<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Secret History of the MINI R60 Crossover</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.motoringfile.com/2009/07/23/the-secret-history-of-the-mini-r60-crossover/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2009/07/23/the-secret-history-of-the-mini-r60-crossover/</link>
	<description>MotoringFile &#124; MINI news, reviews and opinion. MINI Cooper, Cooper S, Clubman, Countryman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:14:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The secret of nmini &#124; FinAppx</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2009/07/23/the-secret-history-of-the-mini-r60-crossover/comment-page-2/#comment-635283</link>
		<dc:creator>The secret of nmini &#124; FinAppx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 12:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/?p=9798#comment-635283</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] MotoringFile Â» Archive Â» The Secret History of the MINI R60 CrossoverMINI&#039;s Top Secret Colorado Project Â» 2009 Factory JCW MCS (Stage II) Â» More MINI Variants Officially Confirmed &#8230; [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] MotoringFile Â» Archive Â» The Secret History of the MINI R60 CrossoverMINI&#39;s Top Secret Colorado Project Â» 2009 Factory JCW MCS (Stage II) Â» More MINI Variants Officially Confirmed &#8230; [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MotoringFile &#187; Archive &#187; Behind the Beachcomber: An Insiders Look at MINI&#8217;s Latest Concept</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2009/07/23/the-secret-history-of-the-mini-r60-crossover/comment-page-2/#comment-285782</link>
		<dc:creator>MotoringFile &#187; Archive &#187; Behind the Beachcomber: An Insiders Look at MINI&#8217;s Latest Concept</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/?p=9798#comment-285782</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] scheduled to debut in Geneva in early March. However MINI is also considering creating (as you&#8217;ve probably read on MF) a non-crossover version that is closer to a Golf GTI four door in concept. The car would feature [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] scheduled to debut in Geneva in early March. However MINI is also considering creating (as you&#8217;ve probably read on MF) a non-crossover version that is closer to a Golf GTI four door in concept. The car would feature [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MotoringFile &#187; Archive &#187; MINI Product Roadmap Revealed (Updated)</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2009/07/23/the-secret-history-of-the-mini-r60-crossover/comment-page-2/#comment-284735</link>
		<dc:creator>MotoringFile &#187; Archive &#187; MINI Product Roadmap Revealed (Updated)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 01:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/?p=9798#comment-284735</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Countryman, like the original MINI, will feature a relatively bespoke platform. However, even with the R60 sharing components with the R55/R56, BMW intends to maximize the [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Countryman, like the original MINI, will feature a relatively bespoke platform. However, even with the R60 sharing components with the R55/R56, BMW intends to maximize the [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Berry</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2009/07/23/the-secret-history-of-the-mini-r60-crossover/comment-page-2/#comment-267387</link>
		<dc:creator>Berry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 16:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/?p=9798#comment-267387</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;We own a Clubman without the turbo, and it does fine (I often use the S button to put it in sport mode; my wife never does that).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The Countryman will certainly be significantly heavier, and the standard Mini engine will be undersized (assuming it&#039;s available), forcing you to pay for the turbo to get reasonable performance.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The article says a diesel will be the only 2.0L available.  Well, maybe that&#039;s okay, but diesels are not so popular in the U.S.  Maybe that&#039;s something we should grow out of, but it seems to me that a 2.0L gasoline engine would be a good choice for the U.S. market.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We own a Clubman without the turbo, and it does fine (I often use the S button to put it in sport mode; my wife never does that).</p>

<p>The Countryman will certainly be significantly heavier, and the standard Mini engine will be undersized (assuming it&#8217;s available), forcing you to pay for the turbo to get reasonable performance.</p>

<p>The article says a diesel will be the only 2.0L available.  Well, maybe that&#8217;s okay, but diesels are not so popular in the U.S.  Maybe that&#8217;s something we should grow out of, but it seems to me that a 2.0L gasoline engine would be a good choice for the U.S. market.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: More Spice with your Pepper? - Page 3</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2009/07/23/the-secret-history-of-the-mini-r60-crossover/comment-page-2/#comment-265897</link>
		<dc:creator>More Spice with your Pepper? - Page 3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 17:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/?p=9798#comment-265897</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] @foxfire read this: MotoringFile Archive The Secret History of the MINI R60 Crossover [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] @foxfire read this: MotoringFile Archive The Secret History of the MINI R60 Crossover [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OhioExpat</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2009/07/23/the-secret-history-of-the-mini-r60-crossover/comment-page-2/#comment-265789</link>
		<dc:creator>OhioExpat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 17:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/?p=9798#comment-265789</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Cool!  Something to replace my Subaru Forester.  We love my wife&#039;s R57-S, but we&#039;ll always need some sort of a wagon with AWD.  Will there be a JCW version??&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool!  Something to replace my Subaru Forester.  We love my wife&#8217;s R57-S, but we&#8217;ll always need some sort of a wagon with AWD.  Will there be a JCW version??</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2009/07/23/the-secret-history-of-the-mini-r60-crossover/comment-page-2/#comment-265631</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 17:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/?p=9798#comment-265631</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m still waiting for a pick up based on the standard MINI chassis. Crossovers are not needed IMO.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still waiting for a pick up based on the standard MINI chassis. Crossovers are not needed IMO.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MotoringFile &#187; Archive &#187; New Countryman Renderings Getting Closer to the Real Thing</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2009/07/23/the-secret-history-of-the-mini-r60-crossover/comment-page-2/#comment-265036</link>
		<dc:creator>MotoringFile &#187; Archive &#187; New Countryman Renderings Getting Closer to the Real Thing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 12:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/?p=9798#comment-265036</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] can read more including our exclusive report on the development of the R60 in the R60 section [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] can read more including our exclusive report on the development of the R60 in the R60 section [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robble</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2009/07/23/the-secret-history-of-the-mini-r60-crossover/comment-page-2/#comment-264954</link>
		<dc:creator>robble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 01:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/?p=9798#comment-264954</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;So when IS this supposed to be at dealerships for sale? 2010?  month?  2011??&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So when IS this supposed to be at dealerships for sale? 2010?  month?  2011??</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JonPD</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2009/07/23/the-secret-history-of-the-mini-r60-crossover/comment-page-2/#comment-264923</link>
		<dc:creator>JonPD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 13:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/?p=9798#comment-264923</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Michael I will never doubt the engineering skill at BMW for being able to craft a heck of a solution. However yes the R60 will be slower through the corners, as similarly a Clubman is a tad slower through the corners. At the end of the day sharing the same power plants as the Coupe and Clubman and caring the additional weight of 4 doors and an optional AWD system there are basic mechanics to talk about there. I have no doubt also that the X6 can haul, but are you telling me that the X6 is a capable in the corner as a 1 series or M3??&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I honestly do really look forward to seeing what both BMW and Mini show in Frankfurt this year, this includes the R60. I have yet to make up my mind about the design and will be interested in seeing the final solution they come up with. This however does not change my opposition to the R60.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael I will never doubt the engineering skill at BMW for being able to craft a heck of a solution. However yes the R60 will be slower through the corners, as similarly a Clubman is a tad slower through the corners. At the end of the day sharing the same power plants as the Coupe and Clubman and caring the additional weight of 4 doors and an optional AWD system there are basic mechanics to talk about there. I have no doubt also that the X6 can haul, but are you telling me that the X6 is a capable in the corner as a 1 series or M3??</p>

<p>I honestly do really look forward to seeing what both BMW and Mini show in Frankfurt this year, this includes the R60. I have yet to make up my mind about the design and will be interested in seeing the final solution they come up with. This however does not change my opposition to the R60.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2009/07/23/the-secret-history-of-the-mini-r60-crossover/comment-page-2/#comment-264921</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 12:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/?p=9798#comment-264921</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Jon- The AWD systems that BMW uses are not going to be slower in corners.. you may be surprised on many fronts with this model and some other showings in Frankfurt... AWD has come a long way and with the most recent developments it has surpassed its added weight penalty. If you get the change go test drive an X6.. drive it hard and you will be blown away. I too am skeptical of weight but I have to admit that progress in drive lines is overcoming that. One thing to also note about all BMWs- they brake as good as they drive even with added weight.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Gabe- glad you got to writing this post!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon- The AWD systems that BMW uses are not going to be slower in corners.. you may be surprised on many fronts with this model and some other showings in Frankfurt&#8230; AWD has come a long way and with the most recent developments it has surpassed its added weight penalty. If you get the change go test drive an X6.. drive it hard and you will be blown away. I too am skeptical of weight but I have to admit that progress in drive lines is overcoming that. One thing to also note about all BMWs- they brake as good as they drive even with added weight.</p>

<p>Gabe- glad you got to writing this post!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JonPD</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2009/07/23/the-secret-history-of-the-mini-r60-crossover/comment-page-2/#comment-264906</link>
		<dc:creator>JonPD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 05:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/?p=9798#comment-264906</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This is true Andrei, however the WRX you mentioned in your first post is a rally car though you will never see one on the Paris-Dakar, while being a rally its a very different kind. Yes I could see the 1.4liter R60 on Paris-Dakar (with the same level of success as the ones you listed above), however if your speaking of rallying such as the WHC the R60 would be more likely candidate to caring families to the event than racing in it. Same thing would happen to the other SUV&#039;s you mentioned above.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is true Andrei, however the WRX you mentioned in your first post is a rally car though you will never see one on the Paris-Dakar, while being a rally its a very different kind. Yes I could see the 1.4liter R60 on Paris-Dakar (with the same level of success as the ones you listed above), however if your speaking of rallying such as the WHC the R60 would be more likely candidate to caring families to the event than racing in it. Same thing would happen to the other SUV&#8217;s you mentioned above.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrei</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2009/07/23/the-secret-history-of-the-mini-r60-crossover/comment-page-2/#comment-264904</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 05:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/?p=9798#comment-264904</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;From wikipedia on Paris-Dakar:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Mercedes Benz M, BMW X5 and BMW X3. Hummer H1 and Hummer H3&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Mitsubishi Pajero/Montero, the Volkswagen Race Touareg, the Bowler Wildcat 200 and the Nissan Navara.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;C4 (a bit explosive?) I could never say anything that would possibly explain the Aztek.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Over and out&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From wikipedia on Paris-Dakar:</p>

<p>Mercedes Benz M, BMW X5 and BMW X3. Hummer H1 and Hummer H3</p>

<p>Mitsubishi Pajero/Montero, the Volkswagen Race Touareg, the Bowler Wildcat 200 and the Nissan Navara.</p>

<p>C4 (a bit explosive?) I could never say anything that would possibly explain the Aztek.</p>

<p>Over and out</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C4</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2009/07/23/the-secret-history-of-the-mini-r60-crossover/comment-page-1/#comment-264867</link>
		<dc:creator>C4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 19:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/?p=9798#comment-264867</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I guess using Andrei&#039;s logic one can deduct that Pontiac&#039;s reasoning behind the Aztek was the same.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess using Andrei&#8217;s logic one can deduct that Pontiac&#8217;s reasoning behind the Aztek was the same.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JonPD</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2009/07/23/the-secret-history-of-the-mini-r60-crossover/comment-page-1/#comment-264857</link>
		<dc:creator>JonPD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 17:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/?p=9798#comment-264857</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ok Andrei now list for me all the SUV&#039;s including micro crossovers that are competing.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t expect we will ever see any Mini with a 2 liter motor. The R60 is built with the idea of getting a small family over a little bit of snow (for those that need a cruch imo), the WRX though seating 5 was still built from the ground up to be a performance car something the R60 will never be (even in JCW form)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok Andrei now list for me all the SUV&#8217;s including micro crossovers that are competing.</p>

<p>I don&#8217;t expect we will ever see any Mini with a 2 liter motor. The R60 is built with the idea of getting a small family over a little bit of snow (for those that need a cruch imo), the WRX though seating 5 was still built from the ground up to be a performance car something the R60 will never be (even in JCW form)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrei</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2009/07/23/the-secret-history-of-the-mini-r60-crossover/comment-page-1/#comment-264800</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/?p=9798#comment-264800</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Rallying is heavily based on &quot;homologation&quot;. The manufacturers need to build X examples before it can be rallied (where X is a number like 2500 or 5000 depending on the class). You can sell these vehicles off at a loss if need be or you can convince the Suburban Assault Vehicle crowd that this is what they need at MSRP. If you can get US soccer moms to buy your homologation minimums, brilliant.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But, if you don&#039;t have a 2 or 2.5 litre turbo engine, you can&#039;t just drop one in, it has to be available to X customers, no specials that are not production based. If you don&#039;t have 4wd you can&#039;t install one.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The rally engine and drivetrain can be modified heavily within the rules, but it would be a stretch to take a 1.4T-FWD and turn it into a 2.0T-4WD. (quite unlike NASCAR)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The classic Mini went through this same process, that is where the Cooper S got its 1071cc and 1275cc engine and larger disc brakes.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Rover produced a thing called the Metro 6R4 back in the day and produced the required minimum number to be homologated for rallying. They were rallied, did well and the surplus units were sold off for whatever they could get for them. And it was based on the Rover Metro grocery getter.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Ford is currently rallying the Focus, not exactly a street legal racecar when you go out to your local dealer and talk to the guy in the plaid pants and white shoes. But if you go to a dealer in the UK you can order a Focus RS with a 300HP 2.5L turbo, just like the one they run in the WRC.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The Audi Quattro came out of world rallying.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The same process is done in racing, vis the Ford GT40, Ferrari 250 GTO (&quot;Gran Turismo Omologato&quot;)...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Do you think that all of those scooby WRXs running around with gold wheels and hood scoops were sold because moms could rely on the safety of a 4wd system to get over curbs at the soccer field? No, rally on Saturday, sell on Monday.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rallying is heavily based on &#8220;homologation&#8221;. The manufacturers need to build X examples before it can be rallied (where X is a number like 2500 or 5000 depending on the class). You can sell these vehicles off at a loss if need be or you can convince the Suburban Assault Vehicle crowd that this is what they need at MSRP. If you can get US soccer moms to buy your homologation minimums, brilliant.</p>

<p>But, if you don&#8217;t have a 2 or 2.5 litre turbo engine, you can&#8217;t just drop one in, it has to be available to X customers, no specials that are not production based. If you don&#8217;t have 4wd you can&#8217;t install one.</p>

<p>The rally engine and drivetrain can be modified heavily within the rules, but it would be a stretch to take a 1.4T-FWD and turn it into a 2.0T-4WD. (quite unlike NASCAR)</p>

<p>The classic Mini went through this same process, that is where the Cooper S got its 1071cc and 1275cc engine and larger disc brakes.</p>

<p>Rover produced a thing called the Metro 6R4 back in the day and produced the required minimum number to be homologated for rallying. They were rallied, did well and the surplus units were sold off for whatever they could get for them. And it was based on the Rover Metro grocery getter.</p>

<p>Ford is currently rallying the Focus, not exactly a street legal racecar when you go out to your local dealer and talk to the guy in the plaid pants and white shoes. But if you go to a dealer in the UK you can order a Focus RS with a 300HP 2.5L turbo, just like the one they run in the WRC.</p>

<p>The Audi Quattro came out of world rallying.</p>

<p>The same process is done in racing, vis the Ford GT40, Ferrari 250 GTO (&#8220;Gran Turismo Omologato&#8221;)&#8230;</p>

<p>Do you think that all of those scooby WRXs running around with gold wheels and hood scoops were sold because moms could rely on the safety of a 4wd system to get over curbs at the soccer field? No, rally on Saturday, sell on Monday.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JonPD</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2009/07/23/the-secret-history-of-the-mini-r60-crossover/comment-page-1/#comment-264785</link>
		<dc:creator>JonPD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/?p=9798#comment-264785</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Andrei think Mini has said that the R60 is aimed squarely at the suv obsessed US, though I am sure they will sell it in many more markets.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As for rallying the R60 is a soft-road vehicle that is going to be slower and more sluggish around corners than the Coupe and Clubman. Not a great place for a rally car. The AWD system is being made with the idea of getting a soccer mom across a snowy parking lot not for thundering down nasty b roads. I am pretty sure we are going to see a JCW version (bleh). Still at the end of the day you will have a slower, softer, and heavier vehicle than either the R55 or R56.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrei think Mini has said that the R60 is aimed squarely at the suv obsessed US, though I am sure they will sell it in many more markets.</p>

<p>As for rallying the R60 is a soft-road vehicle that is going to be slower and more sluggish around corners than the Coupe and Clubman. Not a great place for a rally car. The AWD system is being made with the idea of getting a soccer mom across a snowy parking lot not for thundering down nasty b roads. I am pretty sure we are going to see a JCW version (bleh). Still at the end of the day you will have a slower, softer, and heavier vehicle than either the R55 or R56.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrei</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2009/07/23/the-secret-history-of-the-mini-r60-crossover/comment-page-1/#comment-264752</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 06:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/?p=9798#comment-264752</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You are all missing a couple of bits:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;1) They build vehicles in the target market, in this case Europe.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;2) Rallying. Rallying sells vehicles of this type (WRX, EVO, ...).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Carnac says stay tuned for a 4WD 2L Turbo version RSN.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are all missing a couple of bits:</p>

<p>1) They build vehicles in the target market, in this case Europe.</p>

<p>2) Rallying. Rallying sells vehicles of this type (WRX, EVO, &#8230;).</p>

<p>Carnac says stay tuned for a 4WD 2L Turbo version RSN.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C4</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2009/07/23/the-secret-history-of-the-mini-r60-crossover/comment-page-1/#comment-264494</link>
		<dc:creator>C4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/?p=9798#comment-264494</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;In Europe the Clubman seats 5 (in a pinch of course) but MINIs by far and large are strictly 4 seater vehicles. JonPD, I could not agree more. A Bigger crossover that only seats 4 is pretty lousy given the added weight and heft.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you have a family, you&#039;ll do much better with a 4 door or a station wagon 3 series.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Europe the Clubman seats 5 (in a pinch of course) but MINIs by far and large are strictly 4 seater vehicles. JonPD, I could not agree more. A Bigger crossover that only seats 4 is pretty lousy given the added weight and heft.</p>

<p>If you have a family, you&#8217;ll do much better with a 4 door or a station wagon 3 series.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JonPD</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2009/07/23/the-secret-history-of-the-mini-r60-crossover/comment-page-1/#comment-264479</link>
		<dc:creator>JonPD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/?p=9798#comment-264479</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Pretty sure at the end of the day between sales of the R60 and the X1 that more X1&#039;s will be sold because of seating 5 than R60 because it has 4 doors. A massive number of families just plainly need more room than 4 seats.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Heck here is a another need for you BMW, maybe time to make yet another larger and heavier &quot;mini&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty sure at the end of the day between sales of the R60 and the X1 that more X1&#8242;s will be sold because of seating 5 than R60 because it has 4 doors. A massive number of families just plainly need more room than 4 seats.</p>

<p>Heck here is a another need for you BMW, maybe time to make yet another larger and heavier &#8220;mini&#8221;.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

