F56 MINI Hatch to Feature Optional Suicide Doors

The sketch above is courtesy of Autoexpress and are just here to illustrate a few ideas in the story below. It is rough and shouldn’t be taken as anything other than sketches from an outside source.

Over the past month we’ve heard from several sources that MINI will release a five door version of the F56 hatch. The five door will reportedly come about a year after the standard three door is release in late 2012. Much like the Clubman but with doors on both sides MINI intends this new feature to help owners make better use of the space and for easier access to the rear seats.

The five door will add some weight (at least 100 lbs with chassis strengthening etc) and price to the car but will allow the F56 to compete with larger cars in some markets.

Expect the F56 to be roughly the same size as the R53 and the R56 give or take a a centimeter here and there.

So what does this mean for the Clubman? As we’ve previously reported look for the next generation Clubman to continue to be base on the hatch but grow a sleeker profile and a little more length for further differentiation.

The F56 will debut next year at MINI United next summer and go on-sale a few months later in the fall of 2012. The five door should be available roughly a year later.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Written By: Gabe

  • Rhawth99

    That’s going to be a tight squeeze to jam suicide doors on both sides of the car. Guess the gas fill tube will be located a little bit farther back to open some space on the driver’s side of the car. I know that the above picture is just someone’s guess at what the F56 may look like, but I do like the look of the rear hatch and tail lights.

  • http://www.nathanielsalzman.com Nathaniel Salzman

    Adding to what Gabe says at the get go, do not read much into this image. It’s classic AutoExpress Photoshop work. As for suicide doors, that gets us to what I think the Clubman should have been from the get go. 

    • jeff

      i’m not so sure about that.  a separate model where the only feature is a pair of suicide doors seems a bit phoned in whereas the current clubman actually caters to an different set of needs.  suicide doors and a little easier entry are cool, but the current clubman has added room (both passenger and storage) and a unique design.

      i’m worried that the F56 w/suicide will be too small and a clubman stretched 1/2 a foot will be too big, leaving the current clubman buying population out in the cold.

  • http://www.nathanielsalzman.com Nathaniel Salzman

    Adding to what Gabe says at the get go, do not read much into this image. It’s classic AutoExpress Photoshop work. As for suicide doors, that gets us to what I think the Clubman should have been from the get go. 

  • JonPD

    As long as its an option only I think it will be good, however I wonder if it makes any sense to produce it as a option.  I would take it this is likely to mean the F56 is likely to be longer than the R56 to be able to fit the doors.

  • Harry Dill

    Suicide doors aside, the F56 image is very displeasing. Just as MINI has done since the R53, the design has become progressively coarser and less refined and more bloated. The once beautifully defined front fender and hood contours, curvilinear glass C-pillars, and properly scaled head and tail light designs are history. The canted and over-sized headlights detract from the simpler and much cleaner lines of previous iterations. The same is true for the tail lights — too big and awkward looking. The previous designs blended with the bodywork without noticeably projecting beyond the surface of the sheet metal. Yes, I am in favor of “evolutionary” progressive design when deftly executed.

    We’ve all seen the horrors of excessive and/or misguided cosmetic surgery. Such gross negligence is inexcusable and only succeeds to distort rather than improve our visual experience and diminish aesthetic integrity. Please MIN “entwurfmeisters” catch yourselves before it’s too late!

    • Anonymous

      Harry, as before I am in complete agreement. I do think the beautifully sculpted R50/53 front end won’t be repeated due to the new EU pedestrian impact regulations.

      • Harry Dill

        Yes, the EU ped regs have had major negative impact on design. Presumably, the concealed wiper arms and minimally higher front profile somehow enhances pedestrian safety. Why don’t we just install cow catchers to deflect mindless pedestrians. It’s bizarre, but could arguably satisfy the safety police. Our DOT protocol is equally absurd. Why on earth must European glass be replaced with American glass on German cars that are built to travel the Autobahn? For years “federalizers” were plagued by the 2.5 and 5 mph bumper standards. It’s all bureaucratic nonsense linked to the insurance lobbyists.

  • Anonymous

    If I mentally photoshop the side crease out it’s not bad, I just wonder if another evolutionary update of this 10 year old design is the way to go. It just looks like a warmed over R56. I guess that’s the problem with retro designs like this and the Beetle-what does the new, new, new model look like. I was hoping for a more revolutionary model like the Rocketman.

  • Anonymous

    If I mentally photoshop the side crease out it’s not bad, I just wonder if another evolutionary update of this 10 year old design is the way to go. It just looks like a warmed over R56. I guess that’s the problem with retro designs like this and the Beetle-what does the new, new, new model look like. I was hoping for a more revolutionary model like the Rocketman.

  • Anonymous

    If I mentally photoshop the side crease out it’s not bad, I just wonder if another evolutionary update of this 10 year old design is the way to go. It just looks like a warmed over R56. I guess that’s the problem with retro designs like this and the Beetle-what does the new, new, new model look like. I was hoping for a more revolutionary model like the Rocketman.

  • KPH

    Not pleased with any of the Autoexpress sketchs so I’ll stay determined to ignore it as a PeeChee doodling. The suicide door idea seems a bit grasping, but has real utility and might tip the one reluctant family member to OK the deal. I lived with 2 VW bugs with only occasional thoughts of “It’d be great if only…” and that was the only access to behind the seats. Of course in those days there was no catch for the seat back or shoulder seat belts to fumble with. What would be great is if the rear side windows would ‘wing’ out a few inches for ventilation like the later bugs. Yet another toggle switch and indicator light to play with.

  • Anonymous

    Whether the new F56 looks like the boot shown above or not I like what I see there. It’s  little less blurgy that the latest mess.

  • Aurel

    Those Paceman wheels they used in the sketch better make it to production as well.

  • Anonymous

    I thought the next gen clubman was to be based on the countryman platform, and not a stretched hatch.

  • b-

    The R56 already has an option for a suicide door, it is called the R55.  I can’t see making all the changes and adding the weight for this option on the hatch when you will open a tiny door to what?  The rear seat space in the R56 is TINY, why put a door there?  It seems to me that a new seat slider that would allow the seat to slide further forward would be a better option than to have this as an option.  I see this flooding the used MINI market with cars that people would not want to buy.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1031608383 Chris Topher

    and yet more novelty bought to you by MINI. this is actually kinda cool. thought i’d buy an R60 S but I think i’ll hang tight for this new clubman.

  • Harry Dill

    At this point, perhaps the only saving grace that many of us can anticipate will be the upcoming Coupe and Roadster variants — barring a worthy GP hatchback successor. Add a few horses and tuning tweeks and MINI traditionalists may find the excitement they crave in two very “non-traditional” packages. The roadster could become the 21st century’s Austin Healy Sprite minus the “bug-eyes,” of course!

  • Harry Dill

    Material engineering and design management needs to duel with the bean counters if MINI expects to produce lighter, more fuel-efficient, and better performing vehicles. Think of all the wasted time, money, and effort expended on a Rolls-Royce edition that could have been used to create an aluminum space-framed, skinned, design incorporating carbon elements. Make a genuine high performance MINI for the streets with dry sump lubrication and … centerlock hubs to stimulate our salivary glands. How about some Alcantara in the interior, etc. Come on MINI … Go for it! … and do something exciting to capture the hearts and minds of your enthusiast audience.

  • Hoover

    I like the idea of suicide doors for their utility, but I don’t think I will like what they do to the design.  I think that the Paceman concept looks great as is–I don’t think I would like it as much with its anticipated suicide doors.  But I tend to like cars with fewer cut lines, and uncomplicated but elegant surfaces.  Although I have grown to appreciate the Clubman, I could never bring myself to own one.  Too busy.  I have always longed for a very derivative, but extremely functional extended wheelbase MINI, based on the R50/53 or R56 platform–basically a MINI wagon.  But if this proposed variant is no longer in its dimensions, I would not opt for the suicide doors.  I’m just trying to ignore these Autoexpress illustrations.  It’s a bit futile to opine on their guesses.  I have been pleasantly surprised with almost everything that has made it to production–so I’ll continue to reserve judgment, as usual.

  • Pingback: Neuer MINI / R56-Nachfolger! : Mini

  • Benzz

    I don’t understand why anyone is giving any credence to the AutoExpress mockups….they’re guesses, nothing more.  It’s totally absurd to dismiss the F56 based on crudely-rendered shops from artists who haven’t even seen the car.

    What I wonder is if the optional 5-door F56 will also feature an extended wheelbase….seems a little silly to me if the ingress/egress improvements don’t also come with more legroom.

  • veggivet

    As long as the suicide door is a buyer option, I don’t have any issues with that. Could we please make the crease an option so I can opt out?

  • Pingback: Next-Gen MINI to Feature Optional Suicide Doors - www.miniMINImini.com


Sort by MINI model







MINI Model Cheat Sheet

1st Gen MINI
R50: One & MC Hatch
R52: All 1st Gen MINI Convt.
R53: MCS Hatch
2nd Gen MINI
R55: Clubman
R56: Hatch
R57: Convertible
R58: Coupe
R59: Roadster
R60: MINI Crossover
R61: MINI Crossover Coupe
3rd Gen MINI
F55: Clubman
F56: Hatch
F57: Convertible
F60: MINI Crossover
F62: Traveller

Advertise with MotoringFile

If you or your company are interested in advertising on the most influential MINI website in the world, please visit our Advertising section. If you have further questions about becoming a sponsor or would like to see our rate sheet please feel free to contact us directly.
mini mini
Translate MotoringFile with Google: 
 
Morristown MINI Auctions
BF

MF NewsRoom

MotoringFile Buyers Guides

R50 ('02-'06 MC) Buyers Guide
R53 ('02-'06 MCS) Buyers Guide



MotoringFile Reviews

Auto Reviews:
'12 JCW Coupe
'11 Fiat 500 Sport
'11 Tesla Roaster 2.5 '11 Countryman Comparo
'11 Cooper S Hatch
'11 Countryman MCS (FWD)
'11 Countryman MC (auto)
'10 Mayfair MCS (auto)
'11 Countryman MCS (ALL4)
'10 MINI E
'10 Tesla Roadster Sport
'09 Cooper S Convertible
'09 JCW Hatch
'09 JCW Clubman
JCW Stage I vs JCW Stage II
'08 Clubman S (Auto)
1st Drive: '08 MINI Clubman
'08 Smart Fourtwo
Comparison: '08 BMW 135i
'06 R53 MCS vs '07 R56 MCS
'07 R56 JCW (Stage 1)
'07 MINI Cooper S Long Term
'07 BMW Z4 M Coupe
'07 MINI Cooper & Cooper S
Audio: '07 MC/MCS at the Track
'06 JCW GP Long term
Reader Review: JCW GP
'06 JCW Cooper S Long Term
Comparison: '06 Lotus Elise
Comparison: '06 Mazda MX5
Comparison: '06 UK Focus ST
Comparison: '06 Civic Si
Comparison: '04 TVR T350
Comparison: '06 Nissan 350z
Comparison: '06 VW GTI w/DSG
Podcast: Cooper S Auto
Podcast: BMW 325i
Podcast: JCW MC Soundkit
'04 JCW MINI Cooper Tuning Kit
'05 MCS: One Month Review
'05 MCS Auto
'05 JCW S 1st Drive
'05 MINI Cooper
'05 MCS Conv. Long Term
'05 MINI Cooper S
'05 MCS Cabrio 1st Drive
'04 JCW MCS First Drive
'04 MC w/JCW Tuning Kit
BMW M3 SMG Vs. MCS
'04 MINI Cooper CVT
'02 MCS 3 year Review
Autocrossing the MINI Range

cafepress



Performance Accessories:
M7 Rear Chassis Brace
R56 JCW Engine Kit
R56 JCW Suspension (Long-Term)
R56 JCW Suspension (Track)
R56 JCW Suspension (Street)
R53 Craven Speed Short Shifter
R53 M7 Understrut System
Kumho Ecsta SPT Tires
R53 M7 Strut Tower Plates
R53 JCW Alcantara Wheel
R53 JCW Brake Kit
R53 Webb 15% Pulley
R53 Helix MCSa 15% Pulley
R53 H-Sport 19mm Sway Bar
R53 MCS Supersprint Exhaust
Podcast: R53 MCS SS Exhaust
R53 JCW Cold Air Intake
Reader Rev.: R53 JCW Brakes
R50 Supersprint Exhaust
R50 Remus Exhaust
R50 Promini Intake
R50 Remus Dual Exhaust
Schroth Harness System
R50 CVT Steering Wheel Paddles

Exterior Accessories:
MINI Do More Clubman Hitch
Miniature's Receiver Hitch
OEM White Tail Lights

Lifestyle Accessories:
MINI_Motion Watch
MINI_Motion Driving Shoe

Audio:
MINI Digital SoundModul
ICE-Link Plus iPod Adapter
Official BMW/iPod adapter
ICE-Link iPod Adapter
Kenwood iPod Interface
Alpine iPod Interface
Harman Kardon Stereo

Interior Accessories:
JCW Alcantara Steering Wheel JCW Leather Dash
MCAW Auto Up Circuit
MINI Rear Camera
MINI Rear Saddle (official)
MINI Rear Cargo Storage Case
Official MINI Rear Saddle Bag
2004 MINI Armrest Reviewed
Mymini Knee Pad
MINI Bluetooth Kit
MINI Video Input
Aftermarket Bluetooth Integration
Ian Cull Auto-up Circuit
Universal Mobile Phone Holder