MF Exclusive: “Stage II” JCW MINI Revealed

As we exclusively reported last year, MINI will be releasing not one but two separate JCW kits for the R56 MCS during it’s model cycle. The “Stage I” went on sale last month at MINI dealers around the world. With a power output of 192bhp and (here’s the kicker) as much as 199 lb-ft on tap, it’s turned out to be one of the fastest MINI ever – some would say almost the equal to the JCW GP due to all that torque. However there’s little denying that one of those numbers is noticeably down from the previous dealer/factory installed kit. And MINI being MINI, you knew that had to be eventually rectified.

And that brings us to the factory JCW or the “Stage II” as we dubbed it last year. The “Stage II” will not only match the power output of the previous R53 JCW car but will surely be quicker (due to the increased torque) than even the JCW GP.

Let’s start with engine output. Our information on power output hasn’t changed since our first article about this car from last February. That means we can expect power anywhere form 210 to 220 bhp. To help deal with this power DSC and LSD will come standard. And yes, that last acronym means no automatic option.

The new found power comes from several components. Key to this will be a larger and fully optimized turbocharger (as previously reported on MF). Elsewhere the car will receive the intake kit known from the first kit, an entirely new JCW exhaust and a reprogrammed ECU. To top it all off the car will be equipped with 260 km/h speedometer limit (as opposed to the normal speedometer on the Cooper S with a limit of 240 km/h).

The Stage II will also get the soon to be released 4 piston brake that we reported on last week. The brakes are rumored to be available as a dealer accessory as well. Let that sink in for a moment. Previous MINI brakes (even the JCW/R56 MCS brakes) had to make due with one piston. This new kit will have four of them.

Wrapped around these brakes will be unique JCW 18″ wheels that will be the only major visual reminder that you’re driving a factory JCW car.

While it’s safe to assume the price will be in the same range as the previous factory JCW kit, we don’t have any concrete information on final figures at this time.

One thing the factory JCW kit won’t get will be the excellent JCW Sport Suspension. We’re guessing cost was a factor but it also may have something to do with wanting to make sure the factory JCW car suited all tastes. As amazing as the JCW Suspension is, it does return the ride to near R53 levels.

As we’ve previously reported, expect the new JCW kit to debut sometime in the second half of 2008.

Be sure check back in the coming weeks and months for more details on this car and interesting news about the entire JCW range of products

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Written By: Gabe

  • Jon

    I am betting there is still a lot of info coming down that will explain some of the pricing. I however never expect a factory build to be available as a dealer kit any more than a GP was.

    I believe that one thing BMW understands is how to make a car stand out after decades of the M division work. Just looking forward to hearing more about this tiny terror.

  • msh441

    “I however never expect a factory build to be available as a dealer kit any more than a GP was.”

    Really? The previous JCW was availible as a factory OR dealer option. Why not this one?

    The GP was a different beast alltogether. A last-of-the R53 limitid production run. Every one of the GP performance options were availible to R53 owners. Cosmetics (wing, color, undertray, back seat delete) were limited, but not the actual performance items.

  • Jon

    I personally believe BMW/Mini is partially responding to its prior JCW owners. Many of us noted that as good as the kit is it held 0% resale extra value as is the case with every kit and after-market item. Love my JCW but knowing I threw a handful of cash into the fire never set really well with me. A factory car will hold value and does stand out I believe as a bit as being something unique. As a person who is buying a factory car I would be happy to pay for the smaller production run than see the components that make this car available for any car just to slapped on. The last JCW was never a factory item, true the kit could be put in at the factory but this was still lightyears from being a true factory car.

    Don’t get me wrong I adore the stage 1 kit but I believe that the factory car should stay just as that, a factory car.

  • http://www.motoringfile.com/ Gabe

    Really? The previous JCW was availible as a factory OR dealer option. Why not this one?

    As more information about the kit is released, the answer will become a bit more obvious.

    I am betting there is still a lot of info coming down that will explain some of the pricing. I however never expect a factory build to be available as a dealer kit any more than a GP was.

    You sound like someone who knows how to bet.

    More non news really, no dig intended at you Gabe whatsoever. But if the pricing circa $6000+ is correct then like someone already mentioned I’d expect a hell of a lot more than a bigger turbo, upgraded brakes(which will be available anyway as a dealer option) and an extra 20-25 HP over the JCW Stage 1.

    hah – I don’t think DB, myself or anyone else who writes for MF take anything personal anymore ;)

    But getting to your point… I can only say that it may be best to withhold judgement for a little while yet.

  • Brian

    Ok people I have some new info on the Stage II.

    It was lapping the Hockenheim ring at 1,15,38 sec. For comparison, the Ferrari 360 Modena does it in 1,17,09 and the Porsche 996 GT3 in 1,15,08.

    ok… breathe… just kidding.

  • drutx

    @RB – Not to over do the Torque question, and I’m no gearhead, but I believe the standard English unit for Torque is the multiplication of ft*lb (as opposed to dividing ft/lb or lb/ft).

    Thus, ftlb or lbft yields the same value for torque. Accordingly “Foot pounds” versus “Pound feet” would just be a personal preference.

  • drutx

    Formatting…

    That’s supposed to be ft x lb or lb x ft.

  • greg

    Msh 441. From your mouth to Minis ears. An upgrade for the stage one to make it stage two would be great but don’t hold your breath. I’d be happy with some kind of “in between” upgrade like the ’05 air box 10hp upgrade. That only cost $500!

  • tonyT3

    MF Exclusive: “Stage II” JCW MINI Revealed”

    Um, storey looks more like rumour/conjectour than fact.

  • http://www.motoringfile.com/ Gabe

    Um, storey looks more like rumour/conjectour than fact.

    Thanks for your opinion on how it looks. I can tell you it’s not.

  • Jon

    Funny part is my dealer is as excited by this news as I am. A factory JCW has been a dream of mine since Mini JCW produced it’s first kit for the R53.

    Think between now and March is going to be full of interesting news. I am a bit eager to learn about this car and think Mini is going to produce something rather special.

  • RB

    OK, I got all the info I need as to the lb/ft – ft/lb issue. Thanks.

    Hey Gabe, I thought you didn’t take stupid comments personally anymore? ………. ;-)

  • http://www.motoringfile.com/ Gabe

    Hey Gabe, I thought you didn’t take stupid comments personally anymore? ………. ;-)

    LOL – believe me, that’s not personal :-)

  • greg

    I thought ’06 JCW was a “factory” option. Again, all this story states is that this is coming. We knew that. Since they have given no specifics as to HP or price, the only “news” is that Mini will stiff us on the prior promise that JCW suspension and body kit would be included in the $6000(ish).

    And that’s old news eh?

  • Jon

    Major difference Greg, the 06 had the option of putting on the dealer kit at the factory, both were kits. What Mini is coming up with I believe is more akin to a M styled product.

    Don’t know if I would draw any conclusions as of yet on this car. I have the feeling that there is a lot more information coming down to us over the next several months. I would have liked to see the body kit and suspension be included but then again I am sure Mini is looking at it this way. Is it better to produce an entry factory car for under 40k or just offer a 45k car. I think their decisions makes sense. Myself it doesn’t matter since the body kit and suspension will be installed, hopefully at the factory.

  • Dunphyj

    In terms of the whole bigger brake thing… more pistons means more even pressure on the pads for better bite, modulation, and pedal feel. It also looks a hell of a lot cooler because people always think more is better.

    Fewer pistons means less cost and less unsprung mass. Having fewer pistons also usually means a smaller caliper, which means heat is more localized, which means the pads get up to temp faster and stay there longer. Those are big reasons why BMW does it that way (single-piston on the M3, two-piston on the M5).

    Keep in mind that those statements are assuming all else is equal. For example, it is possible to have 4-pot calipers that are lighter than single-pot calipers. They’ll just be really expensive.

    Overall heat handling is a function of the mass of the brake components, what they’re made of (iron vs. aluminum vs. ceramic), and how well everything is ventillated. Number of pistons isn’t really a factor in and of itself; sometimes calipers with lots of pistons handle heat better, but that’s really only because they tend to be bigger.

    It’s all a design choice.

    A note about the M3′s one-pot calipers: those single pistons are HUGE, and the brake pads are relatively square so the piston ends up covering most of the pad. That’s how they (mostly) get around the pad flex issue.

    BMW also uses sliding calipers wherever possible. That way, the pistons are always on the inside, which gives a lot more freedom in terms of wheel fitment because you don’t have to worry as much about whether the wheels will clear the brakes.

  • lavardera

    AutoBlog is giving MotoringFile kudos over the reporting on the JCW:

    http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/09/the-real-scoop-on-the-mini-jcw-stage-ii-cooper-s/

    You remember autoblog – let me help you out, its the car blog that was described by a certain MF staff as the in one of those blog-cast thingys. Ouch, well I’m sure they are not taking it personally either. I mean its not like they described MotoringFile like the Prada of car blogs or something…

  • Pingback: Super Car Blog » Blog Archive » The real scoop on the MINI JCW Stage II Cooper S

  • msh441

    I understand some people’s desire for a “factory ONLY” M-Car-like MINI JCW. Somthing exclusive. Somthing special. Not your run-of-the-mill JCW (if there is such a thing).

    To many though… well to me at least… this somewhat violates what the MINI is all about. To me, the MINI is (and should remain) a classless car. I like the fact that one can at any time make their car as mild or wild as they want it to be. Leave it stock for a year or two… go JCW a bit later… full blown track caged car after that if you so desire. Or just leave it bone stock forever.

    I understand the idea of an exclusive “end-of-run” car like the GP and I would expect somthing similar when the R56 sees it’s twilight. I just don’t like the idea of a concrete dividing line between production cars. MINI should not need to follow the lead of BMW. It’s part of MINI’s charecter that you can make your MINI whatever you want it to be pretty much whenever you want it.

    Hope this doesn’t seem too much like rambling. It’s hard to verbalize a concept like this.

  • Jon

    As a prior owner of a Cooper, current JCW Cooper S, and future owner of a factory JCW I can say personally I don’t think this will cause a class division. I adore them all, and the people in the Mini community, and I smile and wave at each no matter what version they drive.

    I think it will be accepted the same way the GP is. Reality check, is a GP a Mini, yep. I also believe that this car doesn’t change anything for doing whatever you want to your car,I am certain that even the factory car isn’t going to be the fastest or the best Mini for long. We have a lot of very talented people that are going to make barnstormers out of their Mini. To me this isn’t about exclusiveness its about retaining value and having fun.

  • MCS2007

    If you are out of warranty and add a JCW part from the dealer, then how long is the warranty on the new parts?

    The naming of ‘Stage II’ implies it can be purchased as a package like the Stage I kit. Otherwise, it would have been named ‘r56 JCW car’.

  • Jon

    Good question MCS2007, I was told that when they installed my kit on my R56 that it would be warranted for 24 months unlimited miles or the life of your cars warranty, which-ever is greater.

    The Stage2 is just a name that has been used to express there would be two separate JCW product lines one a dealer available kit and a factory built car.

    http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/07/16/2009-factory-jcw-mcs-the-stage-ii/

    “We first reported on the “Stage II” kit (as we’re calling it) last winter with some sketchy details on general performance targets.”

  • zm

    @ msh441:

    Agreed–which is why I said, ‘the more the merrier’.

  • greg

    Jon. You are correct that JCW tuning was (and still is) available in ’06 as a dealer install. However, the factory installed JCW included JCW brakes AND LSD which at this time of speculation made it a better value than “stage two”.

  • Pingback: zooped.org » Blog Archive » The real scoop on the MINI JCW Stage II Cooper S

  • Pingback: The real scoop on the MINI JCW Stage II Cooper S - Autoblog

  • Jon

    Think there are a few more surprises of the factory car upcoming. Think we should hold off for now until the details of this car comes down before we pass judgment that its not worth its additional costs.

    The factory JCW is coming with the new 4 piston brakes and from the previous details on Motoringfile have said it will be coming with LSD also. Think the upcoming months are going to be enthralling.

  • Impulsive

    $6k? … no thanks.

    Give me the bigger turbo over stock ‘S’ … $1500 to $2000, and the front bumper from the JCW skirt kit … $250, THAT’S IT! I’m not tracking it so I don’t need bigger brakes. The back bumper of the JCW kit is UGLY. The pricing of the JCW skirt kit is insane … the parts don’t cost significantly more to make, and since I don’t want the originals (and shouldn’t pay twice for them), the price difference shouldn’t be as big to choose what I want.

    BMW better look at lowering margins on their share of profit or they’ve lost me as a potential customer.

  • Lee

    Does this have something to do with the new big brakes for the Mini…. http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/13/brembo-supplying-brakes-to-bmw/

  • Jon

    A good question Lee, I personally think the brakes coming with the factory car are an adaptation of the AP brakes being used by the factory race car, though adapted for road usage.

    Will be interesting to see though

  • Pingback: MotoringFile » Archive » Factory JCW Kit Debut Timeline

  • Dr Obnxs

    Ft x Lb and Lb x Ft are the same thing. The root of this evil is two fold… Most people don’t use slugs (the REAL unit of mass, not Lbs) and there’s a style gide that some editor wrote about car stuff that maintains there’s a difference…

    Back to your regularly scheduled Mini banter…

    Matt

  • Pingback: MotoringFile » Archive » The JCW Factory Clubman?

  • Brad

    > BMW better look at lowering margins on their share of profit > or they’ve lost me as a potential customer.

    I’ll happily take your place!

  • Edge

    msh441,

    You said:

    Every one of the GP performance options were availible to R53 owners. Cosmetics (wing, color, undertray, back seat delete) were limited, but not the actual performance items.

    Not true. There are 3 performance-related items that are NOT readily available to non-GP owners in the USA (courtesy of MINIUSA’s restrictions). Those being the GP intercooler, the aluminum trailing arms and the lightweight GP wheels.

    True, you can get these items from international sources (or from USA vendors who already obtained them from an international source). Also, the trailing arms on the R56 are almost identical (although not EXACTLY), so buying those and adapting them to fit is another option…

    But the point remains that through “official” channels, here in the USA, a number of the “unique” GP performance items are simply NOT available to R53 owners.

  • Pingback: MotoringFile » Archive » MotoringFile Top 10 Stories of 2007

  • Pingback: MotoringFile » Archive » Initial Factory JCW Kit Details Leaked

  • Pingback: VehicleBuzz.net » Blog Archive » The real scoop on the MINI JCW Stage II Cooper S

  • Pingback: MotoringFile » Archive » Ask MF: How Livable is the R56 JCW?

  • nuvolari

    No suspension or steering improvements. That is unfortunate.


Sort by MINI model


OutMotoring

MINI Model Cheat Sheet

1st Gen MINI
R50: One & MC Hatch
R52: All 1st Gen MINI Convt.
R53: MCS Hatch
2nd Gen MINI
R55: Clubman
R56: Hatch
R57: Convertible
R58: Coupe
R59: Roadster
R60: MINI Crossover
R61: MINI Crossover Coupe
3rd Gen MINI
F55: Clubman
F56: Hatch
F57: Convertible
F60: MINI Crossover
F62: Traveller

Advertise with MotoringFile

If you or your company are interested in advertising on the most influential MINI website in the world, please visit our Advertising section. If you have further questions about becoming a sponsor or would like to see our rate sheet please feel free to contact us directly.
mini mini
Translate MotoringFile with Google: 
 
Morristown MINI Auctions
BF

MF NewsRoom

MotoringFile Buyers Guides

R50 ('02-'06 MC) Buyers Guide
R53 ('02-'06 MCS) Buyers Guide



MotoringFile Reviews

Auto Reviews:
'12 JCW Coupe
'11 Fiat 500 Sport
'11 Tesla Roaster 2.5 '11 Countryman Comparo
'11 Cooper S Hatch
'11 Countryman MCS (FWD)
'11 Countryman MC (auto)
'10 Mayfair MCS (auto)
'11 Countryman MCS (ALL4)
'10 MINI E
'10 Tesla Roadster Sport
'09 Cooper S Convertible
'09 JCW Coupe
'09 JCW Clubman
JCW Stage I vs JCW Stage II
'08 Clubman S (Auto)
1st Drive: '08 MINI Clubman
'08 Smart Fourtwo
Comparison: '08 BMW 135i
'06 R53 MCS vs '07 R56 MCS
'07 R56 JCW (Stage 1)
'07 MINI Cooper S Long Term
'07 BMW Z4 M Coupe
'07 MINI Cooper & Cooper S
Audio: '07 MC/MCS at the Track
'06 JCW GP Long term
Reader Review: JCW GP
'06 JCW Cooper S Long Term
Comparison: '06 Lotus Elise
Comparison: '06 Mazda MX5
Comparison: '06 UK Focus ST
Comparison: '06 Civic Si
Comparison: '04 TVR T350
Comparison: '06 Nissan 350z
Comparison: '06 VW GTI w/DSG
Podcast: Cooper S Auto
Podcast: BMW 325i
Podcast: JCW MC Soundkit
'04 JCW MINI Cooper Tuning Kit
'05 MCS: One Month Review
'05 MCS Auto
'05 JCW S 1st Drive
'05 MINI Cooper
'05 MCS Conv. Long Term
'05 MINI Cooper S
'05 MCS Cabrio 1st Drive
'04 JCW MCS First Drive
'04 MC w/JCW Tuning Kit
BMW M3 SMG Vs. MCS
'04 MINI Cooper CVT
'02 MCS 3 year Review
Autocrossing the MINI Range

cafepress



Performance Accessories:
M7 Rear Chassis Brace
R56 JCW Engine Kit
R56 JCW Suspension (Long-Term)
R56 JCW Suspension (Track)
R56 JCW Suspension (Street)
R53 Craven Speed Short Shifter
R53 M7 Understrut System
Kumho Ecsta SPT Tires
R53 M7 Strut Tower Plates
R53 JCW Alcantara Wheel
R53 JCW Brake Kit
R53 Webb 15% Pulley
R53 Helix MCSa 15% Pulley
R53 H-Sport 19mm Sway Bar
R53 MCS Supersprint Exhaust
Podcast: R53 MCS SS Exhaust
R53 JCW Cold Air Intake
Reader Rev.: R53 JCW Brakes
R50 Supersprint Exhaust
R50 Remus Exhaust
R50 Promini Intake
R50 Remus Dual Exhaust
Schroth Harness System
R50 CVT Steering Wheel Paddles

Exterior Accessories:
MINI Do More Clubman Hitch
Miniature's Receiver Hitch
OEM White Tail Lights

Lifestyle Accessories:
MINI_Motion Watch
MINI_Motion Driving Shoe

Audio:
MINI Digital SoundModul
ICE-Link Plus iPod Adapter
Official BMW/iPod adapter
ICE-Link iPod Adapter
Kenwood iPod Interface
Alpine iPod Interface
Harman Kardon Stereo

Interior Accessories:
JCW Alcantara Steering Wheel JCW Leather Dash
MCAW Auto Up Circuit
MINI Rear Camera
MINI Rear Saddle (official)
MINI Rear Cargo Storage Case
Official MINI Rear Saddle Bag
2004 MINI Armrest Reviewed
Mymini Knee Pad
MINI Bluetooth Kit
MINI Video Input
Aftermarket Bluetooth Integration
Ian Cull Auto-up Circuit
Universal Mobile Phone Holder