An oldie but a goodie, for those of you into classic Minis, here’s one we couldn’t pass up posting about – even if it’s just for the great pics. And of course it’s for sale (via our friends at Bring a Trailer). For just $13,000 all this could ge yours:
Unlike so many questionable Minis out there, this 1960 Morris Mini is a genuine car with a British Heritage Certificate showing its original DoB in June of 1960. It was given a bare-shell repair and repaint approximately 5 years ago in Old English White with a black top, a classic color combo. A 1275 cc engine and disk brakes bring it closer to Cooper S performance, and the overall interior and exterior presentation is very clean and period correct.
So classic Mini owners out there – let’s here from you. Tell us about your cars and your experiences.
And of course check out the fully story here.
<p>Is this “virgin territory” that motoringfile.com is exploring? Â Are commentators now permitted to post classified ads? I’m not knocking it. Â Simply like to know the posting policy.</p>
<p>If for no other reason, I think images of classic MINIs serve a very useful purpose i.e., they remind us (and presumably the manufacturer) of the genesis of the brand — more specifically, the much loved scale of the cars we’ve grown to love. Â Don’t want to be accused of inadvertent plagiarism, but MINI really needs to get back on track and “THINK SMALL” like another has preached for decades, but has also regrettably begun to super-size. Â MINI needn’t follow trends, but rather remain distinctive and true to its equally iconic heritage.</p>
<p>bringatrailer.com is a separate Web site from MotoringFile, dedicated to bringing to your attention a variety of reasonably priced sporty old cars (with a fondness for European marques). They feature classic MINIs pretty regularly so I’m not sure why this one made the cut for MF. I highly recommend everyone check it out and sign up for their emails. Even if you’re not in the market for an old car of any kind (as I am not), it’s a great read to start your day.</p>
<p>Thank you bee1000.</p>
<p>And that is why we like to feature their finds on MF.</p>
<p>And that is why we like to feature their finds on MF.</p>
<p>Is this “virgin territory” that motoringfile.com is exploring? Â Are commentators now permitted to post classified ads? I’m not knocking it. Â Simply like to know the posting policy.</p>
<p>If for no other reason, I think images of classic MINIs serve a very useful purpose i.e., they remind us (and presumably the manufacturer) of the genesis of the brand — more specifically, the much loved scale of the cars we’ve grown to love. Â Don’t want to be accused of inadvertent plagiarism, but MINI really needs to get back on track and “THINK SMALL” like another has preached for decades, but has also regrettably begun to super-size. Â MINI needn’t follow trends, but rather remain distinctive and true to its equally iconic heritage.</p>
<p>Is this “virgin territory” that motoringfile.com is exploring? Â Are commentators now permitted to post classified ads? I’m not knocking it. Â Simply like to know the posting policy.</p>
<p>If for no other reason, I think images of classic MINIs serve a very useful purpose i.e., they remind us (and presumably the manufacturer) of the genesis of the brand — more specifically, the much loved scale of the cars we’ve grown to love. Â Don’t want to be accused of inadvertent plagiarism, but MINI really needs to get back on track and “THINK SMALL” like another has preached for decades, but has also regrettably begun to super-size. Â MINI needn’t follow trends, but rather remain distinctive and true to its equally iconic heritage.</p>
<p>Is this “virgin territory” that motoringfile.com is exploring? Â Are commentators now permitted to post classified ads? I’m not knocking it. Â Simply like to know the posting policy.</p>
<p>If for no other reason, I think images of classic MINIs serve a very useful purpose i.e., they remind us (and presumably the manufacturer) of the genesis of the brand — more specifically, the much loved scale of the cars we’ve grown to love. Â Don’t want to be accused of inadvertent plagiarism, but MINI really needs to get back on track and “THINK SMALL” like another has preached for decades, but has also regrettably begun to super-size. Â MINI needn’t follow trends, but rather remain distinctive and true to its equally iconic heritage.</p>
<p>Is this “virgin territory” that motoringfile.com is exploring? Â Are commentators now permitted to post classified ads? I’m not knocking it. Â Simply like to know the posting policy.</p>
<p>If for no other reason, I think images of classic MINIs serve a very useful purpose i.e., they remind us (and presumably the manufacturer) of the genesis of the brand — more specifically, the much loved scale of the cars we’ve grown to love. Â Don’t want to be accused of inadvertent plagiarism, but MINI really needs to get back on track and “THINK SMALL” like another has preached for decades, but has also regrettably begun to super-size. Â MINI needn’t follow trends, but rather remain distinctive and true to its equally iconic heritage.</p>
<p>Is this “virgin territory” that motoringfile.com is exploring? Â Are commentators now permitted to post classified ads? I’m not knocking it. Â Simply like to know the posting policy.</p>
<p>If for no other reason, I think images of classic MINIs serve a very useful purpose i.e., they remind us (and presumably the manufacturer) of the genesis of the brand — more specifically, the much loved scale of the cars we’ve grown to love. Â Don’t want to be accused of inadvertent plagiarism, but MINI really needs to get back on track and “THINK SMALL” like another has preached for decades, but has also regrettably begun to super-size. Â MINI needn’t follow trends, but rather remain distinctive and true to its equally iconic heritage.</p>
<p>Is this “virgin territory” that motoringfile.com is exploring? Â Are commentators now permitted to post classified ads? I’m not knocking it. Â Simply like to know the posting policy.</p>
<p>If for no other reason, I think images of classic MINIs serve a very useful purpose i.e., they remind us (and presumably the manufacturer) of the genesis of the brand — more specifically, the much loved scale of the cars we’ve grown to love. Â Don’t want to be accused of inadvertent plagiarism, but MINI really needs to get back on track and “THINK SMALL” like another has preached for decades, but has also regrettably begun to super-size. Â MINI needn’t follow trends, but rather remain distinctive and true to its equally iconic heritage.</p>
<p>My first car was a used 1961 Austin Mini 850 that I got for $440 when I was a senior in HS. I think the only difference between it and this Morris Mini was the grille and hood ornament and mine was light blue including the roof. Even though the 850 cc engine was amazing slow getting started, I still had a lot of fun with it, and was hooked on small cars ever since. I was always lusting for a Cooper S, but never could find one.</p>
<p>If I remember correctly, the original seats were fixed and made of a tubular frame work. The front tubular legs had a hole drilled thru them side-ways, creating a hinge so you could tilt the whole seat forward to get into the backseat. It was basically an upholstered lawn chair.</p>
<p>And the body structure was basically a tin shell with absolutely no insulation, even at the “fire-wall” between engine, which made the interior unbearable during the hot summers in AZ.</p>
<p>I remember what you are describing. Many of the BMC brands of this vintage were similarly scant on acoustic and/or thermal insulation. The Austin Healey “Bug-eye” Sprite is a prime example. If you truly want to experience a tin shell, try out a Citroen 2CV otherwise known as the “tin snail.” </p>
<p>My first car was a used 1961 Austin Mini 850 that I got for $440 when I was a senior in HS. I think the only difference between it and this Morris Mini was the grille and hood ornament and mine was light blue including the roof. Even though the 850 cc engine was amazing slow getting started, I still had a lot of fun with it, and was hooked on small cars ever since. I was always lusting for a Cooper S, but never could find one.</p>
<p>If I remember correctly, the original seats were fixed and made of a tubular frame work. The front tubular legs had a hole drilled thru them side-ways, creating a hinge so you could tilt the whole seat forward to get into the backseat. It was basically an upholstered lawn chair.</p>
<p>And the body structure was basically a tin shell with absolutely no insulation, even at the “fire-wall” between engine, which made the interior unbearable during the hot summers in AZ.</p>
<p>I really liked those early classic Minis. But back in Dec 1972 I don’t think they were being exported to the U.S. any longer. At that time the 1st ever 1973 Honda Civics were showing up at dealers. There were a few of the previous 1972 Honda cars left to sell….the last year for the Honda Z600 Sport Coupe. It was very similar in size/weight to those early Classic Minis…about 10.5 ft long & 1310 lbs along with 10″ wheels. Had 2 doors & a hatchback, & 4 seats but like the Mini, the back seats were minimal! But it only had 36HP from the 2 cylinder 36 ci/606 CC air cooled motorcycle engine. The 0-60 was in the upper teens with a top speed of 75 mph which was also the redline in 4th gear! Although not a Mini it was still lots of fun on tight roads. Since Jan 2008 I’ve had a 2008 MCS hatch & await the release of the new 2 seater JCW Coupe about Oct 1st. With added options, I figure it’ll cost nearly twice as much as my 1st little house in 1971 but it sure will be lots more fun than a 3 BR 1 bath rambler. Lots of changes from the earliest Minis to the upcoming Coupe & Roadster…..</p>