MotoringFile


Cheaper Mini on its Way?

As some long time MotoringFile readers may know MINI's next generation car (the R56) is due to be introduced in the next 2-3 years. There have been rumors in the past that this next MINI will be a car designed to cost BMW less and in turn make more money as opposed to the current car which by most accounts is over engineered considering the price range it occupies. In fact we covered some of this very speculation over a year ago. Of course the extent of the cost savings is unknown and it may simply be components that we can't see or feel that have no bearing on overall quality of the car. We probably won't know details until the cars make their way out of the plant and into our hands.

The Irish Examiner has some further info about the next generation car in a recent article. While the article is vague in nature, what it hints at is interesting. Here's an excerpt:

German car giant BMW is planning to replace its successful British-built Mini with a new, cheaper-to-make model.

The company, which makes the Mini at Cowley near Oxford, has drawn up plans for a version of the car with a less ambitious design, according to a report.

The Munich-based car maker has decided the high specification of the Mini and its relatively low market price has limited its profitability, the report in the Sunday Times said.

The new model, which will not be available for at least three to four years, will have cheaper components and will be offered with a wider range of body types including a five-door estate.

BMW’s Mini, based on Austin’s original classic, has had significant success since the company launched it just under three years ago.

The company sold 176,000 of the cars last year 22% up on 2002 and expects to sell about 180,000 this year. The Mini is sold in 73 countries, with prices ranging from just over $10,000 ($14,982) to more than $14,000 ($20,974).

BMW declined to give profit figures for the Mini, but a spokeswoman said the company expected the current range to make a ‘positive contribution to the group’s bottom line’.

She confirmed that the group plans to build a new range, which is likely to be available in different styles.

There may be a limited amount of extra investment at Cowley, which employs 4,500, to handle extra volumes, she said.

But the spokeswoman said it was too early to give further details on the new car, adding: ‘We’re still some years away from going into production.’

Analysis:

I think BMW is walking down a risky path if it is indeed planning to use cheaper materials and components for the next MINI. When you talk about what sets the MINI apart from other small sports cars the conversation inevitably leads to the amazing chassis. Sure the current MINI shouldn't have been made so well. Sure it's over engineered for even a $30,000 car. But it's resulted in a rare situation in automobiles and marketing where something not only lives up to it's branding and enthusiast hype – but surpasses it. BMW needs to only look at the current VW Beetle to see what happens when a high-end small car with no real engineering prowess starts to age… sales fall flat.

Of course many of us have heard this rumor before. BMW basically gave up on this generation of the MINI in terms of making a profit. They figured a car so spectacular would help build a brand and a loyal following. They were 100% correct with that assumption. It's one thing to cheapen the car by component costs but to mess with the wonderful chassis or the z-link rear suspension BMW/MINI could potentially lose more than a predetermined percent of the customers. They could lose the respect of many core auto enthusiasts … and that will be hard to gain back.

Written By: MF Staff




27 Comments

Gabe May 31st, 2004 Link

Garo/Rollin – thanks for the heads up!

ReplyReply
Shawn May 31st, 2004 Link

Gabe, I totally agree with your analysis. This is an enthusiast's car no matter which aspect mattered most to the the car buyer. They bought it for it's fun factor and you don't get that with cheaper materials. Seriously, would anyone have bought it if someone besides BMW (and all that BMW stands for) had built it? Cheapening the car will run counter to the brand image.

ReplyReply
Ken May 31st, 2004 Link

I don't like the sound of CHeaper Material between related to our MINI ! .. ahaha …

ReplyReply
weslim May 31st, 2004 Link

It's a bad idea to introduce a cheaper Mini. What they should be doing is to concentrate on the current models making them standing out from each other. As for now the One and the Cooper are close to each other in terms of performens (or simply to modify to match) while the real gap is to the Cooper S. By introducing a cheaper model it will only lead more sales for the current models as people will want the “real” thing and not the cheap thing just to own a Mini.

ReplyReply
David Bunting May 31st, 2004 Link

If the next MINI can't be made competitive at the national level SCCA, I think MINI looses a lot of potential enthusiast interst.

Whether or not people are competitive in the SCCA or not, they at least want to know that the car has the potential to be a great handler. Mini built it's reputation on it, and now it's up the MINI (BMW) to uphold that.

ReplyReply
Tim May 31st, 2004 Link

I think that this cost cutting has started already. A bunch of us from Cork went to the Motor show in Birmingham, UK to see the new colours and spec.

We were disapointed at the tackiness of some components on the facelifted model, particularly the headlight clusters, (both types). The interior lights that displaced the clock were also very cheap looking and when I pushed the on/off switch, the whole mechanism receeded into the roof headlining.

The dash, just inside the windscreen looked very 'plasticy' too.

ReplyReply
Frank May 31st, 2004 Link

I think the article is pretty vague….cheapening the car how? By the number of welds it receives during assembly? By the number of screws it gets? By the quality of the interior plastics?

There are millions of ways to cut costs on a car, yet without affecting much of it in the way it feels and looks.

Prime examples of this…the Toyota Camry and Honda Accord. 2 of the best selling family vanilla sedans in the market that get cheapened to produce and market on each new generation. These cars still sell briskly in the American market and yet they have cheaper less complex parts to assemble in comparison to previous models and yet look and feel the same.

If you look at the interior of a 1989 Honda Accord and a 2004 Honda Accord, you'll be surprised as to how much more nicer the interior assembly quality and materials used in the old car versus the new one, but yet these difference may be subtle for the great majority of customers to notice.

I think everyone is taking this article way out of context (If it is true). Don't worry our MINis will not be turned into Pintos or Yugos!

ReplyReply
Gabe May 31st, 2004 Link

I hope you're right Frank.

ReplyReply
Evan May 31st, 2004 Link

There are definite ways to cut costs on building cars without “cheapening” them. I believe BMW is smart enough to not ruin what is has established with the MINI. With an increase in model variety and production numbers, the costs will come down. Also keep in mind that this initial iteration required the establishment of a dealer network- even if it is based off of BMW's existing plan. That huge investment has already been made.

As it is, the current generation does have its cost-cutting evident in some of the plastics and quality of the interior bits. But, and this is why none of that matters, they spent the money in all of the right places- the chassis and structure are excellent along with safety and overall build.

We just have to trust BMW. Even if they drop some now standard equipment, they will keep the core of the car alive and well.

Or I at least have the best model year so far (2004) and will keep it forever.

ReplyReply
Gabe May 31st, 2004 Link

Evan and Frank – you both bring up good points. I think one good example of a recent cost cutting measure done right is the new three-piece dash. They've reduced the complexity, cost and hopefully rattles without any cheapening of the interior.

ReplyReply
Steven Diver May 31st, 2004 Link

Frank & Evan… You both bring up good points, and there are definitely ways of designing and producing a MINI that is cheaper for BMW to produce, without sacrificing overall quality. As Gabe said, a redesigned dash may be cheaper for BMW to produce, while still retaining the same look as the old, and perhaps even providing improvements over the older more complex and expensive design.

This is something that is always happening in the manufacturing world. You have a design, and you want to find a way to make it cheaper to produce, but keep the same level of quality. I think you can be sure of one thing though, that BMW will not want to tarnish its name by producing an inferior product.

I think we will just have to wait and see on this one. The article probably sounds scarier, than what will actually happen.

ReplyReply
Randolph Lee Jun 1st, 2004 Link

Just Pray that they do not let Chris Bangle or some one like him near the MINI

The mess he makes of any car he designs is breathtaking… Why BMW is still folowing this pied piper of bad design is beyond me.

I recall reading somewhere that if not for the paint shop bottleneck the plant could build almost 300,000 a year… but like anything you read in a paper or on the net these days I do notknow how true it was/is.

I too expect to see a traveler version in the future but I think that the SUV craze will be a fading one by the time that MINI might be thinking of doing it, hence we may be saved from that travisty except fot the ones that come out of the custom shops…

BMW has positioned the MINI as a premium brand and I do not see them risking this hard won identity with an intentional cheapening of the brand… that said of course they will look, like any builder of any product will, for ways to improve their profit margin… but not in ways that would impact the perceived quality of the product. That would be Just stupid.

~R

ReplyReply
njpaguy Jun 1st, 2004 Link

There are many ways to realize savings in design and production, but current BMW thinking does tend to make one pause. Take for example the new 5. Subjective comments about design aside, look at the uproar over their choice of interior materials. A simple miscalculation or Bavarian arrogance? (You'll learn to like it…just like iDrive). As I've mentioned before, Dr Panke may be a nuclear physicist, but he's no rocket scientist. Not a doomsayer here; just an observation.

ReplyReply
R Jun 1st, 2004 Link

Lock & load, aim at foot, fire!

Let's hope that when I buy my next MINI it still is a MINI and not a mainland Chinese version…R

ReplyReply
napster Jun 1st, 2004 Link

I hope they know better than to mess with the current car's suspension setup in a negative way. Everybody remember what Nissan did to the 95/99 Maxima's rear suspension setup. They changed over to a cheaper solid beam setup in lieu of the previous generations setup. The result was a disaster for road handling.

ReplyReply
James Jun 1st, 2004 Link

Oh well…nothing we can do about it anyway. I guess that just means that the existing model will be more valuable in the long run!

ReplyReply
andrew Jun 1st, 2004 Link

Randolph. Unless i am mistaken, Chris Bangle is the current head of design for all of BMWs brands… BMW, Rolls-Royce and MINI.

ReplyReply
Frank Jun 1st, 2004 Link

Folks, I think everyone has raised very good points but in my opinion most seem to be jumping the gun way ahead of time. The article is pretty vague and has a clear sensasionalistic tone to it. BMW has gone thru incredible efforts to nurture and preserve the essence of the MINI brand and product alike. MINI has been a resounding success for the marque and if previous history serves as evidence of future strategies I doubt very much BMW will radically change or delute what the MINI is all about in the name of profits and reduced production costs. BMW is what it is because they understand the markets where they sell thier products extremely well and they have earned their reputation based on keeping that core market satisfied with world class products. other manufacturers have loads of trouble understanding this, but it would be short of suicidal to transform the R50 MINI into a Hyundai and like I said that ain't gonna happen.

The cut throat automotive market demands decreased production costs and yet while retaining high quality and product appeal for the customer…that's quite a hefty challenge and most of us understand it one-dimensionally but it is so much more than cheapening a car for the heck of it. All manufacturers in operation today are always seeking to cut costs to keep thier products and profits competitve. as for BMW it doesn't seem to me that they will be willing to jeopardize thier must successful franchise ever. My prediction is that when the R56 comes out in a few years the car will be a hit and it will look higher quality too, perhaps in the interior and materials used, yet they would have cut costs in areas that you will never see/touch or hear. probably the R56 will make use of more integrated modules, use less welds, cheaper dashboard modules that will still look and feel MINI all the way.

Us MINI owners are very passionate about our cars and jump to conclusions without even getting all the facts together and seeing the finish product in person. People complained last year when MINi announced the softening of the suspension, yet today no one complaints as the handling was not affected and the ride quality was improved dramatically. So the R56 will be the same thing, so let's all relax enjoy our cars and let BMW do thier job. 3 years is an eternity in the car business and anything can happen from here til then.

ReplyReply
Rocketboy Jun 1st, 2004 Link

I too doubt that BMW will start making 'disposable' MINIs. If BMW wanted to use the MINI to increase image, why would they degrade the quailty of it? The only 'major' changes that I could see them doing is making the MINI One cheaper, and less like the Cooper, or maybe a MINI .5 that will be even more budget minded than the One.

I just can't see them Dawoo-ifying the current lineup..

ReplyReply
KE3VP Jun 1st, 2004 Link

Hope for the best, but prepare for the worst… With some of the trends I've seen in manufacturing and worldwide corporate mindsets, I can't help but think the way “R” does. The bottom line seems to always be more important than quality. The MINI is my first experience with BMW, and I have been very impressed. I don't remember EVER being so excited about an automobile. I'm looking forward to purchasing another MINI about 2007. If I see a major negative deviation from the current quality/performance benchmark, I'll back off in a heartbeat. A phrase that comes to my mind is “…if it's not broken, don't fix it…”. I hope BMW is listening !!?!?? I guess we'll have to just wait and see.

ReplyReply
Peter Jun 1st, 2004 Link

well, really i think this sucks alot. i am 15 years old and my brother bought a 2003 MINI cooper s. i have to say that i love this car, and by the time it will take for me to be able to afford one, this cheaper model will be out.i think this is really bad, and the only thing that bmw is turning the great MINI into is just a SCION or an AVEO. If BMW changes the model to a cheaper version, i think that ill just have to settle with a RABBIT GTI. I hate saying, this becuase the MINI is my favorite car, and is a very fun driver.

ReplyReply
Frank Jun 1st, 2004 Link

Peter, did you read all 20 comments before yours????

ReplyReply
dgszweda1 Jun 1st, 2004 Link

I think the general trend throughout industry at least in the last decade, has been the thinking that to increase profits you must increase your margins. Sell for more but produce for cheaper. Unfortunately the cheaper usually comes at the expense of the quality of the product. And as time goes and the pressure builds to continue to increase profits, the push to decrease costs at the expense of quality begins to build. Whatever happen to building a better product. I have always been willinging to spend more for a superior product. I think in general quality and customer service are on the decline. One example to make the case the people are willing to spend for quality.

ReplyReply
Bill Lawrence Jun 3rd, 2004 Link

When I was working my way through college, I worked on the assembly line of a major commercial truck manufacturer.

They introduced a new model that was cheaper to build. One of the things they did to cut costs was to make a one piece floor pan, rather than one that came in 8 pieces. This made it so there were 2 people working on the floor assembly, rather than 8. In the process, the body was stiffer and there was less rooom for error in it's build. Not only was the truck cheaper to build, but the customer got a superior product.

BMW will probably take the same approach with the MINI.

ReplyReply
Frank Jun 3rd, 2004 Link

I agree Bill. Thanks for your perspective.

ReplyReply
Stuart Jun 4th, 2004 Link

Just a quick comment, I think the word 'cheap' is the wrong word, it implies low quality and tackiness, I think the article got it wrong, and any remarks were taken out of context. What should be read into this is that the current MINI design maybe difficult and expensive to produce, a new version, though having the same dynamics and looks, would be easier to build right thru the process, thus costing less in overheads, time, and materials. The quality of the car will be further improved I would imagine. So forget the 'cheap' and think “more cost effectively produced”, but with at least as good customer perceived quality and styling, thats the idea for all business enterprises surely?.

ReplyReply
Gabe Jun 4th, 2004 Link

Okay – I offiially feel better now Stuart! Thanks :)

ReplyReply
M7 Tuning

Leave a Reply

Preview:

MF Community


Login using Facebook:


Last visitors
view more...

Articles by MINI model

The Fine Print

MotoringFile reserves the right to edit or delete any post for any reason. Derogatory comments of any kind will not be tolerated.

HTML Formatting Tips

  • To make something bold: <strong>Text to bold</strong>
  • To make something italic: <em>Text to italicize</em>
  • To make a hyperlink: <a href="URL">Text to link</a>
  • To quote something previously said, you can use <blockquote>text</blockquote>

Markdown Formatting Tips (advanced)

MotoringFile also allows use of Markdown formatting in the comment section. This accomplishes the same formatting as HTML but is typically easy to use.

_your text_your text
**your text**your text
`my code`my code
* Bulleted list
* Second item
• Bulleted list
• Second item
1. Numbered list
1. Second item
1. Numbered list
2. Second item
[link name](URL)link name
***Horizontal ruler
<http://url>
<email@add.com>
Auto-linked
![Alt text](URL)Image




MF Community


Login using Facebook:


Last visitors
view more...

Articles by MINI model


Miniature Trailers


Advertise with MotoringFile

If you or your company are interested in advertising on the most influencial MINI website in the world, please visit our Advertising section. If you have further questions about becoming a sponsor or would like to see our rate sheet please feel free to contact us directly.

Previous Select MF Features

2009
» World Debut: MINI Coupé Concept
» World Premier: MINI Roadster Concept
» Exclusive: MINI Product Roadmap Revealed
» Exclusive: MINI's 2011 Product Strategy.
» World Premier: MINI Beachcomber Concept
» Exclusive: MINI Likely to Move Some Production to Germany
» MINI Releases JCW WC50 Special Edition
» Exclusive: Rolls Royce to Create Special Edition MINI
» MINI Mid Life Cycle Refresh Coming in '10
» MINIproduct Roadmap Revealed
» MINI 50th Anniversary Models Revealed
» JCW Diesel a Reality
» MINI's Mid Life-Cycle Refresh
» MotoringFile Does the 24 Hours of Lemons
» MINI's City Car to go RWD
» MINI to Launch Progressive Activity Vehicle
» JCW Re-Imagined: Our Take on the Factory JCW
» JCW GP to Return?
» MF Exclusive: the Secret Design Process of the Clubman
2008
» MINI JCW in Depth / MINI USA JCW Pricing
» MCS Engine's Cold Start Issue (Update)
» Official History of the Modern JCW Tuning Kit
» MINI Crossover Concept Official Release
» MINI Dealers to Sell Fiats in North America?
» MINI Challenge Race Car in the US
» MF's MINI United Video (part 1)
»
MF Exclusive: Ask Stracco Part 2
» R57: Seriously Always Open
» Factory JCW MINI in Detail
» Fiat & BMW To Co-Develop Next MINI?
» Exclusive MINI Takes the State Info
2007
» MINI Officially Updates Line-up for 2008
» New Models & Production Locations Confirmed
» MotoringFile's MINI United Coverage
» 2007 JCW Kit Officially Announced
» MINI's Top Secret Colorado Project
» 2009 Factory JCW MCS (Stage II)
» More MINI Variants Officially Confirmed
» MINI Clubman Official Photos and Specs
» R56 Pedestrian Crash Analysis
» Future JCW Vehicles Revealed
» MINI USA's Motorby Pilot Program
» MINI Clubman Update & Sketch
» BMW To Re-Brand JCW
» 2007 MINI MotoringFile Q&A
» MINI One and MINI Cooper D Now Official
» 2007 MINI Reader Reviews
» 2007 MINI USA Pricing and Options
» MINI Unveils the Sidewalk

2006
» MF Design Analysis: 2007 MINI
» 2007 JCW Accessories Revealed
» MINI Names the R55: The Clubman » 2007 MINI In Detail (Part 2 / Part 3)
» 2007 MINI Official Photos (Part 2 / Part 3)
» 2007 MINI Drops Weight
» Official 2007 MINI UK PDFs
» 2007 Nav Includes iDrive-Like Controller
» 2007 US Market Options Packages
» Hey Stracco: The Interview
» Let's Plan: MINI Clubs & MTTS
» MINI's Official R56 Preview Photos
» MINI's Official R56 Preview
» Next Generation MINI Revealed (#2)
» '07 MC & MCS Spotted in Death Valley
» 2007 MINI Color List (US Market)
» '07 MINI Gets More Power/Less Weight
» MF Review: MINIs on the Dragon
» MINI USA Releases JCW GP Pricing
» JCW Cooper S Long Term Review
» Seven New Colors for 2007
» MINI Release Info on Next Gen Engines
» Chicago Autoshow Gallery
» JCW GP at Geneva (final release info)
» 2006 JCW Product Info
» MINI Concept Detroit - In Detail
» MINI Sourced Triump Still Years Away
» US Connection for MINI's new Roadster
» First MINI Now Triumph?
» More News on the MINI Triumph Concept

2005
» Behind the Wheel of the 2007 MINI
» MINI Concept Tokyo - In Detail
» MINI Concept Frankfurt - In Detail
» Driven: The Nürburgring Nordschleife
» MINI Wins at Targe Newfoundland
» 2006 JCW Accessories
» US Market Color Changes for 2006
» Getrag's All Wheel Drive MINI In Depth
» BMW/MINI to Buy JCW?
» Official 2006 MINIUSA Pricing
» Special Editions/Package for 2006
» Checkmate Options Package (USA)
» JCW Direct From to the Factory in '06
» Tips on How to Sell Your MINI
» 2006 Model Year Timeline
» MINI's 2006 Color Changes
» Next Generation MINI Revealed
» Official MINI Armrest Revealed
» MotoringFile Review: MCS Auto

2004
» Details on the MCS Limited Slip Dif
» MotoringFile 2004 Holiday Gift Guide
» Getrag Tests All-Wheel Drive MINI
» Q&A on the OutMotoring ARC Armrest
» 2005 Chicago Auto Show / Gallery
» MINI USA's JCW GP Delivery Program
» 2005 MINI Changes
» The Cabrio In Depth / Gallery
» Special Edition MC40 / Gallery
» MINI Plant Tour Review
» Hood Rub Service Bulletin
» 2004 Chicago Auto Show / Gallery

2003
» MINI Accessory Additions for 2004
» CVT Paddles Retrofit
» 2005 MINI Spotted
» Rear Fogs Almost Here
» New Prince Engine Caught Testing
» MINI Releases Hood Rub Bulletin
» MINI_Motion Launched
» MINI Conquers Snow and Ice
» MINI One D Announced
» MINI Named North American Car of the Year

MotoringFile Downloads

mini MF map
MF Club Mappr mini
Translate MotoringFile with Google: 
 
BF

MF NewsRoom

Morristown MINI Auctions

MotoringFile Buyers Guides

R50 ('02-'06 MC) Buyers Guide
R53 ('02-'06 MCS) Buyers Guide



MotoringFile Reviews

Auto Reviews:
'09 Cooper S Convertible
'09 JCW Coupe
'09 JCW Clubman
JCW Stage I vs JCW Stage II
'08 Clubman S (Auto)
1st Drive: '08 MINI Clubman
Comparison: '08 BMW 135i
'06 R53 MCS vs '07 R56 MCS
'07 R56 JCW (Stage 1)
'07 MINI Cooper S Long Term
'07 BMW Z4 M Coupe
'07 MINI Cooper & Cooper S
Audio: '07 MC/MCS at the Track
'06 JCW GP Long term
Reader Review: JCW GP
'06 JCW Cooper S Long Term
Comparison: '06 Lotus Elise
Comparison: '06 Mazda MX5
Comparison: '06 UK Focus ST
Comparison: '06 Civic Si
Comparison: '04 TVR T350
Comparison: '06 Nissan 350z
Comparison: '06 VW GTI w/DSG
Podcast: Cooper S Auto
Podcast: BMW 325i
Podcast: JCW MC Soundkit
'04 JCW MINI Cooper Tuning Kit
'05 MCS: One Month Review
'05 MCS Auto
'05 JCW S 1st Drive
'05 MINI Cooper
'05 MCS Conv. Long Term
'05 MINI Cooper S
'05 MCS Cabrio 1st Drive
'04 JCW MCS First Drive
'04 MC w/JCW Tuning Kit
BMW M3 SMG Vs. MCS
'04 MINI Cooper CVT
'02 MCS 3 year Review
Autocrossing the MINI Range

cafepress



Performance Accessories:
R56 JCW Engine Kit
R56 JCW Suspension (Long-Term)
R56 JCW Suspension (Track)
R56 JCW Suspension (Street)
R53 Craven Speed Short Shifter
R53 M7 Understrut System
Kumho Ecsta SPT Tires
R53 M7 Strut Tower Plates
R53 JCW Alcantara Wheel
R53 JCW Brake Kit
R53 Webb 15% Pulley
R53 Helix MCSa 15% Pulley
R53 H-Sport 19mm Sway Bar
R53 MCS Supersprint Exhaust
Podcast: R53 MCS SS Exhaust
R53 JCW Cold Air Intake
Reader Rev.: R53 JCW Brakes
R50 Supersprint Exhaust
R50 Remus Exhaust
R50 Promini Intake
R50 Remus Dual Exhaust
Schroth Harness System
R50 CVT Steering Wheel Paddles

Exterior Accessories:
Miniature's Receiver Hitch
OEM White Tail Lights

Lifestyle Accessories:
MINI_Motion Watch
MINI_Motion Driving Shoe

Audio:
MINI Digital SoundModul
ICE-Link Plus iPod Adapter
Official BMW/iPod adapter
ICE-Link iPod Adapter
Kenwood iPod Interface
Alpine iPod Interface
Harman Kardon Stereo

Interior Accessories:
JCW Alcantara Steering Wheel JCW Leather Dash
MCAW Auto Up Circuit
MINI Rear Camera
MINI Rear Saddle (official)
MINI Rear Cargo Storage Case
Official MINI Rear Saddle Bag
2004 MINI Armrest Reviewed
Mymini Knee Pad
MINI Bluetooth Kit
MINI Video Input
Aftermarket Bluetooth Integration
Ian Cull Auto-up Circuit
Universal Mobile Phone Holder




MINI Model Number Cheat Sheet:

1st Gen MINI
R50: One & MC Coupe
R52: All 1st Gen MINI Convt.
R53: MCS Coupe
2nd Gen MINI
R55: Clubman
R56: One/MC/MCS Coupe
R57: One/MC/MCS Convt.
R60: MINI SUV