MF Exclusive Interview: MINI USA Product Manager Talks Countryman (Part 1)

We sat down with MINI USA Product Manager Vinnie Kung this week armed with loads of questions (many of them yours) around the highly anticipated MINI Countryman crossover. But before we get to what we think is one of the best interviews we’ve ever had on MF, we have to give Vinnie a huge thanks for being (as always) smart, humble and hilarious at all the right moments. MINI is lucky to have him and we’re thrilled to have a chance to talk with him.
Today we’re going to give you the first part of our interview where we talk about US pricing, curb weight, R60 JCW and even the WRC rumor. Look for part 2 Monday for even a few more (hinted) bombshells. Ok, onto the interview…
MotoringFile: First off thanks for taking time to answer our readers’ questions on the MINI Countryman. As you may have seen the R60 has been enormously well received given out expectations and naturally there are lots of questions. So let’s get right to them…
To start with, Vinnie, Tennessee Kung? We have to ask, where does the “Tennessee” come from and what do I need to do to get a state as a nickname?
Vinnie Kung: At the time, a seriously confused Chinese redneck living in Knoxville Tennessee, thought it would be funny to name his child “Tennessee.†So, to find a person who would help realize this practical joke, he left a bottle of Jack and a carton of Lucky Strikes on the front stoop and my thirsty mother thought it was a great idea as well. But, the deal was, it had to be the middle name.
MF: A fair trade then? Ok middle names aside, let’s get to why we’re here. First question; with all the anticipation around the Countryman, people are dying to know when we can expect to see this car in the US market?
VK: The car is planned to land here in the first quarter of next year, several months after the European markets get it. This staggered launch was always part of our plan because of the transition from the BMW X3 to the MINI Countryman. Unlike the Oxford plant, where every tool and part is already in place to build a MINI, the Magna-Steyr plant will have to switch everything on the floor. Even though the manufacturing team is incredibly quick in making this happen, it’s nearly impossible to switch from one completely different car to the next and to build the new car at full volume from the start. We think there is an advantage for the US, since the plant will have already produced thousands of R60s before we get our first one, and this helps ensure high build quality for the US. By the way, BMW’s own internal quality audits show that X3 has the highest build quality of all its products.
.
MF: Good know. What about US pricing? Has that been sorted out yet?
VK: Pricing has not been finalized. It’s the typical bean counter versus product planning discussion you hear about in automotive folklore. We want more content for free and to keep our options priced really low. Meanwhile, the guys at the cash register want us to increase prices to make more money. This goes back and forth for months with charts, charts and more friggin’ charts but as of now, we are priced between the Clubman and the Convertible for the FWD Countryman models. The ALL4 version will be about 6% more than the Cooper S Countryman.
Â
MF: When are we going to specifications like weight. I’m specifically interested to know how much heavier the R60 will be over the R55.
VK: Considering the huge increase in interior space and the modest increase in overall size, our target is to get the weight to around 3,000 pounds in US trim—basically, it’s like driving an R55 with a full-sized passenger next to you.
Â
Q: The fact that the rear seats slide fore and aft is a great idea but how helpful is it in the real world. How much legroom will it actually give you?
VK: There is more rear legroom than in the Clubman, but the primary goal is to give you the flexibility in cargo capacity. Once we get the officials at the EPA to do their measurements, we can put actual numbers to our claims.
Â
Q: What about the roof rack. Will it be functional? Will it be similar to the BMW system or the current MINI solution?
VK: This is an all-new roof rail system. The rails are very low profile and will be standard on every Countryman for the US. It is unlike anything that BMW or MINI has ever done. They go lengterhwise along the sides of the roof and each have a cross-section of a low-profile T. It’s only a half-inch tall so you can barely see it. Florian, our head honcho over at MINI Accessory Development, has several items already planned that will attach to these rails.
Â
MF: The All4 system. Can you tell us about some of the tech behind it? Did I read correctly that, under certain circumstances, 100% of the power will be delivered to the rear wheels? How much does it help dry performance? How badly does it hurt MPG?
VK: The intelligent all-wheel-drive system is so profound, not just for MINI, but for all crossover vehicles. We stole xDrive technology from those BMW guys so not only is the system smart, it is super fast and in essence, able to send engine power from wheel to wheel almost instantly. To optimize handling and performance in the dry, wet and snow, the center diff is electronically controlled to instantly transfer torque from front to back.
Â
The rear diff uses an wet clutch pack actuated electro-hydraulically. The front wheels uses EDLC, where the brake calipers control wheel-spin between the two front wheels.
Â
Any all wheel drive system will inherently reduce fuel economy because of the additional drivetrain inertia. Luckily, our engineers have managed to use the latest low-resistance bearing assemblies and lightweight components to help boost fuel economy, performance and  most importantly, safety.
Â
MF: Speaking of MPG, is the R60 going to feature MINI’s start stop system used outside the US market?
VK: This is one of those classic price versus volume conundrums and it all hinges on take rate in the US compared to Europe and Asia where gasoline costs two to three times as much. So, let me re-enact how this went down. Like today’s MINIs, Auto Start/Stop only works on the Manual transmission. In the US, the majority of MINIs (about 62%) are equipped with the Automatic trans, which means only 38% (about 18,000 per year) of all US MINIs are eligible for the ASSF (Auto-Start/Stop Function.) So, because there is a smaller base, the price instantly doubles just for us to break even on the business case. So, imagine instead of $250, it is now $500 extra for every manual transmission MINI to get this option. So, what we just did with the price increase was drop take rate even more. Worse yet, appeal would be low for the majority of MINI owners because there would be no difference on the fuel economy figure because the EPA does not recognize ASSF in its test cycle, so the window sticker would show no improvement, despite the real-world increase of 1-2 mpg in the city. So, not every manual-trans MINI owner will want to pay $500 for something that theoretically gives them nothing, so if we put in a realistic take rate of 20% on those manual MINIs (3,600 cars), we’re now looking at $1,000 for this option, just to break even. Who’d buy it then? Give it about two years, and we’d have to discontinue it. This is the type of stuff we go back and forth with all day. It kills me not to have it here, but the market dictates what we bring here.
Â
MF: Ok, you’re officially off the hook. I suppose it’s up to us to pressure the EPA to took another look at their standards. Let’s turn to the other end of the spectrum and talk JCW. What can we expect from JCW when it comes to the R60? We’ve heard the rumor and it would seem that there are big plans?
VK: The rumors are somewhat true and somewhat not. We talked about it a few times last year and nothing more had become of it. It’s been quiet since because we’re already working on the next-generation MINIs, so that’s where we will concentrate on JCW.
Â
MF: And what about the WRC rally rumor that won’t go away? Anything you can comment on?
VK: I can neither confirm nor deny, but all the ingredients are there. BMW recently left one form of motorsports and there are a lot of resources…
With that (hinted) bombshell you’ll have to come back Monday to hear more from our interview. Specifically we’ll be talking diesels, center rail options and the possibility that the Countryman will ultimately kill the Clubman.
55 Comments
<p>so price wise, that’s $23k for the cooper and $26.5k for the S. 6% for awd would be $24k for the cooper and $28k for the S.</p>
<p>not terrible but the imprezzas range from $17-$27 and the wrx ranges from $24-$28. actually not too bad at all.</p>
<p>i’m interested to hear about the more car-like variant. no pho-offroading for me, just awd performance…</p>
<p>A big thanks to Vinnie for taking the time to discuss this. Nothing particularly earth shattering news but still great to get a few small extra details.</p>
<p>3k Lb, MINI. Sorry just so hard to swallow</p>
<p>3000lbs does seem like a lot, but when you think my 1st gen Cooper weighs in at 2500 or so, it’s not surprising. I liked the line “basically, it’s like driving an R55 with a full-sized passenger next to you.” But then you have to add the ACTUAL passenger 🙂 So it would be more like adding 500 lbs to the rear seat of your R56. I wonder how 120hp will feel with an additional 500 lbs… or even the S’s hp.</p>
<p>Considering what Bigger Motor Works has done to their entire brand over the years I am not surprised either I am sad to say. Can already taste the MINI platform continuing to bloat in the many years ahead. After all bigger and heavier is apparently the business model at BMW/MINI.</p>
<p>So you’re complaining about a four door crossover weighing 3,000 lbs? Name another that is as wellade structurally that weighs even close to that. The 2nd gen was lighter than the first. The 3rd may end up being the same. Will you still be complaining?</p>
<p>Those prices and weight put it pretty close the 4-door VW GTI, but unfortunately with ~180hp on the S model it would put it pretty far behind performance wise.</p>
<p>No complaints here about the extra weight. Given the extra room, still relatively small in comparison to the rash of crossovers from other manufacturers, I think it’s great. My 120 HP R56 MC has plenty of power for me, I feel it will do just fine in a FWD version of the R60.</p>
<p>It’s not always about performance. For many its about a vehicle with good utility and economy. And if the MC comes in at 23,000, you can sign me up.</p>
<p>Is there still no conformation that we will have awd in cooper trim as well as cooper S trim?</p>
<blockquote><p>Is there still no conformation that we will have awd in cooper trim as well as cooper S trim?</p></blockquote>
<p>It’s mentioned in the official release somewhere that All4 is only available on the MCS.</p>
<p>Nothing magical Gabe about 3k</p>
<p>Just a mental hiccup something based on Sir Alec’s vision and namesake product hitting that level just really makes me unhappy.</p>
<p>I know that the R56 did a great job of keeping weight off the car and do have some hope for the next evolution to do the same. However producing a heavier vehicle will likely lead to so giving on that. However the R56 does look physically much larger than the R53. I am always amazed just how much when I run my cars into the dealership.</p>
<p>Still don’t this a SUV/Crossover/R60 belongs in the brand personally.</p>
<p>Sir Alec’s vision was to create a car for the masses that was economical in response to the Suez Canal crisis of 1956 and gas rationing in Britain. In my mind producing a car with more utility that is also economical is in line with that vision.</p>
<p>I routinely get gas mileage in the upper 30s around town and well over 40 on the interstate in my R56 MC. If I can get close to that, albiet at some acceleration loss with the extra weight, I’d be delighted. In my mind that is totally consistent with the basis of MIni as created.</p>
<p>An excellent point, Gabe. As much as we all prefer less weight, we have to realize that weight is inevitibly going to be somewhat relative to other current vehicles due to size, safety, etc. The MINI, while weighing twice as much as a Mini, is still one of the lightest cars you can buy that isn’t a Smart kart… I mean car… or a tin can. By the same token, the 3000lb isn’t “light” relative to a Mini Estate, but there aren’t many cars under 3000lb anymore… And none or almost none of them are premium 4-door crossovers. Even Cobalts and Civics are nearing the 3k lb mark these days. So, I think we should continue to pressure MINI set realistic weight and weight <em>loss</em> goals, but still realize and appreciate that MINI, just like Mini in 1959, makes some of the smallest and lightest vehicles one can buy.</p>
<p>Not that I would ever buy a SUV 3k lbs isn’t all that heavy still the fact that BMW is behind the MINI brand and is well known for producing every larger and heavier cars 3k is a dangerous slope to me. Yes the competition is slightly heavier it comes with a little more room so no surprise (including seating for 5).</p>
<p>Still think a extended Clubman with 4 doors would have come in under 3k.</p>
<p>I am sorry but the R60 is a MINI that is not so Mini</p>
<p>@jonPD
Sir Alec’s vision was more akin to the smart car….we left his vision the second the new MINI was introduced. The modern MINI brand is not extension of his philosophy, never was and never will be. I don’t understand how a small SAV/SUV that meets my needs and keeps me from buying a larger vehicle is not MINI in philosophy, and it obviously is MINI in design cues.</p>
<p>To me the much ignored BMW 328i Sportswagon is looking better and better by the day vs this thing that pretends to be a MINI (sorry, marketing spin does not work to convince me otherwise).</p>
<p>What’s not to love?</p>
<p>5 passenger seating</p>
<p>RWD</p>
<p>6 cyl inline engine</p>
<p>50/50 weight distribution</p>
<p>A real trunk</p>
<p>BMW build quality</p>
<p>4 year included maintenance</p>
<p>Comfortable seats</p>
<p>Premium look and feel</p>
<p>All for very, very close to the price of an R60 S</p>
<p>And…</p>
<p>I don’t need AWD here in FL, so moot point. BMW dealer is willing to discount, and heck, I can even do European delivery on the Bimmer wagon whereas is unavailable on ANY MINI.</p>
<p>I love my MINIs, but I think we have hit ceiling with them. Our next vehicle needs to provide better rear and cargo room. I can’t think of a better option than the 3er wagon.</p>
<p>I guess I will become the intended BMW customer target after owning 4 MINIs… Going up in the product chain.</p>
<p>The thing to remember for all the weight weenies out there is that not a single “lightweight” car from Sir Alex’s time would pass current crash testing standards. Air bags weigh something, side impact beams in the doors weigh something, roof panels that don’t deform in a roll-over weigh something.</p>
<p>We all may lament the loss of the lightweight pocket rocket, but with 157 million more idiots on the road since the 60’s, I’ll take the added safety any day!</p>
<p>Ditto to Hardingsan. “Tennessee” was a fine choice, seemed candid and question friendly. Learned a lot, the awd system sounds ideal. In this price range few other brands have a front and rear lsd set up for their base model.</p>
<p>Well James the idea that Mass = safety is humorous</p>
<p>I can bet that any of use would rather crash in a F1 than a Hummer. Yes safety items cause extra weight. But still most of the weight of any new car is not the safety items its the luxury items.</p>
<p>I would take a vehicle that is light and agile on its tires that can actually avoid a lot of the accidents a 3k+ lead sled with massive kinetic energy to make sure I can dodge less things.</p>
<p>I also agreed Vinnie did a great job, I put this interview just short of the ask Stacco interviews.</p>
<p>“we are priced between the Clubman and the Convertible for the FWD Countryman models. The ALL4 version will be about 6% more than the Cooper S Countryman”</p>
<p>So for base Countryman we are looking between clubman $21,150 and $24,950 cabrio including Destination</p>
<p>Difference between the clubman and clubman s is $3600
Difference between the cabiro and cabrio s is $2900</p>
<p>So we are looking possibly at $24,000 Countryman and $27500 for Countryman s. So a loaded Countryman S with
Cold Weather $500
Painted Color Exterior $500
Auto trans $1250 (why do I want an auto? So the wife can drive it)
Premimum Pkg $1750</p>
<p>Around $31,000 for a nicely equipped Countryman S</p>
<p>Thoughts?</p>
<p>I will never pay a DIME over $30K for a MINI, no matter how good it is. You entering the turf of better cars once you break that barrier.</p>
<p>@JonPD – F1 cars? That’s like saying today’s passenger jetliners have gotten too heavy so you’d rather be in an F-22.</p>
<p>F1 cars don’t have to meet government safety or emissions standards (or pedestrian crash standards or you get the drift). F1 cars don’t have to deal with impact or rollover protection for multiple occupants. They don’t – to my knowledge – have to have airbags or airbag sensors. People don’t install child safety seats in F1 cars. They don’t have doors or a roof or extra seating or insulation. They’re also built out of absolutely cutting edge materials which, if used in a typical consumer-grade car, would push the cost into supercar territory.</p>
<p>There comes a point where the real world and real market considerations have to be taken into account. Despite what you see as its massive weight and size, the R60 will almost certainly be the smallest and lightest crossover by a good margin when it launches here next year.</p>
<p>C4, that I agree with. Actually my threshold is somewhat lower given I don’t want a S. For the MC my threshhold would be 25,000 including options (I don’t need many). Beyond that other things come into play for me. And other things doesn’t have to be more. I’d love my next to be a R60, but if it goes beyond 25,000 w/options, a loaded Honda Fit w/ NAV, premium sound, etc is less than 20,000. Yes I know, boring, but economics does come into play beyond a certain amount. Other options include VW Golf TDI w/DSG.</p>
<p>Todd, I think you are a little too close to the cabrio, I’m guessing about 22,500 to 23,000.</p>
<p>Glangford,</p>
<p>I very well could be wrong. I just want to find out now now now !</p>
<p>Matt I do hear your points, now hear mine.</p>
<p>I work in a industry where I see a huge number of accidents. This being said I have seen the end effect of safety through mass in the real world. A large number of the accidents are single vehicle accidents that can be linked directly to inertia from the speed and weight of the vehicle doom it when running into massive objects. Add to this the more mass that is carried the less controllable in a crash it is generally speaking. Also since the bigger and heavier for safety has been used for a great many years you can wrap yourself in 5k of steel and I will lay odds on that you will commonly find more massive vehicles around you.</p>
<p>At the end of the day small and lightweight can be very safe.</p>
<p>As for it being the smallest and lightest I think the SX-4 is actually both smaller and lighter already.</p>
<p>For the R60, 3000lb is not unexpected and quite reasonable given the dimensions and platform. I would not call it a light crossover, but it by no means the worst offender… it still comes in lighter than many hatches (e.g., GTI, mazda3, Subaru Impreza). On that basis, I’d give it a B+ for weight management.</p>
<p>Do you lose something when you drop weight? You might, but you don’t HAVE to… good engineering can give the same premium feel and safety and the weight loss will naturally improve: acceleration, cornering, braking, fuel economy, etc. This is why “lightweighting” is such a big deal to today’s auto engineers, inclusive of BMW. BMW has stated that the 3rd gen MINI will seek to be lighter than current models, and have said the same about the next 1-series.</p>
<p>There is currently a 1Hp (human power) Ferrari adult pedal car w/ 250 lb. capacity available at Hammacher Schlemmer selling for $3,000. Certainly a credible marketing gimmick aimed at those “poor” Wall Street souls suffering from bonus buck obesity.</p>
<p>This entire MINI adulteration process is getting more and more bizarre. While there may be proponents that welcome the propagation of grafted offshoots of an iconic original, it is not easy for many of us to digest the thalidomide inspired, greed driven designs that BMW is proffering for profit.</p>
<p>Obviously, BMW is not alone in icon dilution. See Porsche and Aston Martin. They’re well along the road to offering pickups and tractor-trailer big rigs!</p>
<p>Already another direct competition for the R60 with the Nissan Juke. I prefer the design of the R60 somewhat although it should be interesting to see how the battle between the two models go. Lets hope the R60 does better than the M3 up against the GT-R. Nissan tends to bury their cars behind layers of electronics. Then again BMW has followed suit so I guess not much to point out there as a difference (see the X5 and X6 ///Mom models)</p>
<p>@JonPD I agree that mass =/= safety, and typically prefer vehicles that are nimble enough to provide that added level of “active” safety. That’s a big part of why I drive a Clubman. It’s about as small, light and nimble as I can go and still accomodate the toddler’s carseat and a jogging stroller.</p>
<p>As for the SX4, yeah I forgot about it, but honestly so does the vast majority of the car buying public…</p>
<p>With the Nissan Juke I think MINI will have big competition. Also rumor so far has it it will seat 5 and only 2″ longer.</p>
<p>Hate to say it but looking over its very funky design I actually prefer many parts of it over the R60 and think the interior looks like much better materials and design</p>
<p>@JonPD
Sweet Jesus I just looked up the Nissan Juke – that is one ugly beast! Makes the Countryman look like Milla Jovovich.</p>
<p>If MINI can keep the Countryman under 3K lbs. that will be a good piece of engineering on their part.</p>
<p>Personally, I hope they do. As a small car advocate, I’ve put a self-imposed cap of 3K lbs. on all future vehicle purchases.</p>
<p>Just for reference, the new GTI weighs 3113 lbs.</p>
<p>Yea its going to be a love/hate car for sure Doug. Do think its got one major thing going for it. Their design team took much bigger risk designing something unique than MINI did. Interior wise I think its well ahead on design over the MINI. I would also bet on a Audi competitor with their new car as well given a little time.</p>
<p>I think all of the Nissan crossovers look peculiar, but that one cements it.</p>
<p>JohnPD, I won’t get into a debate with you on weight. Your opinion is noted, but don’t forget… I own a MINI too you know! I also feel that cars have gotten arbitrarily heavier at the detriment of handling, but as a major crash survivor (burst fracture of the T12 vertibrae in a BMW Z3), I also know damned well that structural integrity <i>and</i> airbags <i>and</i> roll-bars saved my life. Argue all you want, but until this happens to you, you will never convince me otherwise.</p>
<p>The current size and weight of the R60 is just fine the way it is… let’s let sleeping dogs lie.</p>
<p>Never said safety devices are not worth while James, just there is a lot to be gained from less inertia and being nimble.</p>
<p>Believe me when I can say that I have been involved in more than one nasty accident and I can say that extra mass in the accidents would not helped me and iota.</p>
<p>@JonPD– less mass overall is a good thing. If we can take some mass off the road, we’ll all be better off.</p>
<p>BUT… what about in car-on-car collisions when your proposed lightweight car collides with the average 4000-5000lb SUV? And hopefully you don’t meet up with a H2. Until everyone starts driving lighter cars, it will be a bit dangerous to be one of the few in a light car.</p>
<p>You point is valid though… as a trend going forward, it will be great to see all automakers cut the fat out of their cars. I think the proposed fuel economy regulations will cause many of them to take a serious look at how they can do this.</p>
<p>I must be looking at this from a different POV though. When I saw the 3000lb number, my first impression was also “wow” but for a different reason. I like the concept of a small, lightweight crossover and I’m glad they were able to keep this around 3000lbs with the extra height, length, doors, etc.</p>
<p>Great article. Can’t wait for part two. Every new bit of info on this MINI makes it that much easier to see parked in the driveway (or in my case, on the street, yikes).</p>
<p>Though, it’s a shame that every great article Gabe posts on this new MINI turns into a debate, as one Motoring File commenter seeks to hold court with each new person who makes the mistake of commenting.</p>
<p>The 2-door MINI is still out there, for anyone to buy. Why do we even have this conversation over and over, about the Countryman? It exists, and will continue to exist.</p>
<p>Because we are enthusiastic about this crossover doesn’t mean we’re missing anything. We get it. Please let’s stop beating the drum for any driver’s elitest vision about anything, and let’s stop feeding the … comments.</p>
<p>Best comment of the month.</p>
<p>is this going to come in a five seat belt platform?</p>
<p>I agree with Doug, this is just to enrich the brand and bring something for everyone. Someone who is looking for a m6 isn’t going to buy an X6 because it brings two totally different purposes, feel and performance.</p>
<p>First off, thanks again Gabe and the whole MF team for presenting these types of in-depth articles covering of MINIs and development for this brand that we all love.</p>
<p>I can’t wait for the second half. I really appreciated Vinnie’s explanation of the auto start/stop marketability in the U.S. I would absolutely LOVE to have this feature on my car, but he’s right…no way I’d be willing to pay $1000 for it. Maybe $200 max. I guess it begs the question why this technology cannot be applied to automatics (I know it’s on hybrids and am sure that’s also part of the explanation why it’s not on a non-hybrid automatic).</p>
<p>It does also lead to the question of whether there will be a chance at having European delivery available for the MINI. Also, I think it would be helpful to have a basic review article on BMW/MINI’s corporate structure…what’s the chain of command on design decisions, and then furthermore describe how each national MINI group feeds into the whole in terms of vehicle allotments, vehicle components, etc. I understand why MINIUSA is breaking down what options will be on their cars and what won’t be based on profit margins, but I’ve got to think that the marginal cost differences, at the plant in Austria, of stocking and installing auto start/stop in cars destined for the US vs. cars destined for the EU can’t be that much different. It also implies that in lieu of us getting auto start/stop, we’re getting stuff that is not default on EU cars (like the roof-racks?), or maybe we’re just getting lower relative pricing…</p>
<p>I have had a 2003 mini and 2008. Love the cars but, I need something larger for work.
I want to remain loyal to a company that has been loyal to me for these past 8 years. So..I will miss my “Smaller Wheels” but, I’m thrilled to be able to stay with a company that values it’s customers and builds a superior product.I frankly,understand some of the views of The Mini Purists and I am pleased that they are able to drive there autos, but cut the rest of us some slack for The Countryman will give me the opportunity to stay in the family.</p>
<p>I am sure my view on the R60 will never change, having said that I will hold my tongue on this development from this point on.</p>
<p>Don’t hold your tongue, JonPD. The apologists will try to censor you by means of “subliminal” messages like “don’t feed the troll” and the customary sugarcoated insults.</p>
<p>Keep it up my friend!</p>
<p>@Doug, great reminder about the MINI Cooper/S.</p>
<p>@Gabe, you wrote “Best comment of the month.”</p>
<p>Isn’t debate like this great for motoringfile.com? I know some of us are dismissed on White Roof Radio when commenters are mentioned, but isn’t lively debate a significant benefit to sites like this?</p>
<p>If nothing else, the relative backlash against the Countryman is signaling to MINI that they still have customers who strongly value small, as well as a contingent who want a MINI but need “more” car.</p>
<p>I’m in the former category. I loved your question in Detroit, where I seem to remember that you asked if and when we’d see a smaller car from MINI.</p>
<p>I still view this as a Subaru Outback-ish competitor not a SUV, which takes the edge off. And, I have to say, the top view photograph of the Countryman is one of the sexiest shots of a consumer vehicle I’ve ever seen.</p>
<p>It’s a shame that auto-stop start won’t be available here. BMW is putting in the new 8speed autos. Perhaps the tech isn’t worth it in the smaller engines. I understand the pricing on it though.</p>
<p>The AWD system sounds great. And based on weight, I don’t think the Cooper Countryman would be very happy with the system. I am more excited about the All4 eliminating the torque steer of the Cooper S.</p>
<p>Pricing sounds good, probably can get out the door just at the $30k mark which is reassuring. I don’t think a new 3er Touring is a competitor at all, totally different car. I do like it, but once you add similar options, it’s still about $8k more than the Countryman would be. It’s larger, and has that amazing I-6. It’s the used car front that is more alluring. I found a 2006 325i for $19k, which is what my dad paid for his 2009 Cooper and $1k more than what I paid for my 2004 Cooper.</p>
<p>Like the other MINIs, I don’t know what the direct competitors are. Seems to be a variety of all cars, the “alternative” on a list of similars basically.</p>
<p>Can’t wait for the rest of the interview!</p>
<p>@MatthewW: You sir have been granted the “Best comment of the month” award. Your post has nailed it to perfection. Respectful and healthy debate is what makes these sites interesting and worth coming to. Otherwise, they become nothing but “fanboy” virtual billboards of group think mentality.</p>
<p>MINI needs to remember this: We, your loyal customers, vote with our wallets. You have stiff competition and that’s is simply not going to change in the foreseeable future. Some of us that have purchased your products for nearly a decade lament the direction the company and brand has taken. Your desire to become “all things to al people” will bite you in the rear in due time.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>It’s a shame that auto-stop start won’t be available here. BMW is putting in the new 8speed autos. Perhaps the tech isn’t worth it in the smaller engines. I understand the pricing on it though.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>They won’t be bringing it to the US for the same reasons.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Isn’t debate like this great for motoringfile.com? I know some of us are dismissed on White Roof Radio when commenters are mentioned, but isn’t lively debate a significant benefit to sites like this?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Of course – the debate will never stop. It would be terrible if it did. However the same points being brought up by one person 4-5 times a story gets old over the years. I’ve stated my disappointment that MINI went down this route but I’ve also tried to keep an open mind and not shove that opinion down people’s throat at every opportunity. And by keeping an open mind it’s helped all of us here see both sides of the divide and try to simply bring the best stories to MF.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>I’m in the former category. I loved your question in Detroit, where I seem to remember that you asked if and when we’d see a smaller car from MINI.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>It’s important to respect the business decisions that brought the R60 to market. It will sell well. It will likely make money for BMW and MINI and allow them a little more freedom to do new things. For instance the Roadster and Coupé twins were almost surely brought about only because the R60 was coming. Further sales gives BMW a little more wiggle room to try new things with a still young brand</p>
<p>“It’s important to respect the business decisions that brought the R60 to market.”</p>
<p>@Gabe, I wasn’t clear. I have no illusions about tilting at the BMW windmill: nothing I say or feel about the R60, or any other MINI, will make a difference. Besides, I’m not a hater, but I do honor the opinions of the detractors: it’s not AI’s dream car, to be sure.</p>
<p>What I was commenting on was a question you asked MINI during an interview in Detroit. I don’t have the file at hand, but I will look into it and provide a link.</p>
<p>I thought you asked MINI whether or not the company has plans to design something even smaller than the R50/56.</p>
<p>That, frankly, is something I’d be interested in. My path to MINI went through the SmartCar. Our dealers here, Boulder County, were asking insane premiums (final price a few years ago was in the $25k range) for that “car”. That pushed me into a MINI, which I had wanted since the R50 debuted, but wasn’t small as I had hoped. MINI has exceeded my expectations, and I dream of something as good, yet smaller still.</p>
<p>Great interview!</p>
<p>Oh and that top shot of the car with the roof.</p>
<p>ME WANT.</p>
<p>When an opinion represented by about 5% of the readers becomes about 30% of the posting, and the resulting “debate” becomes 60-75% of the posts it all becomes pretty tiresome. In the end it detracts from the site more than a reasonable health debate. Just because a few individuals inflate the presence of their concerns in the comments it does not make the ideas any more valid or significant to the Mini story. It does however make the comments extremely annoying.</p>
<p>Guys, lets not get on an argument about people posting whatever. I am sorry to you all that I have been pushing the boundaries on taste. Gabe sorry for the headache.</p>
<p>Lets get back on topic. A great part 1 interview with Vinnie, looking forward to a possible part 2.</p>
<p>I wonder since this will be released in early 2011, will this be released as a 2011 model or 2012. I can only think it would make sense to release it as a 2012…… thoughts?</p>
<p>Wow, I am having a real hard time following the line of reasoning regarding the auto stop start pricing. Now, I am no MBA holder from a prestigious school like all the people running BMW/MINI, but it seems to me that the situation is as follows.</p>
<p>BMW/MINI has already spent a pot of money to design the systems to make it work. That cost will not change no matter how many cars it is on.</p>
<p>The engine and car assembly lines are already set up to either install the system or not install it, based on it being available in Europe. These same lines make Euro spec and US spec cars randomly as orders come in already, so any additional costs to allow it to be installed for cars destined to come here should be minimal at most.</p>
<p>The components have a certain cost to make and deliver to the point of installation. If they make 10,000 or 20,000 the cost to make each one is not going to go up. If anything, it should go down. The cost to deliver each additional part to the point of install should be limited, though there is a real cost associated with this.</p>
<p>So, assuming they are pricing their options to cover their costs already, I just can’t see how it matters how many cars it is to be installed on here, since it is already being installed somewhere. Now, if thie were a new option never offered before, I totally get it, but since it is not, unless the accountants are assigning random costs, it just does not make sense to me.</p>