Our friends at Cars.com have some visual proof that the MINI Crossover (name TBD) has stepped foot onto US soil.
The official reveal is a few weeks away but look for photos to slip out from various sources before then. The Crossover will get its public debut at the Frankfurt motor show (this year it’ll be the mother of all shows if you’re a MINI/BMW fan) and should go on sale in the first half of 2010.
<p>And that in a nutshell is why people hate comments on the internet.</p>
<blockquote>I am weary of how more weight, and higher center of gravity, longer suspension travel, and awd will make this “MINI†drive.</blockquote>
<p>Are you serious? Oh gawd, please gimme a break!</p>
<p>I call things as I see them. The R60 is an abomination plain and simple. An insult to the core values and heritage of MINI. I am not alone on this line of thinking.</p>
<p>Last I checked, we still live in a free country. If we don’t like someone’s opinion we either challenge it or ignore it and move on.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Last I checked, we still live in a free country. If we don’t like someone’s opinion we either challenge it or ignore it and move on.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I think that’s what anybody reading comments on MF has learned to do when they see your name Frank – “move on”. Not that my opinions matter but I personally could care less if you don’t like something. Hell I can’t imagine I’m going to like the R60 myself (and I’ve been pretty upfront about that). But not liking <em>anything</em> at all usually means you stop coming to the site.</p>
<p>@<a href="#comment-263325" rel="nofollow">C4</a>: Ok… C4. Carry on hating. You’re free to say what you want and think what you want. I just thought I’d do the same for once. Have a nice day :)</p>
<p>@<a href="#comment-263322" rel="nofollow">C4</a>: umm, wow. in a tizzy today? if you have an opinion and some logic behind it, put it out there, but don’t just throw out one word hate messages.</p>
<p>it seems like all gabe wants is for the comments on his site to be intellectual, rather than trolling.</p>
<p>Here here! I can’t imagine how disappointing it must be for Gabe and co. to see the level of comments progressively drop. Honestly I have spent less time on this site in the last few months specifically because of these types of comments. The MF community belongs to all the readers and commenters. It would be really cool if we all stepped it up a notch with either:</p>
<p>A) Reasonably thoughtful comments that contribute to the community OR
B) Enough self-control to say, “hey, I have nothing of value to contribute to the dialog, so I’m going to keep my trap shut on this one.”</p>
<p>I’m not understanding the C4 hating… If this product is a failure, and MINI cancels it after 2 or 3 model years, then won’t people sharing C4’s opinion be pleased? Wouldn’t that provide encouragement for someone to generate such “anti-buzz” for the product as much and as loudly as they can? That’s what criticism is, right? Sharing an opinion with the intent to sway the opinions of others? The SUV backlash begins now, right? Sure Melis’ comment is more helpful, but it’s not like C4 was comment spamming.</p>
<p>People are entitled to their own opinion, but it does wear thin after a while… Im with Gabe.</p>
<p>I SWEAR I saw 2 driving on the Florida Turnpike near Gainesville on July 4th, but they had Camo Decals on them…not the other decals. I almost jumped out of my seat…freaked my wife out!</p>
<p>I agree with Chad. I think I understood C4’s one word comment perfectly – he thinks a MINI 4-door cross-over is a terrible idea, Brand, purity, concept, heritage-wise. Did not offend me, or seem troll-ish or spam-ish. I don’t agree with him, but he succinctly stated his point of view. Some will agree, others will not. I engoy reading all the comments on this Blog, pro and con and think no less of C4 for his opinion, as a fellow MINI traveller. “We have more in common than not.</p>
<p>For the sake of MINI’s karma, I hope they bring the speedster to production to counteract the ill effects of the crossover. Perhaps this will be MINIs “Cayenne” as in; bringing needed traffic and money into the dealerships to help finance other more exciting projects (ahem…speedster)</p>
<p>It looks almost as large as the BMW X1… I’m not sure I like that. I would’ve been alright with a four-wheel-drive five-door hatch (Fiesta-sized) MINI, but this is too large for my liking.</p>
<p>That said, I can see why BMW is bringing this car to the market. There’s a lot of demand for it (despite what MINI enthusiasts say)–a car for those who want the MINI style but aren’t ready to give up the space of larger vehicles.</p>
<p>Really feel that this product dilutes what a MINI is. The Clubman is acceptable as there are clear roots.</p>
<p>However, this is simply cashing in on the pseudo-4×4 gang. Now when people ask “What car do you drive” my response as “MINI” will now be met with “Which one”</p>
<p>When they do reveal this car, I sincerely hope that they call it a MAXI or something – it simply is, won’t and never will be a MINI.</p>
<p>I have always been proud of my R53 and admired the R56’s due to the real purity of the brand… this I think takes the shine away from it somewhere.</p>
<p>Any-hoo… I can still continue on my Supercharged adventures!</p>
<p>(PS – I have lurked on this site for years, but felt compelled to post for the first time!)</p>
<p>I hope it’s as successful as the cayenne. That way the mini division can open more dealerships & invest money into R&D so build an even better cooper and JCW models.</p>
<p>C4, it is unhelpful to simply comment “Terrible”. It would be equally unhelpful if I were to comment “Fugly”. Now if I expound on exactly what I find to be fugly, it suddenly becomes a useful and constructive comment worthy of further discussion. This is what Gabe was getting at in his first comment.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>I’m not understanding the C4 hating… If this product is a failure, and MINI cancels it after 2 or 3 model years, then won’t people sharing C4’s opinion be pleased?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>It’s not about loving or hating this car. I’m not arguing for it in anyway. It’s about the type of insidious and shallow comments that are illustrated well in the first on this article.</p>
<p>@<a href="#comment-263351" rel="nofollow">Gabe</a>: I would agree that it was a simplistic comment, but to call it insidious? That seems a bit overreaching.</p>
<p>I can understand that MINI thinks this is a good idea, but I can’t help but feel like it’s a mis-step for the brand. I just hope that it isn’t such a mis-step that it hurts the company.</p>
<p>I can’t really see one of these fitting in amongst the rest of the Mini family at various Mini events (especially those built around the Mini’s handling). And that might be the worst of it, from a community standpoint.</p>
<p>@<a href="#comment-263352" rel="nofollow">Chad</a>: It’s the long history of comments like that that go back years and are as often as 2-10 times a day that make it insidious.</p>
<p>I’m glad to see that the fancy yellow/black camo graphics have remained in use long enough to grace our shores. I’m sure the car will look awesome, if only for the loss of the vinyl!!!!</p>
<p>I don’t know if I dig it or not. I can’t tell with the crazy camo. But all this killing the brand chat cracks me up.</p>
<p>About 18 months, many on this site said the same of the Clubman. And though MINI sales are down, they’re far better than virtually all other manufacturers. Yes, I know Subaru and Kia are kicking ass right now. Yay.</p>
<p>Someone already made the Cayenne point, so I won’t, but the purists should be happy that the Clubman helps the brand to grow, so there will still be a brand.</p>
<p>I also can’t resist adding that I seem to recall C4 hating all over the Clubman way back when, and now owning one. Luckily for me, he’ll point out my error if I’m wrong.</p>
<p>Yeah, that crazy yellow camo WORKS, darn it. Need to see it up close and personal. Didn’t think I’d like the Clubman, until I saw it in the flesh. Same with this I think. It will fit with the MINI crowd that wants to stay with the MINI crowd, but have a family, or the need to carry passengers larger than a six year old. Now if only the price was right :-(</p>
<p>I’m thinking that maybe it works at a MINI gathering / club / track event…..mom (or dad) drives up in the Crossover, carrying the grille, kids, strollers etc…and the significant other drives up with little Jimmy or Susie strapped in, ready to have a go at the autocross. It may work….</p>
<p>How do or does that crazy back door/doors, system operate. I use GMC vans w/3 part doors for work and would not buy a car with them.
I have a Clubman S for 4 more days and the barn doors are ok but, 3?</p>
<p>Clubman S was my wifes car and she never complained about a blind spot.</p>
<p>Oh, and Chad.
Negative posted without thought are not interesting to others.</p>
<p>I agree with Gabe about C4. He has shown that he can put together a valuable comment but yet he continues to hide behind his anonymous pseudonym and spew his spam on almost every post here.</p>
<p>The photo that cars.com posted isn’t showing us MF readers anything new. I guess the new bit is that they’re testing it in CA and it makes me wonder…why ship the mule all the way over here for a test drive? I wonder if they’ve been test driving it across the US…</p>
<p>I too am concerned about the mass, bulk, ride height, of the car and whether it will still drive like a MINI should. We’ll see. I’m pretty hopeful though as this would be a perfect way for me to stick with the brand as my family gets another +1 in a couple of years. I can’t wait for the Frankfurt show.</p>
<p>As Jeremy Clarkson said about Tata, “I hope they make tons of money selling the Nano, and spend it all on fast Jags.”</p>
<p>We have nothing to lose by Mini adding new models (even if I have no interest in them) and making more money. My R53 will be the same great car when this comes out as it was when the remodeled R53 came out, when the R53 auto came out, when the R56 came out, when the Clubman came out…</p>
<p>Very good point about Jeremy Clarkson’s comment… on a similar line of thinking, Porsche fans were outraged when Porsche announced the Cayenne, yet it is the profits from the very successful SUV that have helped develop the current range of Porsche cars and have enabled the company to continue mostly on its own.</p>
<p>I’m not opposed to the Crossman, but I understand why many people would be. I also know that there are alot of people that would love something fun like a MINI but need legitimate 4 passenger capacity and also need something that has a bit more space than a Clubman. This car will sell well. If you don’t like it, at least understand that it is necessary to keep the MINI brand viable and will enable it to remain successful as a “seperate” brand within the BMW family. This is what you need to maintain an independent MINI dealer network and ownership experience. It is what you need to be able to expand the dealer network into new markets that do not have dealers. It is also what you need to keep the profits coming in to fund MINI’s other future projects.</p>
<p>It will be nice when we can actually see what it really looks like…then maybe some of the hand wringing will cease. The official reveal can’t come too soon for me. I can’t get a sense of this thing yet. That camo does its job well. I can’t wait to see the front and rear, and all the other design choices(especially the lights and grill)…and see it grouped with other MINIs to get a better sense of scale, as well as getting a feel for the future of MINI design in general. We may get an idea of the four door/hatch “wagon” variant–a model I think more would stand behind.</p>
<p>I can’t help but comment on the other topic that has surfaced in this thread. I appreciate Gabe’s frustration. I just tend to scroll through the comments, and don’t bother reading those from some contributors any more.</p>
<p>I was shocked at some of the pictures floating around showing the size next to regular people and other cars. Surprise, surprise, it’s really not that big at all. It might just be a nice little SAV when all is said and done.</p>
<p>I share some of the others concerns about diluting the brand, but just look back at the 60’s era variants and I think you’ll get an idea of what MINI is trying to do now. I believe wholeheartedly that they’ll position the R60 as the smallest (dare I say MINI’est) SAV in the marketplace which will still stay true to the “smaller is better” axiom they’ve always stood for.</p>
<p>Am I the only one who appreciates the black and yellow camo? I think it’s kinda funky. I’d like to take a test drive of the R57 in the trim shown above with Bootsy Collins riding shotgun.</p>
<p>Are we really still debating this vehicle. Those who like or need and can afford one will have one and those who hate won’t. It is that simple. We all know the regular posters who dislike this move by MINI. You have expressed yourself clearly. Now, give it a rest.</p>
<p>If you follow the link in one of the comments above, you’ll see that the ‘barn doors’ and the handle are fake on the Crossover…there’s a picture on the link showing the rear hatch fully opened in conventional hatch style….the commentary associated with the link indicates that it’s just a standard hatch, not any kind of multi-opening door.</p>
<p>Complaining is one thing, but the only thing worse to me is complaining about complaining. Why give someone the credit and attention they want. Just ignore it and move on. If no one ever pays attention to a complainer that person will get bored and move on. I see the same thing at China Car Times. Everyone complains that all the cars are copies of other cars on every post and everyone complains about that person complaining. Pretty annoying.</p>
<p>I parked my Clubman next to a Cayenne the other day and they are HUGE!! Actually the 911’s I’ve parked next to are even longer than my Clubman. Isn’t the Crossover only about 7-9 inches longer than the Clubman; so doesn’t that still make it the smallest “SAV” in production? And isn’t the new X1 about 18-20 inches longer than the Crossover?</p>
<p>Anyway, that “black and yellow camo” does do an amazing job of hiding the design, but in the process it also makes any new car design look horrible. And add in those black wheels and it is absolutely “butt” ugly.</p>
<p>I don’t know, I think I might like to rock that full wrap around San Francisco for awhile! Maybe the hippies will finally see me coming and not cut me off 😉 he.he.</p>
<p>For crying out loud people it’s not like MINI built a Ford Excursion and dropped a small turbo 4 banger in it and slapped MINI badges on it. I swear, I don’t know if it’s an American thing (and I’m American, and proud) or what??…but this tendency to make things worse than they actually are. I don’t get it? It’ll be barely any bigger than a Clubman and use design featires, technology and parts similar to what you find in pretty much any other MINI on sale today. Pipe the F down already. Sh!r! Not everyone can live with a two-door “mini” car and BMW needs to justify the continued expenditures on the MINI brand. This is the car (along with other forthcoming models) that will help you and many others continue to enjoy the MINI brand. I’d hate to know MINI’s future without it, because it will sell like f’ng hotcakes.</p>
<p>“In a Town Called Malice” The song I play while buzzing around in my “MINI” for a truly Mini Experience. So, I seen many pictures and the prototypes, yet this shot, I believe is the reason some find this MAXI-MINI butt ugg. I am sure that when it hits the shores, that we can call our MINI’s, The Mini-Mini, and the Clubman, the 4×4 will in my opinion be called and classified as the Maxi-Mini, or Mini-Ute. I LOVE my 2009 Mini, have only had it a month, have a 2001 RAV4, hate the RAV but used to think it was a super handling SUV, the Mini sticks to the road like glue, NO SWAY, even at 130kph in the pouring rain! I hope that this MAXIMINI, does as well, I’ll pre-order asap. PUT ME DOWN FOR 1 site unseen. Except, PLEASE…No Barn Doors, maybe Please a hatch style that opens window or window and Door flat fold down.</p>
<p>i didnt think Mini would end up producing this. Time to stop driving my r53 and seal it in the garage for a couple years then make a huge profit on it….Grrr MIni</p>
<p>blockquote> If you follow the link in one of the comments above, you’ll see that the ‘barn doors’ and the handle are fake on the Crossover…there’s a picture on the link showing the rear hatch fully opened in conventional hatch style….the commentary associated with the link indicates that it’s just a standard hatch, not any kind of multi-opening door.</p>
<p><</p>
<p>blockquote>
Thanks for the heads up.
You never know with mules.</p>
<p>For all the haters, this car is still small and Mini when compared to other small SUV’s. So chill.
Chris B. nailed it.</p>
<p>Gabe, Cheers to you for standing up to C4…
Everytime I log onto MOTORING File all I ever seem to read these days are the endless Rantings of this guy.
Regardless of wheter you like it or not, this this WILL sell like “HotCakes” as stated above. What I really am excited for is the Rally Opportunity that this car will open up for the brand. Targa NFLD is one thing, but for BMW to have a serious push into WRC and a serious MINI entry into DAKAR are going to re-establish MINI as a racing force on the world stage.
Everyone seems to forget that MINI has a very coloured Rally Heritage…Monte Carlo anyone???
If you think you can compete in a WRC without 4-wheel drive then you obviously havent read your history…there was before Quattro – and there was after Quattro (Audi for those who dont know)
Call this new model whatever you want to call it…I actually like the name “MINI Terrible” the brand has always been able to get away with tongue-in-cheek things like that.
Personally…I CAN’T WAIT to see this thing! Too bad it wont be until 2011 before we get in in North America.</p>
<p>I love the idea of the crossover, as a MA I know have a chance to sell to another demographic and keep people who would normally move on because MINI has no all wheel drive model and now they can stay in our brand a little longer. Unfortunately, it would be nice to have a 5th seat beat but I understand there is a fine line between staying MINI and not driving like a MINI but me being not a gear head or hardcore as some of the guys on the website (no insult intended) I think MINI will do a great job keeping the MINI spirit and making this one of the most fun driving crossovers on the road. After all who really buys a SUV and wants it to do the same thing as a roadster or coupe I don’t think thats possible.</p>
<p>I’m with C4, as soon as Mini becomes diluted, it becomes just like everything else. To survive you must stick to your core values OR become the innovators in your field otherwise you become nothing special and fade away just like GM LOL</p>
<p>Oh, and I forgot, it looks like a Hyundai, which by the way scored head and shoulders above MINI in the JD Powers Initial Survey.</p>
<p>By being outspoken and critical of MINI, C4 is actually trying to convey what he thinks MINI is really about.</p>
<p>It is rare to have such heritage, to build such a cult following, provide so much driving excitement then throw it away by diluting the line eventually forcing compromises until the likely demise of what MINI is truly about. They SHOULD be going smaller, for an eventual response to the growing environmental concerns we are going to face as third world countries begin to mobilize. That is the true direction I think MINI should be heading and doing anything else is anti MINI and shows nothing but greed.</p>
<p>+1 with Gabe on C4’s history of dramatic and negative comments. I remember back when the R56 was coming out how he claimed it would ruin Mini…and then he bought a Clubman.</p>
<p>I’m actually a bit enthused about the Crossover. I love my R56, really, really love it. Still with two young daughters playing softball, trying to get all the bat bags, catchers gear, and buckets of balls in the R56 has proven a bit challenging at times.</p>
<p>The Clubman buys a little bit of space but not enough in my opinion to justify the purchase. I don’t want to leave the Mini family so if the Crossover has enough room and still has even 80% of that “Mini” feel it might just cover my needs.</p>
<p>@<a href="#comment-263319" rel="nofollow">Gabe</a>: I didn’t realize having such a “voice of reason” comment would turn into a MF version of a flame war.</p>
<p>I agree with Axel. I would love to see a diesel, manual, AWD R60. I’m really curious to see what the C-pillar will look like. I hope that the sloping roof and C-pillar don’t create a whopping blind spot.</p>
<p>I’m happy for this to be coming out. I personally don’t need a car that is larger than my coupe, but I know several people in our MINI club who are very excited about it.</p>
<p>I also agree with Gabe and others.. years and years of disparaging remarks from the same person get’s really old.</p>
<p>Yes, R60 is going to be “little” bigger than other MINI variants of the past; however, as a current R53 owner, I will be considering it as a second car/MINI. Soon, we’ll be replacing our second commuter with a smaller more efficient car, and this will be a good candidate. Our toddler likes my MINI a lot, and he will appreciate to take his commute to preschool everyday in another, more spacious MINI. I am looking forward to it actually.</p>
<p>In terms of whether this will divide the MINI community or not, we’ll see whether I’ll have any problems -as an R53 driver- with my wife once she starts driving the R60. If we end up getting a divorce, then JohnPD and C4 will win :)</p>
<p>Still not digging the physical design or what this development says about the brand. It will be interesting to see how the Mini community re-acts to the shift in brand image over the long term. ie I can’t wait to see a R60 wallowing along the Dragon next year ;)</p>
<p>I can’t wait to see the R60 in Frankfurt. My family has grown since Xmas and while a roof rack with box has extended the R53’s usefulness, it won’t be long before we HAVE to get a bigger vehicle. It would be nice if the R60 turned out to be a decent option.</p>
<p>I bet you we will see pictures from KillBoy of the R60 running the Dragon soon enough since the car is already in the states, they will definitely do some testing there.</p>
<p>Its a real shame that our Nissan Murano Lease ends in Sept, I wish I could extend it till the R60 is released and then convince the wife to get it as her daily. But she’s just not into the MINI, she’s dying for a 328i…. baaah</p>
<p>Guess my question still would be if tomorrow I adopt three kids or need six seats does this mean Mini should make a larger car for me. I know that many people do need the extra room for a larger family and fully accept this, I fail however to think that the brand needs to fill every need of every possible owner. I would much rather have Mini keep a very clear brand image that doesn’t end up tarnishing the rest of the brand. I am not sure if this will be the case of not but I do believe its a real possibility.</p>
<p>As for a R60 on the Dragon, yep it will happen after a chunk of aftermarket tuning to make the extra mass and inertia of this car perform with the same grace of the coupe. Then again, just because I can spend the money to make a school bus cut around the Dragon doesn’t mean its a Mini.</p>
<p>To me the handling and feel of the R60 is going to be interesting. The Clubman is already a little less stable than the Coupe in default configurations. You can feel the extra mass it carries load into the corners. I somewhat shudder at what many extra hundreds of pounds will feel like. I do have trust in BMW/Mini to make a capable car just wonder at the end of the day if it will truly be a Mini.</p>
<p>…the answer Jon PD, is ‘no’ as I hardly believe that BMW will compete on there entire lineup with themselves…</p>
<p>…this model makes sense with the intro of the X1 (financially) and there is still enough divergence in these iterations for folks to differentiate…</p>
<p>…plus I think the intention is to sell more of these stateside as I don’t believe the X1 is really meant for us, but europe instead…</p>
<p>…I will be first in line, so that we can be a ‘miini-only’ family…</p>
<p>…thanks, gabe for speaking up about the trolling…</p>
<p>…I fully understand and appreciate why people don’t and do like decisions made by MINI/BMW however, constant blind dissent is just as misguided and condescending as unfounded incessant praise…</p>
<p>Just as blind as complete blindsided acceptance of every choice made by Mini is Bavarian.</p>
<p>At the end of the day i can say I only expect this to change the perception about what a Mini is. I feel than this may be a negative move but then again I don’t proclaim any sort of insight or genius about what the future holds. I only see the great amount of anger and hostility this car has caused in the Mini community, the community is a large part of what makes a Mini.</p>
<p>Either way this turns out I feel this single development is a pivot point in the time line of Mini. It could be a good move or a bad move. I feel it will sell well but at the same time do more than a little damage. It will be interesting to watch either way.</p>
<p>It does make me chuckle that while Mini is spending so much time and effort with this more and more heavy direct competition is coming to the US against its largest production (the Cooper/Cooper S). Makes me wonder if Mini has realized it needs to grow since its best selling market is being invaded by more cars that have already caused it sales loss in Europe?</p>
<p>Interesting. Did the Cayenne change people’s perception of what a Porsche is? I think a lot of people are going to be surprised when the R60 hits dealerships and people can take it for a test drive. I’m sure it won’t be for everybody, but it seems people are making so many assumptions about this car without any information/details to back up those assumptions: That it will be sluggish. That it will lumber around the turns, etc. Maybe I missed it, but I doubt the R60 will be powered by the same engine that’s in the coupe and clubmans. I’m sure MINI will power it up a bit to compensate for the added mass.</p>
<p>To me, Mini had a much larger departure from its brand history with the BMW version (the MINI) than this R53/56 to R60 evolution. MINI recently established a new brand image (during this decade). They’re building on it and letting it evolve. For those that say the development of the R60 is ruining the brand image, I say that a stagnant brand image is a greater danger. Yeah, a roadster would be nice, but MINI doesn’t really need to put out another small 2-seater vehicle at the moment. In the long-term view of expanding their brand image, putting out a two seater first before a four-door would really be pushing the brand into a tighter corner. Don’t worry, they’ll come back with the roadster after the R60 and then the R60 won’t be such a “brand weakening” car after all, but a brand-building one.</p>
<p>Who knows, maybe the R60 will be crap. But maybe it will be ok. I am just excited to see how it turns out, either way…and maybe I’ll put it on the list of potential new cars to purchase as my wife and I start planning on a second child.</p>
<p>Back when I was in grad school, I had tons of time and played online games like Everquest, Asheron’s Call, etc. Now I don’t have time, and I don’t play any video games. I got my MCS after grad school when I was still engaged to be married. Now I’m married, with a kid and if MINI doesn’t come up with an upgrade for me, they’ll lose me as a customer, just like video games (in general) lost me as a customer. MINI wants people like me to stay in the game, and they want to give people who always loved MINIs but couldn’t see the practicality of them a new way “in” to the brand. Can’t fault them for trying.</p>
<p>Well Aaron there was and still is a bit of a schism in the Porsche Owners group from the Cayenne, though likely still less than the old air cooled group. No doubt that it helped Porsche. Still not sure how a manufacturer building a completely unique SUV compares to Mini making a slight smaller Rav4? Mini has created NOTHING new or unique with this. Manufactures around the world have also been looking at the Micro SUV concept so given the release date of the R60 will be all that small or lite.</p>
<p>I for one believe the R60 will be a decent build, I just think its not one that’s all that great for the brand.
So Aaron if tomorrow comes around that you find out you have twins on the way then Mini should ignore you? Yes I know that small families outgrown the Coupe and Clubman, but just because a market (one of the most hotly competitive ones out there btw) doesn’t mean Mini should build for it. With the idea were do you draw the line on whats a Mini??</p>
<p>If you have a family of 6 or 8 tomorrow should Mini build a car to keep you in the brand? I can tell you one thing for certain already, with the four seat arrangement of the R60 vs the X1 5 seat I am betting more than a small share will be looking at that one additional seat. I have no issues with small families I just feel Mini should concentrate its efforts where is makes a large percentage of its profit from. New business if great but throwing away a portion of your core business is an interesting concept</p>
<p>I hear what you’re saying, JonPD, and I know where you’re coming from…asking where do we draw the line. I just don’t think a four-seat, four door vehicle is necessarily crossing the line. I understand that you disagree. I know some folks are disappointed with how MINI is spending it’s development $$, but there’s little to be done about that. If you told me the R60 was a two-seat roadster, I might agree that that is more fitting within the concept of the brand than this SUV is, but on the other hand, I’d say that I think that’s a waste of developmental $$ because MINI already has a practicality issue and adding another “impractical” car to the stable would potentially lock in that perception of the brand.</p>
<p>Forgot to add: MINI isn’t throwing away a portion of their core business. The coupe, convertible and clubman will still be produced. I’m not sure how the development of the R60 can be considered as a sign that MINI is going to jettison their core business.</p>
<p>Robbie I don’t claim to be any sort of a expert on SUV’s but at the time of the Cayenne can you name another SUV that was built on a high horsepower platform with a tuned suspension? The closet thing I can think of as completion for that was likely to be the new X6 M. Meanwhile Mini is building a Micro SUV that is build for a family of 4, and to me really doesn’t solve any solutions other than being small. Guess it might have a market there but at least the Cayenne had many years of unmolested sales and if you spend anytime looking at what is being developed the Micro SUV is a popular area for many manufactures.</p>
<p>Aarnon I do hear you, and I do honestly know a lot a smart people at BMW/Mini have looked at their business model and decided this was a growth sector for them. However I would point out history which is a collection of smart people that make bad decisions. Time will tell if Mini can figure a way out to heal its community, which I think anybody can agree is still unsettled over this development.</p>
<p>Like others, I have watched the comments on this thread with interest. I do not agree with the sheer number of apologies being proffered for this vehicle by various commenters. On the other hand, I do think it a good idea, particularly now that the car is essentially complete and “coming soon”, to wait and see before passing final judgment on its aesthetics, handling, power-to-weight, or utility.
If I can add just one item for thought: I feel there would be less criticism of the R60, and BMW apologists’ counterpoints would be more reassuring, if the R56 as the core product of the MINI brand was a better resolved sporting vehicle. My observation is that MINI has let down the driving enthusiast portion of their client base several times over the past few years and this has resulted in the mistrust we are seeing of BMW’s ability to design vehicles that should be wearing the MINI badge.</p>
<p>It’s good to see this vehicle quickly approaching official release. Can’t wait for the model to hit the showrooms and receiving an invitation to see the official local dealer launch for a good look-over and test drive. MINI’s vehicles are always interesting. Will be interested in assessing its off-road capability, power and economy. Make sure you have your details registered with MINI to receive an official invite!</p>
<p>Well my friends a lot of good insight to this new vehicle, but remember when Mini came out in 02, this is same way the Porsche Cayene came out, DIFFERENT from the PACk, therefore Mini is coming out AGAIN different from the pack and it was hihgly critizied then, look at it now, one the best vheicles out there. Lets give it a chance but I want it with the 123d 2 liter DIESEL engine in it!!!</p>
<p>Terrible.</p>
<p>I am weary of how more weight, and higher center of gravity, longer suspension travel, and awd will make this “MINI” drive.</p>
<blockquote>Terrible.</blockquote>
<p>And that in a nutshell is why people hate comments on the internet.</p>
<blockquote>I am weary of how more weight, and higher center of gravity, longer suspension travel, and awd will make this “MINI†drive.</blockquote>
<p>There we go. That’s better.</p>
<p>@<a href="#comment-263319" rel="nofollow">Gabe</a>:</p>
<p>Are you serious? Oh gawd, please gimme a break!</p>
<p>I call things as I see them. The R60 is an abomination plain and simple. An insult to the core values and heritage of MINI. I am not alone on this line of thinking.</p>
<p>Last I checked, we still live in a free country. If we don’t like someone’s opinion we either challenge it or ignore it and move on.</p>
<p>A $40K pig in silk clothing…. Still a pig.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Last I checked, we still live in a free country. If we don’t like someone’s opinion we either challenge it or ignore it and move on.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I think that’s what anybody reading comments on MF has learned to do when they see your name Frank – “move on”. Not that my opinions matter but I personally could care less if you don’t like something. Hell I can’t imagine I’m going to like the R60 myself (and I’ve been pretty upfront about that). But not liking <em>anything</em> at all usually means you stop coming to the site.</p>
<p>Where is the name “Frank”?</p>
<p>I do not appreciate you insulting me in a public forum.</p>
<p>@<a href="#comment-263325" rel="nofollow">C4</a>: Ok… C4. Carry on hating. You’re free to say what you want and think what you want. I just thought I’d do the same for once. Have a nice day :)</p>
<p>@<a href="#comment-263322" rel="nofollow">C4</a>: umm, wow. in a tizzy today? if you have an opinion and some logic behind it, put it out there, but don’t just throw out one word hate messages.</p>
<p>it seems like all gabe wants is for the comments on his site to be intellectual, rather than trolling.</p>
p>@Gabe&hardingsan:</p
<p>Here here! I can’t imagine how disappointing it must be for Gabe and co. to see the level of comments progressively drop. Honestly I have spent less time on this site in the last few months specifically because of these types of comments. The MF community belongs to all the readers and commenters. It would be really cool if we all stepped it up a notch with either:</p>
<p>A) Reasonably thoughtful comments that contribute to the community OR
B) Enough self-control to say, “hey, I have nothing of value to contribute to the dialog, so I’m going to keep my trap shut on this one.”</p>
<p>Just one guy’s opinion – YMMV.</p>
<p>Beavers</p>
<p>I’m not understanding the C4 hating… If this product is a failure, and MINI cancels it after 2 or 3 model years, then won’t people sharing C4’s opinion be pleased? Wouldn’t that provide encouragement for someone to generate such “anti-buzz” for the product as much and as loudly as they can? That’s what criticism is, right? Sharing an opinion with the intent to sway the opinions of others? The SUV backlash begins now, right? Sure Melis’ comment is more helpful, but it’s not like C4 was comment spamming.</p>
<p>Gabe you need to show us some Roadster pics from Cali, they will change the tune. :)</p>
<p>People are entitled to their own opinion, but it does wear thin after a while… Im with Gabe.</p>
<p>I SWEAR I saw 2 driving on the Florida Turnpike near Gainesville on July 4th, but they had Camo Decals on them…not the other decals. I almost jumped out of my seat…freaked my wife out!</p>
<p>LT</p>
<p>Are there dimensions to this thing? I’m interested in how big it’s going to be.</p>
<p>I agree with Chad. I think I understood C4’s one word comment perfectly – he thinks a MINI 4-door cross-over is a terrible idea, Brand, purity, concept, heritage-wise. Did not offend me, or seem troll-ish or spam-ish. I don’t agree with him, but he succinctly stated his point of view. Some will agree, others will not. I engoy reading all the comments on this Blog, pro and con and think no less of C4 for his opinion, as a fellow MINI traveller. “We have more in common than not.</p>
<p>For the sake of MINI’s karma, I hope they bring the speedster to production to counteract the ill effects of the crossover. Perhaps this will be MINIs “Cayenne” as in; bringing needed traffic and money into the dealerships to help finance other more exciting projects (ahem…speedster)</p>
<p>It looks almost as large as the BMW X1… I’m not sure I like that. I would’ve been alright with a four-wheel-drive five-door hatch (Fiesta-sized) MINI, but this is too large for my liking.</p>
<p>That said, I can see why BMW is bringing this car to the market. There’s a lot of demand for it (despite what MINI enthusiasts say)–a car for those who want the MINI style but aren’t ready to give up the space of larger vehicles.</p>
<p>More shots here: <a href="http://www.automotivetraveler.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=712&Itemid=194" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.automotivetraveler.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=712&Itemid=194</a></p>
<p>Really feel that this product dilutes what a MINI is. The Clubman is acceptable as there are clear roots.</p>
<p>However, this is simply cashing in on the pseudo-4×4 gang. Now when people ask “What car do you drive” my response as “MINI” will now be met with “Which one”</p>
<p>When they do reveal this car, I sincerely hope that they call it a MAXI or something – it simply is, won’t and never will be a MINI.</p>
<p>I have always been proud of my R53 and admired the R56’s due to the real purity of the brand… this I think takes the shine away from it somewhere.</p>
<p>Any-hoo… I can still continue on my Supercharged adventures!</p>
<p>(PS – I have lurked on this site for years, but felt compelled to post for the first time!)</p>
<p>I hope it’s as successful as the cayenne. That way the mini division can open more dealerships & invest money into R&D so build an even better cooper and JCW models.</p>
<p>All I can think of is the unsuspecting motorist seeing this drive by and wondering what insane person decided to paint their car like that!</p>
<p>C4, it is unhelpful to simply comment “Terrible”. It would be equally unhelpful if I were to comment “Fugly”. Now if I expound on exactly what I find to be fugly, it suddenly becomes a useful and constructive comment worthy of further discussion. This is what Gabe was getting at in his first comment.</p>
<p>No split rear window like the Clubman? I guess I wasn’t paying close enough attention.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>I’m not understanding the C4 hating… If this product is a failure, and MINI cancels it after 2 or 3 model years, then won’t people sharing C4’s opinion be pleased?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>It’s not about loving or hating this car. I’m not arguing for it in anyway. It’s about the type of insidious and shallow comments that are illustrated well in the first on this article.</p>
<p>@<a href="#comment-263351" rel="nofollow">Gabe</a>: I would agree that it was a simplistic comment, but to call it insidious? That seems a bit overreaching.</p>
<p>I can understand that MINI thinks this is a good idea, but I can’t help but feel like it’s a mis-step for the brand. I just hope that it isn’t such a mis-step that it hurts the company.</p>
<p>I can’t really see one of these fitting in amongst the rest of the Mini family at various Mini events (especially those built around the Mini’s handling). And that might be the worst of it, from a community standpoint.</p>
<p>@<a href="#comment-263352" rel="nofollow">Chad</a>: It’s the long history of comments like that that go back years and are as often as 2-10 times a day that make it insidious.</p>
<p>I’m glad to see that the fancy yellow/black camo graphics have remained in use long enough to grace our shores. I’m sure the car will look awesome, if only for the loss of the vinyl!!!!</p>
<p>I don’t know if I dig it or not. I can’t tell with the crazy camo. But all this killing the brand chat cracks me up.</p>
<p>About 18 months, many on this site said the same of the Clubman. And though MINI sales are down, they’re far better than virtually all other manufacturers. Yes, I know Subaru and Kia are kicking ass right now. Yay.</p>
<p>Someone already made the Cayenne point, so I won’t, but the purists should be happy that the Clubman helps the brand to grow, so there will still be a brand.</p>
<p>I also can’t resist adding that I seem to recall C4 hating all over the Clubman way back when, and now owning one. Luckily for me, he’ll point out my error if I’m wrong.</p>
<p>Motor on people.</p>
<p>Yeah, that crazy yellow camo WORKS, darn it. Need to see it up close and personal. Didn’t think I’d like the Clubman, until I saw it in the flesh. Same with this I think. It will fit with the MINI crowd that wants to stay with the MINI crowd, but have a family, or the need to carry passengers larger than a six year old. Now if only the price was right :-(</p>
p>@Chris…</p
<p>I’m thinking that maybe it works at a MINI gathering / club / track event…..mom (or dad) drives up in the Crossover, carrying the grille, kids, strollers etc…and the significant other drives up with little Jimmy or Susie strapped in, ready to have a go at the autocross. It may work….</p>
<p>….finishing that comment ….</p>
<p>….the significant other drives up in a Cooper / Cooper S / Speedster / whatever with little Jimmy or Susie for a go at the autocross…</p>
<p>How do or does that crazy back door/doors, system operate. I use GMC vans w/3 part doors for work and would not buy a car with them.
I have a Clubman S for 4 more days and the barn doors are ok but, 3?</p>
<p>Clubman S was my wifes car and she never complained about a blind spot.</p>
<p>Oh, and Chad.
Negative posted without thought are not interesting to others.</p>
<p>I agree with Gabe about C4. He has shown that he can put together a valuable comment but yet he continues to hide behind his anonymous pseudonym and spew his spam on almost every post here.</p>
<p>The photo that cars.com posted isn’t showing us MF readers anything new. I guess the new bit is that they’re testing it in CA and it makes me wonder…why ship the mule all the way over here for a test drive? I wonder if they’ve been test driving it across the US…</p>
<p>I too am concerned about the mass, bulk, ride height, of the car and whether it will still drive like a MINI should. We’ll see. I’m pretty hopeful though as this would be a perfect way for me to stick with the brand as my family gets another +1 in a couple of years. I can’t wait for the Frankfurt show.</p>
<p>As Jeremy Clarkson said about Tata, “I hope they make tons of money selling the Nano, and spend it all on fast Jags.”</p>
<p>We have nothing to lose by Mini adding new models (even if I have no interest in them) and making more money. My R53 will be the same great car when this comes out as it was when the remodeled R53 came out, when the R53 auto came out, when the R56 came out, when the Clubman came out…</p>
<p>I heard that this is the replacement for Mellow Yellow, the new Interchange Yellow/Black Camouflage exterior paint with body color roof.</p>
p>@bee1000</p
<p>Very good point about Jeremy Clarkson’s comment… on a similar line of thinking, Porsche fans were outraged when Porsche announced the Cayenne, yet it is the profits from the very successful SUV that have helped develop the current range of Porsche cars and have enabled the company to continue mostly on its own.</p>
<p>I’m not opposed to the Crossman, but I understand why many people would be. I also know that there are alot of people that would love something fun like a MINI but need legitimate 4 passenger capacity and also need something that has a bit more space than a Clubman. This car will sell well. If you don’t like it, at least understand that it is necessary to keep the MINI brand viable and will enable it to remain successful as a “seperate” brand within the BMW family. This is what you need to maintain an independent MINI dealer network and ownership experience. It is what you need to be able to expand the dealer network into new markets that do not have dealers. It is also what you need to keep the profits coming in to fund MINI’s other future projects.</p>
<p>It will be nice when we can actually see what it really looks like…then maybe some of the hand wringing will cease. The official reveal can’t come too soon for me. I can’t get a sense of this thing yet. That camo does its job well. I can’t wait to see the front and rear, and all the other design choices(especially the lights and grill)…and see it grouped with other MINIs to get a better sense of scale, as well as getting a feel for the future of MINI design in general. We may get an idea of the four door/hatch “wagon” variant–a model I think more would stand behind.</p>
<p>I can’t help but comment on the other topic that has surfaced in this thread. I appreciate Gabe’s frustration. I just tend to scroll through the comments, and don’t bother reading those from some contributors any more.</p>
<p>I was shocked at some of the pictures floating around showing the size next to regular people and other cars. Surprise, surprise, it’s really not that big at all. It might just be a nice little SAV when all is said and done.</p>
<p>I share some of the others concerns about diluting the brand, but just look back at the 60’s era variants and I think you’ll get an idea of what MINI is trying to do now. I believe wholeheartedly that they’ll position the R60 as the smallest (dare I say MINI’est) SAV in the marketplace which will still stay true to the “smaller is better” axiom they’ve always stood for.</p>
<p>I’m hoping for the best.</p>
<p>Am I the only one who appreciates the black and yellow camo? I think it’s kinda funky. I’d like to take a test drive of the R57 in the trim shown above with Bootsy Collins riding shotgun.</p>
<p>Are we really still debating this vehicle. Those who like or need and can afford one will have one and those who hate won’t. It is that simple. We all know the regular posters who dislike this move by MINI. You have expressed yourself clearly. Now, give it a rest.</p>
<p>@ Roccorocket…</p>
<p>If you follow the link in one of the comments above, you’ll see that the ‘barn doors’ and the handle are fake on the Crossover…there’s a picture on the link showing the rear hatch fully opened in conventional hatch style….the commentary associated with the link indicates that it’s just a standard hatch, not any kind of multi-opening door.</p>
<p>Complaining is one thing, but the only thing worse to me is complaining about complaining. Why give someone the credit and attention they want. Just ignore it and move on. If no one ever pays attention to a complainer that person will get bored and move on. I see the same thing at China Car Times. Everyone complains that all the cars are copies of other cars on every post and everyone complains about that person complaining. Pretty annoying.</p>
<p>5 Bolt wheels rather than the normal MINI 4×100’s.</p>
<p>I parked my Clubman next to a Cayenne the other day and they are HUGE!! Actually the 911’s I’ve parked next to are even longer than my Clubman. Isn’t the Crossover only about 7-9 inches longer than the Clubman; so doesn’t that still make it the smallest “SAV” in production? And isn’t the new X1 about 18-20 inches longer than the Crossover?</p>
<p>Anyway, that “black and yellow camo” does do an amazing job of hiding the design, but in the process it also makes any new car design look horrible. And add in those black wheels and it is absolutely “butt” ugly.</p>
<p>SFRedMCc,</p>
<p>I don’t know, I think I might like to rock that full wrap around San Francisco for awhile! Maybe the hippies will finally see me coming and not cut me off 😉 he.he.</p>
<p>For crying out loud people it’s not like MINI built a Ford Excursion and dropped a small turbo 4 banger in it and slapped MINI badges on it. I swear, I don’t know if it’s an American thing (and I’m American, and proud) or what??…but this tendency to make things worse than they actually are. I don’t get it? It’ll be barely any bigger than a Clubman and use design featires, technology and parts similar to what you find in pretty much any other MINI on sale today. Pipe the F down already. Sh!r! Not everyone can live with a two-door “mini” car and BMW needs to justify the continued expenditures on the MINI brand. This is the car (along with other forthcoming models) that will help you and many others continue to enjoy the MINI brand. I’d hate to know MINI’s future without it, because it will sell like f’ng hotcakes.</p>
<p>“In a Town Called Malice” The song I play while buzzing around in my “MINI” for a truly Mini Experience. So, I seen many pictures and the prototypes, yet this shot, I believe is the reason some find this MAXI-MINI butt ugg. I am sure that when it hits the shores, that we can call our MINI’s, The Mini-Mini, and the Clubman, the 4×4 will in my opinion be called and classified as the Maxi-Mini, or Mini-Ute. I LOVE my 2009 Mini, have only had it a month, have a 2001 RAV4, hate the RAV but used to think it was a super handling SUV, the Mini sticks to the road like glue, NO SWAY, even at 130kph in the pouring rain! I hope that this MAXIMINI, does as well, I’ll pre-order asap. PUT ME DOWN FOR 1 site unseen. Except, PLEASE…No Barn Doors, maybe Please a hatch style that opens window or window and Door flat fold down.</p>
<p>Yeah!</p>
<p>ChrisB, Well said. Times two.</p>
<p>i didnt think Mini would end up producing this. Time to stop driving my r53 and seal it in the garage for a couple years then make a huge profit on it….Grrr MIni</p>
<p>Roccorocket…</p>
<p><</p>
<p>blockquote> If you follow the link in one of the comments above, you’ll see that the ‘barn doors’ and the handle are fake on the Crossover…there’s a picture on the link showing the rear hatch fully opened in conventional hatch style….the commentary associated with the link indicates that it’s just a standard hatch, not any kind of multi-opening door.</p>
<p><</p>
<p>blockquote>
Thanks for the heads up.
You never know with mules.</p>
<p>For all the haters, this car is still small and Mini when compared to other small SUV’s. So chill.
Chris B. nailed it.</p>
<p>Gabe, Cheers to you for standing up to C4…
Everytime I log onto MOTORING File all I ever seem to read these days are the endless Rantings of this guy.
Regardless of wheter you like it or not, this this WILL sell like “HotCakes” as stated above. What I really am excited for is the Rally Opportunity that this car will open up for the brand. Targa NFLD is one thing, but for BMW to have a serious push into WRC and a serious MINI entry into DAKAR are going to re-establish MINI as a racing force on the world stage.
Everyone seems to forget that MINI has a very coloured Rally Heritage…Monte Carlo anyone???
If you think you can compete in a WRC without 4-wheel drive then you obviously havent read your history…there was before Quattro – and there was after Quattro (Audi for those who dont know)
Call this new model whatever you want to call it…I actually like the name “MINI Terrible” the brand has always been able to get away with tongue-in-cheek things like that.
Personally…I CAN’T WAIT to see this thing! Too bad it wont be until 2011 before we get in in North America.</p>
<p>I love the idea of the crossover, as a MA I know have a chance to sell to another demographic and keep people who would normally move on because MINI has no all wheel drive model and now they can stay in our brand a little longer. Unfortunately, it would be nice to have a 5th seat beat but I understand there is a fine line between staying MINI and not driving like a MINI but me being not a gear head or hardcore as some of the guys on the website (no insult intended) I think MINI will do a great job keeping the MINI spirit and making this one of the most fun driving crossovers on the road. After all who really buys a SUV and wants it to do the same thing as a roadster or coupe I don’t think thats possible.</p>
<p>It kind of has the shape of the X6 for the rear angle.</p>
<p>All I know is I will either really like this car, or really hate it.</p>
<p>I’m with C4, as soon as Mini becomes diluted, it becomes just like everything else. To survive you must stick to your core values OR become the innovators in your field otherwise you become nothing special and fade away just like GM LOL</p>
<p>Oh, and I forgot, it looks like a Hyundai, which by the way scored head and shoulders above MINI in the JD Powers Initial Survey.</p>
<p>By being outspoken and critical of MINI, C4 is actually trying to convey what he thinks MINI is really about.</p>
<p>It is rare to have such heritage, to build such a cult following, provide so much driving excitement then throw it away by diluting the line eventually forcing compromises until the likely demise of what MINI is truly about. They SHOULD be going smaller, for an eventual response to the growing environmental concerns we are going to face as third world countries begin to mobilize. That is the true direction I think MINI should be heading and doing anything else is anti MINI and shows nothing but greed.</p>
<p>+1 with Gabe on C4’s history of dramatic and negative comments. I remember back when the R56 was coming out how he claimed it would ruin Mini…and then he bought a Clubman.</p>
<p>I’m actually a bit enthused about the Crossover. I love my R56, really, really love it. Still with two young daughters playing softball, trying to get all the bat bags, catchers gear, and buckets of balls in the R56 has proven a bit challenging at times.</p>
<p>The Clubman buys a little bit of space but not enough in my opinion to justify the purchase. I don’t want to leave the Mini family so if the Crossover has enough room and still has even 80% of that “Mini” feel it might just cover my needs.</p>
<p>Just bring it here with the BMW 2.0 Diesel engine from the 123d and now we’re taking!!!!</p>
<p>OOPs I meant TALKING!!!</p>
<p>@<a href="#comment-263319" rel="nofollow">Gabe</a>: I didn’t realize having such a “voice of reason” comment would turn into a MF version of a flame war.</p>
<p>I agree with Axel. I would love to see a diesel, manual, AWD R60. I’m really curious to see what the C-pillar will look like. I hope that the sloping roof and C-pillar don’t create a whopping blind spot.</p>
<p>I’m happy for this to be coming out. I personally don’t need a car that is larger than my coupe, but I know several people in our MINI club who are very excited about it.</p>
<p>I also agree with Gabe and others.. years and years of disparaging remarks from the same person get’s really old.</p>
<p>Yes, R60 is going to be “little” bigger than other MINI variants of the past; however, as a current R53 owner, I will be considering it as a second car/MINI. Soon, we’ll be replacing our second commuter with a smaller more efficient car, and this will be a good candidate. Our toddler likes my MINI a lot, and he will appreciate to take his commute to preschool everyday in another, more spacious MINI. I am looking forward to it actually.</p>
<p>In terms of whether this will divide the MINI community or not, we’ll see whether I’ll have any problems -as an R53 driver- with my wife once she starts driving the R60. If we end up getting a divorce, then JohnPD and C4 will win :)</p>
<p>By the way, where is C4? Is he banned?</p>
<p>I just wanted this thread to hit an even 60.</p>
<p>Actually, I am looking forward to this model as well. I want four doors, decent mileage, and I like the MINI brand.</p>
<p>Still not digging the physical design or what this development says about the brand. It will be interesting to see how the Mini community re-acts to the shift in brand image over the long term. ie I can’t wait to see a R60 wallowing along the Dragon next year ;)</p>
<p>I was told the rear door would be a hatch and not split barn doors?</p>
<p>I can’t wait to see the R60 in Frankfurt. My family has grown since Xmas and while a roof rack with box has extended the R53’s usefulness, it won’t be long before we HAVE to get a bigger vehicle. It would be nice if the R60 turned out to be a decent option.</p>
<p>@<a href="#comment-263571" rel="nofollow">JonPD</a>:</p>
<p>I bet you we will see pictures from KillBoy of the R60 running the Dragon soon enough since the car is already in the states, they will definitely do some testing there.</p>
<p>Its a real shame that our Nissan Murano Lease ends in Sept, I wish I could extend it till the R60 is released and then convince the wife to get it as her daily. But she’s just not into the MINI, she’s dying for a 328i…. baaah</p>
<p>Guess my question still would be if tomorrow I adopt three kids or need six seats does this mean Mini should make a larger car for me. I know that many people do need the extra room for a larger family and fully accept this, I fail however to think that the brand needs to fill every need of every possible owner. I would much rather have Mini keep a very clear brand image that doesn’t end up tarnishing the rest of the brand. I am not sure if this will be the case of not but I do believe its a real possibility.</p>
<p>As for a R60 on the Dragon, yep it will happen after a chunk of aftermarket tuning to make the extra mass and inertia of this car perform with the same grace of the coupe. Then again, just because I can spend the money to make a school bus cut around the Dragon doesn’t mean its a Mini.</p>
<p>To me the handling and feel of the R60 is going to be interesting. The Clubman is already a little less stable than the Coupe in default configurations. You can feel the extra mass it carries load into the corners. I somewhat shudder at what many extra hundreds of pounds will feel like. I do have trust in BMW/Mini to make a capable car just wonder at the end of the day if it will truly be a Mini.</p>
<p>…the answer Jon PD, is ‘no’ as I hardly believe that BMW will compete on there entire lineup with themselves…</p>
<p>…this model makes sense with the intro of the X1 (financially) and there is still enough divergence in these iterations for folks to differentiate…</p>
<p>…plus I think the intention is to sell more of these stateside as I don’t believe the X1 is really meant for us, but europe instead…</p>
<p>…I will be first in line, so that we can be a ‘miini-only’ family…</p>
<p>…thanks, gabe for speaking up about the trolling…</p>
<p>…I fully understand and appreciate why people don’t and do like decisions made by MINI/BMW however, constant blind dissent is just as misguided and condescending as unfounded incessant praise…</p>
<p>Just as blind as complete blindsided acceptance of every choice made by Mini is Bavarian.</p>
<p>At the end of the day i can say I only expect this to change the perception about what a Mini is. I feel than this may be a negative move but then again I don’t proclaim any sort of insight or genius about what the future holds. I only see the great amount of anger and hostility this car has caused in the Mini community, the community is a large part of what makes a Mini.</p>
<p>Either way this turns out I feel this single development is a pivot point in the time line of Mini. It could be a good move or a bad move. I feel it will sell well but at the same time do more than a little damage. It will be interesting to watch either way.</p>
<p>It does make me chuckle that while Mini is spending so much time and effort with this more and more heavy direct competition is coming to the US against its largest production (the Cooper/Cooper S). Makes me wonder if Mini has realized it needs to grow since its best selling market is being invaded by more cars that have already caused it sales loss in Europe?</p>
<p>Interesting. Did the Cayenne change people’s perception of what a Porsche is? I think a lot of people are going to be surprised when the R60 hits dealerships and people can take it for a test drive. I’m sure it won’t be for everybody, but it seems people are making so many assumptions about this car without any information/details to back up those assumptions: That it will be sluggish. That it will lumber around the turns, etc. Maybe I missed it, but I doubt the R60 will be powered by the same engine that’s in the coupe and clubmans. I’m sure MINI will power it up a bit to compensate for the added mass.</p>
<p>To me, Mini had a much larger departure from its brand history with the BMW version (the MINI) than this R53/56 to R60 evolution. MINI recently established a new brand image (during this decade). They’re building on it and letting it evolve. For those that say the development of the R60 is ruining the brand image, I say that a stagnant brand image is a greater danger. Yeah, a roadster would be nice, but MINI doesn’t really need to put out another small 2-seater vehicle at the moment. In the long-term view of expanding their brand image, putting out a two seater first before a four-door would really be pushing the brand into a tighter corner. Don’t worry, they’ll come back with the roadster after the R60 and then the R60 won’t be such a “brand weakening” car after all, but a brand-building one.</p>
<p>Who knows, maybe the R60 will be crap. But maybe it will be ok. I am just excited to see how it turns out, either way…and maybe I’ll put it on the list of potential new cars to purchase as my wife and I start planning on a second child.</p>
<p>Back when I was in grad school, I had tons of time and played online games like Everquest, Asheron’s Call, etc. Now I don’t have time, and I don’t play any video games. I got my MCS after grad school when I was still engaged to be married. Now I’m married, with a kid and if MINI doesn’t come up with an upgrade for me, they’ll lose me as a customer, just like video games (in general) lost me as a customer. MINI wants people like me to stay in the game, and they want to give people who always loved MINIs but couldn’t see the practicality of them a new way “in” to the brand. Can’t fault them for trying.</p>
<p>Well Aaron there was and still is a bit of a schism in the Porsche Owners group from the Cayenne, though likely still less than the old air cooled group. No doubt that it helped Porsche. Still not sure how a manufacturer building a completely unique SUV compares to Mini making a slight smaller Rav4? Mini has created NOTHING new or unique with this. Manufactures around the world have also been looking at the Micro SUV concept so given the release date of the R60 will be all that small or lite.</p>
<p>I for one believe the R60 will be a decent build, I just think its not one that’s all that great for the brand.
So Aaron if tomorrow comes around that you find out you have twins on the way then Mini should ignore you? Yes I know that small families outgrown the Coupe and Clubman, but just because a market (one of the most hotly competitive ones out there btw) doesn’t mean Mini should build for it. With the idea were do you draw the line on whats a Mini??</p>
<p>If you have a family of 6 or 8 tomorrow should Mini build a car to keep you in the brand? I can tell you one thing for certain already, with the four seat arrangement of the R60 vs the X1 5 seat I am betting more than a small share will be looking at that one additional seat. I have no issues with small families I just feel Mini should concentrate its efforts where is makes a large percentage of its profit from. New business if great but throwing away a portion of your core business is an interesting concept</p>
<blockquote>Still not sure how a manufacturer building a completely unique SUV compares to Mini making a slight smaller Rav4? </blockquote>
<p>so a Cayenne is completely unique from the other SUVS on the road, but a R60 is just another RAV 4? :rolleyes:</p>
<p>That’s <em>one</em> of the dumbest comments I’ve read yet.</p>
<p>I hear what you’re saying, JonPD, and I know where you’re coming from…asking where do we draw the line. I just don’t think a four-seat, four door vehicle is necessarily crossing the line. I understand that you disagree. I know some folks are disappointed with how MINI is spending it’s development $$, but there’s little to be done about that. If you told me the R60 was a two-seat roadster, I might agree that that is more fitting within the concept of the brand than this SUV is, but on the other hand, I’d say that I think that’s a waste of developmental $$ because MINI already has a practicality issue and adding another “impractical” car to the stable would potentially lock in that perception of the brand.</p>
<p>Forgot to add: MINI isn’t throwing away a portion of their core business. The coupe, convertible and clubman will still be produced. I’m not sure how the development of the R60 can be considered as a sign that MINI is going to jettison their core business.</p>
<p>Robbie I don’t claim to be any sort of a expert on SUV’s but at the time of the Cayenne can you name another SUV that was built on a high horsepower platform with a tuned suspension? The closet thing I can think of as completion for that was likely to be the new X6 M. Meanwhile Mini is building a Micro SUV that is build for a family of 4, and to me really doesn’t solve any solutions other than being small. Guess it might have a market there but at least the Cayenne had many years of unmolested sales and if you spend anytime looking at what is being developed the Micro SUV is a popular area for many manufactures.</p>
<p>Aarnon I do hear you, and I do honestly know a lot a smart people at BMW/Mini have looked at their business model and decided this was a growth sector for them. However I would point out history which is a collection of smart people that make bad decisions. Time will tell if Mini can figure a way out to heal its community, which I think anybody can agree is still unsettled over this development.</p>
<p>Like others, I have watched the comments on this thread with interest. I do not agree with the sheer number of apologies being proffered for this vehicle by various commenters. On the other hand, I do think it a good idea, particularly now that the car is essentially complete and “coming soon”, to wait and see before passing final judgment on its aesthetics, handling, power-to-weight, or utility.
If I can add just one item for thought: I feel there would be less criticism of the R60, and BMW apologists’ counterpoints would be more reassuring, if the R56 as the core product of the MINI brand was a better resolved sporting vehicle. My observation is that MINI has let down the driving enthusiast portion of their client base several times over the past few years and this has resulted in the mistrust we are seeing of BMW’s ability to design vehicles that should be wearing the MINI badge.</p>
<p>It’s good to see this vehicle quickly approaching official release. Can’t wait for the model to hit the showrooms and receiving an invitation to see the official local dealer launch for a good look-over and test drive. MINI’s vehicles are always interesting. Will be interested in assessing its off-road capability, power and economy. Make sure you have your details registered with MINI to receive an official invite!</p>
<p>@<a href="#comment-263567" rel="nofollow">Volkan</a>:</p>
<p>C4 is still here my friend, thanks for asking. :)</p>
<p>I am the nemesis of the fanbois in this site and I LOVE IT!</p>
<p>@<a href="#comment-263334" rel="nofollow">Chad</a>:</p>
<p>Thank you Chad. You are the voice of reason. Another free thinking American that doesn’t drink the corporate “Koolaid”.</p>
<p>@<a href="#comment-263667" rel="nofollow">goat</a>:
Fantastic post, Goat.</p>
<p>@<a href="#comment-263475" rel="nofollow">777</a>:</p>
<p>Thank you, sir. My sentiments exactly.</p>
<p>@<a href="#comment-263354" rel="nofollow">Gabe</a>:</p>
<p>Sure Gabe.</p>
<p>Wonder if MiniUSA or either of my local dealers will be sending me an invite to come see the R60 ;)</p>
<p>@ C4 – I just call it like I see it / drive it. :)</p>
<p>Well my friends a lot of good insight to this new vehicle, but remember when Mini came out in 02, this is same way the Porsche Cayene came out, DIFFERENT from the PACk, therefore Mini is coming out AGAIN different from the pack and it was hihgly critizied then, look at it now, one the best vheicles out there. Lets give it a chance but I want it with the 123d 2 liter DIESEL engine in it!!!</p>