Evo Drives the Paceman Prototype

The chaps at Evo have managed (along with a few select UK and Euro press) some seat time in the Paceman All4 prototype. While still butt-wrapped in swirly nonsense, it looks like they got a pretty thorough look at the car. We’re all familiar with the basic looks and layout of the Paceman, but the burning question for many of us has been how does it drive? Evo‘s Mike Duff gives us his impression:


You’re probably expecting to hear that the Paceman drives pretty much like the Countyman. But it doesn’t. The revised suspension settings have, on our first acquaintance, turned it into a considerably more dynamic machine, with less roll, more grip and a far less front-biased chassis balance, certainly on the dusty tarmac of our Spanish test route.

We drove the ‘All 4’ version which, like its Countryman sister, uses a part-time four-wheel drive system to redistribute torque to the rear axle when slip is detected at the front. On the Countryman you need to be pretty much driving on ice or mud to feel the benefit, but the Paceman proves far happier to play on slidey surfaces than its understeery sister. In that regard it feels like a bigger Mini hatchback.

Keep in mind, this is still just the Cooper S version of the Paceman. If the Countryman is any indicator, we can expect JCW Paceman to be all the more fun and dynamic. Duff dings the Paceman for many of the expected goldielocks complaints, but I think we all know what we’re getting into with this car. It’s bigger than the hardtop hatch, less practical (ostensibly) than the full on Countryman, but it also appears to be a lot more fun than the Countryman. If MINI is ultimately aiming for the a go-to vehicle for intersecting fun driving dynamics with available AWD, perhaps the Paceman really is just right.

Head on over to Evo for their full review and lots of photos.

[Source: Evo]

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Written By: Nathaniel Salzman

  • Frenchy2004

    HMMM. I am a little up set. Why could they not have made to CM lower then? Why not a better suspension on the CM? As you guys said on MTTS that your test CM had started to have suspension issues. Is this MINI’s fix? A new, better suspension? I cannot wait to see this fully unveiled and a test drive behind the wheel. Not trying to run off with som many questions. I guess we will soon see.

    • http://bridger.us/ Gabriel Bridger

      There weren’t suspension issues as the car drove that was from day one. The CM with the sport package isn’t well calibrated IMO for the run flats that are on the car.

    • Dr Obnxs

      On the front end the Paceman suspension should be a bolt on to the CM. Rear, I’m not so sure….. Really, if you want “Optimal” anything, sticking with the parts from the factory will be an exercise in frustration….

  • Ryan

    Strange that it would cost more than the Countryman.

    • veggivet

      And unacceptable in my mind. Less car…more $$$. Same engine/drivetrain with less sheet metal. What am I missing?

      • BimmerFile_Michael

        Coupes in the real world always cost more than the 4 door counterparts.

      • jbkONE

        fewer made = more $.

  • http://about.me/bentyyc Ben Tsui

    Those have to be just about the ugliest MINI wheels ever…

  • otter

    I am increasingly interested in the Paceman, the majority of niggles are IMO pluses; however, $38K! I hope that they were talking about pounds of something other than Sterling.

  • MadisonKobalt

    Wow, that is some diatribe in the comments at the end of the EVO article. I know some people including my wife think anything other than the Cooper & Cooper S are really not MINIs, but hey it has a market. In the JCW version I might even buy one, in spite of her objections.


Sort by MINI model







MINI Model Cheat Sheet

1st Gen MINI
R50: One & MC Hatch
R52: All 1st Gen MINI Convt.
R53: MCS Hatch
2nd Gen MINI
R55: Clubman
R56: Hatch
R57: Convertible
R58: Coupe
R59: Roadster
R60: MINI Crossover
R61: MINI Crossover Coupe
3rd Gen MINI
F55: Clubman
F56: Hatch
F57: Convertible
F60: MINI Crossover
F62: Traveller

Advertise with MotoringFile

If you or your company are interested in advertising on the most influential MINI website in the world, please visit our Advertising section. If you have further questions about becoming a sponsor or would like to see our rate sheet please feel free to contact us directly.
mini mini
Translate MotoringFile with Google: 
 
BF

SF

MotoringFile Buyers Guides

R50 ('02-'06 MC) Buyers Guide
R53 ('02-'06 MCS) Buyers Guide






MotoringFile Reviews

Reviews:
'12 JCW Coupe
'11 Fiat 500 Sport
'11 Tesla Roaster 2.5 '11 Countryman Comparo
'11 Cooper S Hatch
'11 Countryman MCS (FWD)
'11 Countryman MC (auto)
'10 Mayfair MCS (auto)
'11 Countryman MCS (ALL4)
'10 MINI E
'10 Tesla Roadster Sport
'09 Cooper S Convertible
'09 JCW Hatch
'09 JCW Clubman
JCW Stage I vs JCW Stage II
'08 Clubman S (Auto)
1st Drive: '08 MINI Clubman
'08 Smart Fourtwo
Comparison: '08 BMW 135i
'06 R53 MCS vs '07 R56 MCS
'07 R56 JCW (Stage 1)
'07 MINI Cooper S Long Term
'07 BMW Z4 M Coupe
'07 MINI Cooper & Cooper S
Audio: '07 MC/MCS at the Track
'06 JCW GP Long term
Reader Review: JCW GP
'06 JCW Cooper S Long Term
Comparison: '06 Lotus Elise
Comparison: '06 Mazda MX5
Comparison: '06 UK Focus ST
Comparison: '06 Civic Si
Comparison: '04 TVR T350
Comparison: '06 Nissan 350z
Comparison: '06 VW GTI w/DSG
Podcast: Cooper S Auto
Podcast: BMW 325i
Podcast: JCW MC Soundkit
'04 JCW MINI Cooper Tuning Kit
'05 MCS: One Month Review
'05 MCS Auto
'05 JCW S 1st Drive
'05 MINI Cooper
'05 MCS Conv. Long Term
'05 MINI Cooper S
'05 MCS Cabrio 1st Drive
'04 JCW MCS First Drive
'04 MC w/JCW Tuning Kit
BMW M3 SMG Vs. MCS
'04 MINI Cooper CVT
'02 MCS 3 year Review
Autocrossing the MINI Range


cafepress