MINI’s Future JCW Vehicle(s)

MF Exclusive Yesterday we introduced the idea that MINI could releasing two JCW vehicles rather than the one we had expected to see late this year or early next. We now have some limited details on the first product, a “Stage One” type of kit similar to the JCW Sound Kit originally released for the R50. Only this time with a real power increase.

Before we get ahead of ourselves, first let’s recap the various rumors we’ve heard about this car over the past year.

In mid-2006 we heard from several people that the power figures that BMW were shoot for were around 210 – 220bhp. This would make the JCW MINI the fastest production MINI ever and go a long way in developing the JCW brand as the ultimate MINI performance marque – aftermarket or otherwise.

We last heard about the 2008 JCW MINI in late 2006. At that time, rumors suggested that BMW was having a harder-than-expected time in getting the necessary power out of the new 1.6L Turbo. One potential solution under discussion was the boring out of the 1.6L to create a 1.8L Turbo easily capable of the proposed power. We’ve now confirmed that – at least initially – MINI won’t be going with a larger engine for any JCW products.

Now that it’s 2007 we’ve heard yet another rumor from some of the same sources.

First off current prototypes of the 2008 JCW seem to sit lower and have revised (i.e. more aggressive) suspension as compared to the R56 MCS as we reported. It also (according to our source) “look the business” as we all had hoped.

But here’s the kicker. In it’s current prototype guise, MINI is only getting around 200bhp out of the car. Surely MINI wouldn’t release the one and only JCW MINI with less power than before? Well they might if there’s more than one JCW MINI. Several sources have independantly mentioned that MINI will have “several” JCW products available over the next couple of years.

We believe the first product will be a “stage 1″ type of vehicle near the old 200bhp figure of the first R53/R52 JCW MINI with the other JCW offering having around to 210-220bhp. That stage 1 product would be closer to the spirit of the original JCW MCS with no suspension work and little visual difference from the stock MCS. Based on our sources, we believe the “Stage 2″ (or whatever it’s eventually named) will much more thorough engine revisions as well as a host of other improvements.

Update: We will have an update on the JCW Stage 1 upgrade very shortly.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Written By: Gabe

  • Timothy

    Well, they could just put the blown Tritec into the engine bay and give that the Works treatment. :-)

  • ahamos

    Given the articles I’ve seen on this site, this doesn’t come as a surprise at all. Just a couple of weeks ago you ran snippets of a discussion with a MINI rep who said there wasn’t going to be much room for improvement in the aftermarket world.

  • http://www.newcountrymini.com UberFisch

    Pray, just pray that something killer comes out… not 200bhp… 230 would be nice.

  • eager2own

    I too would hope that there’s a “Stage 2″ with 220+, but the fact that their scratching their heads at this point and considering putting out a 200bhp JCW worries me. You can re-brand all you want, and make a car look the business (there’s plenty of Civics around which try to do just that), but if the numbers at the end of the day are 200bhp, I don’t think this will be the M-car of MINIs.

  • Jon

    Interesting concept, if the new rumors are correct and Mini is considering various stages of JCW I think they have totally missed the concept.

    If all they do is a rather pathetic enigne HP and torque gain, with some lowering and suspension work tossed in I believe that not a great number of these would be bought. Afterall if they tell me wait another year for a stage 2 or 3 I will wait for the true performace version of the car to hit the streets.

    My question to any other prospective JCW buyers is would you buy a stage one car today if you knew the following.

    1. Less powerfull than the R53 JCW

    2. Lowering

    3. Suspension work

    and that the stage 2 or stage 3 car was slated to come out later? I for one will not spend a single penny on something that is not as good as my current JCW.

  • MINIBro

    The thing that matters is that these upgrades will be available to add to the current R56. If they aren’t I will have a few dissappointed customers who are buying this new model expecting to add some more in house tuned power to their cars.

  • Lee L

    I would definitely not buy that version. I was waiting to hope they did somethign truly good with it. Also, somethign that held its value a little better than before. I doubt having 2 stages of JCW will help that at all, in fact, it will probably make it worse.

  • scott

    But won’t the new one have way more torque also!?

  • eto

    I’d consider this stage 1 JCW kit if it was half the price of the previous kit and didn’t require the sport package.

  • http://www.bancroftsonline.com Sean

    I hope this is not the case. I think a staging system would be a mess. If MINI want to build JCW into an M-like phenomena MINI should just release one well-done, powerful product.

  • http://www.motoringfile.com/ Gabe

    I’d consider this stage 1 JCW kit if it was half the price of the previous kit and didn’t require the sport package.

    You may get your wish.

  • http://hpudrew.gomotoring.com Drew M. (HPUdrew)

    “‘I’d consider this stage 1 JCW kit if it was half the price of the previous kit and didn’t require the sport package.’

    You may get your wish.”

    Well I had to wait until the final comment I read to hear something good out of this article. “Staging” the JCW cars could work, but may prove to be too complicated. If the JCW Stage 1 is only $2-3k more than a MCS that would be ok… but only if the Stage 2 JCW is around 250hp, AWD, and around a $32k beast.

    At that point MINI would have a large brand spread, from the MINI Cooper with 120hp to a MINI JCW2 with 250hp and AWD. That also puts it up against the VW line with the Rabbit/GTI/R32.

    Drew

  • http://inomis.com iNomis

    My question to any other prospective JCW buyers is would you buy a stage one car today if you knew the following:

    1. Less HP than the R53 JCW but 1/2 second faster to 60
    2. Some suspension that makes it 10+ seconds faster at the Ring.
    3. Cheaper than R53 JCW

    Horsepower is only one number… I’m waiting for them all.

  • Bob M

    I echo Jon’s sentiments. I never envisioned that when I passed up the R53 JCW in anticipation of the newer technology R56 version that I would be subjected to such a lengthy wait by Mini with no clear vision for the car and schedule for its production. Regrettably, because of this, I fear there will be no Mini parked in my garage. But if I buy a 335i, does BMW really care? I think not.

  • FrankInMiami

    Has MINI been able to address the rumored engine overheating problems with the R56 JCW package?

  • Chris

    When they say they can’t get a lot of power, they probably mean without sacrificing ‘driveability’ – meaning they get turbo lag, rough idle, or something acceptable to the aftermarket, but not on a factory car.

    I personally would buy a 200 hp JCW if it is a great overall package – suspension, brakes, body kit, and some power.

  • Jon

    A cheaper less capable JCW stage 1. Wonder if thsi is what they met my rebranding. Great, guess this means if BMW/Mini is considering this I can go down to my local BMW dealership and pick up a cheaper and less capable version of the M cars. Maybe I need to look at getting a stage 1 M5 now LOL.

    All I can say is I can’t wait to blast past new stage 1 JCW’s on the track with my current R53 JCW.

  • FrankInMiami

    It goes to show you that the “low-tech” TRITEC engine is a pretty capable little beast. Long live the TRITEC!

  • dr

    The problem is reliable waranteed horsepower…I mean the aftermarket will have no problem making lots more power but those cars will never see 100k miles without major mechanical repairs…Factory vehicles are held to a higher standard and they will not put out crap like that, which hurts the brand image of reliability. It does not suprise me that they are having a hard time making more hp from these engines that is professionally engineered and reliable.

  • http://www.commonwealth.nu fdavid

    After I read in NAM that people are trading in their JCW R53′s and getting only 13k as a starting point regardless it is a JCW or not, it makes me wonder if the extra cash is worth it. I am very happy with my setup on my R53 and I didn’t pay anything close to a JCW setup. Plus I service my car at Morristown Mini and they are performance enthusiasts which have led to no problems as far as warranties and service is concerned, so the whole piece of mind of a MINI brand upgrade does not stand as an excuse to get quality products other that JCW.

  • GZ

    SO. My source was correct when I posted the “stages” JCW a couple weeks ago. I finally drove an MCS this weekend and was impressed by how fast it was. An extra 25HP will be fun but of course we want MORE.

    This is all quite ambiguous. Can the “stage one” be added at the dealership (if so I’ll order an MCS now)or just a factory model? Will “stage two” be an upgrade to “one” or are you stuck with “one” when “two” comes out?

  • http://www.motoringfile.com/ Gabe

    SO. My source was correct when I posted the “stages” JCW a couple weeks ago. I finally drove an MCS this weekend and was impressed by how fast it was. An extra 25HP will be fun but of course we want MORE.

    We’ve been sitting on some of this info for awhile while we tried to verify it with a couple other sources.

    This is all quite ambiguous. Can the “stage one” be added at the dealership (if so I’ll order an MCS now)or just a factory model? Will “stage two” be an upgrade to “one” or are you stuck with “one” when “two” comes out?

    Your state one question will be answered tomorrow :-)

  • minimalist

    uk magazine autocar are speculating that Peugeot will show 210BHP 207 at Geneva show having already launched 150BHP and 175BHP versions of this car whi8ch share the turbocharged mini engine

  • James

    It seems to me that the branding solution here is to hold the actual MCS JCW until the big power version comes along. Sell the “stage 1″ as a kit or option for the regular car, not as a seperate model. Like the way BMW sells both M cars and M packages for lesser Bimmers, but with the added bonus of more power. 200hp plus uprated suspension in a regular MCS would be quite nice, I’m sure.

    What I’d really like these JCW cars/packages to do is make the Sport Button’s “on” setting as the default.

  • Glen B.

    How much power does one need? How much is too much? In 2010, don’t you think global warming and fuel economy will mean more than they do even today. I hope MINI takes a step off the bandwagon of insatiable levels of horsepower.

  • dr

    boy you can tell the people who buy the cute cars because of marketing from those who buy cars because they are fun

    No thanks Glen, I dont like tofu, go ahead and finish it off yourself

  • GZ

    Glen. I recommend keeping a lid on the global warming(BS)rap. That’s a can of worms I’m sure Gabe doesn’t feel is appropriate for MF. Go watch some reruns of the Oscars for your left wing fix but don’t bring it here.

    Hey dr. I’m going out for a steak, wanna come? Let’s take my Hummer.

  • http://www.lifeofben.com Ben
    How much power does one need? How much is too much? In 2010, don’t you think global warming and fuel economy will mean more than they do even today. I hope MINI takes a step off the bandwagon of insatiable levels of horsepower.

    More power does not necessarily equal decreased fuel economy or higher emissions…the current-gen Altima and Camry hybrids are plenty quick, and even non-hybrid technology (like VW’s Twincharger) promises a future of quicker (but still less-environmentally intrusive) cars.

    You know, of course, that the R56 is faster AND more fuel-efficient than the car it replaces, right? And besides, why bring these comments here in the first place…this is probably the only car site on the web where 230hp = “insatiable” :)

  • R56LVR

    I feel better about my R53 JCW with each passing article on the R56. And knowing that I will not be buying a new car in the next couple of years makes it some much easier to justify the head and cam that I’ve been comtemplating…

  • http://www.commonwealth.nu fdavid

    I am with Glen on this one actually. It would be nice to revisit this thread in 5 years and see if there are any changes in consumer perspectives about energy consumption. It would be amazing to see a 220 plus HP Mini that runs in anything other than gasoline. BTW: to care about the environment you don’t need to be a patchouli tofu eater but rather an individual with some common sense. The truth is that I bet right now that a company such as Honda will be the first one to offer a ride like this and then the rest will follow. 1972 Honda civic comes to mind.

  • dr

    Yeah and the truth is that COWs do more to the enviroment than modern cars….The truth is that one volcano eruption spews more crap in the air than if everyone drove Hummers….the truth is that we only have at best 200 years of climate data and from that tiny TINY amount of data scientists have extrapolated hysteria to keep their endowments and government funding rolling in to keep thier pointless jobs…

  • GZ

    I’m casting my vote for dr as MF participant of the day. The Earth’s temperature fluctuates on it’s own regardless of what we do. Puny mankind CANNOT affect this! This crap is all about political agendas and the rest of the world which pollutes far more than the US being jealous of our standard of life.

    In the 70′s the envirocommunists were whinning about global COOLING! Where are those guys now? Furthermore, there is less pollution and more trees now than 30 years ago! DO NOT BUY THIS GARBAGE! AND KEEP IT OUT OF MF! And give me 250 HP on JCW3!

  • http://www.commonwealth.nu fdavid

    Ok. It seems this is not the right demographic/forum for such a topic, rather than intelligent discussion its becoming quite pathetic and depressing; so let’s go back to the topic at hand Minis FUTURE VEHICLES!

  • http://www.motoringfile.com/ Gabe

    The realities of the environmental problems we face daily are pretty obvious to most. And I for one am very interested in limiting the damage we do to the earth every day. However I’d prefer if this debate raged on elsewhere in more appropriate places of the web.

  • GZ

    I agree. However, it’s amusing how opinions are still squeezed in huh?

  • Micah

    Quite funny and ironic how the guys with the uninformed, nonscientific, right-leaning opinions are ranting the loudest…

  • http://www.motoringfile.com/ Gabe

    Comments are now back open. Please be mindful of the posting guidelines as listed below.

  • Miguel

    As a long time BMW owner (’77 2002, ’94 325i), I have always been a fan of the M series cars, but they have been out of reach financially. I have a 2005 MCS and love it, but when you start looking at a $35000 Mini / JCW, a used BMW M3 becomes a serious alternative for me. I think that Mini needs to make a 230+ BHP version, with the suspension, brakes, and looks to match, at a decent price, or driving enthusiasts will start to look elsewhere. The new and used market has a lot of vehicles that can run with the current R53 MCS JCW if a buyer is strictly seeking performance. Going fast with a 1.6 liter engine that is economical and reliable is quite a feat, so this gets kudos above and beyond performance alone. There is however a price ceiling, and Mini needs to recognise this. I think that by offering the “stage one” kit they are making an attempt to keep impatient hot shoes interested, however it may also be a sign that they are having trouble meeting reliability goals with the new “trick” engine. I hope I’m wrong, because I have left a deposit with my dealer on a M56 JCW… whenever they actually come out…2008? I’m cautiously optimistic.

  • Miguel

    Oops. I know some car aficianado is going to call me on it, so the 1977 BMW 2002 was indeed a typo. I don’t think they made a 1977. It was a 1976. Fjord blue and very fun, although it leaned WAY over on the corners. I had to put sway bars and decamber plates on it to keep the chrome on the door handles. The color was almost the same as my Mini.

  • Pingback: MotoringFile » Archive » Is This the JCW Stage II Kit?

  • Pingback: MotoringFile » Archive » R56 JCW Engine Kit: Auto Availability

  • Gilbert’s

    Oh my…. I think i’ll stick with my old cooper S got 210 hp and i am happy..


Sort by MINI model


OutMotoring

MINI Model Cheat Sheet

1st Gen MINI
R50: One & MC Hatch
R52: All 1st Gen MINI Convt.
R53: MCS Hatch
2nd Gen MINI
R55: Clubman
R56: Hatch
R57: Convertible
R58: Coupe
R59: Roadster
R60: MINI Crossover
R61: MINI Crossover Coupe
3rd Gen MINI
F55: Clubman
F56: Hatch
F57: Convertible
F60: MINI Crossover
F62: Traveller

Advertise with MotoringFile

If you or your company are interested in advertising on the most influential MINI website in the world, please visit our Advertising section. If you have further questions about becoming a sponsor or would like to see our rate sheet please feel free to contact us directly.
mini mini
Translate MotoringFile with Google: 
 
Morristown MINI Auctions
BF

MF NewsRoom

MotoringFile Buyers Guides

R50 ('02-'06 MC) Buyers Guide
R53 ('02-'06 MCS) Buyers Guide



MotoringFile Reviews

Auto Reviews:
'12 JCW Coupe
'11 Fiat 500 Sport
'11 Tesla Roaster 2.5 '11 Countryman Comparo
'11 Cooper S Hatch
'11 Countryman MCS (FWD)
'11 Countryman MC (auto)
'10 Mayfair MCS (auto)
'11 Countryman MCS (ALL4)
'10 MINI E
'10 Tesla Roadster Sport
'09 Cooper S Convertible
'09 JCW Coupe
'09 JCW Clubman
JCW Stage I vs JCW Stage II
'08 Clubman S (Auto)
1st Drive: '08 MINI Clubman
'08 Smart Fourtwo
Comparison: '08 BMW 135i
'06 R53 MCS vs '07 R56 MCS
'07 R56 JCW (Stage 1)
'07 MINI Cooper S Long Term
'07 BMW Z4 M Coupe
'07 MINI Cooper & Cooper S
Audio: '07 MC/MCS at the Track
'06 JCW GP Long term
Reader Review: JCW GP
'06 JCW Cooper S Long Term
Comparison: '06 Lotus Elise
Comparison: '06 Mazda MX5
Comparison: '06 UK Focus ST
Comparison: '06 Civic Si
Comparison: '04 TVR T350
Comparison: '06 Nissan 350z
Comparison: '06 VW GTI w/DSG
Podcast: Cooper S Auto
Podcast: BMW 325i
Podcast: JCW MC Soundkit
'04 JCW MINI Cooper Tuning Kit
'05 MCS: One Month Review
'05 MCS Auto
'05 JCW S 1st Drive
'05 MINI Cooper
'05 MCS Conv. Long Term
'05 MINI Cooper S
'05 MCS Cabrio 1st Drive
'04 JCW MCS First Drive
'04 MC w/JCW Tuning Kit
BMW M3 SMG Vs. MCS
'04 MINI Cooper CVT
'02 MCS 3 year Review
Autocrossing the MINI Range

cafepress



Performance Accessories:
M7 Rear Chassis Brace
R56 JCW Engine Kit
R56 JCW Suspension (Long-Term)
R56 JCW Suspension (Track)
R56 JCW Suspension (Street)
R53 Craven Speed Short Shifter
R53 M7 Understrut System
Kumho Ecsta SPT Tires
R53 M7 Strut Tower Plates
R53 JCW Alcantara Wheel
R53 JCW Brake Kit
R53 Webb 15% Pulley
R53 Helix MCSa 15% Pulley
R53 H-Sport 19mm Sway Bar
R53 MCS Supersprint Exhaust
Podcast: R53 MCS SS Exhaust
R53 JCW Cold Air Intake
Reader Rev.: R53 JCW Brakes
R50 Supersprint Exhaust
R50 Remus Exhaust
R50 Promini Intake
R50 Remus Dual Exhaust
Schroth Harness System
R50 CVT Steering Wheel Paddles

Exterior Accessories:
MINI Do More Clubman Hitch
Miniature's Receiver Hitch
OEM White Tail Lights

Lifestyle Accessories:
MINI_Motion Watch
MINI_Motion Driving Shoe

Audio:
MINI Digital SoundModul
ICE-Link Plus iPod Adapter
Official BMW/iPod adapter
ICE-Link iPod Adapter
Kenwood iPod Interface
Alpine iPod Interface
Harman Kardon Stereo

Interior Accessories:
JCW Alcantara Steering Wheel JCW Leather Dash
MCAW Auto Up Circuit
MINI Rear Camera
MINI Rear Saddle (official)
MINI Rear Cargo Storage Case
Official MINI Rear Saddle Bag
2004 MINI Armrest Reviewed
Mymini Knee Pad
MINI Bluetooth Kit
MINI Video Input
Aftermarket Bluetooth Integration
Ian Cull Auto-up Circuit
Universal Mobile Phone Holder