MotoringFile


BMW Group Wins for Outstanding Design

From BMW Group Press:

Munich. Once again, the BMW Group placed at the top of this year’s “Ranking:Design”, an established best-of list in the design industry which selects the 100 most outstanding industrial designers and manufacturers each year. The company won awards for top design quality in both categories.

With two first places in the categories “Industrial Designer” and “Manufacturer”, the BMW Group took the lead for the fourth time in a row in the product group “Transport and Special Vehicles”.

DesignworksUSA, a subsidiary of the BMW Group with studios in Los Angeles and Munich, also achieved one of the sought-after places among the top industrial designers, ranking sixth.

Since the first “Ranking:Design” in 1996, the BMW Group has consistently ranked among the first three places in the product group “Transport and Special Vehicles”. Since 2001 it has even managed to continuously hold first place among the industrial designers and manufacturers in this group.

Moreover, the unbroken string of first place rankings catapulted the Munich automobile manufacturer into the first place of the so-called “Hall of Fame”, which sums up the Ranking:Design awards of the previous years – far ahead of other competitors in the branch.

Established Award for the Best Industrial Designers and Manufacturers.

For the past eight years, Ranking:Design has rated Germany’s most important design competitions. The current results for 2004/2005 are based on the systematic evaluation of 17 national and regional design competitions, including internationally-recognized competitions such as the Design Award of the Federal Republic of Germany, the Red Dot Award and the iF Design Award.

Ranking:Design provides an overview of the evaluations of professional designers and design-oriented manufacturers. The ranking in Ranking:Design rewards successful design achievements over the past year, rather than reflecting individual products.

The BMW Group’s top rankings in this year’s evaluation offer new confirmation of the Munich company’s persuasive design strategy and the visually compelling character of its brands. In international comparison, both the work and the goals of the BMW Group design team live up to the very highest standards.

Before all the relentless (and at times painfully misguided) Chris Bangle bashing begins, remember that the BMW Group and CB himself are in many ways responsible for what most of us drive day in a day out. Without Mr. Bangle’s guidance and scores of BMW Group designers hard work (most notably Frank Stephenson) we would not enjoy the MINI we have today.

Written By: Gabe




22 Comments

BBoy Jul 19th, 2005 Link

w00t!

ReplyReply
Seth L Jul 19th, 2005 Link

Indeed, it should be Adrian van Hooydonk bashing!

But seriously, BMW group deserves it.

ReplyReply
rustyb Jul 19th, 2005 Link

Check this out:

http://www.cnn.com/2005/AUTOS/carreviews/07/14/summer_convertibles/index.html

ReplyReply
05DSMCS Jul 19th, 2005 Link

With all the BMW designs of late, with the new 3 series barely qualifying as an exception, it surprising to me that they garner this award. However, they definitely earn it on guts alone with their recent style changes – which probably counts more in this contest than much else.

It is one thing to accidentally come up with some really ugly designs (a la Hyundai), it’s a completely different thing to have a definite design signature specifically applied to all models – even if most don’t appreciate how they look.

ReplyReply
Steve Jul 19th, 2005 Link

I think this is well deserved praise. Perhaps the never ending tidal wave of “Bangle=Bad” press is beginning to shift.

Just take a look at this Autoweek article which begins with the almost penitent statement: “Maybe Chris Bangle was right…”.

http://www.autoweek.com/article.cms?articleId=102740

ReplyReply
Ralph Jul 19th, 2005 Link

The BMW Group may have won the award for outstanding desgin, but the GPS/Naviation system (I-Drive) won’t win any awards. It’s been critized by everyone and anyone. BMW still thinks it’s good. (So does Mercedes and Audi)

The Japanesse (Lexus) have been given the nod as having the best Nav userfriendly system.

Don’t get me wrong I like BMW and I don’t know if the award included things like NAV system desgin and ease of use.

ReplyReply
GSP Jul 19th, 2005 Link

WhoopDeeDoo. To my eyes fugly is still fugly.

ReplyReply
nrkist Jul 19th, 2005 Link

Saw a new 3-series the other day. Definitely wasn’t working for me. I’m sure BMW is selling a lot of cars, but…

I think Bangle dragged BMW from a higher plane of distinctive functional elegance down into the seething mosh pit of flashy, disposable automotive design, where they are now battling it out with the Asian and American marques they had transcended for so many decades. The equity is rapidly bleeding out of the BMW brand. Hope someone can apply a tourniquet before it flat lines.

ReplyReply
Steve Jul 19th, 2005 Link

…The equity is rapidly bleeding out of the BMW brand. Hope someone can apply a tourniquet before it flat lines…

Nrkist, while I’m sure some would agree with your overall sentiment, I have to take issue with your statement regarding the bleeding of equity. The numbers simply don’t agree with you. In fact, they say the opposite.

First half of 2005 the most successful in BMW Group’s History…

In terms of sales, the first half of 2005 (a point at which all of Chris Bangle’s designs had entered the market) was the most successful in the BMW Group’s history. In addition, June of this year was the single best month in the company’s history as deliveries were up 13.5% compared to the previous year.

ReplyReply
nrkist Jul 19th, 2005 Link

Steve – good point but, as I said, “I’m sure they are selling a lot of cars, but…”

I honestly don’t think that sales numbers are the right metric here. You move toward the middle of the market in terms of design or price, you will sell more cars. That doesn’t mean you are not simultaneously eroding the long-term value of your brand.

ReplyReply
Gabe Jul 19th, 2005 Link

You move toward the middle of the market in terms of design or price, you will sell more cars. That doesn’t mean you are not simultaneously eroding the long-term value of your brand.

Actually I think the exact opposite happened here. BMW made a conscious effort to move their design language forward and into territory that might make some of the more conservative or less progressive buyers a bit hesitant. I believe that, to a certain extent, this was a very calculated move for the brand and it’s audience. They paved the way for the BMW brand to be more bold and forward thinking in the years to come with an audience that prizes those attributes.

If you look at BMW’s automotive design and corporate culture in the 90’s you’ll see that the company embodied the very definition of “staid“. Not that they didn’t make fine cars that performed at a high level. They just did so in a package and with an attitude of a conservative nature. One that didn’t rock the boat with older BMW owners and stayed the course with the same sausage, three different lengths approach that is still used by a number of high-end automakers.

So in a sense you can think of the design shift as a way to refine the brand and in turn, refine the audience and potential customer base now and for years to come. The sales will always be there for a company that makes products like BMW’s. However the sales brought about by this change will move the company towards a more progressive individual that will in turn help steer the brand in the years ahead.

Of course this approach is in stark contrast to the BMW Group’s execution of MINI brand design

ReplyReply
Nick Jul 19th, 2005 Link

I live right near BMW’s DesignWorks/USA.

Its awesome!

ReplyReply
nrkist Jul 19th, 2005 Link
Actually I think the exact opposite happened here. BMW made a conscious effort to move their design language forward and into territory that might make some of the more conservative or less progressive buyers a bit hesitant.

This is all totally subjective, of course. (It’s design!) What you see as “forward”, “bold” and “progressive” I see as just the opposite. I think these new BMW designs are much more targeted toward the middle of the market than with any forward-looking, design-savvy segment of avant garde buyers. They share the gratuitously overworked sheet metal that has always blurred differences among the multitude of offerings from design-weak auto makers. Just my opinion, of course.

ReplyReply
F.R Walter Jul 19th, 2005 Link

I like the new 3. It has an aggressive and nimble look. The biggest thing that BMW neads to be carefull of is looking like a Pontiac. (last year’s 5)

ReplyReply
nrkist Jul 19th, 2005 Link

The biggest thing that BMW neads to be carefull of is looking like a Pontiac. (last year’s 5)

My point, exactly.

ReplyReply
stuart Jul 20th, 2005 Link

Interestingly (or maybe not), a lot of the stuff about to be launched or on the drawing board at ‘other’ manufacturers appears to be following the Bangle route, the ‘high slab trunk lid’ for example. Maybe he was right after all. I-drive seems to be happening in a different form on some cars too, Is BMW staid and boring?, or is it just leading the way ?. New lighting functions and HUD technolgy are certain to win favour when users adapt even though now we can’t see why we need it.

ReplyReply
David Bunting Jul 20th, 2005 Link

BMW is definitely pushing design in a new direction. At least for me, it’s generally working (most successfully on the 3,5, and z4).

The result of which is that, to me, even the newest Audis and Mercedes appear to be dated and stale (the CLS being an exception).

ReplyReply
Rocketboy Jul 20th, 2005 Link

I firmly believe that history will be very kind to Chris Bangle. As polarizing as the designs he inspired are, I think his design era at BMW will be a highly regarded time.

ReplyReply
petsounds Jul 21st, 2005 Link

I believe history will suss Bangle and his cohort’s 5-minute attention span out for what it is — lack of a concise vision, complete disregard for marquee styling cues, and eventually designs that will look extremely dated.

On a related note, I was driving the other day in Los Angeles and saw a 325 I have not seen before, it could be a testing mule for the 2007? It didn’t look like the 2006. It had a snub nose, looking somewhat like the new Mustang. It looked pretty hideous, and seemed to have gotten rid of any design elements of BMW heritage, save perhaps the tail lights.

I have no ill will towards Frank Stephenson — the MINI is a design masterpiece.

ReplyReply
nrkist Jul 21st, 2005 Link
I believe history will suss Bangle and his cohort’s 5-minute attention span out for what it is — lack of a concise vision, complete disregard for marquee styling cues, and eventually designs that will look extremely dated.

word 2 tha mutha

ReplyReply
Guy Lloyd-Parker Aug 16th, 2005 Link

After browsing the web, there seems tobe a link between the Mini and the VWBeetle……I know this for a fact and if anyone can tell me the link between the above and the AudiTT and the BMWx5 then you have the link to me…..

If Frank Srephenson, Freeman Thomas and Adrian Van Hooydonk are looking in then this may interest them,,,,,,If anyone could also link all the above to a mixed-race American, around New York way with the name Andrew, slightly camp, within the design field…..I would love to hear what his surname might be…….I’ll reveil all after I hear his name!

plonker2@go4.it

ReplyReply
mdbx Jan 23rd, 2007 Link

i dont know if this is the right place but i’m wondering if someone can help me. i have some sports car designs that i would like to show to motoring companies especially BMW, mercedes benz, etc. (preferably bmw ) how does one go around that

ReplyReply
M7 Tuning

Leave a Reply

Preview:

MF Community


Login using Facebook:


Last visitors
view more...

Articles by MINI model

The Fine Print

MotoringFile reserves the right to edit or delete any post for any reason. Derogatory comments of any kind will not be tolerated.

HTML Formatting Tips

  • To make something bold: <strong>Text to bold</strong>
  • To make something italic: <em>Text to italicize</em>
  • To make a hyperlink: <a href="URL">Text to link</a>
  • To quote something previously said, you can use <blockquote>text</blockquote>

Markdown Formatting Tips (advanced)

MotoringFile also allows use of Markdown formatting in the comment section. This accomplishes the same formatting as HTML but is typically easy to use.

_your text_your text
**your text**your text
`my code`my code
* Bulleted list
* Second item
• Bulleted list
• Second item
1. Numbered list
1. Second item
1. Numbered list
2. Second item
[link name](URL)link name
***Horizontal ruler
<http://url>
<email@add.com>
Auto-linked
![Alt text](URL)Image




MF Community


Login using Facebook:


Last visitors
view more...

Articles by MINI model


Miniature Trailers


Advertise with MotoringFile

If you or your company are interested in advertising on the most influencial MINI website in the world, please visit our Advertising section. If you have further questions about becoming a sponsor or would like to see our rate sheet please feel free to contact us directly.

Previous Select MF Features

2009
» World Debut: MINI Coupé Concept
» World Premier: MINI Roadster Concept
» Exclusive: MINI Product Roadmap Revealed
» Exclusive: MINI's 2011 Product Strategy.
» World Premier: MINI Beachcomber Concept
» Exclusive: MINI Likely to Move Some Production to Germany
» MINI Releases JCW WC50 Special Edition
» Exclusive: Rolls Royce to Create Special Edition MINI
» MINI Mid Life Cycle Refresh Coming in '10
» MINIproduct Roadmap Revealed
» MINI 50th Anniversary Models Revealed
» JCW Diesel a Reality
» MINI's Mid Life-Cycle Refresh
» MotoringFile Does the 24 Hours of Lemons
» MINI's City Car to go RWD
» MINI to Launch Progressive Activity Vehicle
» JCW Re-Imagined: Our Take on the Factory JCW
» JCW GP to Return?
» MF Exclusive: the Secret Design Process of the Clubman
2008
» MINI JCW in Depth / MINI USA JCW Pricing
» MCS Engine's Cold Start Issue (Update)
» Official History of the Modern JCW Tuning Kit
» MINI Crossover Concept Official Release
» MINI Dealers to Sell Fiats in North America?
» MINI Challenge Race Car in the US
» MF's MINI United Video (part 1)
»
MF Exclusive: Ask Stracco Part 2
» R57: Seriously Always Open
» Factory JCW MINI in Detail
» Fiat & BMW To Co-Develop Next MINI?
» Exclusive MINI Takes the State Info
2007
» MINI Officially Updates Line-up for 2008
» New Models & Production Locations Confirmed
» MotoringFile's MINI United Coverage
» 2007 JCW Kit Officially Announced
» MINI's Top Secret Colorado Project
» 2009 Factory JCW MCS (Stage II)
» More MINI Variants Officially Confirmed
» MINI Clubman Official Photos and Specs
» R56 Pedestrian Crash Analysis
» Future JCW Vehicles Revealed
» MINI USA's Motorby Pilot Program
» MINI Clubman Update & Sketch
» BMW To Re-Brand JCW
» 2007 MINI MotoringFile Q&A
» MINI One and MINI Cooper D Now Official
» 2007 MINI Reader Reviews
» 2007 MINI USA Pricing and Options
» MINI Unveils the Sidewalk

2006
» MF Design Analysis: 2007 MINI
» 2007 JCW Accessories Revealed
» MINI Names the R55: The Clubman » 2007 MINI In Detail (Part 2 / Part 3)
» 2007 MINI Official Photos (Part 2 / Part 3)
» 2007 MINI Drops Weight
» Official 2007 MINI UK PDFs
» 2007 Nav Includes iDrive-Like Controller
» 2007 US Market Options Packages
» Hey Stracco: The Interview
» Let's Plan: MINI Clubs & MTTS
» MINI's Official R56 Preview Photos
» MINI's Official R56 Preview
» Next Generation MINI Revealed (#2)
» '07 MC & MCS Spotted in Death Valley
» 2007 MINI Color List (US Market)
» '07 MINI Gets More Power/Less Weight
» MF Review: MINIs on the Dragon
» MINI USA Releases JCW GP Pricing
» JCW Cooper S Long Term Review
» Seven New Colors for 2007
» MINI Release Info on Next Gen Engines
» Chicago Autoshow Gallery
» JCW GP at Geneva (final release info)
» 2006 JCW Product Info
» MINI Concept Detroit - In Detail
» MINI Sourced Triump Still Years Away
» US Connection for MINI's new Roadster
» First MINI Now Triumph?
» More News on the MINI Triumph Concept

2005
» Behind the Wheel of the 2007 MINI
» MINI Concept Tokyo - In Detail
» MINI Concept Frankfurt - In Detail
» Driven: The Nürburgring Nordschleife
» MINI Wins at Targe Newfoundland
» 2006 JCW Accessories
» US Market Color Changes for 2006
» Getrag's All Wheel Drive MINI In Depth
» BMW/MINI to Buy JCW?
» Official 2006 MINIUSA Pricing
» Special Editions/Package for 2006
» Checkmate Options Package (USA)
» JCW Direct From to the Factory in '06
» Tips on How to Sell Your MINI
» 2006 Model Year Timeline
» MINI's 2006 Color Changes
» Next Generation MINI Revealed
» Official MINI Armrest Revealed
» MotoringFile Review: MCS Auto

2004
» Details on the MCS Limited Slip Dif
» MotoringFile 2004 Holiday Gift Guide
» Getrag Tests All-Wheel Drive MINI
» Q&A on the OutMotoring ARC Armrest
» 2005 Chicago Auto Show / Gallery
» MINI USA's JCW GP Delivery Program
» 2005 MINI Changes
» The Cabrio In Depth / Gallery
» Special Edition MC40 / Gallery
» MINI Plant Tour Review
» Hood Rub Service Bulletin
» 2004 Chicago Auto Show / Gallery

2003
» MINI Accessory Additions for 2004
» CVT Paddles Retrofit
» 2005 MINI Spotted
» Rear Fogs Almost Here
» New Prince Engine Caught Testing
» MINI Releases Hood Rub Bulletin
» MINI_Motion Launched
» MINI Conquers Snow and Ice
» MINI One D Announced
» MINI Named North American Car of the Year

MotoringFile Downloads

mini MF map
MF Club Mappr mini
Translate MotoringFile with Google: 
 
BF

MF NewsRoom

Morristown MINI Auctions

MotoringFile Buyers Guides

R50 ('02-'06 MC) Buyers Guide
R53 ('02-'06 MCS) Buyers Guide



MotoringFile Reviews

Auto Reviews:
'09 Cooper S Convertible
'09 JCW Coupe
'09 JCW Clubman
JCW Stage I vs JCW Stage II
'08 Clubman S (Auto)
1st Drive: '08 MINI Clubman
Comparison: '08 BMW 135i
'06 R53 MCS vs '07 R56 MCS
'07 R56 JCW (Stage 1)
'07 MINI Cooper S Long Term
'07 BMW Z4 M Coupe
'07 MINI Cooper & Cooper S
Audio: '07 MC/MCS at the Track
'06 JCW GP Long term
Reader Review: JCW GP
'06 JCW Cooper S Long Term
Comparison: '06 Lotus Elise
Comparison: '06 Mazda MX5
Comparison: '06 UK Focus ST
Comparison: '06 Civic Si
Comparison: '04 TVR T350
Comparison: '06 Nissan 350z
Comparison: '06 VW GTI w/DSG
Podcast: Cooper S Auto
Podcast: BMW 325i
Podcast: JCW MC Soundkit
'04 JCW MINI Cooper Tuning Kit
'05 MCS: One Month Review
'05 MCS Auto
'05 JCW S 1st Drive
'05 MINI Cooper
'05 MCS Conv. Long Term
'05 MINI Cooper S
'05 MCS Cabrio 1st Drive
'04 JCW MCS First Drive
'04 MC w/JCW Tuning Kit
BMW M3 SMG Vs. MCS
'04 MINI Cooper CVT
'02 MCS 3 year Review
Autocrossing the MINI Range

cafepress



Performance Accessories:
R56 JCW Engine Kit
R56 JCW Suspension (Long-Term)
R56 JCW Suspension (Track)
R56 JCW Suspension (Street)
R53 Craven Speed Short Shifter
R53 M7 Understrut System
Kumho Ecsta SPT Tires
R53 M7 Strut Tower Plates
R53 JCW Alcantara Wheel
R53 JCW Brake Kit
R53 Webb 15% Pulley
R53 Helix MCSa 15% Pulley
R53 H-Sport 19mm Sway Bar
R53 MCS Supersprint Exhaust
Podcast: R53 MCS SS Exhaust
R53 JCW Cold Air Intake
Reader Rev.: R53 JCW Brakes
R50 Supersprint Exhaust
R50 Remus Exhaust
R50 Promini Intake
R50 Remus Dual Exhaust
Schroth Harness System
R50 CVT Steering Wheel Paddles

Exterior Accessories:
Miniature's Receiver Hitch
OEM White Tail Lights

Lifestyle Accessories:
MINI_Motion Watch
MINI_Motion Driving Shoe

Audio:
MINI Digital SoundModul
ICE-Link Plus iPod Adapter
Official BMW/iPod adapter
ICE-Link iPod Adapter
Kenwood iPod Interface
Alpine iPod Interface
Harman Kardon Stereo

Interior Accessories:
JCW Alcantara Steering Wheel JCW Leather Dash
MCAW Auto Up Circuit
MINI Rear Camera
MINI Rear Saddle (official)
MINI Rear Cargo Storage Case
Official MINI Rear Saddle Bag
2004 MINI Armrest Reviewed
Mymini Knee Pad
MINI Bluetooth Kit
MINI Video Input
Aftermarket Bluetooth Integration
Ian Cull Auto-up Circuit
Universal Mobile Phone Holder




MINI Model Number Cheat Sheet:

1st Gen MINI
R50: One & MC Coupe
R52: All 1st Gen MINI Convt.
R53: MCS Coupe
2nd Gen MINI
R55: Clubman
R56: One/MC/MCS Coupe
R57: One/MC/MCS Convt.
R60: MINI SUV