As seen on MotoringFile, the new MINI John Cooper Works is in full launch mode. As such, our colleagues from various automotive news outlet have release their initial review of the most powerful MINI yet. While we won’t dwell on the mechanical specs of the car – we’re sure you must know them all by now – here is what [Auto Express](http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/mini/mini/91381/mini-john-cooper-works-2015-review) and [Auto Car](http://www.autocar.co.uk/car-review/mini/hatchback/first-drives/2015-mini-john-cooper-works-automatic-uk-review) have to say about this new JCW.
Auto Car:
>To drive, the JCW is indeed surprisingly fast up to the legal limit and flexible enough in real-world use to keep up with any lower-order sports car – and any hot hatch up to, say, a Mercedes-Benz A45 AMG. The engine responds keenly, with gutsy low-end torque, a gravelly, crackling exhaust note and ample freedom at high revs.
>
>This one is much happier scything along smooth A-roads than it is pitching and bobbing, staccato-style, down a rough country lane. But it dives into those smooth apexes with instinctive zeal and responds to every input as if on a hair trigger.Equally, it’s not so stiff that its ride turns skittish, or its handling nervous, when you really extend it over the bumps. More steering feedback would be welcome, as would a stickier set of tyres than the standard-fit Pirelli Cinturatos – but perhaps Cowley’s next GP version of this car will have both.
>
>The Mini JCW has always looked like a pricey purchase, and this one is no different. Satisfied customers will value it as much for what it is – the ultimate Mini – as for what it does, because this isn’t the most multi-talented or usable hot hatch. For something likely to approach £30k after options, it’s not the quickest or most exciting for the money, either. However, considering the quality and desirability of the car, its capacity to retain its showroom value and its stirring motive character, the JCW has got more in its armoury than most of its rivals ever needed to succeed. And succeed it will.
Auto Express:
>The new modular underpinnings of the latest MINI Cooper S showed promise of being able to handle and distribute more power effectively, the JCW proves that’s possible. There’s a slight squirm from the steering wheel under hard acceleration but torque steer is well contained, with the rorty crescendo of the new sports exhaust encouraging you to press on, especially with the crackles from the pipes on the overrun.
>
>Rather than a mechanical differential, MINI has bolted on a lighter and cheaper electronic diff. It’s capable of letting you tackle faster, sweeping bends more courageously, with the slight movement in the body allowing you to pinpoint exactly where the grip is. In tighter bends the electronic diff isn’t able to put the MINI’s power down with the conviction of the Corsa VXR fitted with a mechanical differential and the result is a whiff of understeer in the JCW.
>
>But this is where the MINI arguably comes into it’s own. You can counter the understeer with a slight lift of throttle mid corner, allowing the agile back end to become more mobile and follow the nose. There’s far more charm and interactivity in the MINI than you’ll find in the Audi S1, but like the Audi, the JCW’s steering could do with a touch more feel, despite being generally direct and positively weighted.
>
>One of its weak points for the MINI John Cooper Works is value, or lack of it. At £24,380 its almost £4,000 more than the Cooper S but add on some not-so-outrageous optional extras such as sat-nav, parking sensors, automatic air con and Bluetooth and that price escalates rapidly. Our test car came in at a smidge under £32,000 – an eye-watering figure for a hot hatch, never mind a MINI.
All in all both reviews appear to be positive. We can’t wait for comparison review, and to get our hands on it.
<p>Yeah I’m stoked for this car. If I hadn’t already just bought my ’15 R58 JCW, I would be all over this. (My poor wife)</p>
<p>I think journalists need to stop pulling the price card. MINIs are expensive. BMWs are expensive. Yep. Nothing new. Can you get the same driving pleasure from any other type of car? I don’t think so.</p>
<p>You can get driving pleasure from cheaper cars sure, same can be said for a Porsche. But MINIs have something intangible other cars don’t have. I’ve never found another brand/type of car scratch the same itch as MINIs do. I’ve tried.</p>
<p>If you’re just a bean counter, then you won’t honestly consider a MINI anyway.</p>
<p>One of its weak points for the MINI John Cooper Works is value, or lack of it. At £24,380 its almost £4,000 more than the Cooper S but add on some not-so-outrageous optional extras such as sat-nav, parking sensors, automatic air con and Bluetooth and that price escalates rapidly. Our test car came in at a smidge under £32,000 – an eye-watering figure for a hot hatch, never mind a MINI.</p>
<p>From the AutoExpress review……..</p>
<p>I’ve got one on order for $42,000 to replace my 2009 that ran about $40,000. Not cheap by any sense of the word, but I really didn’t give any other car any thought. This will be MINI number 6. Oh well, guess I drank the Kool-Aid, but my 2009 JCW still puts a smile on my face when I take it out for a drive to work, or just around the city.</p>
<p>FWIW I enjoyed the F55 MCS more than the 60k BMW 428i Gran Coupe recently. Sometimes it’s hard to put a price on what a MINI gives you.</p>
<p>via mobile</p>
<p>My wife and I did the Austin to Dallas run on MINI Takes the States last summer. It’s the first time my wife understood the whole MINI thing. We had a blast and only did two stops (we drove out with the group when they left Dallas). My wife isn’t a car person, so it was really neat to see her really enjoy the whole experience. We never got that with the last 4 Lexus autos she had, although they were very nice.
As far as the looks on the new JCW, I wasn’t sold from the photos, but after seeing it live, and taking it for a spin, I agree with Gabe’s comments about the upgraded materials, and the exterior design grew on me.</p>
<p>I drove from Sacramento to Lubbock in MTTS last year in our ’12 R56S. Along the way I paid some attention to the new F56S’s along the way. The look grew on me, and my wife wanted to change to an auto tranny. When we got home, I test drove a F56S Auto and ordered one the next day. I have 8900 miles on my new MINI and have no regrets. If I were a JCW guy, I wouldn’t hesitate.</p>
<p>The transmission in the F series is a game-changer. I’ve never driven a traditional automatic I would consider owning, but the MINI’s is one. I’m guessing the tranny in the M235i is also that good.</p>
<p>It’s better. But in no way as enjoyable as the manual that’s available.</p>
<p>Well yeah, I’d make the same argument about a dual clutch box. More specifically I mean this auto closes the DSG / Torque convertor Auto gap</p>
<p>Yeah quite a bit. The 8AT in BMWs (and a bunch of other higher-end cars) are incredibly fast while being generally more refined than the DCT. The version in the new X6M is particularly impressive.</p>
<p>How is that? It’s not a DCT, DSG or PDK. We are still talking about the Aisin transmission, which I had in my R56 MCS, a regular 6 spd torque converter that is not up to par with the best that ZF has to offer, as in the regular BMW lineup or in Jags.</p>
<p>The Aisin 6 speed in the ’15 F56S is tuned differently from the earlier versons. It shifts much quicker and downshifts quicker while blipping the throttle.</p>
<p>That’s good, but, it still can’t match a dual clutch setup for ease of banging through the gears.</p>
<p>You’re right. But it’s surprisingly close and easier to live with day to day. Id prefer a dual clutch but at its dramatically better than before.</p>
<p>There are always compromises.The Aisin is much more user friendly in everyday use and it’s performance is still far superior to a manual transmission. DSG transmissions are very questionable for cars used as everyday drivers. I know because I an an Audi owner.</p>
<p>And I am a VW owner with a Golf TDI DSG and a R 6MT. I have found that, surprisingly enough, the DSG suits the TDI quite well. WE all have our opinions and so be it.</p>
<p>Amen</p>
<p>On another side, How does a Diesel relate to a gas engine? Sense frolling?</p>
<p>Diesel’s lazy attitude and DSG seem to hide an foibles of the system …</p>
<p>The programming in the Golf R DSG isn’t as good as the F series auto. I’ll stand by that assertion from first hand experience. <em>Can</em> the DSG shift better? Yes it the programming allows it to. My best guess is that the programming is lazy in the DSG because they’re trying to gain something in terms of consumption.</p>
<p>DCT in my old E90, or PDK IS WAY DIFFERENT and better than the F series auto. But again it’s all in the software. VW for some reason decided to dumb down the software in the golf R.</p>
<p>That’s because the 428 isn’t really a focused drivers car (no matter what BMW marketing says). But ask the rear seat passengers what car they like being in, and I bet you get a different answer!</p>
<p>I didn’t compare them as such.</p>
<p>Agreed. And with those prices, I’m surprised BMWs don’t get dinged about for exorbitant prices as much as MINI dues.</p>
<p>They do :)</p>
<p>Then again pick-up trucks are also over 50k these days.</p>
<p>Good for you Karl, life’s to short to drive a boring car. I feel the same way about my custom order f56s…LOVE IT.</p>
<p>Yeah I know. That’s why I was addressing the journalists that always pull the price card. It’s just lazy and boring to read.</p>
<p>One has to note that they make a valid point. I really like driving my wife’s MCS on twisty small roads, but my tuned Golf R is so much faster point to point that at the price they are asking for the JCW, it’s all about the subjective feel, and that is a personal thing that the journalists note. In the end, you really have to accept that technically, it’s not up to what most would call a good value. Disclaimer, I have had 2 Minis and we still have one in the family.</p>
<p>Everyone needs to know about the “price card” as it’s very important. Look, if a 911 GT3 were $25k we’d all be driving them, but they aren’t and we’re not. When a car gets up to the ~$40k price point, lots of other cars come into play.</p>
<p>As far as other cars with the same driving pleasure, there is a very, very long list of cars that give you the giggles and grins of a MINI, it’s just that they are very different value propositions, some more focused and some less. Pricing is all over the place.</p>
<p>The Alfa 4C is ALMOST better than sex, the GLA45 AMG is even MORE fun than the MINIs and my former FIAT 124 spider was one of the most fun cars that I’ve ever owned, despite it’s almost negative total torque number. Around town, the FIAT 500e is as much fun as any MINI (but it’s less fun when driven really hard, it’s a busy drive to get going fast.) Heck, I drove a Challenger Shaker (with only around 400 hp, one of the low power V8s from Chrysler), it was TOTALLY A BLAST! Even with the safety nannies on, when you start from a stop with any authority, the car squats, does that little rear step to the right (anyone who’s owned an older muscle car knows this effect) and then it just TAKES OFF! The base is just over $36k and while it may not be your cup of tea, it sure is a RESOUNDING value statement! For the HP crazy, the Scat Pack Shaker is just at $43k, and offers almost 500 HP. With a warranty that would make any MINI owner weep with jealousy (Even the 707 HP Hellcats come with a 10 year, 100,000 mile warranty!)</p>
<p>No matter what, money is the great equalizer. To say that MINI is still at the top of the value/performance pyramid like it was (arguably) when it first came out just ignores what others have done with their offerings. The Golf R is a great car. If you like a bit of a more buttoned down sophisticated ride, spend your money there. If you like the way the MINIs act (a little more tossable and playfull, but not really any more capable, maybe even less), spend your money on it.</p>
<p>Well I didn’t say you couldn’t have fun for 40k. But the intangible that makes a MINI a MINI can’t be had anywhere else in the automotive landscape in the USA. That’s driving character, interior design/materials. Etc. Some may argue the Abarth, or Fiesta. Similar but still different.</p>
<p>The closest analogy for MINI is Porsche I think. I suppose the biggest difference is that Porsches at the upper end many times hold their value.</p>
<p>With a Porsche every journalist complains about the price, you can get a Z06 etc. etc. for that price.</p>
<p>The honest thing is that if MINI couldn’t justify the price from the market they wouldn’t be able to exist.</p>
<p>I take offense to the lazy journalism of whining about the price is all. At this point MINI has been around a long time, and has been too expensive for a long time. I can say the same about BMW, and Mercedes in general too.</p>
<p>I have a ’15 Golf R. It’s fun in it’s own way, but it’s no MINI. In fact I may sell it because my warranty experience has been so bad with it.</p>
<p>Quick question – well, not that quick since my 2016 order is placed, but far enough out that I can make changes. Would you go with the standard black color line in the interior or with the glowing red color line? I initially opted for the glowing red since I’ve picked the Dinamica microsuede seats, but I don’t think the reds match, and in the pictures of the giant gallery in the other post, I think the standard black looks classier. I ordered the JCW in rebel green with the red roof and mirrors, but I’m wavering on that a little bit, too. I think the white roof and mirrors may look better, too, but I saw the green / red combo in person, and I like it, especially since it’s only available on the JCW.
So, in review – red color line interior or not, and green / red or green / white. I need some cooler heads to prevail before I have to finalize the specs. Thanks – and, the F56 haters don’t really need to reply since I quit caring about your opinions months and months ago. No, I’m not going to get a VW.</p>
<p>For what it’s worth I’d go with:</p>
<p>Rebel green / white
Dynamica seats
Piano black
Red color line</p>
<p>White stripes or no stripes – I currently have the black/red JCW stripes ordered to go with the red roof. Thanks for your feedback, since down deep I think the green/white combo will really look sweet.</p>
<p>I’d say colors are a very personal choice. In general what I do is try to find as many real-world pictures as I can on google to see. My opinion that the red color line is awesome, but I wouldn’t spend 2000 for the leather/dinamica seats myself so it wouldn’t be a problem.</p>
<p>My 13 Golf R with a fair amount of modifications still going like gang busters @ 50K plus miles. They aren’t all bad.</p>
<p>I knew I should have left the VW comment out of it. I don’t dislike the Golf R, it’s just that I’m not getting one. Just looking for some opinions on my color choices – exterior and interior. I really enjoyed the way the new JCW drove, and I’m just waiting for the manual tranny is available. Plus if I have to wait a month to get a 2016, I’m going to wait a month. My 2009 has 31K miles, but is a June 2008 build. Wish I’d waited until the Sept 2008 builds because they made a couple of changes. Tired of being an early adopter and missing out on a couple of early changes.</p>
<p>For me personally I just like that they give you the option to build it up to whatever price you want. There’s no legitimate reason to build a $40k+ MINI unless you really just like checking off boxes. The base price car has tons of features and retains 90% of what makes the MINI fun.</p>
<p>So yeah, if you really want to build a MINI that costs more than a BMW, go for it, but that doesn’t mean MINI’s are insanely priced. My F56 Cooper has LED headlights, Nav, tweed seats and a personalized interior and is still a blast to drive. It cost less than $24k brand new.</p>
<p>The F56 JCW, however, won’t be the fastest and best handling MINI for long. Next year will see the launch of the F54 Clubman JCW which, according to sources, will likely develop up to 300-hp with four-wheel-drive, and have the option of the 8-speed Aisin auto gearbox. But it doesn’t stop there.</p>
<p>Yesterday, it was revealed that BMW bosses have given the go-ahead to the crossover X2, which will adopt the established 5-door, steeply raked, liftback style of the X4 and X6. The same sources say that prototypes will be appearing on the roads by the end of this month, and a concept version will appear at next year’s Geneva motor show.</p>
<p>Why is the X2 of interest to MINI fans? Well, crucially, it will be built on the same UKL FWD/4WD platform shared with the new X1 and F60. This means that the proposed F61 5-door liftback Paceman 2, would now be a viable proposition. A Paceman JCW version, using the same X2 M Performance 300-hp engine, is also possible.</p>
<p>Reading between the lines of these two early reviews (note: we are still awaiting comprehensive road test comparisons) it is clear that the R56 JCW is not going to be the ‘World’s Best Hot Hatch’. It is, however, the best handling and fastest production MINI and, despite its eye watering price, ‘committed’ MINI fans are going to love it.</p>
<p>The F56 JCW, however, won’t be the fastest and best handling MINI for long. Next year will see the launch of the F54 Clubman JCW which, according to sources, will likely develop up to 300-hp with four-wheel-drive, and have the option of the 8-speed Aisin auto gearbox. But it doesn’t stop there.</p>
<p>Yesterday, it was revealed that BMW bosses have given the go-ahead to the crossover X2, which will adopt the established 5-door, steeply raked, liftback style of the X4 and X6. The same sources say that prototypes will be appearing on the roads by the end of this month, and a concept version will appear at next year’s Geneva motor show.</p>
<p>Why is the X2 of interest to MINI fans? Well, crucially, it will be built on the same UKL FWD/4WD platform shared with the new X1 and F60. This means that the proposed F61 5-door liftback Paceman 2, would now be a viable proposition. A Paceman JCW version, using the same X2 M Performance 300-hp engine, is also possible.</p>
<p>Reading between the lines of these two early reviews (note: we are still awaiting comprehensive road test comparisons) it is clear that the R56 JCW is not going to be the ‘World’s Best Hot Hatch’. It is, however, the best handling and fastest production MINI and, despite its eye watering price, ‘committed’ MINI fans are going to love it.</p>
<p>The F56 JCW, however, won’t be the fastest and best handling MINI for long. Next year will see the launch of the F54 Clubman JCW which, according to sources, will likely develop up to 300-hp with four-wheel-drive, and have the option of the 8-speed Aisin auto gearbox. But it doesn’t stop there.</p>
<p>Yesterday, it was revealed that BMW bosses have given the go-ahead to the crossover X2, which will adopt the established 5-door, steeply raked, liftback style of the X4 and X6. The same sources say that prototypes will be appearing on the roads by the end of this month, and a concept version will appear at next year’s Geneva motor show.</p>
<p>Why is the X2 of interest to MINI fans? Well, crucially, it will be built on the same UKL FWD/4WD platform shared with the new X1 and F60. This means that the proposed F61 5-door liftback Paceman 2, would now be a viable proposition. A Paceman JCW version, using the same X2 M Performance 300-hp engine, is also possible.</p>
<p>Reading between the lines of these two early reviews (note: we are still awaiting comprehensive road test comparisons) it is clear that the R56 JCW is not going to be the ‘World’s Best Hot Hatch’. It is, however, the best handling and fastest production MINI and, despite its eye watering price, ‘committed’ MINI fans are going to love it.</p>
<p>The F56 JCW, however, won’t be the fastest and best handling MINI for long. Next year will see the launch of the F54 Clubman JCW which, according to sources, will likely develop up to 300-hp with four-wheel-drive, and have the option of the 8-speed Aisin auto gearbox. But it doesn’t stop there.</p>
<p>Yesterday, it was revealed that BMW bosses have given the go-ahead to the crossover X2, which will adopt the established 5-door, steeply raked, liftback style of the X4 and X6. The same sources say that prototypes will be appearing on the roads by the end of this month, and a concept version will appear at next year’s Geneva motor show.</p>
<p>Why is the X2 of interest to MINI fans? Well, crucially, it will be built on the same UKL FWD/4WD platform shared with the new X1 and F60. This means that the proposed F61 5-door liftback Paceman 2, would now be a viable proposition. A Paceman JCW version, using the same X2 M Performance 300-hp engine, is also possible.</p>
<p>Reading between the lines of these two early reviews (note: we are still awaiting comprehensive road test comparisons) it is clear that the R56 JCW is not going to be the ‘World’s Best Hot Hatch’. It is, however, the best handling and fastest production MINI and, despite its eye watering price, ‘committed’ MINI fans are going to love it.</p>
<p>The F56 JCW, however, won’t be the fastest and best handling MINI for long. Next year will see the launch of the F54 Clubman JCW which, according to sources, will likely develop up to 300-hp with four-wheel-drive, and have the option of the 8-speed Aisin auto gearbox. But it doesn’t stop there.</p>
<p>Yesterday, it was revealed that BMW bosses have given the go-ahead to the crossover X2, which will adopt the established 5-door, steeply raked, liftback style of the X4 and X6. The same sources say that prototypes will be appearing on the roads by the end of this month, and a concept version will appear at next year’s Geneva motor show.</p>
<p>Why is the X2 of interest to MINI fans? Well, crucially, it will be built on the same UKL FWD/4WD platform shared with the new X1 and F60. This means that the proposed F61 5-door liftback Paceman 2, would now be a viable proposition. A Paceman JCW version, using the same X2 M Performance 300-hp engine, is also possible.</p>
<p>Any reason why MINI wouldn’t use the drivetrain from the 2 series tourer for the awd F60?
The ZF 8 spd auto and x-drive combination would be sweet in a F60…..</p>
<p>It only fits in the larger UKL cars like the Clubman (hint hint)</p>
<p>Hi Jan – The ZF 8-speed auto is designed specifically for longitudinal mounted engines with rear-wheel/four-wheel drive applications, whereas the ZF 9-speed auto is designed specifically for transverse mounted engines with front-wheel/four-wheel-drive applications. Currently, Land Rover and Chrysler have exclusive use of the ZF 9-speed auto. The newly upgraded Aisin auto is much improved and, in particular, the eight-speed version is designed for applications using much higher torque outputs.</p>
<p>The next generation 1-series, 2-series AT, X1, X2, F54, F60 and F61 all share the longer and wider UKL platform, and all will use four-wheel-drive in some versions fitted with the B48 four pot engine. The F55/F56/F57 exclusively use the shorter and narrower UKL platform, on which 4-wheel-drive is not available.</p>
<p>The 8 spd Steptronic in the 2 series active tourer will then be found in the new Clubman in conjunction with x-drive, correct?
Is it not made by ZF?</p>
<p>The 8-speed Aisin auto gearbox and xDrive will be available in the F54 Clubman, only with the 2ltr four pot engine. For now, the only auto box available with the 1.5 triple is the Aisin 6-speed.</p>
<p>Aisin gearboxes are built by Aisin AW, headquartered in Aichi, Japan. ZF gearboxes are built by the ZF Group, headquartered in Friedrichshafen in Germany. There is no connection between the two companies.</p>
<p>What I was asking is whether the Steptronic in the 220d was a ZF unit or an Aisin unit ….</p>
<p>Aisin from what I can remember if the launch. We did a full story in the next MINI auto that answers that question. Don’t have time to find the link.</p>
<p>Sorry Jan, I thought I had made that clear. ZF doesn’t make an 8-speed auto for front-wheel-drive cars, only the new 9-speed which, at present, is exclusively supplied to Land Rover and Chrysler. The 8-speed unit in the 2-series Active Tourer is the Aisin AWF8F35 launched in 2013.</p>
<p>Thanks; must have misread your previous post.
My error 8-(</p>