Logo



MotoringFile First Drive: MINI Paceman

When the BMW X6 was introduced there was no one clamoring for a less functional, sportier version of the X5. Yet sales followed at a pace that made BMW look like geniuses, and other automakers took note. Now MINI has introduced its own crossover coupe in the MINI Paceman. Is the Paceman another answer to a question no one was asking? Or is it another brilliant move?

This was the question I kept asking myself from behind the wheel of the Paceman, and I got my answer. It came around mid-day, climbing into the Spanish mountains with the Mediterranean in full view. Corner after corner, our Cooper S test car made the case that the Countryman never quite proved — that a 3,000 lbs crossover has a right to wear the MINI badge.

Many cars that look better in person than in photos. Count the Paceman among them. The Paceman has wider rear flanks than the Countryman, and is simply more voluptuous in person. The 3/4 rear view looked rather dramatic the first time I saw it. I immediately got the sense that the Paceman was a bit of a playground for the MINI Design team. The rear lights are turned horizontal, which helps visually lengthen the car. They have a jeweled quality that looks all the more impressive lit up. Add to that the subtle creases and curves of the body lines and we have a MINI that looks sculpted in a decidedly modern way.

Obvious care and intention went into crafting the Paceman’s shape. In our eyes the results are striking. From the refreshed grille up front, to the sloping rear window, the Paceman has a unique visual identity that speaks of its sporting potential. Luckily, our drive through the western island of Mallorca saw that potential realized.

Throughout the elevation changes and tight corners, the Paceman never felt out of its league. The feedback and general composure was not only miles ahead of any other small crossover, but a significant improvement over the Countryman. This isn’t by accident. MINI has re-calibrated the electric steering and endowed the car with more of that all-important characteristic: feel. With a relatively quick ratio and a bit more nuance in the corners, the Paceman simply feels more eager than the Countryman.

A revised suspension also helps the Paceman’s case. Essentially, MINI took the Sport suspension from the Countryman, optimized it for this car, and fitted it to the Paceman as standard. Because of these adjustments, the Paceman sits one cm lower than the R60, which impacts how the car looks, but more importantly, drops the center of gravity slightly. It may not sound like much, but the better body control of the stiffer suspension, along with the lower ride height, gives the Paceman a more agile feel. Those concerned about outright comfort can still opt for the standard suspension, but be warned, it’ll be a lot less fun.

For all its capability, the Paceman is still no MINI Hardtop. I could feel the extra 200-300 pounds when pushing the car hard. That said, for a crossover with no right to do so, the Paceman produced ear-to-ear grins in the Mallorca canyon switch-backs. Our front wheel drive Cooper S test car lacked the neutrality of the All4 set-up, but it weighed less and felt much closer to the R56’s reflexes than any Countryman we’ve ever driven. This despite being nearly identical in weight. In total, each model of the Paceman weighs around 30-40 lbs less than the Countryman.

Another of the more obvious changes between the two cars is the lack of rear doors. However, simply removing two doors wasn’t a straightforward exercise. MINI Design had some aesthetic issues to solve in removing two doors from a car the height and length of the R60. The Paceman’s front doors are actually smaller than they appear. A large 5-6″ lip on the trailing end of the door increases the visual length of the door and moves the cut-line further towards the rear wheels. It works well for the design but creates an issue opening the doors in tight parking spots.

While the exterior features major changes over the Countryman, the interior (at least up front) sees only minor but welcome tweaks. Yes, the window controls have moved to the doors. Does that impact the character of the car? Absolutely not. In fact, I welcome the change. MINI can be MINI in a number of ways and the placement of window controls has confused people for years. In my mind, it’s a welcome change and one that we’ll eventually see across all MINIs.

MINI Design also addressed the massive grey plastic surround in the center of the dash that cradled the speedo and center vents. The secondary part of the trim is now the same color and pattern as the dash, effectively making it disappear from sight. This reduces the visual weight of the design, making it much less of an eyesore.

In the back, things are decidedly different than the Countryman. With the rear doors gone, MINI has locked in a rear bucket seat layout. While similar to the four door Countryman, the Paceman’s rear seating has crucial differences. For example, the seats have a deeper bottom cushion with more aggressive side bolstering. The result is comfortable and more secure in the corners. Headroom was more than adequate for my 6’2″ frame despite the sloping roofline.

Exclusive to the Paceman are optional factory 19″ wheels. These aren’t JCW wheels either. However, in talking with MINI, the best setup for both comfort and handling feel is still the standard 17″ option. Comfort aside, those 19″ wheels fill up the wheel wells very nicely.

Drivetrains across all models are identical to the Countryman. The US still only gets the Cooper, Cooper S and JCW (starting spring 2013). However, one notable difference to the 2012 Countryman is the updated clutch. Both the manual-equipped Paceman and 2013 Countryman will have the upgrade, which allows for better engagement and more feel.

With the Paceman, MINI didn’t set out to right the wrongs of the Countryman. Clearly the Countryman is doing just fine, with sales exceeding that of the hatch last month in the US. Yet with the Paceman, MINI had an opportunity to prove that their larger platform can be more of what people think of as MINI-like. On the switchbacks of Mallorca it did just that. I can also say that as someone who lived with a Cooper S Countryman All4 for a year, the Paceman is a revelation. It’s quick-witted and more MINI-like in its attitude, yet it stays true to BMW’s “Sport Activity Vehicle” ethos.

Look for the Paceman to hit US dealerships in March of 2013, with the Cooper S priced around $28,000. That’s about $1,500 more than the comparable Countryman, and this price offset will hold across the entire lineup. The range will include the Cooper and Cooper S at launch, with the JCW following shortly thereafter.

Does a crossover coupe make sense? Obviously, if you don’t like the look, go elsewhere. But if you connect with it, the Paceman is an intriguing and entertaining proposition for those looking for a all-weather, vehicle with quick wits. It’s also practical than expected, with more boot space than the Countryman and roomier, more comfortable seating than the R56.

I’ll be frank. In concept, I struggled to look past the size and weight of this car, especially coupled with the lack of rear doors. Yet in the flesh, all those concerns melted away while the style, presence and driving experience of this car took over. It won’t be the practical workhorse the Countryman is for many. Yet for those who are willing to trade a little practicality, the Paceman offers a lot of style and rewards that compromise with a significant handling upgrade. All-in-all, the Paceman is a welcome addition to the MINI line-up, but most of all, a welcome iteration on the Countryman.

Official Paceman Gallery

Paceman Specifications

MINI Detailed Specifications (PDF)

Written By: Gabe

  • e88

    The design is great. I just think they missed the mark by not having a clubman door on the passenger side. Perfect second vehicle for a lot of people that just drive to work with no kids during the week. But on the weekends when one might need to take the toddler or kid out – the lack of the third door is an issue. My $0.02.

    • Chris Underwood

      Agreed, although I would have added the club doors to both sides. One side never made much sense to me.

      • http://bridger.us/ Gabriel Bridger

        MINI didn’t want the extra weight and complexity of two club doors on Paceman. The next gen Clubman gets that.

        • http://borborygmist.influxofdust.com/ Wayne Dyer

          I can’t get past the rear-view-blocking rear doors on the Clubman. Then again what put me off the Coupe is the limited rear visibility. I’m hoping it will be better here, my wife’s looking forward to the Paceman perhaps replacing her ’04 MC. (My ’07 MCS has some life left in it yet…)

        • http://www.facebook.com/frank.granados.733 Frank Granados

          This is good news. We will be looking to trade our ’08 R55 S in about 2-3 years time, so we are looking forward to Clubman v2.0.

      • nick dawson

        I totally agree with you Chris, and I think that the lack of a four door option is a missed opportunity. Land Rover’s best selling model, the Evoque, is made with either two or four doors, with the four door model outselling the two door model. I hear what Gabe is saying, but BMW’s own market research predicts that the four door F55 Hatch will be its best selling MINI. Europeans, in general, value convenience and practicality over style when choosing cars, and I suspect that the long and heavy two doors on the Paceman will discourage many potential customers.

        • http://www.nathanielsalzman.com/ Nathaniel Salzman

          Yeah, if only MINI offered a car this size with four doors. Oh wait… ;-)

        • nick dawson

          F55 will be smaller than R61, and F54 will have six doors and a lrage cargo area. There is still a large market segment for a four door Paceman.

        • http://www.nathanielsalzman.com/ Nathaniel Salzman

          I’m being facetious, per usual. We expected to see the Paceman with club doors, and while I was disappointed to see them absent at first, I appreciate the purity of the Paceman as-is. That said, club doors would be one hell of an option. And as you’re saying, a lot of people would likely check that box. I’m hoping what we’ve heard in terms of the upcoming Clubman having a pair of club doors turns out to be true. That lack of symmetry has always bothered me.

        • nick dawson

          Yes I realized that :). The jury is still out on whether the rear side passenger doors on the second gen Clubman will be Club doors or conventional doors. I previously owned two Clubmans, and I found the one Club door (on the drivers side in the UK) really useful for loading stuff onto the back seat, but adult passengers disliked having to wait to be let out.

          One reliable source has said that the rear passenger doors on Clubman 2 will be Club style, whereas another equally reliable source has said that they will be convential doors mounted on the ‘B’ pillar. The latter makes more sense, because it is easier and cheaper, from an engineering point of view, to meet forthcoming side impact legislation, and saves weight.

          As a matter of interest, the latest ‘Breaking News’ on F58 Traveller is that it will have a seven seat option.

        • http://www.nathanielsalzman.com/ Nathaniel Salzman

          Seven seats and no boot!

        • nick dawson

          Not necessarily, rumour has it that BMW has signed up Dr Who as consultant interior designer on the Traveller ;)

        • http://www.nathanielsalzman.com/ Nathaniel Salzman

          Yeah, but then you end up with a vehicle that’s intended to be driven by six people. You’d be running all over the place pulling levers and bouncing off the time vortex. Then again, you could arrive before you leave, so that’d be cool. Plus, swimming pool!

  • http://www.jwardell.com/ jwardell

    This is the first MINI to grab my attention since the R53, and if I can make it happen financially I think I might be in line to trade up to a Paceman next year. It ticks all the marks I’m looking for with space, handling, non-FWD, and looks. I’ll have mine in black with a red roof! An extra thank you to MotoringFile for continuing to give the best reviews, as I’ve read plenty of others but none other are from the perspective of an existing MINI owner. Only you provide the small but important details like improved dash plastic, steering, and clutch feel that were all concerns of mine in the last few years!

  • yup

    The true successor to the R53

    • R.Burns

      Please don’t compare this new ugly SUV with the R53

  • Ian

    How’s the rear visibility? That rear window looks pretty narrow.

    • http://bridger.us/ Gabriel Bridger

      Less than the R60 but not as bad as I expected. And certainly a huge step up from the JCW Roadster I drive daily :)

      • Ian

        ha! I forgot who I was asking…

  • Jac Cottrell

    I always wanted an AWD MINI Coupe…this could be it! :) We own a ’11 CM ALL4, and while I really like it, i wish it were more like our R53. Can’t wait to drive one!

  • Jac Cottrell

    There is one pic of a red Paceman – is that the new CM red? Looks decent…

  • John McLauchlan

    Gabe, Do you any feedback on the revised R60/R61 clutch? Does it provide improved feel and feedback? Thanks!

    • http://bridger.us/ Gabriel Bridger

      Yes it’s exactly what was needed.

  • lavardera

    Plaid seats, huh? Well, how very Volkswagon…

    • http://bridger.us/ Gabriel Bridger

      So VW invented plaid seats in cars?

      • lavardera

        no, but pretty much has become the mark of the GTI.

  • Aurel

    This just looks great from every angle … real winner! But I still can’t wait to see what they will do with the next gen Clubman …

  • ftttu

    Will the Paceman be the first of the rest of the MINIs to wear their body style name? I would love to see MINI maintain their current method of only listing the performance level-First, One, Cooper, Cooper S and John Cooper Works. Well, we’ll have to wait and see I guess.

  • ftttu

    Oh, and another comment about the Paceman. I loved the size of my first Gen hardtop, but my 3 2nd Gens, though more comfortable and more refined, just weren’t mini anymore. I can’t remember now but it seems like I saw the 3rd Gen is even bigger which I only understand as being good business since it has broader appeal. Due to this Paceman being a jumbo-sized hardtop, I would love to see the hardtop, convertible, spyder, roadster and Clubman remain unchanged in the size department. The Rocketman, if I ever purchased a new MINI, would be the size I’m looking for……if only they would produce it and sell it here in the US.

    • http://bridger.us/ Gabriel Bridger

      The R56 is less than an inch longer and slight shorter than the R50/53 whiling weighing less. So roughly the same size while less weight. Look for that trend to continue.

  • John L.

    Another vehicle with the same philosophy as the Countryman/Paceman and the BMW X5/X6 is the Range Rover Evoque which is available in both 5-door and 3-door coupe. The Evoque is priced closer to the BMW than the MINI but the design concepts of the MINI pair are closer to the Evoque than the BMW. I chose an Evoque 5-door over the Countryman because it offers more space and load capacity yet offers driving dynamics not unlike the Countryman. It looks good parked next to my 2004 Cooper S.

  • http://www.facebook.com/frank.granados.733 Frank Granados

    Like it better than the Countryman. The design is far more cohesive but you give up the practicality of having 4 doors and likely the rear passenger room. I am not yet fully warmed up to the idea of MINI based crossovers anything but I think the Paceman can lure away would be Countryman buyers just on looks. Heck, this thing can even compete with the Land Rover Evoque 2-door.


Sort by MINI model

MotoringFile on Instagram








MINI Model Cheat Sheet

1st Gen MINI
R50: One & MC Hatch
R52: All 1st Gen MINI Convt.
R53: MCS Hatch
2nd Gen MINI
R55: Clubman
R56: Hatch
R57: Convertible
R58: Coupe
R59: Roadster
R60: MINI Crossover
R61: MINI Crossover Coupe
3rd Gen MINI
F54: Clubman
F55: Five Door Hatch
F56: Hatch
F57: Convertible
F60: MINI Crossover
F58: Traveller

Advertise with MotoringFile

If you or your company are interested in advertising on the most influential MINI website in the world, please visit our Advertising section. If you have further questions about becoming a sponsor or would like to see our rate sheet please feel free to contact us directly.
mini mini
Translate MotoringFile with Google: 
 

BF

MotoringFile Buyers Guides

R50 ('02-'06 MC) Buyers Guide
R53 ('02-'06 MCS) Buyers Guide

BF

SF



MotoringFile Reviews

Reviews:
'12 JCW Coupe
'11 Fiat 500 Sport
'11 Tesla Roaster 2.5 '11 Countryman Comparo
'11 Cooper S Hatch
'11 Countryman MCS (FWD)
'11 Countryman MC (auto)
'10 Mayfair MCS (auto)
'11 Countryman MCS (ALL4)
'10 MINI E
'10 Tesla Roadster Sport
'09 Cooper S Convertible
'09 JCW Hatch
'09 JCW Clubman
JCW Stage I vs JCW Stage II
'08 Clubman S (Auto)
1st Drive: '08 MINI Clubman
'08 Smart Fourtwo
Comparison: '08 BMW 135i
'06 R53 MCS vs '07 R56 MCS
'07 R56 JCW (Stage 1)
'07 MINI Cooper S Long Term
'07 BMW Z4 M Coupe
'07 MINI Cooper & Cooper S
Audio: '07 MC/MCS at the Track
'06 JCW GP Long term
Reader Review: JCW GP
'06 JCW Cooper S Long Term
Comparison: '06 Lotus Elise
Comparison: '06 Mazda MX5
Comparison: '06 UK Focus ST
Comparison: '06 Civic Si
Comparison: '04 TVR T350
Comparison: '06 Nissan 350z
Comparison: '06 VW GTI w/DSG
Podcast: Cooper S Auto
Podcast: BMW 325i
Podcast: JCW MC Soundkit
'04 JCW MINI Cooper Tuning Kit
'05 MCS: One Month Review
'05 MCS Auto
'05 JCW S 1st Drive
'05 MINI Cooper
'05 MCS Conv. Long Term
'05 MINI Cooper S
'05 MCS Cabrio 1st Drive
'04 JCW MCS First Drive
'04 MC w/JCW Tuning Kit
BMW M3 SMG Vs. MCS
'04 MINI Cooper CVT
'02 MCS 3 year Review
Autocrossing the MINI Range


cafepress