<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New US Efficiency Standards &amp; What they Mean for MINI</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.motoringfile.com/2009/05/19/new-us-efficiency-standards-what-they-mean-for-mini/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2009/05/19/new-us-efficiency-standards-what-they-mean-for-mini/</link>
	<description>MotoringFile &#124; MINI news, reviews and opinion. MINI Cooper, Cooper S, Clubman, Countryman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:14:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas Elliott</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2009/05/19/new-us-efficiency-standards-what-they-mean-for-mini/comment-page-1/#comment-260480</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Elliott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 18:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/?p=9200#comment-260480</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I couldn&#039;t agree with Dr. Obnxs more either.  Perhaps a more politically acceptable way to do the gas tax would be to issue a net zero gas tax.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree with Dr. Obnxs more either.  Perhaps a more politically acceptable way to do the gas tax would be to issue a net zero gas tax.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KipperFillets</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2009/05/19/new-us-efficiency-standards-what-they-mean-for-mini/comment-page-1/#comment-260445</link>
		<dc:creator>KipperFillets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 09:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/?p=9200#comment-260445</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks guys.  It&#039;s nice to see that the U.S. (and specifically this site) does have morally responsible people.  Even to the extend you&#039;d stick up for a Brit against someone in your own country.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve followed this site for a number of years (I&#039;d never have decided on my R53 without your help), and can say that I&#039;ve found it to be a generally honest and respectable place.  This thread being a case in point.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Greg has every right to voice his opinions, although I suppose it&#039;s up to Gabe to decide if he (or any of us) can do that here.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It does go to show that under the surface, an argument is usually about something else other than the point in question!  I do agree with Greg about most things being about money and political power though.  The rest is just ego and concience.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks guys.  It&#8217;s nice to see that the U.S. (and specifically this site) does have morally responsible people.  Even to the extend you&#8217;d stick up for a Brit against someone in your own country.</p>

<p>I&#8217;ve followed this site for a number of years (I&#8217;d never have decided on my R53 without your help), and can say that I&#8217;ve found it to be a generally honest and respectable place.  This thread being a case in point.</p>

<p>Greg has every right to voice his opinions, although I suppose it&#8217;s up to Gabe to decide if he (or any of us) can do that here.</p>

<p>It does go to show that under the surface, an argument is usually about something else other than the point in question!  I do agree with Greg about most things being about money and political power though.  The rest is just ego and concience.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greg</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2009/05/19/new-us-efficiency-standards-what-they-mean-for-mini/comment-page-1/#comment-260385</link>
		<dc:creator>greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 04:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/?p=9200#comment-260385</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s a hoax. Anyone who belives this tripe is a fool.The vast majority of the scientific community states that any climate change is caused by the sun and volcanic activity and is normal and natural. The earth has cooled for several years now and the polar ice thickness has doubled. This is all about money and political power and those who choose to  subscribe to this scam is a pawn.Hope you geniuses enjoy shelling out some serious cap and trade $$$&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a hoax. Anyone who belives this tripe is a fool.The vast majority of the scientific community states that any climate change is caused by the sun and volcanic activity and is normal and natural. The earth has cooled for several years now and the polar ice thickness has doubled. This is all about money and political power and those who choose to  subscribe to this scam is a pawn.Hope you geniuses enjoy shelling out some serious cap and trade $$$</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shep</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2009/05/19/new-us-efficiency-standards-what-they-mean-for-mini/comment-page-1/#comment-260380</link>
		<dc:creator>Shep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 02:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/?p=9200#comment-260380</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Our &quot;rights&quot;, as residents of one of the richest countries in the world, do not extend to actions that adversely affect the entire world and our descendants. Global climate change and pollution are affected by everyone&#039;s driving, as well as many other personal and collective actions.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&quot;Rights&quot; include responsibilities to others. Driving a high-mileage car is one of the most effective things an individual can do to combat major global problems. It&#039;s time to understand these issues are real and are not going away, to pull one&#039;s head up out of the sand and to do one&#039;s share.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our &#8220;rights&#8221;, as residents of one of the richest countries in the world, do not extend to actions that adversely affect the entire world and our descendants. Global climate change and pollution are affected by everyone&#8217;s driving, as well as many other personal and collective actions.</p>

<p>&#8220;Rights&#8221; include responsibilities to others. Driving a high-mileage car is one of the most effective things an individual can do to combat major global problems. It&#8217;s time to understand these issues are real and are not going away, to pull one&#8217;s head up out of the sand and to do one&#8217;s share.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaston</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2009/05/19/new-us-efficiency-standards-what-they-mean-for-mini/comment-page-1/#comment-260368</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 20:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/?p=9200#comment-260368</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Iâ€™ll take the freedom argument further: I want to be free of paying for otherâ€™s choices. You want to drive a gas guzzler, fine, just donâ€™t ask me to pay for your choice. For example, if you burn more gas, you are contributing more pollution to the air I breathe.  Similarly, my medical bills will be larger than yours if you hit my MINI with your HUMMER.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What we need is fair pricing. Currently, gas and vehicle prices do not reflect their true impact in terms of road use, pollution, national security, and danger to others.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iâ€™ll take the freedom argument further: I want to be free of paying for otherâ€™s choices. You want to drive a gas guzzler, fine, just donâ€™t ask me to pay for your choice. For example, if you burn more gas, you are contributing more pollution to the air I breathe.  Similarly, my medical bills will be larger than yours if you hit my MINI with your HUMMER.</p>

<p>What we need is fair pricing. Currently, gas and vehicle prices do not reflect their true impact in terms of road use, pollution, national security, and danger to others.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greg</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2009/05/19/new-us-efficiency-standards-what-they-mean-for-mini/comment-page-1/#comment-260362</link>
		<dc:creator>greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 19:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/?p=9200#comment-260362</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Shamus. Fine example of liberal elitism playbook. Begin name calling ASAP!  Since my views are consistant with our founding fathers my opinions have substance vs the whims of a &quot;progressive&quot;. My education, position, and comprehension of the world is reality, not a socialist utopia. My values created this country and made it the greatest in the world. Yours are slowly destroying it. Your personal insult is consistant with the tiny hearted blame/hate America crowd. Shut it down Gabe.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shamus. Fine example of liberal elitism playbook. Begin name calling ASAP!  Since my views are consistant with our founding fathers my opinions have substance vs the whims of a &#8220;progressive&#8221;. My education, position, and comprehension of the world is reality, not a socialist utopia. My values created this country and made it the greatest in the world. Yours are slowly destroying it. Your personal insult is consistant with the tiny hearted blame/hate America crowd. Shut it down Gabe.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2009/05/19/new-us-efficiency-standards-what-they-mean-for-mini/comment-page-1/#comment-260355</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 18:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/?p=9200#comment-260355</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;First and last warning - please do not make this personal and keep the attacks out of this.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First and last warning &#8211; please do not make this personal and keep the attacks out of this.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shamus</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2009/05/19/new-us-efficiency-standards-what-they-mean-for-mini/comment-page-1/#comment-260353</link>
		<dc:creator>Shamus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 17:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/?p=9200#comment-260353</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Please ignore @greg. In American, they&#039;re called hillbillies, hicks, and generally, boobs (though you&#039;d just call them prats). They have a very limited understanding of the world around them and usually just differ to baseless anger rather than proper discourse. He, and his like in no way represent America as a whole. Our apologies.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please ignore @greg. In American, they&#8217;re called hillbillies, hicks, and generally, boobs (though you&#8217;d just call them prats). They have a very limited understanding of the world around them and usually just differ to baseless anger rather than proper discourse. He, and his like in no way represent America as a whole. Our apologies.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KipperFillets</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2009/05/19/new-us-efficiency-standards-what-they-mean-for-mini/comment-page-1/#comment-260338</link>
		<dc:creator>KipperFillets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 16:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/?p=9200#comment-260338</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-260317&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;greg&lt;/a&gt;: Considering at the height of the British Empire, choice of worship was fairly limited in Britain, there was a monarchy and no &quot;fake&quot; illusion of freedom, we still managed to rule a good portion of the world.  A tad more than the U.S. can claim at their height (still waiting for that day, I assume).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What you fail to realise is that the American illusion of freedom doesn&#039;t sit with their perception of the government&#039;s control.  Their are more restrictive laws in the U.S. than here in the U.K.  On this site people bleat about not being allowed to get hold of a diesel MINI; we&#039;ve got them all over the roads here.  My choice of car is only limited by what I can afford to buy and run.  Here&#039;s they don&#039;t restrict directly, but rather just tax the hell out of you instead.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Grouping Europe as &quot;Euros&quot; just shows how limited your argument is.  Since when has a German ever stood in line?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-260317" rel="nofollow">greg</a>: Considering at the height of the British Empire, choice of worship was fairly limited in Britain, there was a monarchy and no &#8220;fake&#8221; illusion of freedom, we still managed to rule a good portion of the world.  A tad more than the U.S. can claim at their height (still waiting for that day, I assume).</p>

<p>What you fail to realise is that the American illusion of freedom doesn&#8217;t sit with their perception of the government&#8217;s control.  Their are more restrictive laws in the U.S. than here in the U.K.  On this site people bleat about not being allowed to get hold of a diesel MINI; we&#8217;ve got them all over the roads here.  My choice of car is only limited by what I can afford to buy and run.  Here&#8217;s they don&#8217;t restrict directly, but rather just tax the hell out of you instead.</p>

<p>Grouping Europe as &#8220;Euros&#8221; just shows how limited your argument is.  Since when has a German ever stood in line?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greg</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2009/05/19/new-us-efficiency-standards-what-they-mean-for-mini/comment-page-1/#comment-260317</link>
		<dc:creator>greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 13:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/?p=9200#comment-260317</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Wrong English guy! What made America great was we were free to &quot;pursue happiness&quot; without a monarch takinjg away the fruits of our labor and having the freedom to live as we choose and worship how we choose (no church of England). Not that I expect Euros to understand this as you are too busy standing in lines and accepting what you get.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wrong English guy! What made America great was we were free to &#8220;pursue happiness&#8221; without a monarch takinjg away the fruits of our labor and having the freedom to live as we choose and worship how we choose (no church of England). Not that I expect Euros to understand this as you are too busy standing in lines and accepting what you get.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KipperFillets</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2009/05/19/new-us-efficiency-standards-what-they-mean-for-mini/comment-page-1/#comment-260307</link>
		<dc:creator>KipperFillets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 12:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/?p=9200#comment-260307</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Wow!  Some really heated debate here.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Here in the UK the government have put up duty on fuel, road tax on inefficient cars and introduced congestion charges, all in an effort to persuade us to drive smaller, cleaner cars.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Actually I think a lot of it is really just a means to make money, under the guise of being keen on green.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;However, the biggest worry and outcry here is that it&#039;s costing us more to run a car.  I don&#039;t think I&#039;ve heard anyone protest about their rights to drive a V8 (unless it&#039;s for a specific task).  Just owning a big engined car costs more if I drive it 1 mile a day, than having a smaller car that I drive 10,000 miles a month because of the road tax.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In all this, you don&#039;t hear us complain about &quot;rights to destroy the environment&quot;.  Generally I think we understand that SOMETHING needs to be done, and are willing to give up a bit of freedom to achieve this.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Controversial bit here :- What made America great wasn&#039;t anything more than vast resources that have made the county so wealthy ( Just like Britain gathering wealth of the old empire ).  These resources have been squandered to such an extent that it&#039;s now changing the way you&#039;ve got to live.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m not an eco-warrior, not anti-American and certainly not anti-car.  What I am is pro-common sense.  All areas of motor transport efficiency need addressing, and we&#039;ve got to start someone.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Heaven help us if we all start waving flags and take the &quot;rights over reason&quot; approach.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow!  Some really heated debate here.</p>

<p>Here in the UK the government have put up duty on fuel, road tax on inefficient cars and introduced congestion charges, all in an effort to persuade us to drive smaller, cleaner cars.</p>

<p>Actually I think a lot of it is really just a means to make money, under the guise of being keen on green.</p>

<p>However, the biggest worry and outcry here is that it&#8217;s costing us more to run a car.  I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve heard anyone protest about their rights to drive a V8 (unless it&#8217;s for a specific task).  Just owning a big engined car costs more if I drive it 1 mile a day, than having a smaller car that I drive 10,000 miles a month because of the road tax.</p>

<p>In all this, you don&#8217;t hear us complain about &#8220;rights to destroy the environment&#8221;.  Generally I think we understand that SOMETHING needs to be done, and are willing to give up a bit of freedom to achieve this.</p>

<p>Controversial bit here :- What made America great wasn&#8217;t anything more than vast resources that have made the county so wealthy ( Just like Britain gathering wealth of the old empire ).  These resources have been squandered to such an extent that it&#8217;s now changing the way you&#8217;ve got to live.</p>

<p>I&#8217;m not an eco-warrior, not anti-American and certainly not anti-car.  What I am is pro-common sense.  All areas of motor transport efficiency need addressing, and we&#8217;ve got to start someone.</p>

<p>Heaven help us if we all start waving flags and take the &#8220;rights over reason&#8221; approach.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OH Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2009/05/19/new-us-efficiency-standards-what-they-mean-for-mini/comment-page-1/#comment-260298</link>
		<dc:creator>OH Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 00:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/?p=9200#comment-260298</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;There is a sign in the restroom of my favorite restaurant that says employees must wash their hands before returning to work. I suppose some of those employees feel that their decision to wash their hands has been taken away. I, for one, am glad it&#039;s there.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a sign in the restroom of my favorite restaurant that says employees must wash their hands before returning to work. I suppose some of those employees feel that their decision to wash their hands has been taken away. I, for one, am glad it&#8217;s there.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Irmiger</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2009/05/19/new-us-efficiency-standards-what-they-mean-for-mini/comment-page-1/#comment-260296</link>
		<dc:creator>James Irmiger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 23:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/?p=9200#comment-260296</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m with Matt, leave it on the forums (which, by the way greg, this is a blog, not a forum). Face it, fuel efficiency is here to stay, period. Cars will get increased gas mileage, not necessarily decreased size, performance, or luxury and no amount of arguing here is going to change some people&#039;s contrary opinion to this.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I find that those people who yell the loudest usually know the least. Their responses, sadly, follow the knee-jerk mentality of the uninformed and, facing a compelling argument, are wont to go into hysterical over-explanations and backpedalling rather than concede the point regardless of how valid it may be.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;One note for the good DR (not an argument mind you), the 10th amendment is one of the most loosely interpreted amendments in the constitution and since you quote it so vociferously, the &quot;State&quot; it refers to is the State-level Government. It&#039;s not the Feds, but it&#039;s still government. Again, there is some great reading out there on the roles of government as well as complete transcriptions of the Constitution and it&#039;s amendments if you choose to look. Some of the interpretations can be a bit too liberal or conservative, but if you keep an open mind, you&#039;ll find out that things aren&#039;t quite as bad as you might think.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Good luck with the reading - Moderately James&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with Matt, leave it on the forums (which, by the way greg, this is a blog, not a forum). Face it, fuel efficiency is here to stay, period. Cars will get increased gas mileage, not necessarily decreased size, performance, or luxury and no amount of arguing here is going to change some people&#8217;s contrary opinion to this.</p>

<p>I find that those people who yell the loudest usually know the least. Their responses, sadly, follow the knee-jerk mentality of the uninformed and, facing a compelling argument, are wont to go into hysterical over-explanations and backpedalling rather than concede the point regardless of how valid it may be.</p>

<p>One note for the good DR (not an argument mind you), the 10th amendment is one of the most loosely interpreted amendments in the constitution and since you quote it so vociferously, the &#8220;State&#8221; it refers to is the State-level Government. It&#8217;s not the Feds, but it&#8217;s still government. Again, there is some great reading out there on the roles of government as well as complete transcriptions of the Constitution and it&#8217;s amendments if you choose to look. Some of the interpretations can be a bit too liberal or conservative, but if you keep an open mind, you&#8217;ll find out that things aren&#8217;t quite as bad as you might think.</p>

<p>Good luck with the reading &#8211; Moderately James</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greg</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2009/05/19/new-us-efficiency-standards-what-they-mean-for-mini/comment-page-1/#comment-260288</link>
		<dc:creator>greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 18:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/?p=9200#comment-260288</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Here&#039;s another suggestion. Read all the prior posts on this thread that are political which started this. Not to mention the original story which is political in nature. Furthermore Doc, you have expressed your views numorous times on this forum. Sorry if someone with ones that differ from yours dares to express them.
I don&#039;t believe politics belong on MF, however, if someone offers up an opinion it is only fair that equal time is provided.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s another suggestion. Read all the prior posts on this thread that are political which started this. Not to mention the original story which is political in nature. Furthermore Doc, you have expressed your views numorous times on this forum. Sorry if someone with ones that differ from yours dares to express them.
I don&#8217;t believe politics belong on MF, however, if someone offers up an opinion it is only fair that equal time is provided.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Obnxs</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2009/05/19/new-us-efficiency-standards-what-they-mean-for-mini/comment-page-1/#comment-260287</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Obnxs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 17:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/?p=9200#comment-260287</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Here&#039;s a suggestion: leave the political BS for other forums, and stick to cars here.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Matt&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a suggestion: leave the political BS for other forums, and stick to cars here.</p>

<p>Matt</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greg</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2009/05/19/new-us-efficiency-standards-what-they-mean-for-mini/comment-page-1/#comment-260282</link>
		<dc:creator>greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 14:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/?p=9200#comment-260282</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Does anyone really think the government making decisions for auto manufactuer as to what to build is a good idea?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Pretty soon it will be &quot;Doritos can only have 3 grams of fat vs 7 because we know whats good for you&quot;. So your choice of what you can enjoy is taken from you. Think I&#039;m nuts? How many cities ( i.e.NYC) have outlawed trans fat in restaraunts because the government decided it wasn&#039;t good for you?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And soon it will be &quot;sorry Paul, we can&#039;t perform this proceedure for your cancer because the government won&#039;t pay us for it as they think it&#039;s too expensive&quot; Think I&#039;m crazy? Why do Canadians/Euros come to the USA for treatment instead of using their countries universal health care?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This will not stop at cars people. People who are jealous of Hummer owners and think this is swell are just the types that creeping socialism preys on. And they will using complete BS like &quot;climate change&quot;(notice no more global warming?) to manipulate the gulible.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone really think the government making decisions for auto manufactuer as to what to build is a good idea?</p>

<p>Pretty soon it will be &#8220;Doritos can only have 3 grams of fat vs 7 because we know whats good for you&#8221;. So your choice of what you can enjoy is taken from you. Think I&#8217;m nuts? How many cities ( i.e.NYC) have outlawed trans fat in restaraunts because the government decided it wasn&#8217;t good for you?</p>

<p>And soon it will be &#8220;sorry Paul, we can&#8217;t perform this proceedure for your cancer because the government won&#8217;t pay us for it as they think it&#8217;s too expensive&#8221; Think I&#8217;m crazy? Why do Canadians/Euros come to the USA for treatment instead of using their countries universal health care?</p>

<p>This will not stop at cars people. People who are jealous of Hummer owners and think this is swell are just the types that creeping socialism preys on. And they will using complete BS like &#8220;climate change&#8221;(notice no more global warming?) to manipulate the gulible.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dr</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2009/05/19/new-us-efficiency-standards-what-they-mean-for-mini/comment-page-1/#comment-260278</link>
		<dc:creator>dr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 14:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/?p=9200#comment-260278</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;it takes a Constitutional Amendment to change the Constitution and even then, that has to be ratified by a fixed number of states before it takes effect. The last time that happened was in 1992. The Supreme Court can interpret the Constitution, not change it.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The constitution was drawn as to define the full extent of power of the federal government. It defined limits, not a starting point! since you purport to have &quot;paid attention&quot; you may remember this part &lt;em&gt;&quot;The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people&quot; &lt;/em&gt; If its not in the constitution, its not the governments role. period! I certainly wish that any new power the feds wish to exert must be ratified by 3/4ths of the states, that was the founders intent....They belived in majority rule not minority rule!
Sadly, the constitution is routinely ignored by legislators and beuraucrats (who are apointed not elected!)within federal agencies with the delegated power to legislate through regulation.  These abuses of power, when challenged (and meanwhile enforced) may ultimately find thier way to the supreme court where activist judges, who are politicaly appointed, DO NOT judge on the SOLE basis of the constitution, rather than using the constitution as the sole authority, some justices believing that the constitution changes over time even without a single word on paper being altered, some even using european law to decide. HAVE changed the constitution!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The size and authority of the government is the bold living proof that the constitution may not have been physicaly altered much...but change it has! Its a shame that more people don&#039;t pay that much attention and its offensive when people are willing to ignore it just to force thier lifestyle of economy and minimalism upon others.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>it takes a Constitutional Amendment to change the Constitution and even then, that has to be ratified by a fixed number of states before it takes effect. The last time that happened was in 1992. The Supreme Court can interpret the Constitution, not change it.</blockquote>

<p>The constitution was drawn as to define the full extent of power of the federal government. It defined limits, not a starting point! since you purport to have &#8220;paid attention&#8221; you may remember this part <em>&#8220;The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people&#8221; </em> If its not in the constitution, its not the governments role. period! I certainly wish that any new power the feds wish to exert must be ratified by 3/4ths of the states, that was the founders intent&#8230;.They belived in majority rule not minority rule!
Sadly, the constitution is routinely ignored by legislators and beuraucrats (who are apointed not elected!)within federal agencies with the delegated power to legislate through regulation.  These abuses of power, when challenged (and meanwhile enforced) may ultimately find thier way to the supreme court where activist judges, who are politicaly appointed, DO NOT judge on the SOLE basis of the constitution, rather than using the constitution as the sole authority, some justices believing that the constitution changes over time even without a single word on paper being altered, some even using european law to decide. HAVE changed the constitution!</p>

<p>The size and authority of the government is the bold living proof that the constitution may not have been physicaly altered much&#8230;but change it has! Its a shame that more people don&#8217;t pay that much attention and its offensive when people are willing to ignore it just to force thier lifestyle of economy and minimalism upon others.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greg</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2009/05/19/new-us-efficiency-standards-what-they-mean-for-mini/comment-page-1/#comment-260275</link>
		<dc:creator>greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 12:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/?p=9200#comment-260275</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;When the government robs Peter to pay Paul they will always have a willing accomplice-in Paul.  Unfortunately there are more Pauls than Peters and eventually Peter will run out of money for the government to rob.    Get it Paul?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the government robs Peter to pay Paul they will always have a willing accomplice-in Paul.  Unfortunately there are more Pauls than Peters and eventually Peter will run out of money for the government to rob.    Get it Paul?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JonPD</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2009/05/19/new-us-efficiency-standards-what-they-mean-for-mini/comment-page-1/#comment-260268</link>
		<dc:creator>JonPD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 05:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/?p=9200#comment-260268</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;True eto, however I can bet the farm that we will see a JCW 4x4 R60 that is likely to make my GP seem efficient lol.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True eto, however I can bet the farm that we will see a JCW 4&#215;4 R60 that is likely to make my GP seem efficient lol.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eto</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2009/05/19/new-us-efficiency-standards-what-they-mean-for-mini/comment-page-1/#comment-260265</link>
		<dc:creator>eto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 04:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/?p=9200#comment-260265</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Mini decided to make the least efficient Mini to date, a 4Ã—4 R60&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;No... that would be the R53.  The R60s fuel efficiency is still unknown.  If it is diesel, it will have as good or better fuel efficiency than any petrol MINI.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>Mini decided to make the least efficient Mini to date, a 4Ã—4 R60</blockquote>

<p>No&#8230; that would be the R53.  The R60s fuel efficiency is still unknown.  If it is diesel, it will have as good or better fuel efficiency than any petrol MINI.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

