It’s been six months and 10,000 miles since we took delivery of our British Racing Green 2015 MINI Cooper S. While we ended up losing more than a few options within the ordering process, our MCS was heavily optioned and (crucially) manually equipped. All told not a bad MINI to spend a year getting to know.
Our first few months saw us soldiering through a midwest winter on 16” 195mm summer tires. Not our plans and certainly not something we’d recommend. However the fact that the summers were relatively skinny and I’ve had many years of snow experience meant we were never properly stuck. However pulse-rates were relatively high more than once traveling through winter storms.
Enter spring and the NM Engineering 18” RS12s. After looking wistfully at other 17” and 18” shod MINIs rolling around the hood we finally decided to plunk down for something big and light. After some research (and the help of Aaron at Outmotoring) we came across the NM Engineering 18” RS12s.
As much as our MCS was transformed in appearance with the RS12s, performance was also affected. The result is a 18″ wheel that only weighs a hair over 18 lbs. That in turn reduces unsprung weight (the best possible weight on your car to reduce). It’s had immediate affect on our F56 allowing for more lively turn-in, steering that is more communicative and grip limits that are increased. Ride has been affected (as you’d expect) but not as much as you’d expect thanks to going from run flats to standard tires.
Options
Inside our F56 has held up well with the only obvious wear being seen on the off-white lounge leather seats. Yeah probably to be expected. But here’s the thing. They look nothing less than stellar when clean and the process of cleaning takes nothing more than a damp cloth and a good scrub game. While they don’t necessarily look as crisp as new, they look plenty luxurious agains the darker tones of the interior.
Among the many options that got left off our car was MINI’s comfort access. After six months we can comfortably say that there are few non-performance options I’d look at as mandatory more than comfort access. But first let’s back up. With keyless go standard on the new MINI not only is there no key but there no place to even put the fob. And with the optional comfort access the process to unlock and start the car is as seamless as possible. Simply walk-up, get in and start the engine. However without the optional comfort access the process goes from seamless to aggravating.
The issue is that you get used to not needing the key to start the car. It’s touch-less, buttonless and frankly invisible. Without comfort access you need to dig into your pocket, find the appropriate button (that’s impossible to find without looking), wait for the unlock and then slide into the seat. Sure it’s easy. But experiencing a system that doesn’t require buttons and keys makes you realize what an unnecessary chore it is to have to physically hit a button to unlock the trunk or open a door.
In our eye this makes comfort access nothing less that a must have optional alongside sport suspension, rear fogs and navigation.
One area of curiosity we had with the F56 was the off-white leather lounge seats. They looked too good to pass up but could they hold up? After six months the answer is mixed. Due to the light color they show daily smudges and dirt readily. The upside is that they’ve been a snap to keep clean with nothing but a damp cloth.
Navigation
Speaking of that navigation we found MINI’s substantially upgraded system to be a huge leap forward as compared to the R5X generation. Traffic data has gotten better (it now uses peer to peer data from other MINIs and BMWs to create a more clear picture) and routing is smarter. Yet it’s still not as fast or smart as Google Maps (or Apple Maps for that matter).
My solution is to combine both. I typically use Google Maps for traffic data and a quick gut check on the best way to tackle long Chicago commutes. Then I put the phone away before slotting into 1st. However when I’m going somewhere I’m not familiar with or on long trips I will almost always use the built in nav as it’s the safer option when it comes to distracted driving.
Of course navigation isn’t the only thing that happens on that large screen. And that’s really the other critical reason I’d never do without the option. It’s a window into the car and in my mind you always want the largest window. Sure your smartphone will run rings around navigation etc. But you will never regret having the option if you’re someone who likes to constantly fine tune your driving experience or make use of the things like MINI Connected.
RIP Sport Suspension
If you haven’t heard MINI has made the SS an exclusive option on the JCW and taken it off the option list for other MINIs. In its place you can spec variable dampers which on paper allow for the best of all worlds. The problem is that they don’t go quite far enough on the sporty side with spring rates about 20% less stiff.
In our experience the SS combined with the our car’s original 16” wheels and tires gave it a pleasantly aggressive dynamics without a ride that was unbearable. It’s an interesting combination that gave our MCS good body control and confidence at the limit without being unsettled by broken pavement mid-corner. Moving to the 18” NM Engineering wheels and Continental Extreme DW endowed our car with a more harsh ride but still nothing to complain about.
The downside with the small wheels however is the reduction of that knife-edge feel of precious that a set of 17” or 18” wheels and good tires can give you. There’s a sense that the entire set-up is slightly dulled by the larger sideway and narrower 195 mm width.
After a couple weeks with our car we’d recommend the sport suspension for those looking for the ultimate enthusiast choice. But it can only really be paid off with 17” or 18” wheels with wider tires. The combination allows for a feel and a performance that’s more akin to the R56 and even the R53.
But why the sport suspension over the variable dampers? For us it allows a more sporting experience that feels right on a MINI. Truthfully if the variable dampers had the ability to go from -10% all the ay to +30% matching the sport suspension we’d call them the best of all worlds. But they don’t quite have that range and therefore feel a bit more compromised than we’d want.
Cupholders
Lets talk about the most taboo subject an automotive enthusiast could possibly complain about. Here’s the problem with the F56 MINI’s cupholders. 99% of the time cupholders in my cars are used for one thing – my mobile device. The issue is that MINI slightly downsized the cupholders from the R56. This has happened just as consumers have upsized their phones. The result is that my iPhone 6 Plus has no where to go in the F56. It’s too big to stay in my pocket. It doesn’t fit comfortably plugged into the armrest. And the cupholders are now too small.
Thoughts on 10,000 miles
There’s no question that the F56 MINI is the best product the brand has ever produced. It’s little larger than the previous MINI but for that tradeoff you get a car that has much more utility, performance, technology and comfort. The interior is a revelation as compared with the R50 and R56 generations and the quality has been dramatically improved. This is a MINI that you don’t have to make excuses for. In short it’s both a great small car and a fantastic MINI.
<p>I bought one of these for my phone (though the cupholders are fine for my iPhone 6) and it’s awesome
<a href="http://www.logitech.com/en-us/product/plus-drive?crid=1537" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.logitech.com/en-us/product/plus-drive?crid=1537</a></p>
<p>Still amazed how different the car looks with the 18″ wheels. Major improvement. The R50 looked just perfect with 16s, the R56 looked ok, the F56 looks ridiculous.</p>
<p>“Traffic data has gotten better (it now uses peer to peer data from other MINIs and BMWs to create a more clear picture)”</p>
<p>Is there a reference for this?!? The peer-to-peer aspect makes it seem that it’s using the SIM-based ARTTI instead of RTTI. Do the F5x include SIMs?</p>
<p>I have the Cravenspeed Clamshell mount. Positions the 6+ in a great location in the car, but the mount is a POS. It keeps coming apart and finally broke on me out of the blue. At least Cravenspeed has been great and replaced the mount free of charge. I still wouldn’t really recommend it for the 6+, tho. It’s really too bad that their scissor mount wasn’t reworked to support the Plus.</p>
<p>I’ve used the Brodit/Proclip mount for years and have been very happy with it. The mounting point in the F56 is not as good as it was in the R56, though.</p>
<p>I got the clam shell about 2 months ago to replace the scissor that fit nothing. It feels super strong, i’m suprised yours broke. How long have you had it?</p>
<p>I too just recently ticked over the 10,000 miles mark in my F56 Cooper S (in just 89 days of ownership, btw). The only real complaints I have so far are…</p>
<p>1) the head unit software seems a bit buggy at times — I thought maybe upgrading to the latest SW version would help, but a few days later bluetooth connectivity and the backup camera both stopped working, and</p>
<p>2) the manual no longer has recommended service intervals — “just do stuff when the car tells you to” … no, I like to have my phone remind me well ahead of time when to plan a brake flush, coolant flush, battery replacement, etc.; none of that info that used to be in the R56 manual is in the F56 manual, and</p>
<p>3) I’m occasionally too quick on the clutch for the auto engine start/stop to bring the car back to life after a stop; I’ve stalled it out a few times like that. (tip: the engine will start again if you turn the wheel or press the clutch, so I’m trying to get in the habit of doing that a few seconds before the light changes … doesn’t help with rolling stops, though)</p>
<p>As for the day-to-day, I’m really happy with it so far. As much as I liked my R56, it’s so nice to be away from all the carbon buildup issues that car had.</p>
<p>I’m confused.</p>
<p>“I’m occasionally too quick on the clutch for the auto engine start/stop
to bring the car back to life after a stop; I’ve stalled it out a few
times like that”</p>
<p>Engine turns off when you let out the clutch in neutral. Starts back up as soon as you press in clutch.</p>
<p>Your statement sounds as if you are letting out the clutch before the engine has had time to restart (which would be an extremely fast clutch depress/lift cycle – too fast to get up any revs even if the engine was idling happily).</p>
<p>If it has not restarted it can’t stall. If it has started then it has life. If the engine is running and stalls then that mean you didn’t give it enough gas/revs or you let out the clutch too fast for the current gas/revs.</p>
<p>I just can’t see anything other than operator error causing a stall?</p>
<p>Great write-up Gabe – you mention that the car has the NM Engineering 18″ wheels with Dunlops. Which model Dunlops and did the Continental Extreme DW’s not work out?</p>
<p>Totally my fault. It has the Continental Extreme DW and they have been fantastic.</p>
<p>Having just ordered an F56sa, I note a few ways MINI has maintained a reasonable base price. I am not certain about all of these, but my best survey of floor demos says they are true.</p>
<p>Used to be included at no extra charge in a Cooper S:
Jack
Lug Wrench
Boot Storage Nets
Boot Power Outlet
Dipstick
Seatback Pockets
Footwell Net
Cloth Seats
Metal-Rubber Pedals
Chili red
Load-capable floor in boot
Seatback adjustment in boot</p>
<p>Is there more to the list? I wonder what goes next!</p>
<p>when was a load floor offered for free? I don’t think ever.
Don’t remember any adjustment for the seat in the boot either (except the lever to lay it down and the F56 way of lowering it is vastly superior)</p>
<p>I cannot find beauty in post R53 MINIs. From my perspective they continue to get fatter and less elegant looking with each successive generation. The F56 is by far the least attractive design. Undoubtedly the cars have improved mechanically over the years. Too bad they have become so damn unrefined looking and ugly as well. Of course, beauty is based on individual aesthetic sensibility so I must concede that some may find the current iteration attractive and not even have the knowledge to make a comparison. I would hasten to bet that if the current design were assessed by a panel of automotive designers most would find it less pleasing and less refined than the R53 design.</p>
<p>Bud, I agree with you but that horse has been clubbed to within an inch of its life and is now decaying in the ground. Let’s just say the pedestrian crash standards have done the design of the MINI, and a whole lot of other cars really, no favors. On the other hand sales numbers are up so obviously many disagree with us.</p>
<p>Yes, I am aware of the pedestrian standards that dramatically altered Mini’s profile. Despite the higher profile required for compliance, the post 53 designs lost many very attractive design cues e.g. the from fender contours and the curvilinear glass C pillars to name just two. The front valance below the bumper is grotesque looking in my opinion. The fake intake atop the hood is even worse looking that it was in the previous design. The new tail lights belong on a semi big rig. They are disproportionately oversized, etc.</p>
<p>In terms of sales numbers they clearly indicate that today’s MINI buyer is far less discriminating and certainly negligibly concerned and/or knowledgeable of MINI history. They likely do not compare older designs with the latest and therefore accept what is offered without hesitation. Therefore, I do not think the numbers reflect disagreement with us. I think they reflect a completely different consumer audience.</p>
<p>Guess that I’m one of the rarities on here that I never cared for the R53. It seemed out of proportion, seemed sawed off both front and rear, and I won’t even get into the motor problems from that generation. Rattles, loose fitting seats, if you had a sunroof, leaked and rattled.
But I have to admit, I never owned one, did drive a couple including a GP that a fellow worker owned, still does. That was a different car though. We use to park next to one another at work to save on door dings, or protect each other. His didn’t rattle as much, but he still complained about that. Don’t get me wrong, for those that worship the R50 series, good for you, but I think that it is way over rated.</p>
<p>Do I like the bullhead lower grille? No, that is why when I do get my F56 JCW my intentions are to paint it to match the wheel housing off black. As for the tail lights, get the black surround rings and paint them body color, my intentions are the same for the headlights, too. Paint can do wonders. As for the size of the new F56, I like it, in my old r56 JCW I always thought that it was a bit too small, it needed 5-6″ and a little more wheel base. We got it now. Anyway all, just my two cents, I know that most disagree, but this is just my opinion.</p>
<p>Take pride in being a “rarity.” I applaud dissent. It keeps the dialectic alive!</p>
<p>Aesthetics is, and always will be, a very subjective subject. Thus, to those of us that laud the 53 think it appears to be very well proportioned and appreciate the subtle contour nuances of its sheetmetal and fenestration. To the best of my knowledge the engine was very strong, and the sonorous supercharger a sheer delight to hear spool up. The shakes and rattles aside and the cheap looking plastics used in the interior were its downsides.</p>
<p>I whole-heartedly agree that the R53 (’06) GP was a fabulous vehicle. It remains my favorite MINI to date.</p>
<p>Enjoy your new F56. I’m sure its fit and finish are superior to the older generation MINI.</p>
<p>Gabe- Did you also look at Pirelli Zero tires ? I’m looking at either the Conti DW or the Pirellis for my 2012 S Roadster w/ 17s.</p>