That’s the opinion of more than a few these days. With millennials and younger generations more interested in technology than transportation, the future of the industry and the very shape of cars is ripe for reinvention. Throw autonomous driving cars into the mix and you have either a utopian or nightmare scenario depending on your view point. That scenario has been described a lot lately, but no more thought provokingly than by Zack Kanter:
>Most people – experts included – seem to think that the transition to driverless vehicles will come slowly over the coming few decades, and that large hurdles exist for widespread adoption. I believe that this is significant underestimation. Autonomous cars will be commonplace by 2025 and have a near monopoly by 2030, and the sweeping change they bring will eclipse every other innovation our society has experienced.
What could this mean for MINI? For the automotive industry? The car culture so many of us identify with love?
Massive change would be one scenario. Imagine a future (as Mr. Kanter does) where the vast majority of car ownership is through car sharing programs and companies like Uber. Further imagine the vast majority of those cars being 100% autonomous. The theoretical benefits are shocking:
>A Columbia University study suggested that with a fleet of just 9,000 autonomous cars, Uber could replace every taxi cab in New York City – passengers would wait an average of 36 seconds for a ride that costs about $0.50 per mile. Such convenience and low cost will make car ownership inconceivable, and autonomous, on-demand taxis – the ‘transportation cloud’ – will quickly become dominant form of transportation – displacing far more than just car ownership, it will take the majority of users away from public transportation as well. With their $41 billion valuation, replacing all 171,000 taxis in the United States is well within the realm of feasibility – at a cost of $25,000 per car, the rollout would cost a mere $4.3 billion.
>The effects of the autonomous car movement will be staggering. PricewaterhouseCoopers predicts that the number of vehicles on the road will be reduced by 99%, estimating that the fleet will fall from 245 million to just 2.4 million vehicles.
>Disruptive innovation does not take kindly to entrenched competitors – like Blockbuster, Barnes and Noble, Polaroid, and dozens more like them, it is unlikely that major automakers like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota will survive the leap. They are geared to produce millions of cars in dozens of different varieties to cater to individual taste and have far too much overhead to sustain such a dramatic decrease in sales. I think that most will be bankrupt by 2030, while startup automakers like Tesla will thrive on a smaller number of fleet sales to operators like Uber by offering standardized models with fewer options.
This last bit pre-supposes that automakers such as BMW (and MINI) haven’t seen change coming for many years. BMW’s own research led them to develop autonomous cars (I was a passenger in one for a lap of Laguna Seca four years ago) and a completely new type of electric vehicle the i3. Further BMW has bought into car sharing in a big way throughout Europe and preparing an assault on the U.S. market if rumors are to be believed.
Companies that are nimble and unafraid of reinvention will survive. Those that are mired in outdated processes and products will clearly not. But what will that change truly be? Mr. Kanter is convinced it will be unyielding and much quicker than we expect:
>Morgan Stanley estimates that a 90% reduction in crashes would save nearly 30,000 lives and prevent 2.12 million injuries annually. Driverless cars do not need to park – vehicles cruising the street looking for parking spots account for an astounding 30% of city traffic, not to mention that eliminating curbside parking adds two extra lanes of capacity to many city streets. Traffic will become nonexistent, saving each U.S. commuter 38 hours every year – nearly a full work week. As parking lots and garages, car dealerships and bus stations become obsolete, tens of millions of square feet of available prime real estate will spur explosive metropolitan development.
>The environmental impact of autonomous cars has the potential to reverse the trend of global warming and drastically reduce our dependence on fossil fuels. Passenger cars, SUVs, pickup trucks and minivans account for 17.6% of greenhouse gas emissions – a 90% reduction of vehicles in operation would reduce our overall emissions by 15.9%. As most autonomous cars are likely to be electric, we would virtually eliminate the 134 billion of gasoline used each year in the US alone. And while recycling 242 million vehicles will certainly require substantial resources, the surplus of raw materials will decrease the need for mining.
The dream is huge and frankly fascinating but for one problem. I like to drive. I bet you do as well. And while a world full of autonomous cars could be a dream for driving enthusiasts (computers driving cars are likely safer for the rest of us than many drivers), it’s the car culture that many of us love that could slowly fade into obscurity.
Is it worth it for a potentially positive fundamental change to our society?
[ Source ]
<p>Personal transportation is the last place that is going to be targeted by automation since for it to out-compete current cars people would need to give up ownership and make use of automated vehicles operated in an uber-like fashion. The last study on the idea found that the vast majority of Americans aren’t ready to make that change and can’t see themselves doing that in the next 10 years.</p>
<p>The current primary target for automation by the industry is actually long haul trucking. The port of Rotterdam replaced all of the truckers in their facilities because it allowed them to increase throughput by an absurd 40% because of how unreliable human truckers are, but that simply moved the human-created bottleneck to the depot where trailers are swapped to trucks driven by humans.</p>
<p>The next big push by Rotterdam is to simply replace human drivers on the public roads altogether, but that will require infrastructure such as the ability for these vehicles to be refuelled and pay for that fuel out in the wild. Even then they are only targeting 2025 despite the fact that this is going to save them hundreds of millions of dollars because of the challenges and risks involved. I think that 2025 for road cars is overly optimistic.</p>
<p>We don’t have much time left to complain about the design of the latest Mini or drive the ones we love.</p>
<p>Whether people are ready for it or want automated vehicles is fairly irrelevant. Most don’t know what they want until they see their neighbour or P Diddy with it. It takes a lot of individuality to be a holdout, and most people don’t want to stick out in the way laggards do. Mini drivers an exception, I’m sure.</p>
<p>The article leaves out one key aspect of techno-social change. Every new technology brings with it new behaviours, many of which are completely unexpected. Driverless cars could spur more driving or result in no net gains in real estate. For example, computers led to more printing, not less. And they certainly took up more desk space for a couple decades than their predecessor typewriters.</p>
<p>A Columbia University study suggested that with a fleet of just
9,000 autonomous cars, Uber could replace every taxi cab in New York
City – passengers would wait an average of 36 seconds for a ride that
costs about $0.50 per mile. Such convenience and low cost will make car
ownership inconceivable, and autonomous, on-demand taxis – the
‘transportation cloud’ – will quickly become dominant form of
transportation – displacing far more than just car ownership</p>
<p>This is a rosiest possible view. It completely discounts many important
factors. Consider the entire public versus private issue. If someone
owns something, they take care of it, because it’s the tangible product
of their labor. If someone uses something that they don’t own, they
don’t take care of it. Can you imagine the race to the bottom in a
fleet of automobiles that are the “transportation cloud”? Prostitutes
would be turning tricks in them and leaving used condoms on the seat.
Society is not going to embrace that. The rosy Columbia University
study was apparently authored by someone who believes communism will
work because we’ll all take care of everyone’s common property. History proves that’s not what humans do.</p>
<p>As much as I like fun cars, I’d welcome this change if it meant auto travel became safer by taking looney drivers out of the equation, accidents more rare, and insurance more trivial. Not convinced that self driving cars will do that, but maybe, and perhaps driving can then be recreation for those who really care about it. I think in a larger sense we may finally be approaching the end of the curve on cars, where new technology does not make them meaningfully more valuable to consumers. Then I hope we’ll see a drop in cost rather than a rise. All other tech drops in cost as it becomes widespread. Why do cars continue to get more expensive then?</p>
<p>i understand the excitment of autonomous cars and their appeal. but i do not see them being as popular as people think they will be in such a short amount of time. yes, in 100 years, or even in my childs life, i can definitely see them as mainstream.</p>
<p>But think of all the red tape and regulations we have to go through on an everyday basis. Do people really think that the government is ready to just let cars have control over the roads?</p>
<p>So many thoughts…</p>
<p>1 – I imagine we’ll see cars with autonomous modes in the fairly near future. I’m all for this. Let the car drive itself in the grind of morning and evening commute, but let me take the wheel on the engaging backroad, etc.</p>
<p>2 – Fleet vehicles will see automation first. Trucking, taxis, delivery vehicles and the like.</p>
<p>3 – I could see certain city centers outright banning personal vehicles in favor of a transportation cloud – but what may be workable for somewhere like London or New York would be a stretch in different cities and smaller towns.</p>
<p>4 – I imagine that one day driving will be kind of like horseback riding today – a hobby for those who can afford it, with private “driving parks”. Some people will own their own vehicles and keep them there, others will be able to rent by the hour. This is a pretty sad ending, but ultimately could see a return to purer driving, with real offroad trails for offroad vehicles and nice winding road courses that can be driven with pleasure.</p>
<p>I’d welcome the change. As much as I do enjoy a good drive, having just driven 7 hours from seeing relatives, something else, a chip, driving the car would have been welcome escpecially in monotonous interstate driving. I also like the uber concept. I’m nearing retirement and considering something non-traditional for a retirement home. The inner city. Why rot in the burbs or the country. I’d rather be downtown convieniently enjoying what the city has to offer. A good uber service of self driving cars. Perfect. Between that and a Vespa I’d be fine.</p>
<p>I also can’t help but hope that autonomous cars with great sensors and avoidance logic would make riding that Vespa (and other two-wheelers) that much safer by taking car driver error out of the equation.</p>
<p>Some things to think about…..</p>
<p>The average new car lasts about 15+ years and has three owners….</p>
<p>It takes a couple of turns of the average time to fully replace the fleet, figure about 45 years.</p>
<p>Whatever comes will have to co-exist with current tech, or be limited to only specific situations or locations for quite a long time.</p>
<p>Yes, driving as a pleasure unto itself is a priority for less and less people, and that’s pretty undeniable. But it’s not going away any time soon.</p>
<p>There’s so much talk about autonomous cars, and with the way tech advances, it’s probably a good thing. But before we get to the point where 90% of cars are replaced, there will be a HUGE ethics debate. On one of the latest episodes of Top Gear (#BringBackClarkson!), May & Hammond were discussing this scenario: a single driver in an autonomous car is driving down the road. The car senses or “spots” a pileup ahead with insufficient space for a complete stop, and recognizes two pedestrians on the sidewalk. The simple choice is: sacrifice the driver by plowing ahead into the pileup, or avoiding the crash but taking out two people on a sidewalk. What will the car do? Will there be a manual override for the human to engage?</p>
<p>What about if the car senses an animal in the road, but “knows” in its AI that there’s no room for evasive maneuvers. Does the car just plow over Fido or Fifi?</p>
<p>And don’t get me started on the potential for hackers to get into the car’s cloud control and start playing around. Autonomous, self-driving cars are just bad news in so many ways, yet admittedly good in others. I wouldn’t want to have to figure this out on my own…</p>