Next Gen MINI three Cylinder Driven

A lot is going to change with the next generation MINI. The aesthetic design of the car will be part evolution and part revolution, and the underlying chassis platform was designed from a blank sheet in close collaboration with BMW. At the center of all this change is a new family of engines — not simply a refresh, but a whole new engine platform. It’s the soul of the machine, so MINI fans around the world are hoping BMW gets them right. As we’ve previously reported, the engine lineup for future MINIs (and a few cars in the BMW lineup) is based on a half-liter-per-cylinder platform. This will mean not only a drop in engine displacement from 1,600cc to 1,500cc, but a change from four cylinders down to three.

Perhaps “down” is the wrong way to put it, though. Doing more with less has always been at the heart of MINI.

Between BMW’s Valvetronic technology and MINI’s experience with twin-scroll turbos, getting performance out of 1,500cc shouldn’t be an issue — and we should see impressive mpg numbers to boot. That’s kind of a given at this point. But there are those who will look down their bonnet at a three cylinder engine just on principle. We say that’s premature. In fact, we anticipate that the three cylinder engine in the F56 will be chock full of character and growl. Autocar got its hands on a three cylinder 1-series prototype and they seem to be confirming our hopes:


It is the responsiveness of the new unit, though, that really stands out, giving it the sort of sporting attributes that have become part and parceled of just about all BMW engines down through the years. We are yet to discover exactly how much boost pressure it runs, but there is little hint of lag, just a lovely linear flow of power.

It sounds great, too, different to BMW’s existing four- and six-cylinder in a lot of ways. There is less of the characteristic turbine whine and more of a mechanical growl from up front, and the exhaust note is deeper with a character not unlike that of Subaru’s horizontally opposed four-cylinder once the revs begin to rise. And rise they do. As Steinpanzer explains: “One of the key development goals was to ensure the B38 could be carry its revs like traditional four- and six-cylinder BMW engines. We didn’t want to give up that unique selling point.” The delivery is sophisticated, with strong urge from around 1500rpm well past the 5000rpm mark. Keep it spinning – and with such a fascinating exhaust note there is great incentive to do just that – and it will pull to 6500rpm before the onset of the electric rev limiter.

With some 44bhp and 37lb ft more than the turbocharged 1.6-litre four-cylinder used by the 116i, I’d suggest the prototype it would record a 0-62mph time of less than 8.0sec. On light throttle loads and typical motorway speeds, the trip computer also suggested something in the region of 56mpg, although as BMW was quick to point out this should only be taken as a very rough guide. It is, after all, just a prototype.

None of this sounds like bad news. Great throttle response, lots of power, and tons of growly character. This squares with early three cylinder prototype MINI reports we’ve heard off the record as well. Power and pull aside, anything in the neighborhood of 56 mpg on the (presumedly) heavier 1-series is phenomenal. Fuel economy is at the center of this new engine program, so these numbers are not that surprising, even if they are encouraging.

So take heart, MINI fans, I think we’re in for a good change here.

[Source: Autocar]

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Written By: Nathaniel Salzman

  • slap

    56mpg (UK) = 45mpg (US)

    • http://www.nathanielsalzman.com/ Nathaniel Salzman

      Still. Bigger car and prototype setup. Sign of good things to come.

      • BimmerFile_Michael

        The difference in size of the F20 1 Series to the MINI hatch is very significant a MINI will easily get high 40s on the EPA cycle.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Scott-Eaves/100002517570191 Scott Eaves

      I’d be quite happy with 45mpg.

  • Barry

    Wow! Now that SAABs are going it looks like there may be a bmw in my future

  • Evan

    There’s a video out on the web with sound and the character of the 3-cylinder is really great- growl and warbble with acceleration and quiet at cruise. I think it’ll fit the MINI perfectly- plus it’s smaller, lighter, and gets much better fuel mileage without a loss in power… BMW knows how to build a great engine, and this three cylinder is sounding like a winner! I really can’t wait for the F56 to debut…. A year seems so far away….

    • http://www.nathanielsalzman.com/ Nathaniel Salzman

      We’ll get sneak peaks and online previews before then. Once the dust settles on the new BMW concept and that actual car debuts, I bet we’ll see more and more F56 stuff start to come out of the wood work. The real wait will be for those looking to actually buy one.

  • http://www.facebook.com/charles.r.luxton Charles Rob Luxton

    now if they would just bring that 1 series hatch to america

    • BimmerFile_Michael

      They had the chance, BMWNA said no thanks so it will not be coming. Its a shame. the M135i 5 door is the best hot hatch ever and the US will never see it… makes any GTI or whatever just not even relevant.

      • Blainestang

        To be fair, a GTI is nowhere near the price of a 135, let alone an M135 5-door, but that being said, I agree that BMW missed out by saying “no thanks” to the 1-series hatch. For me, BMW doesn’t offer anything I’m interested in anymore. The only things that come close are the 1M (sold out), the 3-series wagon ($40k starting point and only the base engine is available), and maybe an M3 Sedan (it’s unnecessarily large, heavy, and expensive… and the Coupe is worse). The rest of the lineup essentially fits into the “unnecessarily large, heavy, and expensive” category, too.

  • piperbud

    Can you imagine the mileage a 3 cylinder diesel could yield! If the primary objective is economy diesel would seem to be the ultimate solution for both the Ultimate Driving Machine and MINI. And although the sonorous warble may be pleasing, thrifty fuel consumption should be considered the trump card.

  • piperbud

    With a lighter and more fuel efficient engine it would seem logical fro MINI to consider building a commensurately small scale, authentic, “mini” MINI i.e., a micro-car designed to carry the Isigonis torch of tradition that will also enable MINI to more effectively compete in the burgeoning micro-car marketplace.

    • http://www.nathanielsalzman.com/ Nathaniel Salzman

      MINI would love to bring a Rocketman-like car to market, but scaleable as the F56 platform is, it doesn’t scale that small. That makes developing such a car cost-prohibative for BMW. That is, at any selling price that the market would bear. As we’ve reported previously, there are rumors that MINI may partner with Toyota on a joint platform venture that would make such a car possible. Don’t hold your breath though.

      • piper

        If projected sales volume looked promising I cannot imagine MINI not tapping into it. It is a no-brainer proposition to pair smaller engines with smaller chassis. If other manufacturers can do it, so can MINI/BMW given their combined engineering prowess and desire to capture market share in a burgeoning segment.

      • ulrichd

        Wasn’t there a story of the next Scion iQ and Rocketman sharing a platform?

        • http://www.nathanielsalzman.com/ Nathaniel Salzman

          Yup. That’s the rumor. We’ll see.

        • BimmerFile_Michael

          Not so sure its a rumor :)

  • piperbud

    MINI appears to enjoy pursuing “broad spectrum” game plan by attempting to offer something for everyone. Is it time to consider a logical extension in the form of a narrow angle V6 that would be negligibly larger than the 4 and offer excellent power-to-weight distribution, not to mention stellar performance potential.

  • scotteast

    It’s hard for me to hear ’3 cylinder engine’ and not think of a Geo Metro. I know this will be a better car in every possible way, but it’s going to take time for me to get used to the idea.

    • piper

      Next step may be a horizontally opposed 2-cylinder BMW tricycle. You never know what BMW has brewing with Oktoberfest just around the corner! Brings to mind the Isetta et al …

    • rick92f

      It makes me think of a Speed Triple or Rocket III.

      • http://www.nathanielsalzman.com/ Nathaniel Salzman

        Me too!

        The Triumph 3-cylinder motors are fantastic. Torquey as hell yet very, very smooth. There was at one point a whole sidebar to this article about motorcycle engines that I edited out. Glad I’m not the only one who made that connection.

        • Blainestang

          Agreed… similar performance, better efficiency, and more character. That could practically be a slogan for MINI. This new engine fits MINI perfectly.

  • piper

    Most will agree that BMW/MINI is not lacking when it comes to innovative engineering, hence the frugal 3-cylinder engine initiative. Hopefully we will see some truly progressive performance strides in the near future including AWD combined with AWS (all-wheel steering). BMW/MINI need to be in the vanguard and not follow the lead of Porsche, for example, that will soon incorporate both technologies in the next generation Turbo models.

    • BimmerFile_Michael

      BMW already offers AWD and AWS and has for the last 4 model years, just on larger cars where it makes a lot of sense. People seem to forget this.

  • piper

    Aside from engineering, MINI would be well-advised to focus more heavily on refining its design aesthetic. The cars all echo our national affliction — obesity! Let’s send CAD programs to Weight Watchers and monitor the results. We could end up with the Biggest Winner for being the Biggest Loser! It’s not their physical weight. It’s their girth and bloated physiques that detracts from their beauty.


Sort by MINI model







MINI Model Cheat Sheet

1st Gen MINI
R50: One & MC Hatch
R52: All 1st Gen MINI Convt.
R53: MCS Hatch
2nd Gen MINI
R55: Clubman
R56: Hatch
R57: Convertible
R58: Coupe
R59: Roadster
R60: MINI Crossover
R61: MINI Crossover Coupe
3rd Gen MINI
F55: Clubman
F56: Hatch
F57: Convertible
F60: MINI Crossover
F62: Traveller

Advertise with MotoringFile

If you or your company are interested in advertising on the most influential MINI website in the world, please visit our Advertising section. If you have further questions about becoming a sponsor or would like to see our rate sheet please feel free to contact us directly.
mini mini
Translate MotoringFile with Google: 
 
BF

SF

MotoringFile Buyers Guides

R50 ('02-'06 MC) Buyers Guide
R53 ('02-'06 MCS) Buyers Guide






MotoringFile Reviews

Reviews:
'12 JCW Coupe
'11 Fiat 500 Sport
'11 Tesla Roaster 2.5 '11 Countryman Comparo
'11 Cooper S Hatch
'11 Countryman MCS (FWD)
'11 Countryman MC (auto)
'10 Mayfair MCS (auto)
'11 Countryman MCS (ALL4)
'10 MINI E
'10 Tesla Roadster Sport
'09 Cooper S Convertible
'09 JCW Hatch
'09 JCW Clubman
JCW Stage I vs JCW Stage II
'08 Clubman S (Auto)
1st Drive: '08 MINI Clubman
'08 Smart Fourtwo
Comparison: '08 BMW 135i
'06 R53 MCS vs '07 R56 MCS
'07 R56 JCW (Stage 1)
'07 MINI Cooper S Long Term
'07 BMW Z4 M Coupe
'07 MINI Cooper & Cooper S
Audio: '07 MC/MCS at the Track
'06 JCW GP Long term
Reader Review: JCW GP
'06 JCW Cooper S Long Term
Comparison: '06 Lotus Elise
Comparison: '06 Mazda MX5
Comparison: '06 UK Focus ST
Comparison: '06 Civic Si
Comparison: '04 TVR T350
Comparison: '06 Nissan 350z
Comparison: '06 VW GTI w/DSG
Podcast: Cooper S Auto
Podcast: BMW 325i
Podcast: JCW MC Soundkit
'04 JCW MINI Cooper Tuning Kit
'05 MCS: One Month Review
'05 MCS Auto
'05 JCW S 1st Drive
'05 MINI Cooper
'05 MCS Conv. Long Term
'05 MINI Cooper S
'05 MCS Cabrio 1st Drive
'04 JCW MCS First Drive
'04 MC w/JCW Tuning Kit
BMW M3 SMG Vs. MCS
'04 MINI Cooper CVT
'02 MCS 3 year Review
Autocrossing the MINI Range


cafepress