Logo



5,142 Miles Aboard The 2014 F56 S

mdh2

Photo Credit: Eileen Dugan

Preston Thomas Tucker. Most people know him as the car manufacturer Jeff Bridges portrayed in the critically acclaimed film Tucker: The Man and His Dream. Others know him as one of those formidable entrepreneurs that only the United State seems to have the recipe for. Following the end of World War II, Tucker strongly believed the US car market was ripe for disruption and that unprecedented car designs would bring people back into the dealerships. With that in mind, he started the Tucker Corporation with the ambition of building the car of tomorrow. Even though it would never fully reached production status it would be revolutionary in its form and function by boasting a fuel-injected engine, disc brakes, side impact protections and adaptive headlights. While one can argue about the relative success of Mr. Tucker’s venture, he was, by any measure, a visionary; he saw the future and acted to change the world regardless of the obstacles he faced. Though we must remain objective in evaluating what the Tucker Corporation achieved and what MINI is doing today, our favorite car brand had to overcome serious challenges to remain the undisputed contender in the premium small-car category. After a 5,142 miles MTTS rally, not only has our F56 surpassed these challenges, but moreover MINI might have a serious sales hit on their hands, especially with the soon-to-be-released F55. 

Change Is Good

As an avid MotoringFile reader, I noticed the change in perception regarding the exterior design of the F56 since the first spy photos came out last October. Sentiment went from complete disdain and name-calling to neutral and appreciation as the official content – including the car itself – rolled out. The front treatment, especially for the S, is the one detail enthusiasts will love to hate for years to come. And while MINI could have probably done a better job with it (i.e F54 Clubman Concept), it is difficult to say to what extent given it is nearly impossible for a small car to meet the EU’s new safety requirements without compromising on design. Here at MotoringFile, we got used to the style of the F56 and to be frank, I actually like it. Cars like the Pontiac Aztek, the Chrysler Sebring Cabrio or the Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet rightfully deserve to be hated and to be taken off market as their designers – all from the same family I presume – probably jumped off a bridge to end their respective lives. But, let’s be realistic; the MINI design team has done a fine job under the regulations they had to work with.

Overall, the dislike seems to be fading away replaced with simple curiosity. Case in point,  I stopped counting the number of MTTS attendees that had the same reaction when they first saw our car: “Is that new MINI? Hmm, it’s a little bigger. How is it inside? How does it drive?”.

MTTS_SC02337

Revolutionary Interior

When looking at previous generations of MINIs, if there is one thing revolutionary about the F56, it is the interior. It is by far the best finished product compared to its predecessors, but this is somehow expected. In-car technology has significantly evolved and the corresponding cost has substantially decreased over the past seven years. The UKL platform finally allows MINI to fulfill the promise of bringing the quality of assembly, plastics and switches up to BMW standards. Rattle symphonies, from the tiniest road imperfections, have made way for the delicate sound of robustness (note: this is something we tested extensively thanks to Chicago and Boston roads filled with cracks and potholes as large as the Vredefort Dome). In addition, MINI designers have tackled a number of critiques found in the questionable J.D. Power’s Initial Quality Study (e.g. window toggles, speedometer) and although I’m not an advocate of having an extensive part of product development dictated by consumer feedback, I can’t deny that MINI has created a very compelling interior package.

Does this mean the interior of the F56 is perfect? Of course not… I understand why 54 year old Jeremy Clarkson complains that the light animations coming from the center console are a distraction. This is possibly an interesting topic for another discussion.  However, there are definitely more pressing issues that MINI could easily fix:

  • An additional USB port would be nice; in 2014, one port is just not enough

  • I’m fairly certain back passengers would like to have access to their own grab-handles

  • MINI Connected has gotten better, but there are still so many ways to simplify the UX; the most radical one would be to scratch it altogether and replace it with CarPlay

  • QA engineers probably forgot to test the head-rest buttons; they fell off a couple of times during our journey

  • The same QA engineers should have noticed that the back-up radar screen freezes for a good 45 seconds after the transmission is back on D

  • While our press car came with the Harman Kardon sound system, we barely heard the difference with the standard one. No matter the music player/setting combinations we tried, we could not bring it to life

All that aside, there are plenty of positives. Perhaps my favorite are the completely new sport seats. These new seats are a quantum leap compared to what was offered in the RXX series (I would even include the RECAROs in that comparison). Words escape me to describe how good they are. I am 5’9” and have suffered chronic back pain for three years. I have had a considerable amount of driving time with each of the prior generations of MINIs and I spent a third of my MTTS trip in the back of the F56, so trust me when I say that these seats are a godsend. Go test them now!

2014-08-03 12.51.04

The Right Car At The Right Time

I’d like to set the stage before I dive into this section. My first car was a R50 D that I drove for five years and still runs strong for my folks today. I had a R53 and a R56 S for short periods of time. I currently drive a 135i Coupe. And I regularly switched between our F56 S Automatic, a R56 and a JCW R58 during MTTS. All in all, I believe I am qualified to make a comparison.

Before one can drive their car, one has to actually get themselves into it.  Doing so with our Hatch was no easy task. The reason being that the coverage radius of the Comfort Access System is (very) limited; it couldn’t even be opened from the passenger-side. I unfortunately can’t erase from my memory visions of db and Todd making love to the driver-side door to get it open. It is important to note that the same system is better implemented in BMWs.

Turning on the engine of this new Cooper S is surprising. It is a quiet car at idle and during city driving, but it transforms into a pavement-eating beast once you floor the magic pedal. That is what I mean by the “right car at the right time.” It’s not going to jump to your throat when you drive off to work at seven in the morning – I’m looking at you, JCW Coupe – but the predictable torque curve will be quickly available as needed. In regards to handling, we threw it around corners at very high speeds and the typical MINI reaction ensued (we had smile on our faces). Observers indicate that the F56 is not as sharp as previous models. I beg to differ – it felt very similar. Although, if I had to option a 2015, I would most certainly get the sport suspension.

MTTS_2014-07-30 As you see, driving a MINI is as fun as ever and I’m not ashamed to say that the revised automatic transmission is partly responsible for that fun. What?! Crime of lèse-majesté! Car manufacturers and automotive journalists conspire to eradicate the manual transmission and to force us into driving automatics! No, none of this is actually happening. All my cars had manual transmissions (except for my current 135i that sports a 7-speed DCT),  so take my word for it when I tell you that the automatic transmission is as good as they say. It’s fast, smooth and easily adapts to traffic conditions and driving styles. And for once, we had fun playing with flappy paddles, especially on the twisties of the Million Dollar Highway.

Again, is everything perfect in MINI wonderland? No, but it’s very close and I can’t wait to drive the 2015 JCW. In the meantime I would like MINI to investigate the following:

  • Fuel economy is disappointing. MINI advertises 30/41 mpg figures but we oscillated between 31 and 33 mpg based on 80% highway driving. Taking for granted that we drove hard and changed drivers often, it seems the only way to attain an acceptable fuel mileage (i.e. 39 mpg) is to turn on Burnside Green Mode

  • The brakes have less feel to them. Our sources tell us that following complaints from owners, MINI USA moved to the dustless pads for the US market. Although these new pads approximately have the same stopping power as their predecessors, they feel weaker

  • The cruise control is overly complicated. Tap “+” to go faster and tap “-” to go slower; it’s as simple as that. There is no need for a quarter of a tap to go 5.26 miles faster. But I’m not going to lie; Gabe, db and Todd love the revised cruise control

MTTS_SC02376

Let’s be positive again and focus on my two favorite driving features. Before this F56, I never had a chance to test a head-up display. It’s a nice-to-have feature that requires small changes in your driving behavior, but once you’ve tried it you can never go back. It’s like Xenon headlights; nobody in their right minds would ever use halogens again after Xenons. Finally, the ultimate best feature, the highlight of MTTS: the JCW Exhaust! I’m one of the lucky few that got to test a pre-production version of it. It is as good as it looks and even better than it sounds. My opinion is that every single MINI should sound this way and if I owned a dealership, I’d make sure each of my customer would get it installed. That’s how good it is. Everyone, grab your holiday shopping list and add the JCW exhaust to the top of it, now. Don’t forget to tell your family that you won’t be with them on Christmas morning because you will be too busy playing with your new toy. Sorry, children.

2014-08-08 09.09.11

This is The MINI You’re Looking For

While I had some appreciation for the car before driving it, I was still afraid it would disappoint. As a nerd and a geek, I live for new stuff. I can hardly contain my excitement prior to an Apple keynote and these days I am practicing Jedi-like patience to wait for the release of Star Wars VII. So when new stuff doesn’t meet my expectations, sadness is usually follows; the kind of sadness James May experienced after he drove the Countach. Fortunately for us, MINI did it again and failed to disappoint.  All I can say is if you are on the fence about buying a new car, head to the closest MINI dealer right now. Also for anyone still believing that “they ruined the brand”, it would probably do them some good to read a biography of Alec Issigonis.

Written By: Alex Sitbon

  • ulrichd

    I will count myself among those whose feelings have changed from outright disdain to something more positive. The two main issues I have with the F56 are that it no longer looks particularly mini/small and I still absolutely loathe the tail lights.

  • Jason

    Don’t you dare touch my dustless brake pads. It’s one of my favorite new features.

    Good review though. Lays out both the positive and the negative well :)

  • http://about.me/bentyyc Ben Tsui

    Great right up Alex! Maybe it’s a “real estate” thing, but am curious why the MINI heads-up display requires that little “screen”, when the (seemingly) similar system in BMWs does not?

    • http://www.issigonized.com Alexandre Sitbon

      Thanks Ben! Having this format for MINI’s head-up display is probably a combination of cost and real-estate. I would defer to Gabe or Nathaniel for more info if they have any.

    • Jerry

      Ben, If they use the screen they can get away from the added expense of a special windshield. HUD systems have a special piece laminated into the windshield. In my Bonneville and Grand Prix it raised the glass price 4 to 500$. Mind you I believe costs on glass have come down. also it could have caused issues with the pitch of the windshield and where the projector sits. The last observation would possibly be to make it easier to see in bright sunlight. On the windshield they have a tendency to “BLEACH? out in bright sunlight.

      This is all speculation of course but some off the top of my head very viable reasons to do it this way..

      PS: just thought… probably easier to retrofit as an add on. The dash cavity will already be there. Change the dash pad, drop in the unit and rec-ode the computer.?.?.?

      • fishbert

        The steeper windshield pitch on the MINI makes it a rock magnet in my experience. I am so happy that replacement windshields are so inexpensive on the R56. Never occurred to me that putting the HUD on the windshield might change that.

        Also, is it true that the HUD visibility is rather badly affected by sunglasses? I do 90% of my daytime driving in sunglasses here in “burn your eyeballs down to the socket” Arizona. =(

        • http://www.nathanielsalzman.com/ Nathaniel Salzman

          The specific issue is if you’re using polarized sunglasses. Viewing angle can also make a difference. For example, I’m too tall to properly see the HUD on many BMWs.

        • http://instagram.com/gabrielbridger Gabriel Bridger

          6’2″ and it’s fine for me.

        • http://scamper.com scamper

          I went solarized-free this year, and it’s the best thing I’ve ever done. Suddenly I can read screens and readouts without turning my head sideways, not to mention being able to see water puddles when I need to. Unless you need solarized, you don’t need them. (You don’t need them.)

  • http://www.issigonized.com Alexandre Sitbon

    Thanks Jason! Dustless brake pads are indeed a big plus but for people like me who are OCD about washing their cars, braking feel is more important.Or, maybe it’s just me :)

  • r_k_w

    An additional USB port would be nice; in 2014, one port is just not enough.

    … and that one port is too low powered to provide charging for many devices. They put only one port because the stereo can only connect to one USB device at a time, but there should be extra ports just for charging.

  • hemisedan

    Nice report, it’s good to hear a positive report as well as letting us know that all is not perfect. I think that many on this forum have beaten to death the catfish mouth for long enough, let’s move on or bank roll an aftermarket company to make a replacement, then we can bi*ch about that too. European pedestrian requirements are the reason, for the most part. Also, I was looking forward to ordering the HUD until I found out that part of it was a cheap looking plastic pop up. Oh well, I’ve been hoping for a report such as this, with more than a hundred miles or so.

    • http://www.issigonized.com Alexandre Sitbon

      Thanks! I’m glad you liked it.

      • hemisedan

        either next year of 2016 I will be replacing my R-59 that I drive now. Need a bit more space as well as fewer blind spots. This report helps me to get back to Mini, as I was thinking of others. VW GTI looks good on paper, but they are just darn ugly.

        • http://scamper.com scamper

          Totally agree about GTI ugliness, both inside (busy, random) and out (square, plain).

  • fishbert

    Alex,

    I seem to recall DB saying on WRR a while back that he found the sport seats somewhat uncomfortable. I think it was from when he first tried them at the dealer. Did his opinion change on the road?

    How about Todd? He’s a big guy… did he also find them to be a “godsend”, or did they present any issues with his body type?

    (I ask this as someone for whom the sport seats just don’t work, and who is frustrated that there’s no way to escape them on the MCS.)

    • http://www.issigonized.com Alexandre Sitbon

      I would let db and Todd pitch in, but as far as I remember we all share the same opinion about the sport seats. We love them and our almost daily reaction to them was “ohhh, these seats are amazing”. It’s not surprising that someone would change their mind after a long road trip versus a dealer test-drive. I do not know what Nathaniel’s take on the matter is.

      • http://www.nathanielsalzman.com/ Nathaniel Salzman

        I like them a lot.

        • fishbert

          Aw, man… feeling so lonely in my plight now. =( Thanks for the opinions, though.

        • http://www.nathanielsalzman.com/ Nathaniel Salzman

          I think it’s less about size than it is preference. My wife is tiny and hates aggressive side bolstering in seats even though she fits in them just fine. If you don’t like them, then that’s legit for you. Everybody has different preferences.

        • fishbert

          For me it’s definitely a size thing. But my girlfriend sounds a lot like your wife (tiny and fits fine, but hates it as a matter of preference). Would be awesome if MINI would let buyers “you-ify” an MCS with the normal seats.

        • John McLauchlan

          I am with you (in the minority) on this one. Recently drove an F56 with sport seats for 4 days. The experience reinforced opinions from prior test drives regarding the new sport seats.

    • donburnside

      You are right fishbert, when I first tried those seats on the dealers 2.5 mile test drive circuit, I did not care for them. After driving across the US, I wish I had them in my R50!

  • Chilly

    Can we expect a long-term review/update on the Standard Cooper and/or MCS with manual transmission any time soon? Thanks.

    • http://instagram.com/gabrielbridger Gabriel Bridger

      Yes our long-term Cooper S should be arriving soon.

  • robblef

    If you couldn’t tell much difference between the basic stereo and the HK then something was definitely wrong with your unit. The new HK is the best stereo MINI has ever had. Put in “Sail” turn it up to about 95% and get blown away.

    • http://instagram.com/gabrielbridger Gabriel Bridger

      Agreed. There’s a massive difference between the two from my experience.

    • Jason

      100% agreed here too. My wife’s Clubman also has the HK system and the F56 version blows it completely away.

    • http://www.issigonized.com Alexandre Sitbon

      I’m completely willing to admit there might have been an issue with our HK. My 2012 R56 S use to have it as well so I know how much of difference it is compared to the standard audio setup.

    • hemisedan

      On my previous2011 JCW, I had the HK system and, well it was disappointing. So I didn’t get it on my current R59 roadster JCW. I listen to Sirus most of the time, and then some talk radio, but I think that there should have been a big difference between the two systems. Maybe there was something amiss with my HK. I’ll probably go with it in the next Lil Guy.

  • MisterRyan

    It’s pretty ironic when people say “it no longer looks small.” Um hello? Have you seen the original MINI?

  • Squeek67

    Well written guys. I agree with nearly every item in the article. While there are a few things that I could nitpick about, I have about 4500 on my new F56S and I still cant wait to wake up in the morning and drive it again. I for one am part of the younger crowd (28) and absolutely love the Tech and lights in the car and don’t find them as a distraction as Jeremy indicates (isn’t he like 80 by now?)

    • http://www.issigonized.com Alexandre Sitbon

      Glad you liked the review!

  • GoRixter

    Good review. It will be interesting to see the ratings from Consumer Reports etc after a few months

    • http://www.issigonized.com Alexandre Sitbon

      Happy you liked it. Thanks!


Sort by MINI model

MotoringFile on Instagram








MINI Model Cheat Sheet

1st Gen MINI
R50: One & MC Hatch
R52: All 1st Gen MINI Convt.
R53: MCS Hatch
2nd Gen MINI
R55: Clubman
R56: Hatch
R57: Convertible
R58: Coupe
R59: Roadster
R60: MINI Crossover
R61: MINI Crossover Coupe
3rd Gen MINI
F54: Clubman
F55: Five Door Hatch
F56: Hatch
F57: Convertible
F60: MINI Crossover
F58: Traveller

Advertise with MotoringFile

If you or your company are interested in advertising on the most influential MINI website in the world, please visit our Advertising section. If you have further questions about becoming a sponsor or would like to see our rate sheet please feel free to contact us directly.
mini mini
Translate MotoringFile with Google: 
 

BF

MotoringFile Buyers Guides

R50 ('02-'06 MC) Buyers Guide
R53 ('02-'06 MCS) Buyers Guide

BF

SF



MotoringFile Reviews

Reviews:
'12 JCW Coupe
'11 Fiat 500 Sport
'11 Tesla Roaster 2.5 '11 Countryman Comparo
'11 Cooper S Hatch
'11 Countryman MCS (FWD)
'11 Countryman MC (auto)
'10 Mayfair MCS (auto)
'11 Countryman MCS (ALL4)
'10 MINI E
'10 Tesla Roadster Sport
'09 Cooper S Convertible
'09 JCW Hatch
'09 JCW Clubman
JCW Stage I vs JCW Stage II
'08 Clubman S (Auto)
1st Drive: '08 MINI Clubman
'08 Smart Fourtwo
Comparison: '08 BMW 135i
'06 R53 MCS vs '07 R56 MCS
'07 R56 JCW (Stage 1)
'07 MINI Cooper S Long Term
'07 BMW Z4 M Coupe
'07 MINI Cooper & Cooper S
Audio: '07 MC/MCS at the Track
'06 JCW GP Long term
Reader Review: JCW GP
'06 JCW Cooper S Long Term
Comparison: '06 Lotus Elise
Comparison: '06 Mazda MX5
Comparison: '06 UK Focus ST
Comparison: '06 Civic Si
Comparison: '04 TVR T350
Comparison: '06 Nissan 350z
Comparison: '06 VW GTI w/DSG
Podcast: Cooper S Auto
Podcast: BMW 325i
Podcast: JCW MC Soundkit
'04 JCW MINI Cooper Tuning Kit
'05 MCS: One Month Review
'05 MCS Auto
'05 JCW S 1st Drive
'05 MINI Cooper
'05 MCS Conv. Long Term
'05 MINI Cooper S
'05 MCS Cabrio 1st Drive
'04 JCW MCS First Drive
'04 MC w/JCW Tuning Kit
BMW M3 SMG Vs. MCS
'04 MINI Cooper CVT
'02 MCS 3 year Review
Autocrossing the MINI Range


cafepress