Sports Compact Car not only gives us a great review of the MCS with a JCW kit but they also go on to give a solid historical account of how the Cooper name came to be associated with the Mini/MINI and automobiles in general:
At age 15, John Cooper practically invented the mid-engine racecar with his friend Eric Brandon. The two created the single-seater Cooper 500 from two old Fiat Topolino front ends, powered it with a JAP motorcycle engine, and changed motoracing forever.
ÂÂ
The car's success, thanks to its unique mid-engine design and low price encouraged John and his father Charles to form the Cooper Car Company in the late 1940s.
A few years later, the Coopers built a rear-engine Formula 2 car, which was so small, light and well-balanced, it challenged the front-engine Formula 1 cars on the winding European circuits. Then in 1958, Stirling Moss drove a baby Cooper to the first-ever World Championship victory for a rear-engine car, and in 1959 and 1960, the Cooper Car Company won consecutive Formula 1 Constructor's World Championships.
In 1961, John took his mid-engine car to Indianapolis to compete against the much larger front-engine roadsters. With F1 star Jack Brabhan driving, the car finished ninth, but the die was cast. By 1962, every car on the Formula 1 grid had its engine behind the driver, and in 1965 a rear-engine, Ford-powered Lotus won the Indianapolis 500.
Other accomplishments include the Mini Cooper, which debuted in 1961, and eventually won four consecutive Monte Carlo rallies from 1964 to 1967, and a long list of performance parts and engine-tuning kits for the original Mini in the 1980s.
Although John Cooper died in 2000, the company he started with his dad is still going strong, and it's still tuning Minis. Only now, it's tuning the new MINI and John's son Mike is running the show.
You can read the entire article (and the actual JCW review) here.
<p>I just don't get the 0-60 times. They said that this one is much faster than the previous S that they tested, but it only shows it being .3 second quicker to 60 from the previous stock S, and that S had 17″ wheels and a sunroof, while the JCW had 16″ wheels.</p>
<p>Plus the 7.1 seconds for the JCW doesn't even beat the officially advertised numbers of the stock S's 6.9 seconds.</p>
<p>I would think that an extra 37 hp would do more and that the magazine would have said something</p>
<p>There could be a lot of factors that contributed to the slow times. Weather, track, driver etc.</p>
<p>Also consider that the test car had 195/55R-17 tires on 16×7″ rims. That can change your times drastically, and explains why they didn't do handling tests.</p>
<p>To each his own. Tyres aside, this review stat-wise doesn't seem correct. I think the only thing that the JCW gives you is a enough engine pep to make the ride more fun.</p>
<p>Well, they actually said that the test track was just re-surfaced and was still slick. They also said that there was a noticable difference in power even with the track problem.</p>
<p>First the 16″ rims should have provided quicker times than the 17″ rims on the standard S.</p>
<p>You are right on the resurfacing of the track. For a published 0-60 of 6.9seconds from BMW, I can't figure out why I have never seen a time from any modded Mini in a magazine of less than 7.0seconds, except for the BBR220. I know that a lot of conditions can be attributed to it, but you would figure that you would see something below 6.9 especially on a JCW or other modded Mini. The car in my opinion seems faster than 7.0seconds, which I guess is all that counts anyway.</p>
<p>Has anybody else had their MCS above 130? I have but my dealer says that can't be. The speedo is big enough so I don't think I misread it.</p>
<p>RB</p>
<p>Im pretty sure the Cooper S tops out at 135 and the Cooper at 124, so sure, seems logical to me. </p>
<p>I've had a G35 coupe at 155mph down I-294. I've never drivin to the loop and back so fast; now that was a rush! Best time to try it? A summer night at 11 p.m durin the week; just hope the cops aren't watchin.</p>