R56 reliability - I&#039;ll leave that for NAM :) I will however gladly review a new JCW on the track if MINI will give me one.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
  <p>And I have personally put 80k hard miles, including many track days, on the Getrag 6 speed and stock clutch at 180 ftlbs peak torque at the crank with zero issues, and many people are driving competitively with stock R53 drivetrains, so I think that sh!tâ€™s pretty solid.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Last thing I&#8217;m going to do is make any blanket statements about R53 or R56 reliability &#8211; I&#8217;ll leave that for NAM :) I will however gladly review a new JCW on the track if MINI will give me one.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nuvolari</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2008/04/30/limited-slip-unavailable-on-factory-jcw-mini/comment-page-1/#comment-218839</link>
		<dc:creator>nuvolari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 03:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/2008/04/30/limited-slip-unavailable-on-factory-jcw-mini/#comment-218839</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Gabe, my understanding is that the block of the R53 was upgraded over the R50 with forged crank, uprated bearings and improved oiling to handle JCW+ power levels.  Afaik, there is no difference between the R56 Cooper and S engines.  Am I wrong about that?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And I have personally put 80k hard miles, including many track days, on the Getrag 6 speed and stock clutch at 180 ftlbs peak torque at the crank with zero issues, and many people are driving competitively with stock R53 drivetrains, so I think that sh!t&#039;s pretty solid.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gabe, my understanding is that the block of the R53 was upgraded over the R50 with forged crank, uprated bearings and improved oiling to handle JCW+ power levels.  Afaik, there is no difference between the R56 Cooper and S engines.  Am I wrong about that?</p>

<p>And I have personally put 80k hard miles, including many track days, on the Getrag 6 speed and stock clutch at 180 ftlbs peak torque at the crank with zero issues, and many people are driving competitively with stock R53 drivetrains, so I think that sh!t&#8217;s pretty solid.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

