<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Countryman Photo &amp; Video Recap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.motoringfile.com/2010/01/26/countryman-photo-video-recap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2010/01/26/countryman-photo-video-recap/</link>
	<description>MotoringFile &#124; MINI news, reviews and opinion. MINI Cooper, Cooper S, Clubman, Countryman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:32:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fanzypantz</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2010/01/26/countryman-photo-video-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-292606</link>
		<dc:creator>Fanzypantz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/?p=11103#comment-292606</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Anyone know the curb weight... has to be 300-400 lbs more. Apparently MINI is using the 1.6L variants so it will be an exciting yawn 0-60. Will MINI offer the diesel variants in the US?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Look wise... I&#039;d describe it as fugly cute.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone know the curb weight&#8230; has to be 300-400 lbs more. Apparently MINI is using the 1.6L variants so it will be an exciting yawn 0-60. Will MINI offer the diesel variants in the US?</p>

<p>Look wise&#8230; I&#8217;d describe it as fugly cute.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lavardera</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2010/01/26/countryman-photo-video-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-292538</link>
		<dc:creator>lavardera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 15:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/?p=11103#comment-292538</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;no sense of humor today, oh well&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no sense of humor today, oh well</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C4</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2010/01/26/countryman-photo-video-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-292492</link>
		<dc:creator>C4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 03:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/?p=11103#comment-292492</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I am not going to take your bait, Lav. You are too much of a R56 apologist to even bother...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not going to take your bait, Lav. You are too much of a R56 apologist to even bother&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lavardera</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2010/01/26/countryman-photo-video-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-292434</link>
		<dc:creator>lavardera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/?p=11103#comment-292434</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;you mean you think the little wheels look alright?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you mean you think the little wheels look alright?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C4</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2010/01/26/countryman-photo-video-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-292401</link>
		<dc:creator>C4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/?p=11103#comment-292401</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry Lavardera, but pretty much like in the last 3 years, we will continue to agree to disagree on this one as well.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Lavardera, but pretty much like in the last 3 years, we will continue to agree to disagree on this one as well.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glangford</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2010/01/26/countryman-photo-video-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-292219</link>
		<dc:creator>glangford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/?p=11103#comment-292219</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I agree. I like it alot.  It may be my next car.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think aside from the usual &#039;haters&#039; the comments have been overall positive, more so than I anticipated particularly with the comments when the &#039;test mule&#039; was exposed and the concept proposed.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. I like it alot.  It may be my next car.</p>

<p>I think aside from the usual &#8216;haters&#8217; the comments have been overall positive, more so than I anticipated particularly with the comments when the &#8216;test mule&#8217; was exposed and the concept proposed.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lavardera</title>
		<link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2010/01/26/countryman-photo-video-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-292193</link>
		<dc:creator>lavardera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motoringfile.com/?p=11103#comment-292193</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well its here, and all the fear and angst is finally out of the closet. Funny how it brings out a raft of stale crits of the R56 along with the die-hard haters of this model!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think the design is well done. The shape is right, the size smaller than I expected, the interior moves reinforce the &quot;family&quot; begun with the R56, and like it or not the center stack affirms the R56 more than revolutionizes it. Sorry stack haters - you loose that one. My only complaint is the road-going wheel/tire combination looks too small in diameter for the size of the car. The larger diameter on the Beachcomber looked so much more right, and the road wheels with low profile tires need that same overall diameter.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well its here, and all the fear and angst is finally out of the closet. Funny how it brings out a raft of stale crits of the R56 along with the die-hard haters of this model!</p>

<p>I think the design is well done. The shape is right, the size smaller than I expected, the interior moves reinforce the &#8220;family&#8221; begun with the R56, and like it or not the center stack affirms the R56 more than revolutionizes it. Sorry stack haters &#8211; you loose that one. My only complaint is the road-going wheel/tire combination looks too small in diameter for the size of the car. The larger diameter on the Beachcomber looked so much more right, and the road wheels with low profile tires need that same overall diameter.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

